Advertisement

Human Ecology

, Volume 46, Issue 1, pp 79–89 | Cite as

Constitutionality in Montana: A Decade of Institution Building in the Blackfoot Community Conservation Area

  • Jill M. BelskyEmail author
  • Alexander Barton
Article
  • 216 Downloads

Abstract

Constitutionality is an approach that addresses how people shape their own institutions and rules for local natural resource use even amidst politically challenging conditions at multiple scales. In this paper we examine thelocal public-private partnership known as the Blackfoot Community Project in western Montana (U.S.A.) and its efforts to forstall increasing social and ecological fragmentation by purchasing and conveying thousands of acres of divested corporate timberlands into various conservation ownerships including a locally-owned community conservation area. Based on a decade of participatory research, we examine the creation and operation of the Blackfoot Community Conservation Area (BCCA)’s key governance institution, the BCCA Council, and its efforts to develop locally supported and effective procedures for two of its most contentious issues: motorized recreation and grazing. The analysis highlights strategies of deliberate and incremental processes of participation, cooperation across property boundaries, experimentation, adaptation, and rule modification to find compromises for combined local social and ecological benefits. The paper concludes with a discussion on the tensions raised between these accomplishments occurring in a boldly neoliberal nation-state and among increasingly heterogenous communities, and ongoing challenges entailed in using the market and private ownership (albeit governed by and for a collective of  local constituents) as a strategy to foster resource ownership and stewardship.

Keywords

Constitutionality Community-based conservation Governance Local institutions Montana Western United States 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Agrawal A., and Gibson C. (eds.) (2001). Communities and the Environment, Rutgers University Press, N.J.Google Scholar
  2. Agrawal, A. (2005). Environmentality: Community, Intimate Government, and the Making of Environmental Subjects in Kumaon, India. Current Anthropology 46(2): 161–181.Google Scholar
  3. BCCA (2008). Management Plan for the Core, 1st edn.Google Scholar
  4. BCCA (2017). Management Plan for the Core, 2nd edn.Google Scholar
  5. Belsky J. M. (1999). Misrepresenting communities: the politics of community-based rural ecotourism in Gales Point Manatee, Belize. Rural Sociology 64: 641–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Belsky, J.M. (2008). Creating Community Forests. In: Forest Community Connections: Continuity and Change. E. Donoghue and V. Sturtevant (eds). Chapter 12. Washington D.D.: Resources for the Future. Google Scholar
  7. Belsky J. M. (2015). Community forestry in Bhutan and Montana: comparative engagements with market forces. Forest Policy and Economics 58: 29–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Best C., and Wayburn L. A. (2001). American’s private forests: states and stewardship, Island Press, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  9. Beymer-Farris B. A. (2013). Producing biodiversity in Tanzania’s mangrove forests? A combined political ecology and ecological resilience approach to sustainably utilized landscapes. In Brannstrom C., and Vadjunec J. M. (eds.), Land Change, Science, Political Ecology, and Sustainability: Synergies and Divergencies, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  10. Bliss, J.C., E.C. Kelly, J. Abrams and C. Bailey. (2008). Disintegration of the industrial forest estate and the future of small-scale forestry in the United States. Working Paper Number RSP 08–03. Rural Studies Program, Oregon State University.Google Scholar
  11. Brosius J. P., Tsing A. L., and Zerner C. (1998). Representing Communities: Histories and Politics of Community-Based Natural Resource Management. Society & Natural Resources 11: 157–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bullock R., Broad G., Palmer L., and Smith M. A. (eds.) (2017). Growing Community Forests: Practice, Research and Advocacy in Canada, University of Manitoba Press, Manitoba, Canada.Google Scholar
  13. Bullock R., Armitage D., and Mitchell B. (2012). Shadow networks, social learning, and collaborating through crisis: building resilient forest-based communities in Northern Ontario, Canada. Chapter 13. In Bullock R., Armitage D., and Mitchell B. (eds.), Collaborative Resilience: Moving through Crisis to Opportunity, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, pp. 309–335.Google Scholar
  14. Campbell L. M., Haalboom B. J., and Trow J. (2007). Sustainability of Community-Based Conservation: Sea Turtle Egg Harvesting in Ostional (Costa Rica) Ten Years Later. Environmental Conservation 34: 122–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cheng, A.S. and M. Fernandez-Gimenez. (2006). Ford Foundation community-based forestry demonstration program research Component: Final report, Department of Forest, Rangeland, and Watershed Stewardship, Colorado State University, Fort Collins.Google Scholar
  16. Cleaver F. (2012). Development through Bricolage: Rethinking Institutions for Natural Resource Management, Routledge Press, London and New York.Google Scholar
  17. Cleaver F., and de Koning J. (2015). Furthering critical institutionalism. International Journal of the Commons 9: 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Creswell J. W. (2013). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches, Sage Publications, Los Angeles, CA.Google Scholar
  19. Dillman D. A. (1978). Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method, Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  20. Donoghue E., and Sturtevant V. (2008). Forest community connections: continuity and change, Resources for the Future, Washington D.D.Google Scholar
  21. Duvall, A. (2006). Towards Community-Owned Forests: Landowner Perspectives on the Blackfoot Community Conservation Area. Master’s Thesis. University of Montana.Google Scholar
  22. Duvall, A. and J.M. Belsky. (2005). Blackfoot community conservation area survey: Your views on Future use, ownership and management (Preliminary Survey Results). January 26, 2005. Unpub. ms.Google Scholar
  23. Fairfax S. I., Gwin M. A. K., Raymond L., and Watt L. A. (2005). Buying nature: the limits of land acquisition as a conservation strategy, 1780-2004, MIT, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  24. Fortmann L. (1995). Talking Claims: Discursive Strategies in Contesting Property. World Development 23(6): 1053–1063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fraser N. (2011). Marketization, social protection, emancipation: toward a neo-polanyian conception of capitalist crisis. In Calhoun C. J., and Derluguian G. M. (eds.), Business as Usual: the Roots of the Global Financial Meltdown, NYU Press, New York, pp. 137–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fraser N. (2013). A Triple Movement? Parsing the Politics of Crisis after Polanyi. New Left Review 81: 119-+.Google Scholar
  27. Gilmour, D. (2016). Forty years of community forestry. Food and Agriculture Organization. Forestry Paper 176, Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
  28. Goetz, H. and A. Duvall (2006). Final Report – BCP and BCCA. December 2006. Unpub. Ovando, MT.Google Scholar
  29. Haller, T. and Merten. (2017). Crafting our own rules: Constitutionality as a bottom-up approach to crafting by-laws in Zambia. Human Ecology.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-017-9917-2.
  30. Haller T., Acciaioli G., and Rist S. (2016). Constitutionality: Conditions for Crafting Local Ownership of Institution-Building Processes. Society & Natural Resources 29(1): 68–87.  https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2015.1041661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hecht S. B., Morrison K. D., and Padoch C. (eds.) (2014). The social lives of forests: past, resent, and future of woodland resurgence, The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  32. Jensen D., Draffan G., Osborn J., and Council, I. E. P. L. (1995). Railroads and clearcuts: legacy of Congress's 1864 Northern Pacific Railroad land grant, Keokee Co Pub Inc.Google Scholar
  33. Kusel J., and Adler E. (2003). Forest communities, community forests: struggles and successes in rebuilding communities and forests, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
  34. Li T. M. (2007). Practices of assemblage and community forest management. Economy and Society 36: 264–294.Google Scholar
  35. Lindbergh, L. and H. Goetz. (2016). Guest opinion: Montana conservation starts around kitchen table. Seeley Lake Pathfinder, June 30, (2016). Downloaded April 22, 2017 from http://www.seeleylake.com/story/2016/06/30/opinion/montana-private-land-conservation-it-all-starts-with-people-around-a-kitchen-table/1058.html.
  36. Lyman M. W., Danks C., and McDonough M. (2013). New England's Community Forests: Comparing a Regional Model to ICCAs. Conservation and Society 11: 46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. McCarthy J. (2005). Devolution in the woods: community forestry as hybrid neoliberalism. Environment and Planning 37: 994–1014.Google Scholar
  38. Mwangi E., Markelova H., and Meinzen-Dick R. (eds.) (2012). Collective Action and Property Rights for Poverty Reductin: Insights from Africa and Asia, University of Pennsylvannia Press, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
  39. Ostrom E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ostrom E. (2005). Understanding Institutional Diversity, Princeton University Press, Princeton N.J.Google Scholar
  41. Parker, M. (2014). Swan Story. In: Charnley, S, Sheridan, T.E. and Nabhan, G.P. (eds.). Stitching the West Back Together: Conserving Working Landscapes and Biodiversity in the American West. The Univesity of Chicago Press. pp. 123‑136.Google Scholar
  42. Perreault T., Bridge G., and McCarthy J. (2015). The Routledge Handbook of Political Ecology, Routledge, Oxon and N.Y.Google Scholar
  43. Portes, A. and P. Landolt. (1996). The Downside of Social Capital. The American Prospect 26 (May- June): 18-21, 94 http://epn.org/prospect/26/26-cnt2.
  44. Rasker R. (2006). An Exploration into The Economic Impact of Industrial Development versus Conservation on Western Public Lands. Society and Natural Resources 19(3): 191–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Siebert S. F., and Belsky J. M. (2014). Historic livelihoods and land uses as ecological disturbances and their role in enhancing biodiversity: an example from Bhutan. Biological Conservation 177: 82–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Singh, N.M. (2013). The Affective Labor of Growing Forests and the Becoming of Environmental Subjects: Rethinking Environmentality in Odisha, India. Geoforum 47: 189-198.Google Scholar
  47. Yung L., and Belsky J. M. (2007). Private Property Rights and Community Goods: Negotiating Landowner Cooperation Amidst Changing Ownership on the Rocky Mountain Front. Society & Natural Resources 20: 689–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Zimmerer, K. S. (2015). Methods and environmental science in political ecology. In Perreault, T., Bridge, G., and McCarthy, J. (eds.), 2015. The Routledge Handbook of Political Ecology. Oxon and N.Y., Routledge. Chap 11, 150–168.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Society & ConservationUniversity of MontanaMissoulaUSA

Personalised recommendations