Human Ecology

, Volume 42, Issue 2, pp 311–324 | Cite as

Applying a Social-Ecological System Framework to the Study of the Taos Valley Irrigation System

Article

Abstract

This paper applies a social-ecological system (SES) framework to the analysis of a SES in the Taos valley of northern New Mexico. The SES analyzed is a set of interconnected irrigation communities known as acequias. These have persisted in the area for several hundred years. In this paper I combine concepts from multi-level governance, social network analysis, and interconnected action situations to diagnose the factors that have enabled the acequias to maintain the levels of cooperation needed to persist as farming communities in a high desert environment. To conduct this research, interview data were collected on-site to complement existing court testimonies and other relevant primary and secondary data. These data were analyzed via a step-wise diagnostic process that is inspired by the SES framework and used to illustrate how the acequias form a multilevel governance system via key network attributes, and how this governance structure maps onto the resource system while not overburdening the participants and providing sufficient benefits to motivate continued cooperation over time.

Keywords

Social-ecological systems Acequias Irrigation Diagnosis New Mexico Institutions 

References

  1. Agrawal, A. (2001). Common Property Institutions and Sustainable Governance of Resources. World Development 29(10): 1649–1672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agrawal, A. (2003). Sustainable Governance of Common-pool resources: Context, Methods, and Politics. Annual Review of Anthropology 32: 243–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderies, J. M., and Janssen, M. (2011). The Fragility of Robust Social-Ecological Systems. Global Environmental Change 21(4): 1153–1156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barabasi, A.-L. (2002). Linked: The New Science of Networks. Perseus, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  5. Barroll, P., and Burck, P. (2006). Documentation of OSE Taos Area Calibrated Groundwater Flow Model T17.0. New Mexico Office of the State Engineer Water Resource Allocation Program, Technical Services Division, Santa Fe.Google Scholar
  6. Baxter, J. (1997). Dividing New Mexico’s Waters: 1700–1912. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
  7. Berkes, F. (2007). Commons in a Multi-level World. International Journal of the Commons 2(1): 1–6.Google Scholar
  8. Bodin, O., and Crona, B. (2008). Management of Natural Resources at the Community Level: Exploring the Role of Social Capital and Leadership in a Rural Fishing community. World Development 36(12): 2763–2779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brondizio, E., Ostrom, E., and Young, O. (2009). Connectivity and the Governance of Multilevel Social-Ecological Systems: The Role Of Social Capital. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 34: 253–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Coward, W. (1977). Irrigation Management Alternatives: Themes from Indigenous Irrigation Systems. Agricultural Administration 4(3): 223–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Coward, W. (1979). Principles of Social Organization in an Indigenous Irrigation System. Human Organization 38(1): 28–36.Google Scholar
  12. Cox, M., and Ross, J. (2011). Robustness and Vulnerability of Community Irrigation Systems: The Case of the Taos Valley Acequias. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 61(3): 254–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cox, M., Arnold, G., and Villamayor-Tomas, S. (2010). A Review of Design Principles for Community-Based Natural Resource Management. Ecology and Society 15(4). [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss4/art38/.
  14. Crawford, S. (1988). Mayordomo: Chronicle of an Acequia in Northern New Mexico. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
  15. Drakos, P., Lazarus, J., White, B., Banet, C., Hodgins, M., Riesterer, J., and Sandoval, J. (2004). Hydrologic characteristics of basin-fill aquifers in the Southern San Luis Basin, New Mexico. In Brister, B., Bauer, P. W., Read, A. S., and Leuth, V. W. (eds.), New Mexico Geological Society Fall Field Conference Guidebook - 55 Geology of the Taos Region. Starline Printing, Albuquerque, pp. 391–404.Google Scholar
  16. Fernald, S., and Guldan, S. (2006). Surface-Groundwater Interactions Between Irrigation Ditches, Alluvial Aquifers, and Streams. Reviews in Fisheries Science 14: 79–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fernald, S., Baker, T. T., and Guldan, S. (2007). Hydrologic, Riparian, and Agroecosystem Functions of Traditional Acequia Irrigation systems. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 30(2): 147–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Geertz, C. (1959). Form and Variation in Balinese Village Structure. American Anthropologist 61(6): 991–1012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gibson, C., McKean, M., and Ostrom, E. (2000). People and Forests: Communities, Institutions, and Governance. MIT Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  20. Janssen, M., Bodin, O., Anderies, J. M., Elmqvist, T., Ernston, H., McAllister, R. R. J., …. Ryan, P. (2006). Toward a Network Perspective of the Study of Resilience in Social-Ecological Systems. Ecology and Society 11(1). [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art15/.
  21. Jones, B. (2001). Politics and the Architecture of Choice: Bounded Rationality and Governance. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  22. King, G., Koehane, R., and Verba, S. (1994). Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
  23. Lam, W. F. (2001). Coping With Change: A Study of Local Irrigation Institutions in Taiwan. World Development 29(9): 1569–1592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lauber, B. L., Decker, D., and Knuth, B. (2008). Social Networks in Community-Based Natural Resource Management. Environmental Management 42(4): 677–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McCay, B. (1996). Common and private concerns. In Hanna, S., Folke, C., and Maler, K.-G. (eds.), Rights to Nature: Ecological, Economic, Culture, and Political Principles of Institutions for the Environment. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp. 111–126.Google Scholar
  26. McGinnis, M. (2011). Networks of Adjacent Action Situations in Polycentric Governance. Policy Studies Journal 39(1): 51–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ostrom, E. (2005). Understanding Institutional Diversity. Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
  29. Ostrom, E. (2007). A Diagnostic Approach for Going Beyond Panaceas. PNAS 104(39): 15181–15187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ostrom, E. (2009). A General Framework for Analyzing Sustainability of Social-Ecological Systems. Science 325: 419–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ostrom, E., Gardner, R., and Walker, J. (1994). Rules, Games, and Common-Pool Resources. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
  32. Poteete, A. R., and Ostrom, E. (2004). Heterogeneity, Group Size and Collective Action: The Role of Institutions in Forest Management. Development and Change 35(3): 435–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Poteete, A. R., Janssen, M. A., and Ostrom, E. (2010). Working Together: Collective Action, the Commons, and Multiple Methods in Practice. Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
  34. Rivera, J. (1998). Acequia Culture: Water, Land, and Community in the Southwest. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
  35. Rodriguez, S. (2007). Acequia: Water-sharing, Sanctity, and Place. School for Advanced Research Press, Santa Fe.Google Scholar
  36. Schlager, E. (1990). Model Specification and Policy Analysis: The Governance of Coastal Fisheries. PhD Dissertation. Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana.Google Scholar
  37. Schneider, M., Scholz, J., Lubell, M., Mindruta, D., and Edwardsen, M. (2003). The Performance of Policy Networks: The Relation between Network Structure and Network Performance. American Journal of Political Science 47: 143–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Shivakoti, G. P., and Ostrom, E. (2002). Improving Irrigation Governance and Management in Nepal. ICS Press, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  39. Siy, R. (1982). Community Resource Management: Lessons from the Zanjera. University of Philippines Press, Quezon City.Google Scholar
  40. Tang, S. Y. (1992). Institutions and Collective Action: Self Governance in Irrigation. ICS Press, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
  41. Trawick, P. (2001). Successfully Governing the Commons: Principles of Social Organization in an Andean Irrigation System. Human Ecology 29(1): 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tucker, C., Randolph, J., and Castellanos, E. (2007). Institutions, Biophysical Factors and History: An Integrative Analysis of Private and Common Property Forests in Guatemala and Honduras. Human Ecology 35(3): 259–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. United States Geological Survey (USGS) (2010). Streamgage Data. Retrieved August 15, 2010 http://waterdata.usgs.gov/nwis/nwisman.
  44. Wollenberg, E., Merino, L., Agrawal, A., and Ostrom, E. (2007). Fourteen Years of Monitoring Community-Managed Forests: Learning from IFRI’s Experience. International Forestry Review 9(2):670–684.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dartmouth CollegeHanoverUSA

Personalised recommendations