Human Ecology

, Volume 43, Issue 5, pp 669–679 | Cite as

“My garden is the one with no trees:” Residential Lived Experiences of the 2012 Asian Longhorn Beetle Eradication Programme in Kent, England

  • Emily F. Porth
  • Norman DandyEmail author
  • Mariella Marzano


Studies on the management of biosecurity outbreaks have increased in recent years. Whether these outbreaks affect plant, animal, or human health, there is a strong tendency to employ an “emergency modality” management approach which focuses on speedy eradication and containment. However, there is conflict between rapid response management and prescribed best practices for stakeholder engagement. To explore these tensions, we focus on the 2012 Asian longhorn beetle outbreak and eradication programme in Kent, England. Hailed as a success story by policy leaders, this case study is explored using qualitative research with residents who were directly affected by the eradication. By considering the specific impacts of tree health management on a local level, we recommend that outbreak management programmes take an “open” approach (Leach 2010). This includes focusing on good communication and long term democratic engagement, which are crucial for cultivating trust and promoting biosecure citizenship.


Outbreak management Stakeholder engagement Introduced species Tree health Qualitative research Southeastern England 



This research would not have been possible without the residents of Paddock Wood who so generously gave us their time and their stories, and we are sincerely thankful for their participation. We are also grateful for comments and suggestions from Edward Eaton and Chris Quine on early versions of this paper, as well as for the constructive and thoughtful feedback we received from reviewers at Human Ecology. The Department for Food, Environment, and Rural Affairs (Defra) supplied funding for this research as part of the Tree Health and Plant Biosecurity Action Plan (Project TH0107). Please note that the study results expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of funders.


  1. Barker, K. (2010). Biosecure citizenship: politicising symbiotic associations and the construction of biological threat. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 35: 350–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brasier, C. M. (2008). The biosecurity threat to the UK and global environment from international trade in plants. Plant Pathology 57: 792–808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brockerhoff, E. G., Bain, J., Kimberley, M., and Knížek, M. (2006). Interception frequency of exotic bark and ambrosia beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytinae) and relationship with establishment in New Zealand and worldwide. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 36: 289–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Buller, H. (2013). Introducing aliens, reintroducing natives: a conflict of interest for biosecurity. In Dobson, A., Barker, K., and Taylor, S. L. (eds.), Biosecurity: The Socio-Politics of Invasive Species and Infectious Diseases. Routledge, London, pp. 183–198.Google Scholar
  5. Chambers, J., Barker, K., and Rouse, A. (2012). Reflections on the UK’s approach to the 2009 swine flu pandemic: conflicts between national government and local management of the public health response. Health and Place 18: 737–745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chase, L. C., Decker, D. J., and Lauber, T. B. (2004). Public participation in wildlife management: what do stakeholders want? Society and Natural Resources 17: 629–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cheng, A. S., Kruger, L. E., and Daniels, S. E. (2003). “Place” as an integrating concept in natural resource politics: propositions for a social science research agenda. Society & Natural Resources 16(2): 87–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ciesla, W. M. (2011). Forest Entomology: A Global Perspective. Blackwell, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Collier, S. J., and Lakoff, A. (2008). The Problem of Securing Health’ in Biosecurity Interventions: Global Health and Security in Question. Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 7–32.Google Scholar
  10. Corbin, J., and Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Sage, London.Google Scholar
  11. EPPO. (2012). EPPO Technical Document No. 1061, EPPO Study on the Risk of Imports of Plants for Planting. EPPO, Paris,
  12. Flint, C. (2006). Community perspectives on spruce beetle impacts on the Kenai Peninsula, Alaska. Forest Ecology and Management 227: 207–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Flint, C. (2007). Changing forest disturbance regimes and risk perceptions in Homer. Alaska Risk Analysis 27: 1597–1608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gilchrist, V. J., and Williams, R. L. (1999). Key informant interviews. In Crabtree, B. F., and Miller, W. L. (eds.), Doing Qualitative Research, 2nd ed. London, Sage, pp. 73–88.Google Scholar
  15. Haack, R. A., Herard, F., Sun, J., and Turgeon, J. J. (2010). Managing invasive populations of Asian onghorned beetle and citrus longhorned beetle: a worldwide perspective. Annual Review of Entomology 55: 521–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hinchliffe, S., Allen, J., Lavau, S., Bingham, N., and Carter, S. (2012). Biosecurity and the topologies of infected life: from borderlines to borderlands. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 38(4): 531–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hulme, P. E., Bacher, S., Kenis, M., Klotz, S., Kühn, I., Minchin, D., Nentwig, W., Olenin, S., Panov, V., Pergl, J., Pyšek, P., Roques, A., Sol, D., Solarz, W., and Vilà, M. (2008). Grasping at the routes of biological invasions: a framework for integrating pathways into policy. Journal of Applied Ecology 45: 403–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Leach, M., Scoones, I., and Stirling, A. (2010). Governing epidemics in an age of complexity: narratives, politics, and pathways to sustainability. Global Environmental Change 20: 369–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Leibhold, A. M., Brockerhoff, E. G., Garret, L. J., Parke, J. L., and Britton, K. O. (2012). Live plant imports: the major pathway for forest insect and pathogen invasions of the US. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 10(3): 135–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mackenzie, B. F., and Larson, B. M. H. (2010). Participation under time constraints: landowner perceptions of rapid response to the emerald ash borer. Society and Natural Resources 23: 1013–1022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Macleod, A., Evans, H. F., and Baker, R. H. A. (2002). An analysis of pest risk from an Asian longhorn beetle (Anaplophora glabripennis) in the European Community. Crop Protection 21: 635–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mumford, J. (2013). Biosecurity management practices: determining and delivering a response. In Dobson, A., Barker, K., and Taylor, S. L. (eds.), Biosecurity: The Socio-Politics of Invasive Species and Infectious Diseases. Routledge, London, pp. 105–120.Google Scholar
  23. Palmer, S., Martin, D., DeLauer, V., and Rogan, J. (2014). Vulnerability and Adaptive Capacity in Response to the Asian Longhorned Beetle Infestation in Worcester, Massachusetts. Human Ecology, [available online]Google Scholar
  24. Perrings, C., Williamson, M., Barbier, E. B., Delfino, D., Dalmazzone, S., Shogren, J., Simmons, P., and Watkinson, A. (2002). Biological Invasion Risks and the Public Good: an Economic Perspective. Conservation Ecology 6(1): 1.Google Scholar
  25. Reed, M. S. (2008). Stakeholder participation for environmental management: a literature review. Biological Conservation 141(10): 2417–2431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Robson, C. (2002). Real world research, 2nd ed. Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  27. Rodríguez-Labajos, B., Binimelis, R., and Monterroso, I. (2009). Multi-level driving forces of biological invasions. Ecological Economics 69: 63–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Straw, N., and Tilbury, C. (2012). Report on the outbreak of Asian longhorn beetle (Anaplophora glabripennis) at Paddock Wood, Kent, in 2012. Internal report for Forest Research 02/10/2012Google Scholar
  29. USDA. (2005). Addressing the Risks Associated with the Importation of Plants for Planting: A White Paper,
  30. Webber, J. (2010). Pest risk analysis and invasion pathways for plant pathogens. New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science 40: 45–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wynne, B. (1989). Sheepfarming after chernobyl: a case study in communicating scientific information. Environment Science and Policy for Sustainable Development 31(2): 10–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Crown Copyright 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Emily F. Porth
    • 1
  • Norman Dandy
    • 2
    Email author
  • Mariella Marzano
    • 3
  1. 1.Forest ResearchAlice Holt LodgeFarnhamUK
  2. 2.Centre for Rural Policy Research, Department of PoliticsUniversity of ExeterExeterUK
  3. 3.Forest ResearchRoslinUK

Personalised recommendations