Applying a Social-Ecological System Framework to the Study of the Taos Valley Irrigation System
This paper applies a social-ecological system (SES) framework to the analysis of a SES in the Taos valley of northern New Mexico. The SES analyzed is a set of interconnected irrigation communities known as acequias. These have persisted in the area for several hundred years. In this paper I combine concepts from multi-level governance, social network analysis, and interconnected action situations to diagnose the factors that have enabled the acequias to maintain the levels of cooperation needed to persist as farming communities in a high desert environment. To conduct this research, interview data were collected on-site to complement existing court testimonies and other relevant primary and secondary data. These data were analyzed via a step-wise diagnostic process that is inspired by the SES framework and used to illustrate how the acequias form a multilevel governance system via key network attributes, and how this governance structure maps onto the resource system while not overburdening the participants and providing sufficient benefits to motivate continued cooperation over time.
KeywordsSocial-ecological systems Acequias Irrigation Diagnosis New Mexico Institutions
- Barabasi, A.-L. (2002). Linked: The New Science of Networks. Perseus, Cambridge.Google Scholar
- Barroll, P., and Burck, P. (2006). Documentation of OSE Taos Area Calibrated Groundwater Flow Model T17.0. New Mexico Office of the State Engineer Water Resource Allocation Program, Technical Services Division, Santa Fe.Google Scholar
- Baxter, J. (1997). Dividing New Mexico’s Waters: 1700–1912. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
- Berkes, F. (2007). Commons in a Multi-level World. International Journal of the Commons 2(1): 1–6.Google Scholar
- Coward, W. (1979). Principles of Social Organization in an Indigenous Irrigation System. Human Organization 38(1): 28–36.Google Scholar
- Cox, M., Arnold, G., and Villamayor-Tomas, S. (2010). A Review of Design Principles for Community-Based Natural Resource Management. Ecology and Society 15(4). [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss4/art38/.
- Crawford, S. (1988). Mayordomo: Chronicle of an Acequia in Northern New Mexico. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
- Drakos, P., Lazarus, J., White, B., Banet, C., Hodgins, M., Riesterer, J., and Sandoval, J. (2004). Hydrologic characteristics of basin-fill aquifers in the Southern San Luis Basin, New Mexico. In Brister, B., Bauer, P. W., Read, A. S., and Leuth, V. W. (eds.), New Mexico Geological Society Fall Field Conference Guidebook - 55 Geology of the Taos Region. Starline Printing, Albuquerque, pp. 391–404.Google Scholar
- Gibson, C., McKean, M., and Ostrom, E. (2000). People and Forests: Communities, Institutions, and Governance. MIT Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
- Janssen, M., Bodin, O., Anderies, J. M., Elmqvist, T., Ernston, H., McAllister, R. R. J., …. Ryan, P. (2006). Toward a Network Perspective of the Study of Resilience in Social-Ecological Systems. Ecology and Society 11(1). [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art15/.
- Jones, B. (2001). Politics and the Architecture of Choice: Bounded Rationality and Governance. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
- King, G., Koehane, R., and Verba, S. (1994). Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
- McCay, B. (1996). Common and private concerns. In Hanna, S., Folke, C., and Maler, K.-G. (eds.), Rights to Nature: Ecological, Economic, Culture, and Political Principles of Institutions for the Environment. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp. 111–126.Google Scholar
- Ostrom, E. (2005). Understanding Institutional Diversity. Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
- Ostrom, E., Gardner, R., and Walker, J. (1994). Rules, Games, and Common-Pool Resources. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
- Poteete, A. R., Janssen, M. A., and Ostrom, E. (2010). Working Together: Collective Action, the Commons, and Multiple Methods in Practice. Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
- Rivera, J. (1998). Acequia Culture: Water, Land, and Community in the Southwest. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
- Rodriguez, S. (2007). Acequia: Water-sharing, Sanctity, and Place. School for Advanced Research Press, Santa Fe.Google Scholar
- Schlager, E. (1990). Model Specification and Policy Analysis: The Governance of Coastal Fisheries. PhD Dissertation. Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana.Google Scholar
- Shivakoti, G. P., and Ostrom, E. (2002). Improving Irrigation Governance and Management in Nepal. ICS Press, San Francisco.Google Scholar
- Siy, R. (1982). Community Resource Management: Lessons from the Zanjera. University of Philippines Press, Quezon City.Google Scholar
- Tang, S. Y. (1992). Institutions and Collective Action: Self Governance in Irrigation. ICS Press, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
- United States Geological Survey (USGS) (2010). Streamgage Data. Retrieved August 15, 2010 http://waterdata.usgs.gov/nwis/nwisman.
- Wollenberg, E., Merino, L., Agrawal, A., and Ostrom, E. (2007). Fourteen Years of Monitoring Community-Managed Forests: Learning from IFRI’s Experience. International Forestry Review 9(2):670–684.Google Scholar