Advertisement

Human Ecology

, Volume 44, Issue 1, pp 119–128 | Cite as

“Community Work” in a Climate of Adaptation: Responding to Change in Rural Alaska

  • Philip A. Loring
  • S. Craig Gerlach
  • Henry J. Penn
Article

Abstract

We draw on our research experiences with municipal workers in Alaska, where the impacts of climate change are already extensive, to examine adaptation and related concepts, such as resilience and vulnerability, which have become widely used in science and policy formulation for addressing climate change despite also being subject to multiple critiques. We use local people’s experiences with environmental challenges to illustrate limitations of the climate change adaptation paradigm, and offer the additional concept of “community work” — analogous to niche construction — as a counterpart to the adaptive process at the community level. Whereas climate change adaptation insinuates active and purposive change, the reality we have repeatedly encountered is that people in these communities focus not on changing but on building and maintaining capacity and achieving stability: keeping aging and overtaxed infrastructure running while also working toward improving quality of life and services in their communities. We discuss how these findings are congruent with recent calls to better situate climate change adaptation policy in the context of community development, and argue that scientists and policymakers need to understand this context of community work to avoid the pitfalls that potentially accompany the adaptation paradigm.

Keywords

Adaptation Agency Arctic Climate change Development Indigenous peoples Niche construction Alaska 

References

  1. ACIA. (2005). Arctic climate impact assessment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  2. Adger, W. N. (2006). Vulnerability. Global Environmental Change 16:268–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alessa, L., Kliskey, A., Lammers, R., Arp, C., White, D. M., Hinzman, L. D., and Busey, R. (2008). The Arctic water resource vulnerability index: an integrated assessment tool for community resilience and vulnerability with respect to freshwater. Environmental Management 42:523–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Allison, E. H., Perry, A. L., Badjeck, M.-C., Neil Adger, W., Brown, K., Conway, D., Halls, A. S., Pilling, G. M., Reynolds, J. D., Andrew, N. L., and Dulvy, N. K. (2009). Vulnerability of national economies to the impacts of climate change on fisheries. Fish and Fisheries 10:173–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Atkinson, D. E. (2005). Observed storminess patterns and trends in the circum-Arctic coastal regime. Geo-Marine Letters 25:98–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Atkinson, D. E., Schweitzer, P., Smith, O., and Norris, L. (2011). The Arctic Coastal Margin. Chapter V: The Interplay of Components. North by 2020. University of Alaska Press, Fairbanks.Google Scholar
  7. Barnett, J., and O’Neill, S. (2010). Maladaptation. Global Environmental Change 20:211–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barth, F. (1956). Ecologic relationships of ethnic groups in swat, north Pakistan. American Anthropologist 58:1079–1089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bassett, T. J., and Fogelman, C. (2013). Déjà vu or something new? The adaptation concept in the climate change literature. Geoforum 48:42–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bates, D. G. (2004). Human adaptive strategies: ecology, culture, and politics. 3 edition. Pearson, Boston.Google Scholar
  11. Beck, P. S. A., Juday, G. P., Alix, C., Barber, V. A., Winslow, S. E., Sousa, E. E., Heiser, P., Herriges, J. D., and Goetz, S. J. (2011). Changes in forest productivity across Alaska consistent with biome shift. Ecology Letters 14:373–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bennett, J. W. (1969). Northern plainsmen: adaptive strategy and agrarian life. Aldine Atherton Inc., Chicago.Google Scholar
  13. Bennett, J. W. (1996). Human ecology as human behavior. Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick.Google Scholar
  14. Blount, B., Jacob, S., Weeks, P., and Jepson, M. (2015). Testing cognitive ethnography: mixed-methods in developing indicators of well-being in fishing communities. Human Organization 74:1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Brown, B. (2012). Daring greatly: how the courage to be vulnerable transforms the way we live, love, parent, and lead. Penguin.Google Scholar
  16. Brubaker, M. Y., Flensburg, S., and Skarada, J. (2014). Climate change and health effects in the Bristol bay region of Alaska. Alaska native tribal health consortium, Center for Climate and Health, Anchorage.Google Scholar
  17. Checker, M. (2007). “But I know it’s true:” environmental risk assessment, justice, and anthropology. Human Organization 66:112–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cinner, J. E., Fuentes, M. M. P. B., and Randriamahazo, H. (2009). Exploring social resilience in Madagascar’s marine protected areas. Ecology and Society 14:14.Google Scholar
  19. Codding, B. F., Bird, R. B., Kauhanen, P. G., and Bird, D. W. (2014). Conservation or co-evolution? intermediate levels of aboriginal burning and hunting have positive effects on kangaroo populations in Western Australia. Human Ecology 1–11.Google Scholar
  20. Darwin, C. (1859). On the origin of species by means of natural selection. John Murray.Google Scholar
  21. Davidson, D. J. (2010). The applicability of the concept of resilience to social systems: some sources of optimism and nagging doubts. Society & Natural Resources 23:1135–1149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Day, R. L., Laland, K. N., and Odling-Smee, F. J. (2003). Rethinking adaptation: the niche-construction perspective. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 46:80–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Di Leonardo, M. (1987). The female world of cards and holidays: women, families, and the work of kinship. Signs 12(3):440–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Eichelberger, L. P. (2011). Manufacturing insecurity: power, water, waste, and the silences of sustainability and suffering in northwest Alaska.Google Scholar
  25. Ford, J. D., Smit, B., and Wandel, J. (2006). Vulnerability to climate change in the Arctic: a case study from Arctic bay, Canada. Global Environmental Change 16:145–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ford, J. D., Pearce, T., Duerden, F., Furgal, C., and Smit, B. (2010). Climate change policy responses for Canada’s Inuit population: the importance of and opportunities for adaptation. Global Environmental Change 20:177–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Friedman, J. (1974). Marxism, structuralism and vulgar materialism. Man 9(3):444–469.Google Scholar
  28. Gallopín, G. C. (2006). Linkages between vulnerability, resilience, and adaptive capacity. Global Environmental Change 16:293–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gerlach, S. C., Loring, P. A., Turner, A. M., and Atkinson, D. E. (2011). Food systems, climate change, and community needs. Pages 111–134 In Lovecraft, A. L., and Eicken, H. (eds.), North by 2020. University of Alaska Press, Fairbanks.Google Scholar
  30. Gould, S. J., and Lewontin, R. C. (1979). The spandrels of San Marco and the panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme. Proceedings of the royal society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences 205:581–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Haalboom, B., and Natcher, D. C. (2012). The power and peril of “vulnerability”: approaching community labels with caution in climate change research. Arctic 65:319–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Himes-Cornell, A., and Kasperski, S. (2015). Assessing climate change vulnerability in Alaska’s fishing communities. Fisheries Research 162:1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hinkel, J. (2011). “Indicators of vulnerability and adaptive capacity”: towards a clarification of the science–policy interface. Global Environmental Change 21:198–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hornborg, A. (2009). Zero-sum world: challenges in conceptualizing environmental load displacement and ecologically unequal exchange in the world system. International Journal of Comparative Sociology 50:237–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. IPCC. (2014). Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Geneva.Google Scholar
  36. Kottak, C. P. (1990). Culture and “Economic Development”. American Anthropologist 92:723–732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Laland, K. N., and O’Brien, M. J. (2010). Niche construction theory and archaeology. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 17:303–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Laland, K. N., Odling-Smee, F. J., and Feldman, M. W. (1996). The evolutionary consequences of niche construction: a theoretical investigation using two-locus theory. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 9:293–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Laska, S., and Morrow, B. H. (2006). Social vulnerabilities and hurricane Katrina: an unnatural disaster in new Orleans. Marine Technology Society Journal 40:16–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Leslie, P., and McCabe, J. T. (2013). Response diversity and resilience in social-ecological systems. Current Anthropology 54:114–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lewontin, R. C. (2001). The triple helix: gene, organism, and environment. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Loring, P. A. (2013). Are we acquiescing to climate change? Social and environmental justice considerations for a changing Arctic. Pages 1–11 In Mueter, F. J., Dickson, D. M. S., Huntington, H. P., Irvine, J. R., Logerwell, E., MacLean, S. A., Quakenbush, L. T., and Rosa, C. (eds.), Responses of Arctic marine ecosystems to climate change. Alaska Sea Grant, University of Alaska Fairbanks.Google Scholar
  43. Loring, P. A., Chapin III, F. S., and Gerlach, S. C. (2008). Ecosystem services and the services-oriented architecture: computational thinking for the diagnosis of change in social ecological systems. Ecosystems 11:478–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Loring, P. A., Gerlach, S. C., Atkinson, D. E., and Murray, M. S. (2011). Ways to help and ways to hinder: governance for successful livelihoods in a changing climate. Arctic 64:73–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Loring, P. A., Gerlach, S. C., and Huntington, H. P. (2013). The new environmental security: linking food, water, and energy for integrative and diagnostic social-ecological research. Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development 3:55–61.Google Scholar
  46. Loring, P. A., Penn, H., Gerlach, S. C., and Schnabel, W. (2015). Challenges to community water security in Bristol Bay: a report on climate change, vulnerability, and community capacity. WERC-HD Occasional Series No. 02, Fairbanks.Google Scholar
  47. Lynch, A., and Brunner, R. (2007). Context and climate change: an integrated assessment for barrow, Alaska. Climatic Change 82:93–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Mathis, J. T., Cooley, S. R., Lucey, N., Colt, S., Ekstrom, J., Hurst, T., Hauri, C., Evans, W., Cross, J. N., and Feely, R. A. (2014). Ocean acidification risk assessment for Alaska’s fishery sector. Progress in Oceanography 136:71–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Mayr, E. (1982). The growth of biological thought: diversity, evolution, and inheritance. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Mayr, E. (1983). How to carry out the adaptationist program? The American Naturalist 121:324–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Mazess, R. B. (1975). Adaptation: a conceptual framework. Pages 9–15 Evolutionary models and studies in human diversity. The Hague, Mouton.Google Scholar
  52. McGowan, K. A., Westley, F., Fraser, E. D. G., Loring, P. A., Weathers, K. C., Avelino, F., Sendzimir, J., Roy Chowdhury, R., and Moore, M.-L. (2014). The research journey: travels across the idiomatic and axiomatic toward a better understanding of complexity. Ecology and Society 19:37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. McGreavy, B. (2015). Resilience as discourse. Environmental Communication 1–18. doi: 10.1080/17524032.2015.1014390.
  54. Moser, S. C. (2009). Good morning, America! The explosive US awakening to the need for adaptation.Google Scholar
  55. Nelson, D. R., West, C. T., and Finan, T. J. (2009). Introduction to “In Focus: Global Change and Adaptation in Local Places”. American Anthropologist 111:271–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Neocleous, M. (2013). Resisting resilience. Radical Philosophy 178:2–7.Google Scholar
  57. Netting, R. M. (1986). Cultural ecology. Waveland Press.Google Scholar
  58. Netting, R. M. (1993). Smallholders, Householders: Farm Families and the Ecology of Intensive, Sustainable Agriculture. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  59. O’Brien, M. J., and Laland, K. N. (2012). Genes, culture, and agriculture: an example of human niche construction. Current Anthropology 53:434–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Odling-Smee, F. J., Laland, K. N., and Feldman, M. W. (1996). Niche construction. The American Naturalist 147:641–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Odling-Smee, F. J., Laland, K. N., and Feldman, M. W. (2003). Niche construction: the neglected process in evolution. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Parenti, C. (2011). Tropic of chaos: climate change and the new geography of violence. Nation Books.Google Scholar
  63. Rappaport, R. A. (1968). Pigs for the ancestors: ritual in the ecology of a new guinea people. Yale University, New Haven.Google Scholar
  64. Rappaport, R. A. (1977). Ecology, Adaptation and the Ills of Functionalism (Being, Among Other Things, A Response to Jonathan Friedman) [pp. 138–190, http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.0522508.0002.002:02]. Michigan Discussions in Anthropology.
  65. Ray-Gadamus, L. (2013). Linkages between human health and ocean health: a participatory climate change vulnerability assessment for marine mammal harvesters. International Journal of Circumpolar Health 72.Google Scholar
  66. Reed, M. S., Fraser, E. D. G., and Dougill, A. J. (2006). An adaptive learning process for developing and applying sustainability indicators with local communities. Ecological Economics 59:406–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Robson, E. (1978). Utiliscation du concept d’odoptation en Anthropologie culturelle. Social Science Information 17:279–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Rowley-Conwy, P., and Layton, R. (2011). Foraging and farming as niche construction: stable and unstable adaptations. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 366:849–862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Schenone, L. (2003). A thousand years over a hot stove: a history of American women told through food, Recipes and Remebrances. W. W. Norton & Company, New York.Google Scholar
  70. Scott, J. C. (1998). Seeing like a state: how certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. Yale University Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
  71. Simpson, G. G. (1967). The meaning of evolution: a study of the history of life and of its significance for man. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  72. Smit, B., and Wandel, J. (2006). Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability. Global Environmental Change 16:282–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Smith, B. D. (2011). General patterns of niche construction and the management of “wild” plant and animal resources by small-scale pre-industrial societies. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 366:836–848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. SNAP. (2014). SNAP Community Charts: Dillingham, Alaska. http://www.snap.uaf.edu/charts.php#community=315.
  75. Stein, D., and Valters, C. (2012). Understanding theory of change in international development.Google Scholar
  76. Thornton, T. F., and Manasfi, N. (2010). Adaptation—genuine and spurious: demystifying adaptation processes in relation to climate change. Environment and Society: Advances in Research 1:132–155.Google Scholar
  77. Tompkins, E. L., and Adger, W. N. (2005). Defining response capacity to enhance climate change policy. Environmental Science & Policy 8:562–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Valters, C. (2014). Theories of change in international development: communication, learning, or accountability? Page 29. The Justice and Security Research Programme, London.Google Scholar
  79. Walker, B., and Salt, D. (2006). Resilience thinking. Island Press, Washington.Google Scholar
  80. Yanarella, E. J., and Levine, R. S. (2014). From sustainability to resilience: advance or retreat? Sustainability: The Journal of Record 7:197–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Philip A. Loring
    • 1
  • S. Craig Gerlach
    • 2
  • Henry J. Penn
    • 3
  1. 1.University of SaskatchewanSaskatoonCanada
  2. 2.Department of Anthropology and ArchaeologyUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryCanada
  3. 3.Water and Environmental Research CenterUniversity of Alaska FairbanksFairbanksUSA

Personalised recommendations