Advertisement

Human Ecology

, Volume 42, Issue 2, pp 167–181 | Cite as

Fragmentation, Cooperation and Power: Institutional Dynamics in Natural Resource Governance in North-Western Namibia

  • Michael Bollig
  • Diego A. Menestrey Schwieger
Article

Abstract

Contemporary theoretical accounts of common pool resource management assume that communities are able to develop institutions for sustainable resource management if they are given security of access and appropriate rights of management. In recent years comprehensive legal reforms of communal rural resource management in Namibia have sought to create an institutional framework linking the sustainable use of natural resources (game, water, forest) and rural development. The state, however, ceded rights to rural communities in an ambiguous and fragmented manner, creating a number of instances of overlapping property rights and different legal conditions for different natural resources. Nowadays communities grapple with the challenge of developing institutions for these resource-centered “new commons”. This paper describes the process of local institutional development, focusing on the challenges arising from the necessity to define group boundaries, the issues arising from monitoring and sanctioning within newly defined institutions, and the ideological underpinnings of different trajectories of communal resource management.

Keywords

Common pool resource management Conservation Water-management Namibia Pastoralists 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank. M. Schnegg, Th. Kelbert, K. Gradt, T. Linke from the LINGS Project, and a group of colleagues from the Institute of Social and Cultural Anthropology at the University of Cologne for commenting on previous versions of this text. We also thank two anonymous reviewers whose comments helped to improve the paper significantly. Research in northern Namibia was sponsored by the German Research Council and VW Foundation.

References

  1. Acheson, J. M. (2006). Institutional Failure in Resource Management. Annual Review of Anthropology 35: 117–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agrawal, A. (2003). Sustainable Governance of Common-Pool Resources: Context, Methods, Politics. Annual Review of Anthropology 32: 243–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Agrawal, A., and Gibson, C. C. (1999). Enchantment and Disenchantment: The Role of Community in Natural Resource Conservation. World Development 27: 629–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baland, J. M., and Platteau, J. P. (1996). Halting Degradation of Natural Resources. Is There a Role for Rural Communities? Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  5. Barnes, J., Macgrego, J., and Weaver, C. (2002). Economic Efficiency and Incentives for Change Within Namibia’s Community Wildlife Use Initiatives. World Development 30: 667–681.Google Scholar
  6. Barr, A. (2003). Trust and Expected Trustworthiness: Experimental Evidence from Zimbabwean Villages. Economic Journal 113: 614–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blaikie, P. (2006). “Is Small Really Beautiful?” Community-Based Natural Resource Management in Malawi and Botswana. World Development 34: 1942–1957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bollig, M. (1998). Framing Kaokoland. In Hayes, P., and Sylvester, J. (eds.), The Colonising Camera: Photographs in the Making of Namibian History. Ohio University Press, Athens, pp. 167–170.Google Scholar
  9. Bollig, M. (2006). Risk Management in a Hazardous Environment. A Comparative Study of Two Pastoral Societies. Springer, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bollig, M. (2013). Social-ecological change and institutional development in a pastoral community in north-western Namibia. In Bollig, M., Wotzka, H. P., and Schnegg, M. (eds.), Pastoralism in Africa. Past, Present and Futures. Berghahn, London, pp. 316–340.Google Scholar
  11. Bollig, M., and Schulte, A. (1999). Environmental Change and Pastoral Perceptions: Degradation and Indigenous Knowledge in Two African Pastoral Communities. Human Ecology 27: 493–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bollig, M., and Wirtz, K. (2012). The Impact of CBNRM Activities of Rural Livelihoods in Namibia’s Kunene Region. Evaluation Report to EED. Manuscript.Google Scholar
  13. Brown, C. (2011a). Analysis of Human-Wildlife Conflict in the MCA-Supported Conservancies for the Five-Year Period of 2006–2010. Namibia Nature Foundation, Windhoek.Google Scholar
  14. Brown, C. (2011b). An Analysis of Human Wildlife Conflict in the ≠ Khoadi//Hoas Conservancy for the Period 2007 to June 2011. Namibia Nature Foundation, Windhoek.Google Scholar
  15. Coleman, E. A., and Steed, B. (2009). Monitoring and Sanctioning in the Commons: An Application to Forestry. Ecological Economics 68(7): 2106–2113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Davis, A. (2008). Namibia’s Communal Conservancies: A Review of Progress and Challenges in 2007. NACSO, Windhoek.Google Scholar
  17. de Vette, M., Kashulu, R., and Hebinck, P. (2012). Conservancies in Namibia: a discourse in action. In Arts, B., van Bommel, S., Ros-Tonen, M., and Verschoor, G. (eds.), Forest-People Interfaces. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, pp. 121–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. DRWS (Directorate of Rural Water Supply). (2004). 10 Years Directorate of Rural Water Supply. Windhoek.Google Scholar
  19. Fabricius, C., and Collins, S. (2007). Community-Based Natural Resource Management: Governing the Commons. Water Policy 9(2): 83–97.Google Scholar
  20. Fabricius, C., Koch, E., Magome, H., and Turner, S. (2004). Rights, Resources, & Rural Development: Community-Based Natural Resource Management in Southern Africa. Cromwell Press, London.Google Scholar
  21. Falk, T., Bock, B., and Kirk, M. (2009). Polycentrism and Poverty: Experiences of Rural Water Supply Reform in Namibia. Water Alternatives 2(1): 115–137.Google Scholar
  22. Fehr, E., and Schmidt, K. M. (1999). A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation. Quarterly Journal of Economics 114: 817–868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Friedman, J. T. (2011). Imagining the Post-Apartheid State: An Ethnographic Account of Namibia. Berghahn Publishers, New York.Google Scholar
  24. Galvin, K. (2009). Transitions: Pastoralists Living with Change. Annual Review in Anthropology 38: 185–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ghate, R., and Nagendra, H. (2005). Role of Monitoring in Institutional Performance: Forest Management in Maharashtra, India. Conservation and Society 3: 509–532.Google Scholar
  26. Haller, T., Galvin, M., Meroka, P., Alca, J., and Alvarez, A. (2008). “Who Gains from Community Conservation?” Intended and Unintended Costs and Benefits of Participative Approaches in Peru and Tanzania. Journal of Environment and Development 17(2): 118–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Harring, S., and Odendaal, W. (2012). God Stopped Making Land! Land Rights, Conflict and Law in Namibia’s Caprivi Region. John Meinert Printing, Windhoek.Google Scholar
  28. Henrich, J., McElreath, R., Barr, A., Ensminger, J., Barret, C., Bolyanatz, A., Cardenas, J. C., Gurven, M., Gwako, E., Henrich, N., Lesorogol, C., Marlowe, F., Tracer, D., and Ziker, J. (2006). Costly Punishment Across Human Societies. Science 312(5781): 1767–1770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Heyns, P. (2005). Water Institutional Reforms in Namibia. Water Policy 7: 89–106.Google Scholar
  30. Hohmann, T. (2004). Transformationen Kommunalen Ressourcenmanagements im Tsumkwe Distrikt (Nordost-Namibia). Univ. Mag, Köln.Google Scholar
  31. Hoole, A. (2010). Place-Power-Prognosis: Community-Based Conservation, Partnerships and Ecotourism in Namibia. International Journal of the Commons 4: 78–99.Google Scholar
  32. Hoole, A., and Berkes, F. (2010). Breaking Down Fences: Recoupling Social-Ecological Systems for Biodiversity Conservation in Namibia. Geoforum 41: 304–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jones, B. T. B. (1999). Policy Lessons from the Evolution of a Community-Based Approach to Wildlife Management, Kunene Region, Namibia. Journal of International Development 11: 295–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jones, B. T. B. (2001). The evolution of policy on community conservation in Namibia and Zimbabwe. In Hulme, D., and Murphree, M. (eds.), African Wildlife and Livelihoods: The Promise and Performance of Community Conservation. James Currey, Oxford, pp. 38–58.Google Scholar
  35. Jones, B. T. B., Long, S. A., Vaughan, C., Murphy, C., Katjiua, J. B., and Mulonga, S. (2002). Wildlife, Tourism and Livelihoods in Namibia: A Summary of Preliminary Findings of the Project up to end August 2002. WILD Working Paper No. 20. Namibia, Windhoek.Google Scholar
  36. Kirk, M., Prediger, S., Falk, T., and Vollan, B. (2010). Resource Tenure Reforms, Preferences and Enforcement Mechanisms: Evidence on User Cooperation in Namibia. Paper presented at the annual World Bank conference “Land policy and administration”, Washington D.C., 26–27 April, 2010.Google Scholar
  37. Leslie, P., and McCabe, J. T. (2013). Response Diversity and Resilience in Social-Ecological Systems. Current Anthropology 54: 114–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Moir, R. (2008). Spies and swords: behaviour in environments with costly monitoring and sanctioning. In Cherry, T., Kroll, S., and Shogren, J. (eds.), Environmental Economics, Experimental Methods. Abingdon, Routledge, pp. 212–233.Google Scholar
  39. NACSO (The Namibian Association of Community Based Natural Resource Management Support Organisations). (2007). Namibia’s Communal Conservancies. A Review of Progress and Challenges in 2007. Windhoek.Google Scholar
  40. NACSO (The Namibian Association of Community Based Natural Resource Management Support Organisations). (2010). Namibia’s Communal Conservancies. A Review of Progress. Windhoek.Google Scholar
  41. NACSO (The Namibian Association of Community Based Natural Resource Management Support Organisations). (2011). Conservation and the Environment in Namibia. 2010/11. Namibia’s Communal Conservancy Sector. Windhoek.Google Scholar
  42. Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge University Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ostrom, E. (2002). Common-Pool Resources and Institutions: Toward a Revised Theory. In Gardner, B., and Rauser, G. (eds.), Handbook of Agricultural Economics, Volume 2A. Rausser Gordon C.. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 1315–1339.Google Scholar
  44. Owen-Smith, G. (2010). An Arid Eden. A Personal Account of Conservation in the Kaokoveld. Jonathan Ball Publishers, Johannerburg.Google Scholar
  45. Poteete, A. R., and Ostrom, E. (2004). Heterogeneity, Group Size and Collective Action: The Role of Institutions in Forest Management. Development and Change 35(3): 435–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Republic of Namibia. (1990). The Constitution of the Republic of Namibia. Windhoek.Google Scholar
  47. Republic of Namibia. (1996). Nature Conservation Amendment Act No. 5, 1996 (Act 5 of 1996). Windhoek.Google Scholar
  48. Republic of Namibia. (2000). Standard Constitution of Water Point Association. Ministry of Agriculture, Water and Rural Development. Directorate of Rural Water Supply. Windhoek.Google Scholar
  49. Republic of Namibia. (2004). 2004. Water Resources Management Act No. 24. Windhoek.Google Scholar
  50. Rizzo, L. (2010). Gender and Colonialism: A History of Kaoko in North-Western Namibia, 1870s–1950s. Basler Afrika Bibliographien, Basel.Google Scholar
  51. Roe, D., Nelson, F., and Sandbrook, C. (eds.) (2009). Community Management of Natural Resources in Africa: Impacts, Experiences and Future Directions. Natural Resource Issues No. 18. International Institute for Environment and Development, London.Google Scholar
  52. Rustagi, D., Engel, S., and Kosfeld, M. (2010). Conditional Cooperation and Costly Monitoring Explain Success in Forest Commons Management. Science 330(6006): 961–965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sefton, M., Shupp, R., and Walker, J. (2007). The Effect of Rewards and Sanctions in Provision of Public Goods. Economic Inquiry 45(4): 671–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Silva, J. A., and Mosimane, A. W. (2013). Conservation-Based Development in Namibia: A Mixed Methods Assessment of Economic Benefits. Journal of Environment & Development 22: 25–50.Google Scholar
  55. Smith, P. D., and McDonough, M. H. (2001). Beyond Public Participation: Fairness in Natural Resource Decision Making. Society and Natural Resources 14: 239–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Song, Z., Ouyang, Z., and Xu, W. (2012). The Role of Fairness Norms the Household-Based Natural Forest Conservation: The Case of Wolong, China. Ecological Economics 84(1): 164–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Suich, H. (2009). Livelihood Impacts of CBNRM and Related Activities in IRDNC Target Areas. A Meta-Synthesis. Manuscript. IRDNC, Windhoek.Google Scholar
  58. Sullivan, S. (2002). “How sustainable is the communalizing discource of ‘new’ conservation?” the masking of difference, inequality and aspiration in the fledgling ‘conservancies’ of Namibia. In Catty, D., and Colchester, M. (eds.), Conservation and Mobile Indigenous Peoples: Displacement, Forced Settlement and Conservation. Berghahn Press, Oxford, pp. 158–187.Google Scholar
  59. Sutter, M., Haigner, S., and Kocher, M. G. (2010). “Choosing the Carrot or the Stick?” Endogenous Institutional Choice in Social Dilemma Situations. Review of Economic Studies 77: 1540–1566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Van Wolputte, S. (2007). Cattle Works: Livestock Policy, Apartheid and Development in Northwest Namibia, c. 1920–1980. African Studies 66(1): 103–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Social and Cultural Anthropology, University of CologneKoelnGermany

Personalised recommendations