Skip to main content
Log in

Resource Entitlement and Mobility of Pastoralists in the Yerer and Daketa Valleys, Eastern Ethiopia

  • Published:
Human Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Literature on the mobility of pastoralists and resource access is widely available, but conceptualization and understanding of the socioeconomic processes expected to affect the outcome are inconsistent. In this article, drawing on research conducted in the Yerer and Daketa Valleys, eastern Ethiopia, we use the notion of entitlements to examine how, under increasing pressure for resource access, various agro-pastoral households manage conflicting interests in common grazing resources. We observed that in times of drought and resource scarcity incumbent agro-pastoralists find peaceful sharing arrangements with intruding pastoralists. Asset-poor agro-pastoralists enter into mutually beneficial arrangements with pastoralists, trading their resource endowments to grazing land for other assets from the pastoralists, whereas wealthier households prefer a reciprocal risk-management strategy. These multiple arrangements have distributional effects because asset-poor agro-pastoralist households can stabilize or enhance their household assets and their capabilities in times of drought, and thus benefit from assisting pastoralist migrants to the common grazing land.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We understand “institutions” as emerging sites of social interaction, negotiation, and contestation comprising heterogeneous actors with diverse goals. They consist of all rules, customs, and practices in use in the study area. These institutions are based on local beliefs, cultures, and traditions, and are influential in the way local people acquire their access to common grazing land.

  2. The dependency ratio is the ratio of the economically dependent part of the population to the productive part. The economically dependent part is recognized to be individuals under the age of 15 and over the age of 65. The productive part makes up the gap in between (ages 15–64).

  3. Reciprocal arrangement is largely a risk-management strategy by agro-pastoralist community members, in which they accommodate pastoralists and extend their resources, particularly the rangelands and water points, mainly because they expect the same treatment from pastoralists in case members of the agro-pastoral communities face drought and are forced to migrate to areas under the control of pastoralists in the future.

References

  • Agrawal, A., and Gibson, C. (1997). Community, Resources and Development: Beyond Enchantment and Disenchantment. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auty, R. M., ed. (2001). Resource Abundance and Economic Development, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.

  • Azam, J.-P. (2001). The Redistributive State and Conflicts in Africa. Journal of Peace Research 38(4): 429–444. doi:10.1177/0022343301038004002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bassett, T. J. (1986). Fulani Herd Movement. Geographical Review 76: 233–248. doi:10.2307/214143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogale, A., and Korf, B. (2007). To Share or Not To Share? (Non-)Violence, Scarcity and Resource Access in Somali Region, Ethiopia. Journal of Development Studies 43(4): 743–765. doi:10.1080/00220380701260093.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bromley, W. B., and Cernea, M. M. (1989). The Management of Common Property Natural Resources: Some Conceptual and Operational Fallacies. World Bank Discussion Paper 57. The World Bank, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carius, A., and Lietzmann, K. M. (1999). Environmental Change and Security: A European Perspective. Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carment, D. (2003). Assessing State Failure: Implications for Theory and Policy. Third World Quarterly 24(3): 407–427. doi:10.1080/0143659032000084384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collier, P., and Hoeffler, A. (2002). On the Incidence of Civil War in Africa. Journal of Conflict Resolution 46: 13–28. doi:10.1177/0022002702046001002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collinson, S., ed. (2003). Power, Livelihoods and Conflict: Case Studies in Political Economy Analysis of Humanitarian Action. Humanitarian Policy Group Report 13, Overseas Development Institute, London, UK.

  • De Soysa, I. (2002). Ecoviolence: Shrinking Pie, or Honey Pot? Global Environmental Politics 2(4): 1–33. doi:10.1162/152638002320980605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guijt, I., and Shah, M. K. (eds.) (1998). The Myth of Community: Gender Issues in Participatory Development, Intermediate Technology Publications, London, UK.

  • Hermann, M. (2002). Wars and Votes: Power, Conflict and Institutions. Working Paper No. 02-26. Development Studies Institute and London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homewood, K. M. (2004). Policy, Environment and Development in African Rangelands. Environmental Science & Policy 7: 125–143. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2003.12.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korf, B. (2005). Rethinking the Greed-Grievance Nexus: Property Rights and the Political Economy of War in Sri Lanka. Journal of Peace Research 42(2): 201–217. doi:10.1177/0022343305050691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawry, S. W. (1990). Tenure Policy Toward Common Property Natural Resources in Sub-Saharan Africa. Natural Resources Journal 30: 403–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Billon, P. (2001). The Political Ecology of War: Natural Resources and Armed Conflicts. Political Geography 10(5): 561–584. doi:10.1016/S0962-6298(01)00015-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leach, M., Mearns, R., and Scoones, I. (1999). Environmental Entitlements: Dynamics and Institutions in Community-Based Natural Resource Management. World Development 27(2): 225–247. doi:10.1016/S0305-750X(98)00141-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mas-Colell, A., Whinston, M. D., and Green, J. R. (1995). Microeconomic Theory. Oxford University Press, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazrui, A. (1995). The Blood Experience: The Failed State and Political Collapse in Africa. World Policy Journal 12(1): 28–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, N., Kamara, A., and Kirk, M. (2002). The Effect of Environmental Variability on Livestock and Land-Use Management: The Borana Plateau, Southern Ethiopia. Socio-Economics and Policy Research Working Paper 35. International Livestock Research Institute, Addis Ababa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohamed Salih, M. A., Dietz, T., and Abdel Ghaffar, M. A. (2001). African Pastoralism: Conflict, Institutions and Government. Pluto Press, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muhereza, F., and Otim, P. (2002). Pastoral Resource Competition In Uganda: Case Studies Into Commercial Livestock Ranching And Pastoral Institutions. International Books, Utrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulugeta, A., and Hagmann, T. (2008). Governing Violence in the Pastoralist Space: Karrayu and State Notions of Cattle Raiding in the Ethiopian Awash Valley. Afrika Focus 21(2): 71–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ngaido, T. (1995). Making Laws and Building Institutions in the Sahel: The Case of Niger. Entwicklung und landlicher Raum 29(6): 19–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niamir-Fuller, M. (2000). Managing mobility in African rangelands. In McCarthy, N., Swallow, B., Kirk, M., and Hazell, P. (eds.), Property Rights, Risk, and Livestock Development in Africa. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC, pp. 102–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, D. C. (1994). Constraints on institutional innovation: Transaction costs, incentive compatibility, and historical considerations. In Ruttan, V. W. (ed.), Agriculture, Environment and Health: Sustainable Development in the 21st Century. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN, pp. 48–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peluso, N., and Watts, M. (2001). Violent environments. In Peluso, N., and Watts, M. (eds.), Violent Environments. Cornell University, Ithaca, pp. 3–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Place, F., and Hazell, P. (1993). Productivity Effects of Indigenous Land Tenure Systems in Sub-Saharan Africa. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 75(1): 10–19. doi:10.2307/1242949.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruttan, L. M., and Mulder, M. B. (1999). Are East African Pastoralists Truly Conservationists? Current Anthropology 40(5): 621–652. doi:10.1086/300086.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scoones, I., ed. (1993). Living with Uncertainty: The Agro-Ecology of Savanna Systems in Africa. Intermediate Technology Publication, London, UK.

  • Scoones, I. (1994). Exploiting Heterogeneity: Habitat Use by Cattle in Dry Land Zimbabwe. Journal of Arid Environments 29(2): 221–237. doi:10.1016/S0140-1963(05)80092-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1981). Poverty and Famines: An Essay on Entitlement and Deprivation. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swallow, B. M., and Bromley, D. W. (1995). Institutions, Governance and Incentives in Common Property Regimes for African Rangelands. Environmental and Resource Economics 6(2): 99–118. doi:10.1007/BF00691679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilahun, T., Hadij, B., and Barre, B. (1996). From communal grazing to privatized enclosure: A case study of changing land tenure in Jerer Valley. In Edwards, S., and Mesfin, T. (eds.), Conference on Pastoralism in Ethiopia, 4–6 February 1993. Institute for Sustainable Development and Ministry of Agriculture, Addis Ababa, pp. 73–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, M. D. (2004). Political Ecology and the Moral Dimensions of ‘Resource Conflicts’: The Case of Farmer–Herder Conflicts in the Sahel. Political Geography 23: 863–889. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2004.05.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turton, D. (ed.) (2006). Ethnic Federalism: The Ethiopian Experience in Comparative Perspective, James Currey and Addis Ababa University Press, London, Oxford, Addis Ababa.

  • Webb, P., and von Braun, J. (1994). Famine and Food Security in Ethiopia: Lessons for Africa. John Wiley, Chichester, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimmer, A. (1997). Who Owns the State? Understanding Ethnic Conflict in Post-Colonial Societies. Nations and Nationalism 3(4): 631–665. doi:10.1111/j.1354-5078.1997.00631.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research received funding through a Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, Research Cooperation with Developing Countries)—Bundesministerium für Wirtschaftliche Zusammenarbeit und Entwicklung (BMZ, Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development) grant on “The Role of Local-level Institutions in Enhancing Sustainable Rural Livelihoods in Ethiopia”.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ayalneh Bogale.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bogale, A., Korf, B. Resource Entitlement and Mobility of Pastoralists in the Yerer and Daketa Valleys, Eastern Ethiopia. Hum Ecol 37, 453–462 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-009-9236-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-009-9236-3

Keywords

Navigation