Gender-Differentiated Impacts of the Belo Monte Hydroelectric Dam on Downstream Fishers in the Brazilian Amazon

  • Laura Castro-Diaz
  • Maria Claudia Lopez
  • Emilio Moran
Article

Abstract

The Belo Monte Hydroelectric dam on the Xingu River in the Brazilian Amazon will be the third largest dam in the world in power generating capacity (11 GW). Its construction has brought negative socioeconomic and environmental impacts for local fishers that far outweigh the benefits. We used a qualitative case study approach to explore perceptions among fishers in a community downstream from the dam of the impact of Belo Monte on their livelihoods and their fisheries. We found that fishers, who, although they were not displaced were neither consulted nor compensated, have been severely impacted by the dam, and that fishermen and fisherwomen are differentially affected. More attention needs to be given to downstream communities and the impacts they experience.

Keywords

Hydroelectric dams Socio-ecological impacts Downstream communities Gender Amazon fishers Xingu River Brazil 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are thankful for the guidance Dr. Kimberly Chung provided throughout different stages of this research. We also wish to thank Prof. Miqueias Calvi for his assistance during the research, especially during the fieldwork. Many thanks to Natalia Ocampo who helped with the coding book validation. We greatly appreciate comments from Rebecca Minardi on an early version of this manuscript. Camila Farias provided invaluable help as a research assistant in the field and transcribing the interviews. Nan Li helped us developing the maps. We wish to thank the members of Vila Nova for their warm reception and their openness to sharing their experiences during fieldwork. We stand in awe of their courage under difficult circumstances.

More importantly, the opinions expressed in this paper belong solely to the authors, and should not be attributed to any of the above, or to the funding sources.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Informed Consent

This study was deemed exempt, category 2 research by the Internal Review Board on Human Subjects (IRB No. IRB# ×16-729e) at Michigan State University. Informed consent was used to ensure voluntary participation and confidentiality.

References

  1. Abril, G., Guérin, F., Richard, S., Delmas, R., Galy-Lacaux, C., Gosse, P., et al (2005). Carbon Dioxide and Methane Emissions and the Carbon Budget of a 10-Year Old Tropical Reservoir (Petit Saut, French Guiana). Global Biogeochemical Cycles 19(4): n/a–n/a.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GB002457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adams, W. M. (2009). Green Development 3rd edition: Environment and Sustainability in a Developing World.Google Scholar
  3. Agarwal, B. (1997). “Bargaining” and Gender Relations: Within and beyond the Household. Feminist Economics 3(1): 1–51.  https://doi.org/10.1080/135457097338799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Agostinho, A. A., Pelicice, F. M., and Gomes, L. C. (2008). Dams and the Fish Fauna of the Neotropical Region: Impacts and Management Related to Diversity and Fisheries. Brazilian Journal of Biology 68(4): 1119–1132.  https://doi.org/10.1590/S1519-69842008000500019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Alho, C. (2011). Environmental Effects of Hydropower Reservoirs on Wild Mammals and Freshwater Turtles in Amazonia: A Review. Oecologia Australis 15(3): 593–604.  https://doi.org/10.4257/oeco.2011.1503.11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Alho, C., Reis, R. E., and Aquino, P. P. U. (2015). Amazonian Freshwater Habitats Experiencing Environmental and Socioeconomic Threats Affecting Subsistence Fisheries. Ambio: 412–425.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-014-0610-z.
  7. Arvizu, D., Bruckner, H., Chum, O., Edenhofer, S., Estefen, A., Faaij, M., … Zwickel, T. (2011). Technical Summary. (O. Edenhofer, R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, K. Seyboth, P. Eickemeier, P. Matschoss, … C. Von Stechow, Eds.), IPCC Special Report on Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York: Cambridge University Press. doi: https://doi.org/10.5860/CHOICE.49-6309
  8. Baran, E., and Myschowoda, C. (2009). Dams and Fisheries in the Mekong Basin. Aquatic Ecosystem Health & Management 12(3): 227–234.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14634980903149902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Barry, B. (1997). Sustainability and Intergenerational Justice. Theoria: A Journal of Social and Political Theory 45(89): 43–65.  https://doi.org/10.3167/004058197783593443.Google Scholar
  10. Bartle, A. (2002). Hydropower potential and development activities. Energy Policy 30(14): 1231–1239.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(02)00084-8
  11. Bayley, P. B., and Petrere, M. (1989). Amazon Fisheries: Assessment Methods, Current Status and Management Options. Canadian Special Publication in Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 106: 385–398.Google Scholar
  12. Bechtel, J. D. (2010). Gender, Poverty and the Conservation of Biodiversity. A review of Issues and Opportunities. MacArthur Foundation Conservation White Paper Series. Retrieved from http://production.macfound.org/media/files/CSD_GENDER_WHITE_PAPER.pdf
  13. Bennett, E. (2005). Gender, Fisheries and Development. Marine Policy 29(5): 451–459.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2004.07.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bernard, H. R. (1995). Research Methods in Antropology, AltaMira Press, Walnut Creek.Google Scholar
  15. Boanada Fuchs, V. (2016). Blaming the weather, blaming the people: Socio-environmental governance and a crisis attitude in the brazilian electricity sector. Ambiente & Sociedade 19(2): 221–246.  https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-4422ASOC0260R1V1922016
  16. Branch, T. A., and Kleiber, D. (2017). Should we call them Fishers or Fishermen? Fish and Fisheries 18(1): 114–127.  https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Braun, Y. A. (2011). The Reproduction of Inequality: Race, Class, Gender, and the Social Organization of Work at Sites of Large-Scale Development Projects. Social Problems 58(2): 281–303.  https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2011.58.2.281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cavendish, W. (2000). Empirical Regularities in the Poverty-Environment Relationship of Rural Households: Evidence from Zimbabwe. World Development 28(11): 1979–2003.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(00)00066-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dean, W. (1987). Brazil and the Struggle for Rubber: a Study in Environmental History. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Deb, A. K., Emdad Haque, C., and Thompson, S. (2015). “Man can”t give Birth, Woman can’t Fish’: Gender Dynamics in the Small-Scale Fisheries of Bangladesh. Gender, Place and Culture 22(3): 305–324.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2013.855626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. EIA. (2015). Brazil. International Energy Data and Analysis. Retrieved from https://www.eia.gov/beta/international/analysis_includes/countries_long/Brazil/brazil.pdf
  22. Fan, H., He, D., & Wang, H. (2015). Environmental consequences of damming the mainstream Lancang-Mekong River: A review. Earth-Science Reviews 146(2): 77–91.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2015.03.007
  23. Fearnside, P. M. (1995). Hydroelectric Dams in the Brazilian Amazon as Sources of “Greenhouse” Gases. Environmental Conservation 22(1): 7.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892900034020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fearnside, P. M. (1999). Social Impacts of Brazil’s Tucurui Dam. Environmental Management 24(4): 483–495.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s002679900248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fearnside, P. M. (2006). Dams in the Amazon: Belo Monte and Brazil’s hydroelectric development of the Xingu River basin. Environmental Management 38(1): 16–27.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-005-0113-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fearnside, P. M. (2014). Impacts of Brazil’s Madeira River Dams: Unlearned Lessons for Hydroelectric Development in Amazonia. Environmental Science and Policy 38: 164–172.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2013.11.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fearnside, P. M. (2015). Emissions from Tropical Hydropower and the IPCC. Environmental Science & Policy, 50(Table 1), 225–239. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.03.002
  28. Fearnside, P. M. (2016). Environmental and Social Impacts of Hydroelectric Dams in Brazilian Amazonia: Implications for the Aluminum Industry. World Development 77: 48–65.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.08.015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fleury, L. C., and Almeida, J. (2013). A construção da usina hidrelétrica de Belo Monte: Conflito ambiental e o dilema do desenvolvimento. Ambiente & Sociedade 16(4): 141–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Frausin, V., Fraser, J. A., Narmah, W., Lahai, M. K., Winnebah, T. R. A., Fairhead, J., and Leach, M. (2014). “God made the Soil, but we made it Fertile”: Gender, Knowledge, and Practice in the Formation and use of African Dark Earths in Liberia and Sierra Leone. Human Ecology 42(5): 695–710.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-014-9686-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Galvao, E. (1955). Santos e Visagens. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil: Companhia Editora Nacional.Google Scholar
  32. Grisotti, M. (2016). The construction of health causal relations in the belo monte dam context. Ambiente & Sociedade 19(2): 287–304.  https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-4422ASOC0252V1922016
  33. Hallwass, G., Lopes, P. F., Juras, A. a., and Silvano, R. a. M. (2013). Fishers’ Knowledge Identifies Environmental Changes and Fish Abundance Trends in Impounded Tropical Rivers. Ecological Applications 23(2): 392–407.  https://doi.org/10.1890/12-0429.1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Haraway, D. (1991). Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective. In Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The reinvention of nature. New York: Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
  35. Harper, S., Zeller, D., Hauzer, M., Pauly, D., and Sumaila, U. R. (2013). Women and Fisheries: Contribution to Food Security and Local Economies. Marine Policy 39: 56–63.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2012.10.018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. IEA (2012). Technology Roadmap: Hydropower, France, Paris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. IEA (2015). IEA Statistics: Renewables Information, France, Paris.Google Scholar
  38. IHA. (2003). The Role of Hydropower in Sustainable Development. IHA White Paper (Vol. 13). 1–140Google Scholar
  39. IHA. (2015). 2015 Hydropower Status Report.Google Scholar
  40. IPCC. (2014). Mitigation of Climate Change - Working Group III Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (O. Edenhofer, R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, J. C. Minx, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, … T. Zwickel, Eds.). United Kingdom and New York, USA, USA: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from http://report.mitigation2014.org/spm/ipcc_wg3_ar5_summary-for-policymakers_approved.pdf
  41. Junk, W. J., & Mello, J. a. S. N. De. (1990). Impactos ecológicos das represas hidrelétricas na bacia amazônica brasileira. Estudos Avançados 4(8): 126–143.  https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-40141990000100010
  42. Kebe, M. (2009). Taking the Contribution of Fisheries into Account in Development Policy. In Å. Barklund (Ed.), Fisheries, Sustainablility and Development (pp. 365–376). Royal Swedish Academy of Agriculture and Forestry (KSLA).Google Scholar
  43. Kelkar, M. (2007). Local knowledge and natural resource management: A gender perspective. Indian Journal of Gender Studies 14(2): 295–306.  https://doi.org/10.1177/097152150701400205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Koch, F. H. (2002). Hydropower - The Politics of Water and Energy: Introduction and Overview. Energy Policy 30(14): 1207–1213.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(02)00081-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Koralagama, D., Gupta, J., and Pouw, N. (2017). Inclusive Development from a Gender Perspective in Small Scale Fisheries. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 24: 1–6.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2016.09.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lahiri-Dutt, K. (2012). Large Dams and Changes in an Agrarian Society: Gendering the Impacts of Damodar Valley Corporation in Eastern India. Water Alternatives 5(2): 529.Google Scholar
  47. Manyari, W. V., and de Carvalho, O. A. (2007). Environmental Considerations in Energy Planning for the Amazon Region: Downstream effects of Dams. Energy Policy 35(12): 6526–6534.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2007.07.031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Marques, J. G. (2001). Pescando Pescadores: Ciência y etnociência em uma perspectiva ecológica (2da. Ediçã). Sao Paulo: Núcleo de apoio à pesquisa sobre populações humanas e áreas úmidas brasileiras, USP.Google Scholar
  49. McGrath, D. G., de Castro, F., Futema, C., Domingues de Amaral, B., and Calabria, J. (1993). Fisheries and the Evolution of Resource Management on the Lower Amazon Floodplain. Human Ecology 21(2): 167–195.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00889358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Miles, M., Huberman, A. M., and Saldaña, A. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook, SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  51. Moran, E. F. (1974). The Adaptive System of the Amazonian Caboclo. In Wagley, C. (ed.), Man in the Amazon, University of Florida Press, Gainesville, pp. 136–159.Google Scholar
  52. Moran, E. F. (2016). Roads and Dams: Infrastructure-Driven Transformations in the Brazilian Amazon. Ambiente & Sociedade 2016, XIX, 207–220.  https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-4422ASOC256V1922016
  53. Orr, S., Pittock, J., Chapagain, A., and Dumaresq, D. (2012). Dams on the Mekong River : Lost Fish Protein and the Implications for Land and Water Resources. Global Environmental Change 22(4): 925–932.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.06.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. REN21. (2015). Renewables 2015 Global Status Report. Annual Reporting of Renewables: Ten years of excellence. Paris. Retrieved from http://www.ren21.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/REN12-GSR2015_Onlinebook_low_nolinks.pdf
  55. Richter, B. D., Postel, S., Revenga, C., Scudder, T., Lehner, B., Churchill, A., and Chow, M. (2010). Lost in development’s shadow: The downstream human consequences of dams. Water Alternatives 3(2): 14–42.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11195-009-9131-2.Google Scholar
  56. Silvano, Juras, A., & Begossi, A. (2005). Clean Energy and Poor People: Ecological Impacts of Hydroelectric Dams on Fish and Fishermen in the Amazon Rainforest. Energy, Environment, Ecosystems, Development and Landscape Architecture, 139–147.Google Scholar
  57. Smith, N. (1981). Man, Fishes, and the Amazon, Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  58. Soito, J. L. D. S., & Freitas, M. a V. (2011). Amazon and the expansion of hydropower in Brazil: Vulnerability, impacts and possibilities for adaptation to global climate change. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 15(6): 3165–3177.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.04.006
  59. Sousa Junior, W. C., and Reid, J. (2010). Uncertainties in Amazon Hydropower Development: Risk Scenarios and Environmental Issues Around the Belo Monte Dam. Water Alternatives 3(2): 249–268 Retrieved from http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-77956637011&partnerID=tZOtx3y1.Google Scholar
  60. Stenberg, R. (2006). Damming the River: A Changing Perspective on Altering Nature. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 10(3): 165–197.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2004.07.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Stickler, C. M., Coe, M. T., Costa, M. H., Nepstad, D. C., McGrath, D. G., Dias, L. C. P., et al (2013). Dependence of Hydropower Generation on Forests in the Amazon Basin at Local to Regional Scales. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 110(23): 9601–9606.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1215331110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Sunderland, T., Achdiawan, R., Angelsen, A., Babigumira, R., Ickowitz, A., Paumgarten, F., et al (2014). Challenging Perceptions about Men, Women, and Forest Product Use: A Global Comparative Study. World Development 64(S1): S56–S66.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.03.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Tilt, B., Braun, Y., and He, D. (2009). Social Impacts of Large Dam Projects: A Comparison of International Case Studies and Implications for Best Practice. Journal of Environmental Management 90(SUPPL. 3): S249–S257.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.07.030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Trussart, S., Messier, D., Roquet, V., and Aki, S. (2002). Hydropower Projects: A Review of most Effective Mitigation Measures. Energy Policy 30(14): 1251–1259.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(02)00087-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. von Sperling, E. (2012). hydropower in Brazil: Overview of Positive and Negative Environmental Aspects. Energy Procedia 18: 110–118.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2012.05.023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wagley, C. (1953). Amazon Town. A Study of Man in the Tropics, Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar
  67. WCD. (2000). Dams and Development: a New Framework for Decision-Making. The Report of the World Comission on Dams (Vol. 23). London. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/GCO.0b013e3283432017
  68. Weeratunge, N., Snyder, K. A., and Sze, C. P. (2010). Gleaner, Fisher, Trader, Processor: Understanding Gendered Employment in Fisheries and Aquaculture. Fish and Fisheries 11(4): 405–420.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-2979.2010.00368.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Winemiller, K. O., McIntyre, P. B., Castello, L., Fluet-Chouinard, E., Giarrizzo, T., Nam, S., et al (2016). Balancing Hydropower and Biodiversity in the Amazon, Congo, and Mekong. Science 351(6269): 128–129.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac7082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Witkoski, A. C. (2010). Terras, Florestas e Águas de Trabalho. Os Camponeses Amazônicos e formas de uso de seus recursos naturais. (A. C. Witkoski, Ed.). São Paulo: Annablume.Google Scholar
  71. Yüksel, I. (2009). Dams and Hydropower for Sustainable Development. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy 4(1): 100–110.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15567240701425808
  72. Yüksel, I. (2010). Hydropower for Sustainable Water and Energy Development. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 14(1): 462–469.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2009.07.025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Zarfl, C., Lumsdon, A. E., Berlekamp, J., Tydecks, L., and Tockner, K. (2014). A global boom in hydropower dam construction. Aquatic Sciences 77(1): 161–170.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-014-0377-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Zhong, Y., and Power, G. (1996). Environmental Impacts of Hydroelectric Projects on Fish Resources. Regulated Rivers: Research & Management 12: 81–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Department of Community SustainabilityMichigan State UniversityEast LansingyUSA
  2. 2.The Center for Global Change and Earth Observations at Michigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA
  3. 3.The Department of Geography, Environment and Spatial SciencesMichigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA

Personalised recommendations