“Brasilience:” Assessing Resilience in Land Reform Settlements in the Brazilian Cerrado

Abstract

This study assessed the socioecological resilience of family farms in three land reform settlements in Mato Grosso, Brazil, located in the ecologically threatened Cerrado biome. Using focus groups, a household survey, and analysis of soil samples we characterized farming systems and quantified indicators of resilience, which we contextualized with a qualitative analysis of distributions of power and access to rights and resources. In Mato Grosso, where diversified agriculture is a marginal presence in an industrialized agricultural landscape, none of the communities were achieving participant-defined threshold levels of any measured indicator of resilience. However, farmers who were members of a marketing cooperative selling produce through a federal public procurement program had significantly greater agrobiodiversity, plant-available soil phosphorus, household food self-sufficiency, and access to stable markets. Our pilot study suggests that the convergence of grassroots mobilization and political-institutional change is a central leverage point for developing more resilient food systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

References

  1. Anderies, J. M., Folke, C., Walker, B., and Ostrom, E. (2013). Aligning Key Concepts for Global Change Policy: Robustness, Resilience, and Sustainability. Ecology and Society 18: 8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Astier, M., García-Barrios, L., Galván-Miyoshi, Y., González-Esquivel, C. E., and Masera, O. R. (2012). Assessing the Sustainability of Small Farmer Natural Resource Management Systems. A Critical Analysis of the MESMIS Program (1995–2010). Ecology and Society 17.

  3. Blesh, J., and Drinkwater, L. (2013). The Impact of Nitrogen Source and Crop Rotation on Nitrogen Mass Balances in the Mississippi River Basin. Ecological Applications 23: 1017–1035.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Blesh, J., and Wolf, S. A. (2014). Transitions to Agroecological Farming Systems in the Mississippi River Basin: Toward an Integrated Socioecological Analysis. Agriculture and Human Values 31: 621–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Browder, J. O., Pedlowski, M. A., and Summers, P. M. (2004). Land Use Patterns in the Brazilian Amazon: Comparative Farm-Level Evidence from Rondonia. Human Ecology 32: 197–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Carpenter, S., Walker, B., Anderies, J. M., and Abel, N. (2001). From Metaphor to Measurement: Resilience of What to What? Ecosystems 4: 765–781.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cleveland, C. C., Townsend, A. R., and Schmidt, S. K. (2002). Phosphorus Limitation of Microbial Processes in Moist Tropical Forests: Evidence from Short-Term Laboratory Incubations and Field Studies. Ecosystems 5: 0680–0691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Crutzen, P. J. (2006). The “anthropocene”. In Earth System Science in the Anthropocene: Springer, pp. 13–18.

  9. Davidson, E. A., de Araujo, A. C., Artaxo, P., Balch, J. K., Brown, I. F., Bustamante, M. M. C., et al. (2012). The Amazon Basin in Transition. Nature 481: 321–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Drinkwater, L. E., and Snapp, S. S. (2007). Nutrients in Agroecosystems: Rethinking the Management Paradigm. Advances in Agronomy 92: 163–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Drinkwater, L. E., Schipanski, M., Snapp, S. S., and Jackson, L. E. (2008). Ecologically Based Nutrient Management. In Snapp, S. S., and Pound, B. (eds.), Agricultural Systems: Agroecology and Rural Innovation for Development. Academic, Burlington, MA, pp. 159–208.

    Google Scholar 

  12. FAOSTAT (2014). http://faostat.fao.org August 2014.

  13. Galt, R. E. (2013). Placing Food Systems in First World Political Ecology: a Review and Research Agenda. Geography Compass 7: 637–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gliessman, S. R. (2007). Agroecology: The Ecology of Sustainable Food Systems. CRC Press, Boca Raton.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Goodman, D., Sorj, B., and Wilkinson, J. (1987). From Farming to Biotechnology: A Theory of Agro-industrial Development. Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Graeub, B. E., et al. (2015). The State of Family Farms in the World, World Development. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.05.012.

  17. Gunderson, L. H., and Holling, C. S. (2002). Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Systems of Humans and Nature. Island, Washington.

  18. IBGE (2009). Censo Agropecuário 2006: Brasil, Grandes Regiões e Unidades da Federação. IBGE, Rio de Janiero.

    Google Scholar 

  19. INCRA (2012). Projetos de Reforma Agrária Conforme Fases de Implementação. In: Ministerio de Desenvolvimento Agrícola (MDA); Instituto Nacional de Colonização e Reforma Agrária (INCRA), pp. 1–315.

  20. INMET (2012). Monitoramento das Estações Convencionais. http://www.inmet.gov.br/sim/sonabra/convencionais.php.

  21. Jackson, L. E., Pascual, U., and Hodgkin, T. (2007). Utilizing and Conserving Agrobiodiversity in Agricultural Landscapes. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 121: 196–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Jepson, W. (2006). Private Agricultural Colonization on a Brazilian Frontier, 1970–1980. Journal of Historical Geography 32: 839–863.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kremen, C., and Miles, A. (2012). Ecosystem Services in Biologically Diversified Versus Conventional Farming Systems: Benefits, Externalities, and Trade-Offs. Ecology and Society 17.

  24. Lapola, D. M., Martinelli, L. A., Peres, C. A., Ometto, J. P., Ferreira, M. E., Nobre, C. A., et al. (2014). Pervasive Transition of the Brazilian Land-Use System. Nature Climate Change 4: 27–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lathuillière, M. J., Johnson, M. S., and Donner, S. D. (2012). Water Use by Terrestrial Ecosystems: Temporal Variability in Rainforest and Agricultural Contributions to Evapotranspiration in Mato Grosso, Brazil. Environmental Research Letters 7: 024024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. López-Ridaura, S., Masera, O., and Astier, M. (2002). Evaluating the Sustainability of Complex Socio-Environmental Systems. The Mesmis Framework. Ecological Indicators 2: 135–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Macedo, M. N., DeFries, R. S., Morton, D. C., Stickler, C. M., Galford, G. L., and Shimabukuro, Y. E. (2012). Decoupling of Deforestation and Soy Production in the Southern Amazon During the Late 2000s. PNAS 109: 1341–1346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Marriott, E. E., and Wander, M. (2006). Qualitative and Quantitative Differences in Particulate Organic Matter Fractions in Organic and Conventional Farming Systems. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 38: 1527–1536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Matson, P. A., Parton, W. J., Power, A. G., and Swift, M. J. (1997). Agricultural Intensification and Ecosystem Properties. Science 277: 504–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. McMichael, P. (2009). A Food Regime Genealogy. Journal of Peasant Studies 36: 139–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Myers, N., Mittermeier, R. A., Mittermeier, C. G., Da Fonseca, G. A., and Kent, J. (2000). Biodiversity Hotspots for Conservation Priorities. Nature 403: 853–858.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Ostrom, E. (2009). A General Framework for Analyzing Sustainability of Social-Ecological Systems. Science 325: 419–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Pacheco, P. (2009). Smallholder Livelihoods, Wealth and Deforestation in the Eastern Amazon. Human Ecology 37: 27–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Perfecto, I., Vandermeer, J. H., and Wright, A. L. (2009). Nature’s Matrix: Linking Agriculture, Conservation and Food Sovereignty: Earthscan.

  35. Peterson, G. (2000). Political Ecology and Ecological Resilience: an Integration of Human and Ecological Dynamics. Ecological Economics 35: 323–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Rada, N. (2013). Assessing Brazil’s Cerrado Agricultural Miracle. Food Policy 38: 146–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Rocheleau, D. E. (2008). Political Ecology in the Key of Policy: from Chains of Explanation to Webs of Relation. Geoforum 39: 716–727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Rosset, P. M., and Martínez-Torres, M. E. (2012). Rural Social Movements and Agroecology: Context, Theory, and Process. Ecology and Society 17.

  39. Sauer, S., and Pereira Leite, S. (2012). Agrarian Structure, Foreign Investment in Land, and Land Prices in Brazil. Journal of Peasant Studies 39: 873–898.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Schipanski, M. E., and Drinkwater, L. E. (2010). Nitrogen Fixation of Red Clover Interseeded with Winter Cereals Across a Management-Induced Fertility Gradient. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 90: 105–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Shennan, C. (2008). Biotic Interactions, Ecological Knowledge and Agriculture. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 363: 717–739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Simmons, C., Walker, R., Perz, S., Aldrich, S., Caldas, M., Pereira, R., et al. (2010). Doing it for Themselves: Direct Action Land Reform in the Brazilian Amazon. World Development 38: 429–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Smaling, E., Roscoe, R., Lesschen, J., Bouwman, A., and Comunello, E. (2008). From Forest to Waste: Assessment of the Brazilian Soybean Chain, Using Nitrogen as a Marker. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 128: 185–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Snapp, S., Mafongoya, P., and Waddington, S. (1998). Organic Matter Technologies for Integrated Nutrient Management in Smallholder Cropping Systems of Southern Africa. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 71: 185–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Soares-Filho, B., Rajão, R., Macedo, M., Carneiro, A., Costa, W., Coe, M., et al. (2014). Cracking Brazil’s Forest Code. Science 344: 363–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Tomich, T. P., Brodt, S., Ferris, H., Galt, R., Horwath, W. R., Kebreab, E., et al. (2011). Agroecology: a Review from a Global-Change Perspective. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 36: 193–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Turner, M. D. (2015). Political Ecology II Engagements with Ecology. Progress in Human Geography: 0309132515577025.

  48. VanWey, L. K., Spera, S., de Sa, R., Mahr, D., and Mustard, J. F. (2013). Socioeconomic Development and Agricultural Intensification in Mato Grosso. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 368: 20120168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Vivan, J. L., May, P. H., da Cunha, L. H., de Boef, W. S., and Clement, C. R. (2009). Analysis of Information Used in the Management of Plant Genetic Resources: a Case Study from Northwestern Mato Grosso, Brazil. Agroforestry Systems 76: 591–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Walsh-Dilley, M., Wolford, W., and McCarthy, J. (2013). Rights for Resilience: Bringing Power, Rights and Agency into the Resilience Framework. Prepared for the Strategic Initiative of Oxfam America and the ACSF-Oxfam Rural Resilience Project. Available online: http://www.acsf.cornell.edu/collaborations/oxfam-cu.php.

  51. Wander, M. (2004). Soil Organic Matter Fractions and Their Relevance to Soil Function. Soil Organic Matter in Sustainable Agriculture CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp. 67–102.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Wittman, H. (2009). Reframing Agrarian Citizenship: Land, Life and Power in Brazil. Journal of Rural Studies 25: 120–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Wittman, H. (2010). Agrarian Reform and the Environment: Fostering Ecological Citizenship in Mato Grosso, Brazil. Canadian Journal of Development Studies 29: 281–298.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Wittman, H. (2011). Food Sovereignty: a New Rights Framework for Food and Nature? Environment and Society: Advances in Research 2: 87–105.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Wittman, H., and Blesh, J. (in press). Food Sovereignty and Fome Zero: Connecting Public Food Procurement Programs to Sustainable Rural Development In Brazil. Journal of Agrarian Change.

  56. Wolford, W. (2008). Environmental Justice and the Construction of Scale in Brazilian Agriculture. Society & Natural Resources 21: 641–655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Wolford, W. (2010). This Land is Ours Now: Social Mobilization and the Meanings of Land in Brazil: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Brooke Pian and Johan Oldekop for research assistance, and Ryan Galt and the peer reviewers for comments on the manuscript. We are especially grateful to the farmers who participated in the study. Funding for this research was provided by the National Science Foundation (Blesh, Award # 1064807) and the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jennifer Blesh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Blesh, J., Wittman, H. “Brasilience:” Assessing Resilience in Land Reform Settlements in the Brazilian Cerrado. Hum Ecol 43, 531–546 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-015-9770-0

Download citation

Keywords

  • Agroecology
  • Food sovereignty
  • Brazil
  • Resilience