Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Understanding of Biodiversity Among Western Canadian University Students

  • Published:
Human Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  • Brock, W., and Xepapadeas, A. (2003). Valuing Biodiversity from an Economic Perspective: A Unified Economic, Ecological, and Genetic Approach. The American Economic Review 93: 1597–1614 doi:10.1257/000282803322655464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buijs, A. E., Fischer, A., Rink, D., and Young, J. C. (2008). Looking Beyond Superficial Knowledge Gaps: Understanding Public Representations of Biodiversity. International Journal of Biodiversity Science and Management 4: 65–80 doi:10.3843/Biodiv.4.2:1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butchart, S. H. M., Walpole, M., Collen, B., van Strien, A., Scharlemann, J. P. W., Almond, R. E. A., et al. (2010). Global Biodiversity: Indictators of Recent Declines. Science 328: 1164–1168 doi:10.1126/science.1187512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cakir, M., Irez, S., and Dogan, O.-K. (2010). Understandings of Current Environmental Sigues: Turkish Case Study in Six Teacher Education Colleges. Educational Studies 36: 21–33 doi:10.1080/03055690903148522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carey, S. (1986). Cognitive Science and Science Education. American Psychologist 41(10): 1123–1130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christie, M., Hanley, N., Warren, J., Murphy, K., Wright, R., and Hyde, T. (2006). Valuing the Diversity of Biodiversity. Ecological Economics 58: 304–317 doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.07.034.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, J., Newstead, S., and Byrne, R. (1993). Human Reasoning: The Psychology of Deduction. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, A., and Young, J. (2007). Understanding Mental Constructs of Biodiversity: Implications for Biodiversity Management and Conservation. Biological Conservation 136: 271–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleisig, D. (2011). Adding Information may Increase Overconfidence in Accuracy of Knowledge Retrieval. Psychological Reports 108: 379–392 doi:10.2466/04.11.23.PR0.108.2.379-392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammermeister, A., Gauthier, D., and McGovern, K. (2001). Saskatchewan’s Native Prairie: Statistics of a Vanishing Ecosystem and Dwindling Resource. Native Plant Society of Saskatchwan Inc, Saskatoon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herriot, T. (2009). Grass, Sky, Song: Promise and Peril in World of Grassland Birds. HarperCollins, Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooper, D., Chapin, F., Ewel, J., Hector, A., Inchausti, P., Lavorel, S., … Wardle, D. (2005). Effects of Biodiversity on Ecosystem Functioning. Ecological Monographs, 75: 3–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, L. M., and Brehm, L. (2003). Qualitative Insight into Public Knowledge of, and Concern with, Biodiversity. Human Ecology 31: 309–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson-Laird, P., and Byrne, R. (1991). Deduction. Erlbaum, Hillsdale.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay, J.J., and Foster, J. (1999). About teaching systems thinking. In Savage, G., and Roe, P. (eds.), Proceedings of the HKK conference, 14–16 June, 1999, University of Waterloo, ON, p. 615–172. Retrieved April 18, 2012 from http://www.trinitiesofwisdom.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/How-to-teach1.pdf.

  • Ke Chung, K. (1993). Biodiversity, Conservation, and Inventory: Why Insects Matter. Biodiversity and Conservation 2: 191–214 doi:10.1007/BF00056668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ke Chung, K., and Byrne, L. (2006). Biodiversity Loss and the Taxonomic Bottleneck: Emerging Biodiversity Science. Ecological Research 21(6): 794–810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindemann-Matthies, P. (2005). Loveable Mammals and Lifeless Plants: How Children’s Interest in Common Local Organisms can be Enhanced through Observation of Nature. International Journal of Science Education 27: 655–677 doi:10.1080/09500690500038116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindemann-Matthies, P., and Bose, E. (2008). How Many Species are There? Public Understanding and Awareness of Biodiversity in Switzerland. Human Ecology 36: 731–742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindemann-Matthies, P., and Kamer, T. (2006). The Influence of an Interactive Educational Approach on Visitors’ Learning in a Swiss Zoo. Science Education 90: 296–315 doi:10.1002/sce.20127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacDougall, A. S., McCann, K. S., Gellner, G., and Turkington, R. (2013). Diversity Loss with Persistent Human Disturbance Increases Vulnerability to Ecosystem Collapse. Nature 494: 86–89 doi:10.1038/nature11869.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, T. M., and Geraci, L. (2011). Unskilled but Aware: Reinterpreting Overconfidence in Low-performing Students. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 37: 502–506 doi:10.1037/a0021802.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, C., and Keil, F. (2004). Knowing the Limits of One’s Understanding: The Development of an Awareness of an Illusion of Explanatory Depth. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 87: 1–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, M. G., Fischhoff, B., Bostrom, A., and Atman, C. (2002). Risk Communication: A Mental Models Approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisbet, E., and Gick, M. (2008). Can Health Psychology Help the Planet? Applying Theory and Models of Health Behaviour to Environmental Actions. Canadian Psychology 49: 296–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Novacek, M.J. (2008). Engaging the Public in Biodiversity Issues. PNAS, 10, 11571–11578. Retrieved April 9, 2012 from www.pnas.org_cgi_doi_10.1073_pnas.0802599105.

  • Richmond, R. (1993). Systems Thinking: Critical Thinking Skills for the 1990s and Beyond. System Dynamics Review 9: 113–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, A.T. (2003). Teaching Systems Thinking and Practice through Environmental Art. Ethics and the Environment, 8, 153–168. Retrieved April 18, 2012 from http://homepages.uwp.edu/crooker/research/systems/articles/2003-rosenthal-ee.pdf.

  • Spash, C. L., and Hanley, N. (1995). Preferences, Information, and Biodiversity Preservation. Ecological Economics 12: 191–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutter, G. (2008). Promoting Sustainability: Audience and Curatorial Perspectives on the Human Factor. Curator 51: 187–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki, D., and Dressel, H. (2010). More Good News: Real Solutions to the Global Eco-crisis. Greystone Books, Vancouver.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, J. (1994). The Beak of the Finch: A Story of Evolution in Our Time. Vintage Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. O. (1988). Biodiversity (ed.). National Academy Press, Washington, DC.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katherine D. Arbuthnott.

Appendix A

Appendix A

Expert-Identified Categories and Details

I. Definition (Total: 8)

  • variety at many levels of life organization

  • species (legal definition)

  • animals

  • plants

  • insects

  • microorganisms

  • genetic diversity, both within and across species

  • distribution of species

II. Source and maintenance processes (Total: 4)

  • evolution

  • over very long time periods

  • continual process of adaptation to existing conditions

  • variety of niches and interactions between existing species create ecosystems which provide the template in which evolution can work; ecosystems = community of life; independent of size scale

III. Value (Total: 8)

  • maintains life

  • without genetic diversity individual species can’t survive

  • creates conditions for continual adaptation; preserves options

  • impacts individuals

  • food, medicine

  • ecological services

  • inspiration — meaning beyond ourselves

  • aesthetics, pleasure

IV. How is it threatened? (Total: 2)

  • pace of change due to human modifications of environment too rapid for species adaptation

  • we are simplifying (reducing variety) without understanding the consequences; e.g., soil modifications (fertilizers, pesticides); genetic modification of organisms

V. Human responsibility? (Total: 3)

  • humans have responsibility to other species because we have the power to influence everything

  • we have laws that reflect this responsibility (Species at Risk Act) and political jurisdictions for different categories of life forms (federal — migratory birds, aquatic life; provincial — terrestrial animals)

  • public organizations express this responsibility — e.g., WWF, Sierra club, justice groups

Total: /25

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Arbuthnott, K.D., Devoe, D. Understanding of Biodiversity Among Western Canadian University Students. Hum Ecol 42, 147–158 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-013-9611-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-013-9611-y

Keywords

Navigation