Skip to main content
Log in

Beyond Mean and Variance: Economic Risk Versus Perceived Risk of Farming, Foraging, and Fishing Activities in Southwestern Madagascar

  • Published:
Human Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Economic analyses of risk typically employ mean and variance calculations such as the coefficient of variation (CV) and z-score model. In this study we examine to what degree these simple measures approximate people’s perceptions of the risk associated with different farming, foraging, and fishing subsistence activities in southwestern Madagascar. CV calculated using production data for 15 activities (ranked) explains about 18 % of participants’ risk ratings from 24 focus groups. CV corresponds better to the ratings of men (37 %) and farmers (40 %), but does not predict the ratings by women, foragers, or Vezo fishermen, suggesting that economic measures of risk have a male and agrarian bias. Narrative responses suggest that risk is qualitatively different for foragers and fishermen, who face hazard (danger) and the cosmological dread of dying far from home. We conclude by predicting the ethnographic and ecological contexts when researchers should go beyond mean and variance when estimating risk.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agar, M., and MacDonald, J. (1995). Focus Groups and Ethnography. Human Organization 54(1): 78–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvard, M. S., and Kuznar, L. (2001). Deferred Harvests: The Transition from Hunting to Animal Husbandry. American Anthropologist 103(2): 295–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Astuti, R. (1995). ‘The Vezo are not a Kind of People’ Identity, Difference, and ‘Ethnicity’ Among a Fishing People of Western Madagascar. American Ethnologist 22: 464–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baird, T. D., Leslie, P. W., and McCabe, J. T. (2009). The Effect of Wildlife Conservation on Local Perspectives of Risk and Behavioral Response. Human Ecology 37: 463–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernoulli, D. (1954). Exposition of a New Theory on the Measurement of Risk. Econometrica 22(1): 23–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binswanger, H. P. (1980). Attitudes toward Risk: Experimental Measurement in Rural India. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 62(3): 395–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bliege Bird, R. L., and Bird, D. W. (1997). Delayed Reciprocity and Tolerated Theft: The Behavioral Ecology of Food-Sharing Strategies. Current Anthropology 38(1): 49–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bliege Bird, R., and Bird, D. W. (2008). Why Women Hunt: Risk and Contemporary Foraging in a Western Desert Aboriginal Community. Current Anthropology 49(4): 655–693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloch, M. (1971). Implications of Marriage Rules and Descent: Categories for Merina Social Structures. American Anthropologist 73: 164–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowles, S. (2011). Cultivation of Cereals by the First farmers was not More Productive than Foraging. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108(12): 4760–4765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chibnik, M. (2011). Anthropology, Economics, and Choice. University of Texas, Austin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dandoy, G. (1972). Contributions à l'Etude Géographique de l'Ouest Malgache. ORSTOM, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dove, M. R. (1993). Uncertainty, Humility, and Adaptation in the Tropical Forest: The Agricultural Augury of the Kantu. Ethnology 32: 145–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, M. (1985). Risk Acceptability According to the Social Sciences. Russell Sage, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, M., and Wildavsky, A. (1982). Risk and Culture: An Essay on the Selection of Technical and Environmental Dangers. University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, F. (2000). Rural Livelihoods and Diversity in Developing Countries. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans-Pritchard, E. E. (1937). Witchcraft, Oracles, and Magic among the Azande. The Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischhoff, B., Slovic, P., Lichtenstein, S., Read, S., and Combs, B. (1978). How Safe is Safe Enough? A Psychometric Study of Attitudes Towards Technological Risks and Benefits. Policy Sciences 9: 127–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M., and Savage, L. J. (1948). The Utility Analysis of Choices Involving Risk. The Journal of Political Economy 56(4): 279–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gigerenzer, G., and Goldstein, D. G. (1996). Reasoning the Fast and Frugal Way: Models of Bounded Rationality. Psychological Review 103(4): 650–669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goland, C. (1993). Field Scattering as Agricultural Risk Management: A Case-Study from Cuyo-Cuyo, Department of Puno, Peru. Mountain Research and Development 13(4): 317–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goszczynska, M., Tyszka, T., and Slovic, P. (1991). Risk Perception in Poland: A Comparison with Three Other Countries. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 4: 179–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkes, K., and Bliege Bird, R. (2002). Showing Off, Handicap Signaling, and the Evolution of Men’s Work. Evolutionary Anthropology 11(2): 58–67.

  • Hegmon, M. (1989). Risk Reduction and Variation in Agricultural Economies: A Computer Simulation of Hopi Agriculture. Research in Economic Anthropology 11: 89–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henrich, J., and McElreath, R. (2002). Are Peasants Risk-Averse Decision Makers? Current Anthropology 43(1): 172–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herskovits, M. J. (1926). The Cattle Complex in East Africa (part 3). American Anthropologist 28: 494–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoerner, J.-M. (1986). Géographie Régionale du Sud-Ouest de Madagascar. Association des Géographes de Madagascar, Antananarivo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollander, J. A. (2004). The Social Contexts of Focus Groups. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 33: 602–637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., and Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect Theory: Analysis of Decision under Risk. Econometrica 47: 263–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, F. (1921). Risk, Uncertainty, and Profit. Century Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohler, T. A., and Van West, C. R. (1996). The Calculus of Self-interest and the Development of Cooperation: Sociopolitical Development and Risk among Northern Anasazi. In Tainter, J. and Tainter, B. B. (eds.), Evolving Complexity and Environmental Risk in the Prehistoric Southwest, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, pp. 169–196.

  • Kottak, C. P. (1971). Social Groups and Kinship Calculation among Southern Betsileo. American Anthropologist 73: 178–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuznar, L. A. (2001). Risk Sensitivity and Value among Andean Pastoralists: Measures, Models, and Empirical Tests. Current Anthropology 42(3): 432–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landis, J. R., and Koch, G. A. (1977). The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data. Biometrics 33: 671–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linnekin, J., and Poyer, L. (1990). Cultural Identity and Ethnicity in the Pacific. University of Hawai’i Press, Honolulu.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malinowski, B. (1992 [1948]). Magic, Science and Religion. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.

  • Myerson, J., and Green, L. (1995). Discounting of Delayed Rewards: Models of Individual Choice. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 64(3): 263–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nisbett, R., and Ross, L. (1980). Human Inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, S. (1987). Red Destinies: The Landscape of Environmental Risk in Madagascar. Human Ecology 15: 67–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ottino, P. (1963). Les Economies Paysannes Malgaches du Bas-Mangoky. Editions Berger-Levrault, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ottino, P., Lavondes, H., and Trouchaud, M. (1960). Premier Rapport sur les Problèmes Humains dans le Delta du Mangoky. ORSTOM/IRSM, Antananarivo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennington, J. A. T. (1998). Bowes and Church’s Food Values of Portions Commonly Used. Lippincott, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poyer, L., and Kelly, R. L. (2000). Mystification of the Mikea: constructions of foraging identity in southwest Madagascar. Journal of Anthropological Research 56: 163–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohrmann, R., and Renn, O. (2000). Risk Perception Research. In Renn, O., and Rohrmann, R. (eds.), Cross-Cultural Risk Perception: A Survey of Empirical Studies. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, pp. 13–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjöberg, L., Kolarova, D., Rucai, A.-A., and Bernström, M.-L. (2000). Risk Perception in Bulgaria and Romania. In Renn, O., and Rohrmann, B. (eds.), Cross-Cultural Risk Perception: A Survey of Empirical Studies. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 147–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slovic, P. (1987). Perception of Risk. Science 236: 280–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K., Barrett, C. B., and Box, P. W. (2000). Participatory Risk Mapping for Targeting Research and Assistance: With an Example from East African Pastoralists. World Development 28(11): 1945–1959.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smithson, J. (2000). Using and Analysing Focus Groups: Limitations and Possibilities. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 3: 103–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephens, D. W. (1981). The Logic of Risk-Sensitive Foraging Preferences. Animal Behaviour 29(2): 628–629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoffle, R. W., Traugott, M. W., Stone, P. V., McIntyre, P. D., Jensen, F. V., and Davidson, C. C. (1991). Risk Perception Mapping: Using Ethnography to Define the Locally Affected Population for a Low-Level Radioactive Waste Storage Facility in Michigan. American Anthropologist 93(3): 611–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, M. E. (2003). A Cognitive Portrayal of Risk Perception in Turkey: Some Cross-National Comparisons. Risk Management 5(4): 25–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, B. (2001). The Behavioral Ecology and Economics of Variation, Risk, and Diversification among Mikea Forager-Farmers of Madagascar. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

  • Tucker, B. (2003). Mikea Origins: Relicts or Refugees? Michigan Discussions in Anthropology 14: 193–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, B. (2006). A Future Discounting Explanation for the Persistence of a Mixed Foraging-Horticulture Strategy among the Mikea of Madagascar. Behavioral Ecology and the Transition to Agriculture, 22–40.

  • Tucker, B., Tsimitamby, Humber, F., Benbow, S., and Iida, T. (2010). Foraging for Development: A Comparison of Food Insecurity, Production, and Risk Among Farmers, Forest Foragers, and Marine Foragers of Southwestern Madagascar. Human Organization 69: 375–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, B., and Young, A. G. (2005). Growing up Mikea: Children’s Time Allocation and Tuber Foraging in Southwestern Madagascar. In Hewlett, B., and Lamb, M. (eds.), Hunter-Gatherer Childhoods: Evolutionary, Developmental, and Cultural Perspectives. Transaction Publishers, Somerset, NJ, pp. 147–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, B. (2012). Do Risk and Time Experimental Choices Represent Individual Strategies for Coping with Poverty or Conformity to Social Norms? Evidence from Rural Southwestern Madagascar. Current Anthropology 53(2): 149–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, M., and Daly, M. (1985). Competitiveness, Risk Taking, and Violence: The Young Male Syndrome. Ethology and Sociobiology 6: 59–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winterhalder, B. (1986). Diet Choice, Risk, and Food Sharing in a Stochastic Environment. Journal of Anthropological Research 5: 369–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winterhalder, B., and Goland, C. (1997). An Evolutionary Ecology Perspective on Diet Choice, Risk, and Plant Domestication. In Gremillion, K. J. (ed.), People, Plants, and Landscapes: Studies in Paleoethnobotany. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa, pp. 123–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winterhalder, B., Lu, F., and Tucker, B. (1999). Risk-Sensitive Adaptive Tactics: Models and Evidence from Subsistence Studies in Biology and Anthropology. Journal of Archaeological Research 7: 301–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, P. C. (1999). Lemur Traits and Madagascar Ecology: Coping with an Island Environment. Yearbook of Physical Anthropology 42: 31–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu Leung, W.-T. (1968). Food composition table for use in Africa. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yount, J. W., Tsiazonera, and Tucker, B. (2001). Constructing Mikea Identity: Past or Present links to Forest and Foraging. Ethnohistory 48: 3257–3291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by the National Science Foundation (BCS 0650412), conducted in collaboration with the Université de Toliara (thanks, President Théodoret) and CeDRATOM (thanks, Director Bartholémy Manjakahery), and written while the first author was a fellow at the Wissenschaftskolleg zu Berlin (thanks, Reinhart Meyer-Kalkus and Luca Giuliani for allowing Tsiazonera and Jaovola to visit Berlin). Thanks to Rolland Lahiniriko, Razafindravelo Pirrette Miza, Tsitindry Théodore Ramanonvotsoa, Louinaise Rasoanomenjanahary, Gervais Tantely, Jean Roger Tsikengo, Mr. Tsimitamby, and Mr. Zafimandimby for assistance in the field. Monique Borgerhoff Mulder, Alex Courtiol, Zach Fohl, Craig Hadley, Jessica Ham, Amber Huff, Claudia Kasper, Joe Lanning, Elaina Lill, Flora Lu, Virpi Lummaa, Victoria Ramenzoni, Laura Tilghman, and Ludo Razafrindramazana contributed comments and other assistance on drafts of this manuscript. Special thanks to Sophie Benbow and Blue Ventures Conservation, U.K., for providing CPUE data for sea turtles.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bram Tucker.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tucker, B., Tombo, J., Tsiazonera et al. Beyond Mean and Variance: Economic Risk Versus Perceived Risk of Farming, Foraging, and Fishing Activities in Southwestern Madagascar. Hum Ecol 41, 393–407 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-013-9563-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-013-9563-2

Keywords

Navigation