Household Agrobiodiversity Management on Amazonian Dark Earths, Oxisols, and Floodplain Soils on the Lower Madeira River, Brazil
- 298 Downloads
Smallholder farmers play a critical role in the maintenance of global agrobiodiversity. However, the social and environmental factors that shape agrobiodiversity and its management in rural smallholder communities are still debated among scholars. This study examines variation in the diversity of useful plant species (i.e., species richness) managed by households located in three distinct environments along the Lower Madeira River in the Central Brazilian Amazon: Amazonian Dark Earths (ADE), upland Oxisols (OX), and floodplain soils (FP). Among the 106 households studied, those located on ADE managed a significantly higher number of useful species than those on floodplain soils but not than those on Oxisols. A generalized linear mixed effects model indicates that the age of the household head, number of household members and adults, and area of land under cultivation are statistically significant factors that influence species richness across all households. Ethnographic data are employed to contextualize these findings and discuss other influences on agrobiodiversity management in rural Amazonian communities, including regional historical ecology and the life histories of individual farmers.
KeywordsAgrobiodiversity Species richness Amazonian Dark Earths (ADE) Smallholder agriculture Amazonia Brazil
Research was made possible with the support of a Fulbright-Hays Doctoral Dissertation Research Award for the primary author. Institutional support in Brazil was provided by the National Institute of Amazonian Research (INPA) where the primary author was a visiting scholar in the Botany Department between 2009 and 2010. The research protocol was approved by the University of Florida’s Institutional Review Board (protocol #2009-U- 0539). The authors wish to thank all the interviewees in Borba who spent time talking about the plants they manage. Augusto Oyuela-Caycedo, Mike Heckenberger, Chris McCarty, Marianne Schmink, and Nigel Smith provided useful comments on an early version of the manuscript. Two anonymous reviewers also offered helpful feedback and suggestions. Juliana Lins graciously provided many useful corrections and updates to species names in Table 1. Any errors remain those of the authors alone.
- Balée, W. L. (1994). Footprints of the Forest: Ka’apor Ethnobotany – The Historical Ecology of Plant Utilization by an Amazonian People. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
- Balée, W. L., and Erickson, C. L. (eds.) (2006). Time and Complexity in Historical Ecology: Studies in the Neotropical Lowlands. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
- Bates, D.B., Maechler, M., and Bolker, B. (2011). lme4: Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using S4 Classes. R package version 0.999375-39. Available at: http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4.
- Bernard, H. R. (2011). Research Methods in Anthropology: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches, 5th ed. Altamira Press, Lanham.Google Scholar
- Brondízio, E. S. (2011). Forest Resources, Family Networks and the Municipal Disconnect: Examining Recurrent Underdevelopment in the Amazon Estuary. In Pinedo-Vasquez, M., Ruffino, M. L., Padoch, C., and Brondízio, E. S. (eds.), The Amazon Várzea: The Decade Past and the Decade Ahead. Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 207–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Brush, S. B. (2008). Farmers’ Bounty: Locating Crop Diversity in the Contemporary World. Yale University Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
- Cavalcante, P. B. (1991). Frutas Comestíveis da Amazônia. Edições CEJUP, Belém.Google Scholar
- Chayanov, A. V. (1966). The Theory of Peasant Economy. American Economic Association, Homewood.Google Scholar
- Chibnik, M. (1994). Risky Rivers: The Economics and Politics of Floodplain Farming in Amazonia. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
- Clement, C. R. (1999). 1492 and the Loss of Amazonian Crop Diversity. I. The Relation Between Domestication and Human Population Decline. Economic Botany 53: 12–25.Google Scholar
- Clement, C. R., Klüppel, M. P., German, L. A., Almeida, S. S., Major, J., Aragão, L. E. O. C., Guix, J. C., Lleras, E., WinklerPrins, A. M. G. A., Hecht, S. B., and McCann, J. M. (2009). Diversidade Vegetal em Solos Antrópicos da Amazônia. In Teixeira, W. G., Kern, D. C., Madari, B. E., Lima, H. N., and Woods, W. I. (eds.), As Terras Pretas de Índio da Amazônia: Sua Caracterização e Uso deste Conhecimento na Criação de Novas Áreas. Embrapa Amazônia Ocidental, Manaus, pp. 147–161.Google Scholar
- Clement, C. R., McCann, J. M., and Smith, N. J. H. (2003). Agrobiodiversity in Amazônia and its Relationship with Dark Earths. In Kern, D. C., Lehmann, J., Glaser, B., and Woods, W. I. (eds.), Amazonian Dark Earths: Origins Properties and Management. Kluwer Press, Dordrecht, pp. 159–178.Google Scholar
- Denevan, W. M. (1984). Ecological Heterogeneity and Horizontal Zonation of Agriculture in the Amazon Floodplain. In Schmink, M., and Wood, C. H. (eds.), Frontier Expansion in Amazonia. University Press of Florida, Gainesville, pp. 311–336.Google Scholar
- Fraser, J. A., Alves-Pereira, A., Junqueira, A. B., Peroni, N., and Clement, C. R. (2012). Convergent Adaptations: Bitter Manioc Cultivation Systems in Fertile Anthropogenic Dark Earths and Floodplain Soils in Central Amazonia. PLoS One 7(8): e43636 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0043636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gelman, A. (2008). Scaling Regression Inputs by Dividing by Two Standard Deviations. Statistics in Medicine 27(15): 2865–2873.Google Scholar
- Gelman, A., and Hill, J. (2007). Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
- German, L. A. (2003). Ethnoscientific Understandings of Amazonian Dark Earths. In Lehmann, J., Kern, D. C., Glaser, B., and Woods, W. I. (eds.), Amazonian Dark Earths: Origin, Properties Management. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 179–201.Google Scholar
- Hiraoka, M., Yamamoto, S., Matsumoto, E., Nakamura, S., Falesi, I. C., and Baena, A. R. C. (2003). Contemporary Use and Management of Amazonian Dark Earths. In Lehmann, J., Kern, D. C., Glaser, B., and Woods, W. I. (eds.), Amazonian Dark Earths: Origin, Properties Management. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 395–396.Google Scholar
- Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (IBGE). (2010). Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics, Rio de Janeiro. Available at: http://www.ibge.br.gov.
- Junqueira, A. B., Shepard Jr., G. H., and Clement, C. R. (2010). Secondary Forests on Anthropogenic Soils in Brazilian Amazonia Conserve Agrobiodiversity. Biodiversity and Conservation 19(7): 1933–1961.Google Scholar
- Kumar, B. M., and Nair, P. K. R. (2004). The Enigma of Tropical Homegardens. Agroforestry Systems 61: 135–152.Google Scholar
- Lima, D. M. (2004). ‘The roça legacy’: Land Use and Kinship Dynamics in Nogueira, an Amazonian Community of the mIddle Solimões Region. In Nugent, S., and Harris, M. (eds.), Some Other Amazonians: Perspectives on Modern Amazonia. Institute for the Study of the Americas, London, pp. 12–36.Google Scholar
- Moran, E. F. (1993). Through Amazonian Eyes: The Human Ecology of Amazonian Populations. University of Iowa Press, Iowa City.Google Scholar
- Padoch, C. (1999). Varzea: Diversity, Development, and Conservation of Amazonia’s Whitewater Floodplains. New York Botanical Garden Press, New York.Google Scholar
- R Core Team. (2013). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. Available at: http://www.R-project.org/.
- Thrupp, L. A. (2002). Linking Agricultural Biodiversity and Food Security: the Valuable Role of Agrobiodiversity for Sustainable Agriculture. International Affairs 76: 265–281.Google Scholar