Skip to main content

Farmers’ Perspectives on Vital Soil-related Ecosystem Services in Intensive Swidden Farming Systems in the Peruvian Amazon

Abstract

A growing dilemma is how to conserve Amazonian forest while allowing local people to secure their livelihoods. Small-scale swidden farming in Amazonia is entirely dependent on the continued provision of ecosystem services (ES) that generate the conditions for agriculture. This study identified soil-related ES needed for, and enhanced by, productive swidden systems from the farmer’s perspective. Workshops in six farming communities in northeastern Peru discussed various land uses, swidden systems that continue to be productive, and swidden systems on degraded land. The participating farmers noted changes in their production systems and described the ES (or lack thereof) in terms of soil quality, crop production quantity and quality, burning practices, forest regeneration, and farming skill. The central elements described in farmers’ own strategies for managing soil-related ES were fallow management for biomass production and crop diversity, factors identified as central to future ES management work in established agricultural areas in Amazonia.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

Notes

  1. One workshop was arranged in each village, except in one village where separate workshops were held for men and women.

References

  • Alcorn, J. (1990). Indigenous agroforestry strategies meeting farmers’ needs. In Anderson, A. (ed.), Alternatives to Deforestation: Steps Toward Sustainable Use of the Amazon Rain Forest. Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 141–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbieri, A., and Carr, D. (2005). Gender-Specific Out-Migration, Deforestation and Urbanization in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Global and Planetary Change 47: 99–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brondizio, E. (1999). Agroforestry intensification in the Amazon estuary. In Granfelt, T. (ed.), Managing the Globalized Environment: Local Strategies to Secure Livelihoods. Intermediate Technology Publications, London, pp. 88–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brondizio, E., and Moran, E. (2008). Human Dimensions of Climate Change: The Vulnerability of Small Farmers in the Amazon. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 363: 1803–1809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brookfield, H., Padoch, C., Parsons, H., and Stocking, M. (eds.) (2002). Cultivating Biodiversity. Understanding, Analysing & Using Agricultural Diversity. ITDG, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapin, S., Kofinas, G., and Folke, C. (2009). Principles of Ecosystem Stewardship: Resilience-based Natural Resource Management in a Changing World. Springer, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Che Piu, H., and García, T. (2011). Estudio REDD Perú: La Situación de REDD en el Perú. Lima, Peru.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daily, G. (ed.) (1997). Nature’s services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems. Island Press, Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dale, V., and Polasky, S. (2007). Measures of the Effects of Agricultural Practices on Ecosystem Services. Ecological economics 64: 286–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Defoer, T., and Budelman, A. (eds.) (2000). Managing Soil Fertility in the Tropics. Resource Guide. FAO and KIT Press, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Schutter, O. (2010). Report submitted by the Special Rapporteur on the right to food. UN report to Human Rights Council.

  • Eklöf, G. (2011). Mer pengar åt skogen?—REDD, biologisk mångfald och fattigdomsbekämpning. Naturskyddsföreningen, Stockholm.

    Google Scholar 

  • ESPA-AA. (2008). Challenges to Managing Ecosystem Sustainability for Poverty Alleviation: Securing Well-Being in the Andes/Amazon. Situation analysis prepared for the ESPA Program. Amazon Initiative Consortium, Belém, Brazil.

  • Foley, J., Asner, G., Costa, M., Coe, M., DeFries, R., Gibbs, H., Howard, E., Olson, S., Patz, J., Ramankutty, N., and Snyder, P. (2007). Amazonia Revealed: Forest Degradation and Loss of Ecosystem Goods and Services in the Amazon Basin. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 5: 25–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fujisaka, S., and White, D. (1998). Pasture or Permanent Crops After Slash-and-Burn Cultivation? Land-Use Choice in Three Amazon Colonies. Agroforestry Systems 42: 45–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gobierno Regional de San Martín (2008). Plan de Concertado de Desarolllo Departemental de San Martín 2008–2015. Gobierno Regional de San Martín, Moyobamba.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godar, J., Tizado, E. J., and Pokorny, B. (2012). Who is Responsible for the Deforestation in the Amazon? A Spatially Explicit Analysis Along the Tranzamazon Highway in Brazil. Forest Ecology and Management 267: 58–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutiérrez-Vélez, V. H., DeFries, R., Pinedo-Vásquez, M., Uriarte, M., Padoch, C., Baethgen, W., Fernades, K., and Lim, Y. (2011). High-Yield Oil Palm Expansion Spares Land at the Expense of the Forest in the Peruvian Amazon. Environmental Research Letters 6: 044029.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, M. C., Stehman, S. V., Potapov, P. V., Loveland, T. R., Townshend, J. R. G., DeFries, R. S., Pittman, K. W., Arunarwati, B., Stolle, F., Steininger, M. K., Carroll, M., and DiMiceli, C. (2008). Humid Tropical Forest Clearing from 2000 to 2005 Quantified by Using Multitemporal and Multiresolution Remotely Sensed Data. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105: 9439–9444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hecht, S. (2005). Soybeans, Development and Conservation on the Amazon Frontier. Development and Change 36: 375–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IAASTD. (2007). International Assessment of Agricultural Science and Technology for Development. Synthesis Report.

  • INEI. (1994). III Censo Nacional Agropecuario (CENAGRO). San Martín. http://www.inei.gob.pe/bancocuadros/bancocuadro.asp?p=3.

  • INEI. (1996). Perfil Agropecuario del Departamento de San Martín. In I. N. d. E. e. (ed.), Informática, http://www.inei.gob.pe/biblioineipub/bancopub/Est/Lib0210/N00.htm, Lima.

  • INEI. (1997). Compendio Estadistico Departamental 1996–1997. Departamento: San Martín. http://www.inei.gob.pe/biblioineipub/bancopub/Est/Lib0284/n00.htm.

  • INEI. (2005). Perú en Cifras. Indicadores Demográficos. Población. Perú: Población Total, según Departamento Censos 1993–2005 http://www.inei.gob.pe/perucifrasHTM/inf-dem/cua3.htm.

  • INEI. (2006). Compendio Estadístico 2006 Población e Indicadores Demográficos. Migración Interna. http://www.inei.gob.pe/Sisd/index.asp.

  • INEI. (2007a). Perú: Anuario de Estadísticas Ambientales 2007. Instituto Nacional de Estadística e Informática

  • INEI. (2007b). Estadísticas ambientales. Biodiversidad. Diversidad Biológica, Lima, Peru. http://www.inei.gob.pe/Sisd/index.asp.

  • Kleinman, P., Pimentel, D., and Bryant, R. (1995). The Ecological Sustainability of Slash-and-Burn Agriculture. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 52: 235–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kvale, S. (1996). Inter-views. Sage, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lathrap, D. (1970). The Upper Amazon. Thames and Hudson, Southampton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebel, L., and Daniel, R. (2009). The Governance of Ecosystem Services from Tropical Upland Watersheds. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 1: 61–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lojka, B., Lojkova, J., Banout, J., Polesny, Z., and Preininger, D. (2008). Performance of An Improved Fallow System in the Peruvian Amazon—Modelling Approach. Agroforestry Systems 72: 27–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marquardt Arévalo, K. (2008). Burning Changes: Action Research with Farmers and Swidden Agriculture in the Upper Amazon. PhD Dissertation, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala.

  • Marquardt, K., Salomonsson, L., and Brondizio, E. (2010). Small-Scale Farmers’ Land Management Strategies in the Upper Amazon: An Action Research Case Study. Interciencia 35: 421–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeely, J., and Scherr, S. (2003). ECOAGRICULTURE—Strategies to Feed the World and Save Biodiversity. Island Press, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B., and Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Sage: London & Thousand Oaks, California.

  • Millenium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Synthesis. Island Press, Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, N., Mittermeier, R., Mittermeier, C., da Fonseca, G., and Kent, J. (2000). Biodiversity Hotspots for Conservation Priorities. Nature 403: 853–858.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Padoch, C. (2002). Spotting expertise in a diverse and dynamic landscape. In Brookfield, H., et al. (eds.), Cultivating Biodiversity. Understanding, Analysing & Using Agricultural Diversity. ITDG, London, pp. 203–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Padoch, C., and Pinedo-Vasquez, M. (2001). Resource Management in Amazonia: Caboclo and Ribereño Traditions. In Maffi, L. (ed.), On Biocultural Diversity, Smithsonian Institution Press, pp. 364–376.

  • Padoch, C., and Pinedo-Vásquez, M. (2006). Concurrent activities and invisible technologies. An example of timber management in Amazonia. In Posey, D., and Balick, M. (eds.), Human Impacts on Amazonia. The Role of Traditional Ecological Knowledge in Conservation and Development. Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 172–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Padoch, C., Coffey, K., Mertz, O., Leisz, S. J., Fox, J., and Wadley, R. L. (2007). The Demise of Swidden in Southeast Asia? Local Realities and Regional Ambiguities. Danish Journal of Geography 107: 29–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pokorny, B., Godar, J., Hoch, L., Johnson, J., de Koning, J., Medina, G., Steinbrenner, R., Vos, V., and Weigelt, J. (2010). La producción familiar como alternativa de un desarollo sostenible para la Amazonía: Lecciones aprendidas de iniciativas de uso forestal por productores familiares en la Amazonía boliviana, brasilera, ecuatoriana y peruana. CIFOR, Bogor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peres, C., and Lake, I. (2003). Extent of Nontimber Resource Extraction in Tropical Forests: Accessibility to Game Vertebrates by Hunters in the Amazon Basin. Conservation Biology 17: 521–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez, J. P., Beard, T. D., Bennet, E. M., Cumming, G. S., Cork, S. J., Agard, J., Dobson, A. P., and Peterson, G. D. (2006). Trade-Offs Across Space, Time, and Ecosystem Services. Ecology and Society 11: 28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salati, E., and Vose, P. (1984). Amazon Basin: A System in Equilibrium. Science, New Series 225: 129–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroth, G., Lehmann, J., Rodrigues, M., Barros, E., and Macedo, J. (2001). Plant-Soil Interactions in Multistrata Agroforestry in the Humid Tropics. Agroforestry Systems 53: 85–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soares-Filho, B., Nepstad, D., Curran, L., Cerqueira, G., Garcia, R., Ramos, C., Voll, E., McDonald, A., Lefebvre, P., and Schlesinger, P. (2006). Modelling Conservation in the Amazon Basin. Nature 440: 520–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staver, C. (1989). Why Farmers Rotate Fields in Maize-Cassava-Plantain Bush Fallow Agriculture in the Wet Peruvian Amazon. Human Ecology 17: 401–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swinton, S., Lupia, F., Robertson, P., and Hamilton, S. (2007). Ecosystem Services and Agriculture: Cultivating Agricultural Ecosystems for Diverse Benefits. Ecological Economics 64: 245–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WinklerPrins, A., and Barrera-Bassols, N. (2004). Latin American Ethnopedology: A Vision of Its Past, Present, and Future. Agriculture and Human Value 21: 139–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kristina Marquardt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Marquardt, K., Milestad, R. & Porro, R. Farmers’ Perspectives on Vital Soil-related Ecosystem Services in Intensive Swidden Farming Systems in the Peruvian Amazon. Hum Ecol 41, 139–151 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-012-9522-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-012-9522-3

Keywords

  • Diversity
  • Fallow management
  • Land use
  • Peruvian Amazon
  • Small-scale farming
  • Subsistence production