Advertisement

Human Ecology

, Volume 44, Issue 6, pp 687–699 | Cite as

Domestic and International Climate Migration from Rural Mexico

  • Raphael J. Nawrotzki
  • Daniel M. Runfola
  • Lori M. Hunter
  • Fernando Riosmena
Article
  • 519 Downloads

Abstract

Evidence is increasing that climate change and variability may influence human migration patterns. However, there is less agreement regarding the type of migration streams most strongly impacted. This study tests whether climate change more strongly impacted international compared to domestic migration from rural Mexico during 1986–99. We employ eight temperature and precipitation-based climate change indices linked to detailed migration histories obtained from the Mexican Migration Project. Results from multilevel discrete-time event-history models challenge the assumption that climate-related migration will be predominantly short distance and domestic, but instead show that climate change more strongly impacted international moves from rural Mexico. The stronger climate impact on international migration may be explained by the self-insurance function of international migration, the presence of strong migrant networks, and climate-related changes in wage difference. While a warming in temperature increased international outmigration, higher levels of precipitation declined the odds of an international move.

Keywords

Climate change Rural Mexico Domestic migration International migration Environment 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This article is based on Chapter V of Nawrotzki’s dissertation titled “Climate Change as a Migration Driver in Mexico, 1986-99.” We thank Richard G. Rogers and Fred C. Pampel for insightful comments on the substantive contributions of this research and helpful advice on the statistical model development. We also express our gratitude to Rachel Magennis for her careful editing and helpful suggestions. Many thanks to the journal editor and two anonymous reviewers for helpful suggestions to improve the quality and clarity of this article.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Funding

The authors gratefully acknowledge support from the Minnesota Population Center (R24 HD041023) and the University of Colorado Population Center (R24 HD066613), funded through grants from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute for Child Health and Human Development (NICHD). In addition, this work received support from the National Science Foundation funded Terra Populus project (NSF Award ACI-0940818).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. Grant support listed above was provided independent of research topic, methods, and findings.

Research Ethics

The analyses described in this article were performed using secondary data obtained from various publically available sources as outlined in the Data and Methods section.

References

  1. Allison P. D. (1984). Event history analysis, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allison P. D. (2002). Missing data, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barber J. S., Murphy S. A., Axinn W. G., and Maples J. (2000). Discrete-time multilevel hazard analysis. Sociological Methodology 30(1): 201–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bardsley D. K., and Hugo G. J. (2010). Migration and climate change: examining thresholds of change to guide effective adaptation decision-making. Population and Environment 32(2–3): 238–262. doi: 10.1007/s11111-010-0126-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bates D. M. (2010). lme4: mixed-effects modeling with R, Springer, New York.Google Scholar
  6. Bates D. M., Maechler M., Bolker B. M., and Walker S. (2014). lme4: linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4, CRAN.R-project.org, Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar
  7. Black R., Adger W. N., Arnell N. W., Dercon S., Geddes A., and Thomas D. S. (2011). The effect of environmental change on human migration. Global Environmental Change 21: S3–S11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bohra-Mishra P., Oppenheimer M., and Hsiang S. M. (2014). Nonlinear permanent migration response to climatic variations but minimal response to disasters. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 111(27): 9780–9785. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1317166111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bolstad P. (2012). GIS fundamentals: a first text on geographic information systems, 4 edn., Eider Press, White Bear Lake, MN.Google Scholar
  10. Boyd R., and Ibarraran M. E. (2009). Extreme climate events and adaptation: an exploratory analysis of drought in Mexico. Environment and Development Economics 14: 371–395. doi: 10.1017/s1355770x08004956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bronaugh D. (2014). R package climdex.Pcic: PCIC implementation of climdex routines, Pacific Climate Impact Consortium, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.Google Scholar
  12. Brown S. K., and Bean F. D. (2006). International migration. In Posten D., and Micklin M. (eds.), Handbook of population, Springer Publishers, New York, pp. 347–382.Google Scholar
  13. Carr D. L., Lopez A. C., and Bilsborrow R. E. (2009). The population, agriculture, and environment nexus in Latin America: country-level evidence from the latter half of the twentieth century. Population and Environment 30(6): 222–246. doi: 10.1007/s11111-009-0090-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Castles S. (2010). Understanding global migration: a social transformation perspective. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 36(10): 1565–1586. doi: 10.1080/1369183x.2010.489381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cerrutti M., and Massey D. S. (2001). On the auspices of female migration from Mexico to the United States. Demography 38(2): 187–200. doi: 10.2307/3088300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cohen J. H. (2004). The culture of migration in southern Mexico, University of Texas Press, Austin, TX.Google Scholar
  17. Danielson J. J., and Gesch D. B. (2011). Global multi-resolution terrain elevation data 2010 (GMTED2010): Open-File Report 2011–1073, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia.Google Scholar
  18. de Janvry A., and Sadoulet E. (2001). Income strategies among rural households in Mexico: the role of off-farm activities. World Development 29(3): 467–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Endfield G. H. (2007). Archival explorations of climate variability and social vulnerability in colonial Mexico. Climatic Change 83(1–2): 9–38. doi: 10.1007/s10584-006-9125-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. ESRI (2012). ArcGIS Online, ESRI, DeLorme Publishing Company, Inc., Redlands, CA.Google Scholar
  21. Feng S., and Oppenheimer M. (2012). Applying statistical models to the climate-migration relationship. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 109(43): E2915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Findlay A. M. (2011). Migrant destinations in an era of environmental change. Global Environmental Change-Human and Policy Dimensions 21: S50–S58. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.09.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fischer P. A., and Malmberg G. (2001). Settled people don't move: on life course and (im-)mobility in Sweden. International Journal of Population Geography 7: 357–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fussell E. (2004). Sources of Mexico's migration stream: rural, urban, and border migrants to the United States. Social Forces 82(3): 937–967. doi: 10.1353/sof.2004.0039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fussell E., and Massey D. S. (2004). The limits to cumulative causation: international migration from Mexican urban areas. Demography 41(1): 151–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gray C. L., and Bilsborrow R. (2013). Environmental influences on human migration in rural Ecuador. Demography 50: 1217–1241. doi: 10.1007/s13524-012-0192-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gray C. L., and Mueller V. (2012). Drought and population mobility in rural Ethiopia. World Development 40(1): 134–145. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.05.023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gutmann M. P., and Field V. (2010). Katrina in historical context: environment and migration in the US. Population and Environment 31(1–3): 3–19. doi: 10.1007/s11111-009-0088-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hamilton E. R., and Villarreal A. (2011). Development and the urban and rural geography of Mexican emigration to the United States. Social Forces 90(2): 661–683. doi: 10.1093/sf/sor011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Henry S., Schoumaker B., and Beauchemin C. (2004). The impact of rainfall on the first out-migration: a multi-level event-history analysis in Burkina Faso. Population and Environment 25(5): 423–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hevesi J. A., Istok J. D., and Flint A. L. (1992). Precipitation estimation in mountainous terrain using multivariate geostatistics .1. Structural-analysis. Journal of Applied Meteorology 31(7): 661–676. doi: 10.1175/1520-0450(1992)031<0661:peimtu>2.0.co;2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Honaker J., King G., and Blackwell M. (2011). Amelia II: a program for missing data. Journal of Statistical Software 45(7): 1–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hunter L. M., Murray S., and Riosmena F. (2013). Rainfall patterns and U.S. migration from rural Mexico. International Migration Review 47(4): 874–909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hunter L. M., Luna J. K., and Norton R. M. (2015). Environmental dimensions of migration. Annual Review of Sociology 41: 377–397. doi: 10.1146/annurev-soc-073014-112223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Huq, S., Rahman, A., Konate, M., Sokona, Y., & Reid, H. (2003). Mainstreaming adaptation to climate change in least developed countries (LDCs). Retrieved from London:Google Scholar
  36. INEGI (2012). Sistema Estatal y Municipal de Bases de Datos, Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Geografía e Informática, Aguascalientes, Mexico.Google Scholar
  37. IPCC (2013). Summary for policymakers. In Stocker T. F., Qin D., Plattner G. K., Tignor M., Allen S. K., Boschung J., Nauels A., Xia Y., Bex V., and Midgley P. M. (eds.), Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom, pp. 1–30.Google Scholar
  38. IPCC (2014a). Annex II: Glossary. In Mach K. J., Planton S., von Stechow C., Pachauri R. K., and Meyer L. A. (eds.), Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), Geneva, Switzerland, pp. 117–130.Google Scholar
  39. IPCC (2014b). Summary for policymakers. In Field C. B., Barros V. R., Dokken D. J., Mach K. J., Mastrandrea M. D., Bilir T. E., Chatterjee M., Ebi K. L., Estrada Y. O., Genova R. C., Girma B., Kissel E. S., Levy A. N., MacCracken S., Mastrandrea P. r., and White L. L. (eds.), Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 1–32.Google Scholar
  40. Kaenzig R., and Piguet E. (2014). Migration and climate change in Latin America and the Caribbean. In Piguet E., and Laczko F. (eds.), People on the move in a changing climate, Springer, New York, NY, pp. 155–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kanaiaupuni S. M. (2000). Reframing the migration question: an analysis of men, women, and gender in Mexico. Social Forces 78(4): 1311–1347. doi: 10.2307/3006176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kandel W., and Massey D. S. (2002). The culture of Mexican migration: a theoretical and empirical analysis. Social Forces 80(3): 981–1004. doi: 10.1353/sof.2002.0009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kelly P. M., and Adger W. N. (2000). Theory and practice in assessing vulnerability to climate change and facilitating adaptation. Climatic Change 47(4): 325–352. doi: 10.1023/a:1005627828199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kugler T. A., Van Riper D. C., Manson S. M., Haynes D. A., Donato J., and Stinebaugh K. (2015). Terra Populus: workflows for integrating and harmonizing geospatial population and environmental data. Journal of Map and Geography Libraries 11(2): 180–206. doi: 10.1080/15420353.2015.1036484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lilleor H. B., and Van den Broeck K. (2011). Economic drivers of migration and climate change in LDCs. Global Environmental Change-Human and Policy Dimensions 21: S70–S81. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.09.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lindstrom D. P., and Lauster N. (2001). Local economic opportunity and the competing risks of internal and US migration in Zacatecas, Mexico. International Migration Review 35(4): 1232–1256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lobell D. B., and Field C. B. (2007). Global scale climate - crop yield relationships and the impacts of recent warming. Environmental Research Letters 2(1): 1–7. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/2/1/014002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lobell D. B., Hammer G. L., McLean G., Messina C., Roberts M. J., and Schlenker W. (2013). The critical role of extreme heat for maize production in the United States. Nature Climate Change 3(5): 497–501. doi: 10.1038/nclimate1832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lustig N. (1990). Economic-crisis, adjustment and living standards in Mexico, 1982-85. World Development 18(10): 1325–1342. doi: 10.1016/0305-750x(90)90113-c.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Massey D. S. (1987). The Ethnosurvey in theory and practice. International Migration Review 21(4): 1498–1522. doi: 10.2307/2546522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Massey D. S., and Espinosa K. E. (1997). What's driving Mexico-US migration? A theoretical, empirical, and policy analysis. American Journal of Sociology 102(4): 939–999. doi: 10.1086/231037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Massey D. S., and Parrado E. A. (1998). International migration and business formation in Mexico. Social Science Quarterly 79(1): 1–20.Google Scholar
  53. Massey D. S., and Riosmena F. (2010). Undocumented migration from Latin America in an era of rising U.S. enforcement. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 630: 294–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Massey D. S., Alarcon R., Durand J., and Gonzalez H. (1987). Return to Aztlan: the social process of international migration from western Mexico, University of California Press, Berkely, CA.Google Scholar
  55. Massey D. S., Arango J., Hugo G., Kouaouci A., Pellegrino A., and Taylor J. E. (1993). Theories of international migration - a review and appraisal. Population and Development Review 19(3): 431–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. McKenzie D. J. (2006). The consumer response to the Mexican peso crisis. Economic Development and Cultural Change 55(1): 139–172. doi: 10.1086/505721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. McLeman R. A. (2011). Settlement abandonment in the context of global environmental change. Global Environmental Change 21: S108–S120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Menne M. J., Durre I., Vose R. S., Gleason B. E., and Houston T. G. (2012). An overview of the global historical climatology network-daily database. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology 29(7): 897–910. doi: 10.1175/jtech-d-11-00103.1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. MPC (2013a). Integrated Public Use Microdata Series, International: Version 6.2 [Machine-readable database], University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.Google Scholar
  60. MPC (2013b). Terra Populus: Beta Version [Machine-readable database], Minnesota Population Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.Google Scholar
  61. Mueller V., Gray C. L., and Kosec K. (2014). Heat stress increases long-term human migration in rural Pakistan. Nature Climate Change 4(3): 182–185. doi: 10.1038/nclimate2103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Myers N. (2002). Environmental refugees: a growing phenomenon of the twenty-first century. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 357(1420): 609–613. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2001.0953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Nawrotzki R. J. (2012). The politics of environmental concern: a cross-national analysis. Organization & Environment 25(3): 286–307. doi: 10.1177/1086026612456535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Nawrotzki R. J., and Bakhtsiyarava M. (2016). International climate migration: evidence for the climate inhibitor mechanism and the agricultural pathway, Population, Space & Place, Online, pp. 1–16. doi: 10.1002/psp.2033.Google Scholar
  65. Nawrotzki R. J., Riosmena F., and Hunter L. M. (2013). Do rainfall deficits predict U.S.-bound migration from rural Mexico? Evidence from the Mexican census. Population Research and Policy Review 32(1): 129–158. doi: 10.1007/s11113-012-9251-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Nawrotzki R. J., Hunter L. M., Runfola D. M., and Riosmena F. (2015a). Climate change as migration driver from rural and urban Mexico. Environmental Research Letters 10(11): 1–9. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/10/11/114023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Nawrotzki R. J., Riosmena F., Hunter L. M., and Runfola D. M. (2015b). Amplification or suppression: social networks and the climate change-migration association in rural Mexico. Global Environmental Change 35: 463–474. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.09.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Orrenius P. M., and Zavodny M. (2003). Do amnesty programs reduce undocumented immigration? Evidence from IRCA. Demography 40(3): 437–450. doi: 10.2307/1515154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Paternoster R., Brame R., Mazerolle P., and Piquero A. (1998). Using the correct statistical test for the equality of regression coefficients. Criminology 36(4): 859–866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Perz S. G. (2000). The rural exodus in the context of economic crisis, globalization and reform in Brazil. International Migration Review 34(3): 842–881. doi: 10.2307/2675947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Peterson T. C., and Manton M. J. (2008). Monitoring changes in climate extremes - a tale of international collaboration. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 89(9): 1266–1271. doi: 10.1175/2008bams2501.1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Peterson T. C., Folland C., Gruza G., Hogg W., Mokssit A., and Plummer N. (2001). Report of the activities of the working group on climate change detection and related rapporteurs, World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  73. RCoreTeam (2015). R: a language and environment for statistical computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar
  74. Rosenzweig M. R., and Stark O. (1989). Consumption smoothing, migration, and marriage - evidence from rural India. Journal of Political Economy 97(4): 905–926. doi: 10.1086/261633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Rubin D. (1987). Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys, Wiley, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Ruiter S., and De Graaf N. D. (2006). National context, religiosity, and volunteering: results from 53 countries. American Sociological Review 71(2): 191–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Saldana-Zorrilla S. O., and Sandberg K. (2009). Spatial econometric model of natural disaster impacts on human migration in vulnerable regions of Mexico. Disasters 33(4): 591–607. doi: 10.1111/j.0361-3666.2008.01089.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Sanchez Cohen I., Oswald Spring U., Diaz Padilla G., Cerano Paredes J., Inzunza Ibarra M. A., Lopez Lopez R., and Villanueva Diaz J. (2013). Forced migration, climate change, mitigation and adaptation policies in Mexico: some functional relationships. International Migration 51(4): 53–72. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2435.2012.00743.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Sanchez B., Rasmussen A., and Porter J. R. (2014). Temperatures and the growth and development of maize and rice: a review. Global Change Biology 20(2): 408–417. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Schlenker W., and Roberts M. J. (2009). Nonlinear temperature effects indicate severe damages to US crop yields under climate change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106(37): 15594–15598. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0906865106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Scoones I. (1999). Sustainable rural livelihoods: a framework for analysis, Institute of Development Studies, Brighton, U.K.Google Scholar
  82. Singer J. D., and Willett J. B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis: modeling change and event occurrence, Oxford University Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Stahle, D. W., Cook, E. R., Villanueva Diaz, J., Fye, F. K., Burnette, D. J., Griffin, R. D.,. .. Heim, R. R. (2009). Early 21st-century drought in Mexico. Eos, Transactions of the American Geophysical Union, 90(11), 89–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Stark O., and Bloom D. E. (1985). The new economics of labor migration. American Economic Review 75(2): 173–178.Google Scholar
  85. Steduto P., Hsiao T. C., Fereres E., and Raes D. (2012). Crop yield response to water, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
  86. Steele F. (2005). Event history analysis, ESRC National Centre for Research Methods, Bristol, U.K.Google Scholar
  87. Steele F., Diamond I., and Amin S. (1996). Immunization uptake in rural Bangladesh: a multilevel analysis. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series a-Statistics in Society 159: 289–299. doi: 10.2307/2983175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Stern N. (2007). Economics of climate change: the stern review, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Taylor J. E. (1999). The new economics of labour migration and the role of remittances in the migration process. International Migration 37(1): 63–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. White M. J., and Lindstrom D. P. (2006). Internal migration. In Poston D., and Micklin M. (eds.), Handbook of population, Kluwer Academic Publishers, New York, pp. 311–346.Google Scholar
  91. Winters P., Davis B., and Corral L. (2002). Assets, activities and income generation in rural Mexico: factoring in social and public capital. Agricultural Economics 27(2): 139–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Raphael J. Nawrotzki
    • 1
  • Daniel M. Runfola
    • 2
  • Lori M. Hunter
    • 3
  • Fernando Riosmena
    • 4
  1. 1.Minnesota Population CenterUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA
  2. 2.Institute for the Theory and Practice of International RelationsThe College of William and Mary WilliamsburgUSA
  3. 3.Department of Sociology and CU Population Center (Institute of Behavioral Science)University of Colorado BoulderBoulderUSA
  4. 4.Department of Geography and CU Population Center (Institute of Behavioral Science)University of Colorado BoulderBoulderUSA

Personalised recommendations