Human–Tiger Conflict in Context: Risks to Lives and Livelihoods in the Bangladesh Sundarbans
- 1.3k Downloads
People’s perceptions of the risk posed by wild animals to human lives and/or livelihoods can influence the rate at which people intentionally kill these species. Consequently, human–wildlife conflict (HWC) management strategies may benefit from the inclusion of actions which reduce risk perceptions. This study uses Participatory Risk Mapping (PRM) and semi-structured interviews to explore local perceptions and the wider socio-economic context of human–tiger conflict (HTC) in the Bangladesh Sundarbans area. Of the 24 locally-relevant problems identified by the PRM process, tigers were the only problem to be cited by >50 % of respondents. The ‘tiger problem’ was also perceived by villagers to be of relatively high severity. Negative perceptions of tigers in the Sundarbans communities are exacerbated by other locally-experienced poverty-related problems, as well cyclones, floods and soil erosion. Interactions between the problems experienced by villagers, including HTC, result in a complex ‘risk web’ which detrimentally affects lives and livelihoods and ultimately perpetuates poverty levels in the Sundarbans communities. This research demonstrates that PRM and in-depth, qualitative research can enhance understanding of the perceived magnitude and wider socio-economic context of risks from wildlife and aid the identification of risk perception management actions which may help to reduce the number of animals killed by people.
KeywordsPanthera tigris Human–wildlife conflict Risk perception Poverty Sundarbans
- Ahmad, I. U., Greenwood, C. J., Barlow, A. C. D., Islam, M. A., Hossain, A. N. M., Khan, M. M. H., and Smith, J. L. D. (2009). Bangladesh Tiger Plan 2009–2017. Bangladesh Forest Department, Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.Google Scholar
- Ahmed, A. (2011). Lighting Lives in the Sundarbans. http://wwf.panda.org/?uNewsID=201051 [accessed 13 March 2012].
- Ajzen, I., and Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting behaviour. Prentice Hall, Inc. New Jersey, USA.Google Scholar
- Arnoldi, J. (2009). Risk. Polity Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
- Barlow, A. C. D. (2009). The Sundarbans tiger: adaptation, population status and conflict. PhD Thesis. University of Minnesota, USA.Google Scholar
- Barnes, D. F., Openshaw, K., Smith, K. R., and Van Der Plas, R. (1994). What makes people cook with improved biomass stoves? A comparative international review of stove programs. World Bank Technical Paper Number 242. Energy Series.Google Scholar
- Beck, U. (1992). Risk Society—Towards a New Modernity. Sage, London.Google Scholar
- Beier, P. (1991). Cougar Attacks on Humans in the United States and Canada. Wildlife Society Bulletin 19: 403–412.Google Scholar
- Cavalcanti, S. M. C., Marchini, S., Zimmermann, A., Gese, E. M., and Macdonald, D. W. (2010). Jaguars, livestock, and people in Brazil: realities and perceptions behind the conflict. In Macdonald, D. W., and Loveridge, A. J. (eds.), Biology and Conservation of Wild Felids. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 383–402.Google Scholar
- Douglas, M., and Wildavsky, A. B. (1982). Risk and Culture: An Essay on the Selection of Technical and Environmental Dangers. University of California Press, USA.Google Scholar
- Friendship (2012). Health Care, nutrition and population. http://friendship-bd.org/page/healthcare [accessed 1 March 2012].
- Jackson, R., and Wangchuk, R. (2001). Linking Snow Leopard Conservation and People-Wildlife Conflict Resolution: Grassroots Measures to Protect the Endangered Snow Leopard from Herder Retribution. Endangered Species Update 18: 138–141.Google Scholar
- Jackson, R. M., Mishra, C., McCarthy, T. M., and Ale, S. B. (2010). Snow leopards: conflict and conservation. In Macdonald, D. W., and Loveridge, A. J. (eds.), Biology and Conservation of Wild Felids. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 417–430.Google Scholar
- Khan, M. M. H. (2004). Ecology and Conservation of the Bengal Tiger in the Sundarbans Mangrove Forest of Bangladesh. PhD Thesis. University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
- Living With Lions (2012). Lion Guardians. http://www.lionconservation.org/lion-guardians.html [accessed 4 April 2012].
- Marchini, S., and Macdonald, D. W. (2012). Predicting ranchers’ intention to kill jaguars: case studies in Amazonia and Pantanal. Biological Conservation.Google Scholar
- Marker, L., Dickman, A. J., Mills, G. L., and Macdonald, D. W. (2010). Cheetahs and ranchers in Namibia. In Macdonald, D. W., and Loveridge, A. J. (eds.), Biology and Conservation of Wild Felids. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 351–372.Google Scholar
- Mizutani, F., Muthiani, E., Kristjanson, P., and Recke, H. (2005). Impact and value of wildlife in pastoral livestock productions systems in Kenya: Possibilities for healthy ecosystem conservation and livestock development for the poor. In Osofsky, S. A., Cleveland, S., Karesh, W. B., Kock, M. D., Nyhus, P. J., Starr, L., and Yang, A. (eds.), Conservation and Development Interventions at the Wildlife/Livestock Interface: Implications for Wildlife, Livestock and Human Health. IUCN, Gland, pp. 121–132.Google Scholar
- Mohsanin, S., Barlow, A. C. D., Greenwood, C. J., Islam, M. A., Kabir, M. M., Rahman, M. M., and Howlader, A. (2012). Assessing the Threat if Human Consumption of Tiger Prey in the Bangladesh Sundarbans. Animal Conservation doi:10.1111/j.1469-1795.2012.00571.x.
- Murtaza, M. G. (2001). Socio-Economic Baseline Study of the Impact Zone of the Sundarbans. Sundarbans Biodiversity Conservation Project Report. Forest Department, Government of Bangladesh Khulna, Bangladesh.Google Scholar
- Neumann-Denzau, G., and Denzau, H. (2010). Examining the extent of human-tiger conflict in the Sundarbans Forest, Bangladesh. Tigerpaper 37(2): 4–7.Google Scholar
- Nyhus, P. J., Osofsky, S., Ferraro, P., Madden, F., and Fischer, H. (2005). Bearing the costs of human–wildlife conflict: the challenges of compensation schemes. In Woodroffe, R., Thirgood, S., and Rabinowitz, A. (eds.), People and Wildlife. Conflict or Coexistence? Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 107–121.Google Scholar
- Rahman, H. A., Barlow, A. C. D., Greenwood, C. J., Islam, M. A., and Ahmed, I. U. (2009). Livestock depredation by tiger on the edge of the Bangladesh Sundarbans. Technical Report. Wildlife Trust of Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.Google Scholar
- Rahman, M. A., Islam, M. K., and Lahann, P. (2012). Stray-tiger human conflict incidents January, 2012. Technical Report. Wildlife Trust of Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.Google Scholar
- Sanderson, E., Forrest, J., Loucks, C., Ginsberg, J. R., Dinerstein, E., Seidensticker, J., Leimgruber, P., Songer, M., Heydlauff, A., O’Brien, T. G., Bryja, G., Klenzendorf, S., and Wikramanayake, E. (2006). Setting Priorities for the Conservation and Recovery of Wild Tigers: 2005–2015. The Technical Assessment. WCS, WWF, Smithsonian, and NFWF-STF, New York - Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
- Sen, S. G. (2010) Conservation of the Sundarbans Through Sustainable Shrimp Aquaculture. Policy Analysis Paper. Harvard Kennedy School, Harvard University, Massachusetts, USA. http://www.innovations.harvard.edu/cache/documents/12273/1227364.pdf [accessed 1st March 2012]
- Smith, K., Barrett, C. B., and Box, P. (2001). Not Necessarily in the Same Boat: Heterogeneous Risk Assessment Among East African Pastoralists. Journal of Development Studies 37: 1–30.Google Scholar
- Thirgood, S., Woodroffe, R., and Rabinowitz, A. (2005). The impact of human–wildlife conflict on human lives and Livelihoods. In Woodroffe, R., Thirgood, S., and Rabinowitz, A. (eds.), People and Wildlife. Conflict or Coexistence? Cambridge University Press, UK, pp. 13–26.Google Scholar