Wild Foods: Safety Net or Poverty Trap? A South African Case Study
Wild foods contribute towards the food security of an estimated one billion people. In light of expectations of the contribution of wild foods to sustainable and climate-resilient livelihoods and widespread evidence of their consumption, their contribution to households’ diets requires a more nuanced understanding, specifically with respect to their safety net function during food shortages. Data were collected from two villages in Venda, South Africa, selected due to differences in mean annual precipitation. Semi-structured interviews were administered to 170 households and a Participatory Rural Appraisal was conducted to assess the influence of multiple variables, including household characteristics and site, on wild food use. Household archetypes were defined based on the frequency of consumption in response to increasing food scarcity. Our findings suggest limitations to the safety net function of wild foods including seasonal fluctuations in availability and decreased availability during extreme events, with dependent households decreasing their consumption frequency in response to food scarcity. Given this potential poverty trap, further research is required, particularly in terms of when the safety net function of wild foods may be weak or detrimental to the livelihoods of the vulnerable.
KeywordsClimate Food security Seasonal availability fluctuations Vulnerability Wild foods Participatory rural appraisal South Africa
We thank the communities of Bennde Mutale and Vondo for their engagement in the research as well as the research team who assisted with the data collection. Funding was provided by South Africa’s National Research Foundation, The Global Change Institute (through funding from the Carnegie Foundation of New York), the Centre of Excellence in Tree Health Biotechnology, the University of the Witwatersrand, and the Center for International Forestry Research.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. The necessary ethical clearance to conduct the research was obtained from the Research Office of the University of the Witwatersrand (H120803). All ethical standards were adhered to. The relevant local authorities were approached for permission to conduct the research and formal, free, prior and informed consent was obtained from all participants. Anonymity was assured.
- Angelsen, A. and Wunder, S. (2003). Exploring the forest-poverty link: key concepts, issues and research implications. CIFOR occasional paper no. 40. CIFOR, Bogor, p. 70.Google Scholar
- Dazé, A., Ambrose, K., and Ehrhart, C. (2009). Climate Vulnerability and Capacity Analysis Handbook, CARE International, Atlanta, p. 52.Google Scholar
- Dovie, D.B.K. (2001). Woodland Resource Utilisation, Valuation and Rural Livelihoods in the Lowveld, South Africa. M.Sc. Thesis, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg.Google Scholar
- Egan, B. A., Toms, R., Minter, L. R., Addo-Bediako, A., Masoko, P., Mphosi, M., and Olivier, P. A. S. (2014). Nutritional Significance of the Edible Insect, Hemijana variegata Rothschild (Lepidoptera: Eupterotidae), of the Blouberg Region, Limpopo, South Africa. African Entomology 22: 15–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Fukushima, T., Morimoto, Y., Maundu, P., Kahindi, B., and Fondo, J. (2010). Local Preference of Indigenous Fruit Trees in Coast Province, Kenya. African Journal of Environmental Science and Technology 4: 872–885.Google Scholar
- Mucina, L., and Rutherford, M. C. (eds.) (2011). The Vegetation of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland, SANBI, Pretoria.Google Scholar
- R Core Team. (2017). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, Version 3.4.1. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/.
- Shackleton, C., and Shackleton, S. (2004). The Importance of Non-Timber Forest Products in Rural Livelihood Security and as Safety-Nets: A Review of Evidence from South Africa. South African Journal of Science 100: 658–664.Google Scholar
- Statistics South Africa, 2014. Census 2011_Provincial profile: Limpopo. Report No. 03–01-78 (2011). Statistics South Africa, Pretoria.Google Scholar
- Turnbull, M., and Turvil, E. (2012). Participatory Capacity and Vulnerability Analysis: A Practitioner’s Guide, Oxfam International, Cowley, p. 43.Google Scholar
- Weyer, D., Shackleton, C. M., and Adam, Y. O. (2017). HIV/AIDS and Other Household Shocks as Catalysts of Local Commercialization of Non-Timber Forest Products in Southern Africa. Development Policy Review 0: 1–17.Google Scholar