Advertisement

Human Ecology

, Volume 46, Issue 2, pp 159–170 | Cite as

Is kola Tree the Enemy of Cocoa? A Critical Analysis of Agroforestry Recommendations Made to Ivorian Cocoa Farmers

  • Elsa Sanial
  • François Ruf
Article

Abstract

Cocoa production in Côte d’Ivoire (40% of the world market) has tripled in the past 35 years even as the country’s forests are depleted. The chocolate industry, concerned about production so concentrated in one country and its dependence on the forest, is trying to convince smallholders to obtain ‘cocoa certification.’ This scheme, while couched in environmental terms, aims to increase cocoa yields and recommends the removal of kola trees from cocoa plots. This advice, ultimately largely ignored by the cocoa farmers, reflects a lack of understanding of farmer practices and kola tree’s economic, social, and cultural role. The chocolate industry reveals its vision for agroforestry as limited to production and demonstrates an unwillingness to participate in the smallholder-driven innovation system that is transforming Ivorian cocoa cultivation.

Keywords

Kola tree Cocoa certification Agroforestry Chocolate Industry Environmental NGOs Ecological services Côte d’Ivoire 

Notes

Funding

This study was funded by AFD/CIRAD (CIRAD/DOEIDOD/ARB/2015-022).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ben Houassa, K. (2011). Adoption and Levels of Demand of Fertilizer in Cocoa Farming in Côte d’Ivoire: Does Risk Aversion Matter? CSAE Conference-Economic Development in Africa, St Catherine’s College, Oxford.Google Scholar
  2. Boiral, P., Lanteri J. F., and Olivier De Sardan, J. P. (1985). Paysans, experts et chercheurs en Afrique Noire. Sciences sociales et développement rural, p. 224.Google Scholar
  3. Colson, F., and Remy, J. (1990). Le développement, un enjeu de pouvoir. Coulomb, P. et al (ed.), 197–205Google Scholar
  4. Conseil du Café-Cacao (2015). Le manuel du planteur de cacao.Google Scholar
  5. De Foresta, H., and Michon, G. (1997). The Agroforest Alternative to Imperata Grasslands: When Smallholder Agriculture and Forestry Reach Sustainability. Agroforestry Systems 36: 105–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. De Foresta, H., Michon, G., and Kusoro, A. (2000). Complex agroforests. Lecture Note 1, ICRAF, p. 14.Google Scholar
  7. Ekanade, O. (1987). Spatio-Temporal Variations of Soil Properties Under Cocoa Interplanted with Kola in a Part of the Nigerian Cocoa Belt. Agroforestry Systems 5: 419–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hall A, Mytelka L, and B. Oyeyinka (2006). Concepts and guidelines for diagnostic assessments of agricultural innovation capacity., Working paper Series, 2016–17. United Nations University, Unu-Merit, Maastricht. 33 p.Google Scholar
  9. http://www.agriculture.gouv.ci/ retrieved on 20/11/2015.
  10. Holt-Gimenez, E., and Altieri, M. A. (2013). Agroecology, Food Sovereignty and the New Green Revolution. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems 37(1): 90–102.Google Scholar
  11. International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (2009). Programme de renforcement de l’économie cacaoyère en Afrique de l’Ouest (West Africa Cocoa Livelihoods Program, CLP). Atelier de formation des paysans relais sur l’approche champ école paysan en cacaoculture et replantation/diversification. 20 sept – 3 Oct 2009, Gagnoa, 167 p.Google Scholar
  12. Janin, P. (2000). Crises ivoiriennes et redistribution spatiale de la mobilité: les Baoulé dans la tourmente. Revue Tiers Monde, 791–814.Google Scholar
  13. Johns, N. D. (1999). Conservation in Brazil’s Chocolate Forest: the Unlikely Persistence of the Traditional Cocoa Agroecosystem. Environmental Management 23: 31–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Klerx, L., Aarts, N., and Leeuwis, C. (2010). Adaptative Management in Agricultural Innovation Systems: the Interactions Between Innovation Networks and their Environment. Agricultural Systems 103: 390–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kusters, K., Ruiz Pérez, M., de Foresta, H., Dietz, T., Ros-Tonen, M., Belcher, B., Manalu, P., Nawir, A., and Wollenberg, E. (2008). Will Agroforests Vanish? The Case of Damar Agroforests in Indonesia. Human Ecology 36: 357–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Laderach, P., Martinez-Valle, A., Schroth, G., and Castro, N. (2013). Predicting the Future Climatic Suitability For Cocoa Famring Of The World’s Leading Producer Countries, Ghana and Côte d’Ivoire. Climatic change 119(3): 841–854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Le Coeur, C. (1927). Le Commerce de la Noix de Kola en Afrique Occidentale. Annales de Géographie 200(36): 143–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Leeuwis, C. (2004). Communication for Rural Innovation: Rethinking Agricultural Extension, Blackwell Science, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lemeilleur, S., N’Dao, Y., and Ruf, F. (2015). The Productivist Rationality Behind a Sustainable Certification Process: Evidence from the Rainforest Alliance in the Ivorian Cocoa Sector. International Journal of Sustainable Development 18(4): 310–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Léonard, E., and Oswald, M. (1996). Une Agriculture Forestière Sans Forêt. Changements Agro-Écologiques et Innovations Paysannes en Côte d’Ivoire. Nature, Sciences, Sociétés 4(3): 202–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lovejoy, P. (1980). Kola in the History of West Africa. Cahiers d’études Africaines 77(20): 97–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mbembe, A. (2000). De la postcolonie. Essai sur l’imagination politique dans l’Afrique contemporaine, Karthala. 275pGoogle Scholar
  23. N’Guessan, J. (2000). Cola, Espace et Sociétés: Étude de Géographie Sociale et Culturelle de la Filière de la Cola au Marché de gros de Bouaké. Revue Cames 2: 25–35.Google Scholar
  24. Neilson, J. (2007). Global Markets, Farmers and the State: Sustaining Profits in the Indonesian Cocoa Sector. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies 43(2): 227–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Niemenak, N., Onomo, P. E., Fotso, L. R., and Ndoumou, D. O. (2008). Purine Alkaloids and Phenolic Compounds in Three Cola Species and Garcinia kola Grown in Cameroon. South African Journal of Botany 74: 629–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Oladokun, M. A. O., and Egbe, N. E. (1990). Yields of Cocoa/Kola Intercrops in Nigeria. Agroforestry Systems 10: 153–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Oswald, J. (2005). Dynamique des formations agroforestières en Côte d’Ivoire (1980–2000). Thèse de doctorat en géographie Université des Sciences et Technologies de Lille, p. 304.Google Scholar
  28. Palinrungi, R. (2015). The institutional interests of upgrading agents in the Indonesian cocoa value chains. PhD Thesis, School of Geosciences, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney. p. 245.Google Scholar
  29. Pollini, J. (2011). Understanding agricultural intensification on a forest frontier in Madagascar. Elements of a Malthusian/Boserupian synthesis. In: Contested Agronomy Agricultural research in a changing world, Sumberg, J. and Thompson, J. (Eds.). Routledge 116–130Google Scholar
  30. Robbins, P. (2012). Political Ecology, Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, p. 276.Google Scholar
  31. Ruf, F. (1995). From the forest rent to the tree capital; basic laws of cocoa cycles. In Ruf F., and Siswoputanto P. S. (eds.), Cocoa Cycles. The Economics of Cocoa Supply, Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge, pp. 1–53.Google Scholar
  32. Ruf, F. (2011). The Myth of Complex Cocoa Agroforests: The Case of Ghana. Human Ecology 39: 373–388.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-011-9392-0. Published online: 7 April 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ruf, F., and Konan, A. (2016). Le cacao aux portes d’Abidjan: de la forêt à la décharge publique. Traques et caches des innovations villageoises. Inter-réseaux Développement rural. Online 26 July. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/306248569.
  34. Ruf, F., N’Dao, Y., and Lemeilleur, S. (2013). Certification du cacao, stratégie à hauts risques. (Certification of cocoa. A high-risk strategy). Inter-réseaux Développement rural On line 3 June, 2013. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/296755701.
  35. Ruf, F., Galo, A., Kouassi, D., Kiendré, J. (2015). La « fiente de poulet » dans les cacaoyères de Côte d’Ivoire. Une révolution agroécologique et sociale, une innovation villageoise « frugale ». (Chicken manure in the cocoa plantations of Côte d’Ivoire. An agro-ecological and social revolution, a ‘frugal’ village innovation). Inter-réseaux Développement rural. On line 22 Avril 2015. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/285055054.
  36. Russel, T. A. (1956). The kola of Nigeria and Cameroons. Tropical Agriculture, 32,  p. 263Google Scholar
  37. Sanial, E. (2015). A la recherche de l’ombre: analyse du retour des arbres associés dans les plantations de cacao ivoiriennes Mémoire de Master 2 géographie, Université Jean Moulin Lyon 3. p. 211.Google Scholar
  38. Scott, J. (1986). Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance. Journal of Peasant Studies 13(2): 5–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Smith-Dumont, E., Gnahoua, G. M., Ohouo, L., Sinclair, F. L., and Vaast, P. (2014). Farmers in Côte d’Ivoire Value Integrating Tree Diversity in Cocoa for the Provision of Ecosystem Services. Agroforestry System 88(6): 1047–1066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Snider, A., Kraus, E., Sibelet, N., Bosselmann, A. S., and Faure, G. (2016). Influence of voluntary coffee certifications on cooperatives’ advisory services and agricultural practices of smallholder farmers in Costa Rica. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension 22(5): 435–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Spielman, D., Ekboir, J., and Davis, K. (2009). The Art and Science of Innovation Systems Inquiry: Applications to Sub-saharan African Agriculture. Technology in Society 31: 399–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sundstrom, L. (1966). The Cola Nut. Functions in West African Social Life. Studia Ethnographia Upsaliensia 28: 135–149.Google Scholar
  43. Tindall, R. (1998). The Culture of Cola: Social and Economic Aspects of a West African Domesticate. Ethnobotanical Leaflets 1: 9.Google Scholar
  44. Vernière, M. (1969). Anyama étude de la Population et du Commerce Kolatier. Cahiers ORSTOM Série Sciences Humaines 6(1): 83–112.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Université Jean Moulin Lyon 3 EVS-CRGALyonFrance
  2. 2.CIRAD c/o Université Houphouët-BoignyAbidjanCôte d’Ivoire

Personalised recommendations