Evaluating Farmers’ Knowledge of Shade Trees in Different Cocoa Agro-Ecological Zones in Ghana
- 468 Downloads
Shade trees are an integral part of most cocoa growing systems across the world. This study assesses farmers’ local knowledge of shade trees at two locations in Ghana with different climatic conditions and vulnerability to climate change. Akumadan is located in the northern dry part of the cocoa belt representing marginal conditions for cocoa cultivation, whereas Asankragua is located in the southern wet part, more ecologically favorable for cocoa cultivation. Inventories were conducted to assess the abundance of species, their structural characteristics and benefits to cocoa systems. Results show that cocoa farmers have detailed knowledge on the functions of shade trees in cocoa systems and prefer species that provide specific needs according to the location. However, abundance of species in a location does not necessary translate into beneficial impacts on cocoa productivity. In the drier part of the cocoa belt, income diversification through shade trees is an adaptation strategy to the increasingly marginal conditions for cocoa production, which has led to the high proportion of fruit trees among the most abundant species. In contrast, farmers in the southern part of the cocoa belt select shade trees for their high cocoa compatibility. Adaptation strategies for cocoa farmers should therefore promote species that best accommodate farmers’ economic, agronomic and environmental needs.
KeywordsAgroforestry Local knowledge Shade Theobroma cacao Tree attributes Ghana
We are indebted to the participating farmers who shared their knowledge on shade trees and kindly responded to our questionnaires. We also express our gratitude to Aikins Nyamekye and Bismark Debrah for their great help as field assistants and translators, as well as to Joseph Owusu for identifying shade tree species. This research is part of the CGIAR programs on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS) and Forests, Trees and Agriculture (FTA). Funding through the German Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ) is gratefully acknowledged. L.M.-S. and K.C. received a thesis research grant of BEAF/GIZ. We also thank IITA for logistical support.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
This study was funded by the German Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ), project number: 12.1433.7–001.00.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Asare R. (2005). Cocoa agroforests in West Africa: a look at activities on preferred trees in the farming systems. Forest & landscape working papers no. 6–2005, Forest & Landscape, Denmark, p. 76.Google Scholar
- Asare R., and Asare R. A. (2008). A participatory approach for tree diversification in cocoa farms: Ghanaian farmers’ experience. STCP working paper series issue 9, International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Accra, p. 29.Google Scholar
- Aulong S., Duray S., and Temple L. (2000). Dynamics and floristic structure of agroforests including citrus species in Central Cameroon. Fruits 55: 103–114.Google Scholar
- Bally, I. S. E. (2006). Mangifera indica (mango). Species profiles for Pacific Island Agroforestry. www.traditionaltree.org.
- Beer J., Muschler R., Kass D., and Somarriba E. (1998). Shade management in coffee and cacao plantations. Agroforestry Systems 38: 139–164.Google Scholar
- Dawoe E. K., Quashie-Sam J., Isaac M. E., and Oppong S. K. (2012). Exploring farmers’ local knowledge and perceptions of soil fertility and management in the Ashanti Region of Ghana. Geoderma 179–180: 96–103.Google Scholar
- Hawthorne W., and Gyakari N. (2006). Photoguide for the forest trees of Ghana, Oxford Forestry Institute, Oxford, p. 432.Google Scholar
- Hoogendijk T., and Dahrs D. (2012). Shade tree guide for Ghanaian cocoa farmers, Agro Eco Luis Bolk Institute, Accra, p. 45.Google Scholar
- Manu M., and Tetteh E. (1987). A guide to cocoa cultivation, CRIG, New Tafo, p. 51.Google Scholar
- Sinclair F. L., and Walker D. H. (1999). A utilitarian approach to the incorporation of local knowledge in agroforestry research and extension. In Buck L. E., Lassoie J. P., and Fernandes E. C. M. (eds.), Agroforestry in sustainable agricultural systems, CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp. 253–283.Google Scholar
- Smith N., Williams J., Plucknett D., and Talbott J. (1992). Tropical forests and their crops, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, p. 568.Google Scholar
- Sonwa D. J., and Weise S. F. (2008). Diversifying and intensifying the cocoa agroforest landscape: review and strategic approaches for managing the shade matrix in west and Central Africa, IITA, Accra, p. 60.Google Scholar
- Tscharntke T., Clough Y., Bhagwat S. A., Buchori D., Faust H., Hertel D., Hölscher D., Juhrbandt J., Kessler M., Perfecto I., Scherber C., Schroth G., Veldkamp E., and Wanger T. C. (2011). Multifunctional shade-tree management in tropical agroforestry landscapes – a review. Journal of Applied Ecology 48: 619–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Vaast P., Harmand J. M., Rapidel B., Jagoret P., and Deheuvels O. (2016). Coffee and cocoa production in agroforestry - a climate-smart agriculture model. In Torquebiau E. (ed.), Climate change and agriculture worldwide, Springer, Heibelberg, pp. 197–208.Google Scholar