Human Ecology

, Volume 36, Issue 1, pp 111–123 | Cite as

Community Member Viewpoints on the Ría Celestún Biosphere Reserve, Yucatan, Mexico: Suggestions for Improving the Community/Natural Protected Area Relationship

  • Jessica Méndez-Contreras
  • Federico Dickinson
  • Teresa Castillo-Burguete
Article

Abstract

The results of an analysis of the viewpoints of Celestún community members regarding the Ría Celestún Biosphere Reserve, Mexico, are used as the basis for recommendation to improve the community/natural protected area (NPA) relationship. Participant observation was used to record the opinions of 80 people (8–83 years of age) between April and August 2002. Twenty semistructured interviews were held with local young people randomly selected from the participant observation group and their fathers; one interview was held with a municipal officer. Results indicate that the informants perceived a lack of communication between community members and the Reserve concerning its objectives and action areas, minimal community participation in Reserve regulation development, an absence of alternative productive activities and unjustified restriction of natural resources. These perceived conditions can potentially generate conflict between the community and the Reserve administration, preventing fulfillment of the Reserve’s environmental protection mission and negatively affecting community welfare. It is suggested that communication between the Reserve and the community be mutual and free-flowing, that Reserve objectives be identified in conjunction with the community, that community members be included in Reserve activities and administration, that interdisciplinary teams be formed to encourage communication and participation and that alternative productive activities be developed. Particular emphasis is placed on the need to listen to and address the concerns of young people because they will define the community/Reserve relationship in the near future.

Keywords

Natural protected areas Conflict Yucatan Mexico Community participation 

References

  1. Agrawal, A. (2005). Environmentality. Technologies of Government and the Making of Subjects, Duke University Press, Durham, North Carolina.Google Scholar
  2. Agrawal, A., and Gibson, C. C. (2001). The role of community in natural resource conservation. In Agrawal, A., and Gibson, C. C. (eds.), Communities and the Environment. Ethnicity, Gender, and the State in Community-Based Conservation, Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, New Jersey, pp. 1–31.Google Scholar
  3. Andrews, A. (1980). Salt-making, Merchants and Markets: The Role of a Critical Resource in the Development of Maya Civilization, Department of Anthropology. Phoenix, University of Arizona.Google Scholar
  4. Batllori, E. (1988). Productividad Secundaria en el Estero de Celestún. Departamento de Recursos del Mar. Mérida, México, Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del I.P.N. Unpublished master thesis.Google Scholar
  5. Batllori, E. (1990). Caracterización ecológica del Refugio Faunístico “Ría Celestún” al noroeste de la Península de Yucatán, Mérida, Cinvestav-Mérida.Google Scholar
  6. Batllori, E. (2003). Estudio técnico para el desarrollo del Ordenamiento Ecológico del Territorio de la Reserva de la Biosfera Ría Celestún, ubicada entre los estados de Yucatán y Campeche, Reporte Técnico Final, Mérida, Cinvestav-Mérida.Google Scholar
  7. Berkes, F. (1999). Sacred Ecology. Traditional Ecological Knowledge and Resource Management, Taylor & Francis, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  8. Berlanga, M., and Wood, P. (1996). Áreas de importancia para la conservación de las aves en la Península de Yucatán. II Workshop on Important Areas for Bird Conservation in Mexico (AICAS), Huatulco, Mexico.Google Scholar
  9. Bernard, H. R. (1995). Research Methods in Anthropology. Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Altamira Press, Walnut Creek, California.Google Scholar
  10. Brechin, S. R. (2003). Wandering boundaries and illegal residents. The political ecology of protected area deforestation in South Sumatra Indonesia from 1979 to 1992. In Brechin, S. R., Wilshusen, P. R., Fortwangler, C. L., and West, P. C. (eds.), Contested Nature. Promoting International Biodiversity with Social Justice in the Twenty-first Century, State University of New York Press, Albany, New York, pp. 59–71.Google Scholar
  11. Brechin, S. R., Wilshusen, P. R., et al. (Eds.) (2003). Contested Nature. Promoting International Biodiversity with Social Justice in the Twenty-first Century, State University of New York Press, Albany, New York.Google Scholar
  12. Cabrera, M., and PRONATURA (2002). La Reserva de la Biosfera Ría Celestún. Usos y valores económicos. Resumen ejecutivo. Mérida, p. 8.Google Scholar
  13. Castilla, J. C., and Defeo, O. (2001). Latin America Shellfisheries: Emphasis on Co-management and Experimental Practices. Reviews in Fish Biology Fisheries 11: 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Castillo, M. T., Dickinson, F., et al. (1995). State Policies, Natural Resources, and Community Participation in Rural Mexico. Human Ecology: Progress Through Integrative Perspectives, The Society for Human Ecology, Bar Harbor, Maine, USA.Google Scholar
  15. CONANP (2000). Programa de Manejo Reserva de la Biosfera Ría Celestún. México, D. F., Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales.Google Scholar
  16. CONANP (2006). Qué son las ANP, México, D.F., Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales/Comisión Nacional de Áreas Naturales Protegidas, 2006.Google Scholar
  17. Dall, W., Hill, B. J., et al. (1990) The Biology of Penaeidae, Academic, London.Google Scholar
  18. Defeo, O., Andrade Hernández, M., et al. (2005). Pautas para el manejo de la pesquería de jaiba y camarón en un área natural protegida: El caso de la Ría Celestún, Yucatán-Campeche. Mérida, México, Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados, Comisión Nacional para la Biodiversidad y Pronatura Península de Yucatán.Google Scholar
  19. Diamond, J. (2005). Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed, Viking, New York.Google Scholar
  20. Dickinson, F., and Castillo, M. T. (2003). Participación comunal e innovación de vivienda en la costa de Yucatán. Revista de la Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán 18(224): 53–66.Google Scholar
  21. Dickinson, F., and Lizarraga, I. (2001). Palafitos para la costa yucateca. Cuadernos de Arquitectura 13: 62–68.Google Scholar
  22. Dickinson, F., Viga, D., et al. (1998). Communal participation and sociocultural change in rural Yucatan: Participatory research, health, and quality of life. Human Ecology Review 5(2): 58–65.Google Scholar
  23. Dickinson, F., Viga, D., et al. (2006). Collaboration and difficulties in an applied human ecology project. Implications for the local coastal environment. Landscape and Urban Planning 74: 204–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. DOF (1997). SEMARNAP. Aviso por el que se da a conocer el establecimiento de épocas y zonas de veda de las especies de camarón en aguas marinas y de los sistemas lagunarios estuarinos de jurisdicción federal del Golfo de México y Mar Caribe. Diario Oficial de la Federación. México, D.F., pp. 6–8.Google Scholar
  25. DOF (2000). SEMARNAP. Aviso por el que se da a conocer el establecimiento de épocas y zonas de veda de las especies de camarón en aguas marinas y de los sistemas lagunarios estuarinos de jurisdicción federal del Golfo de México y Mar Caribe. Diario Oficial de la Federación. México, D.F., pp. 15–16.Google Scholar
  26. Fontana, A., and Frey, J. H. (1994). Interviewing. The art of science. In Denzin, N. K., and Lincoln, Y. S. (eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research, Sage, Thousand Oaks, California, pp. 361–376.Google Scholar
  27. Fraga, J. (1993). La inmigración y sus principales efectos en la costa yucateca. Estudio de caso en Celestún y Sisal. Facultad de Ciencias Antropológicas. Mérida, México, Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán, p. 291. Unpublished master thesis.Google Scholar
  28. Fraga, J., Arias, Y., et al. (2006). Comunidades y actores sociales en áreas marinas protegidas del Caribe (México, Cuba y República Dominicana). In Breton, Y., Brown, D. N., Davy, B., Huaghton, M., and Ovares, L. (eds.), Manejo de Recursos Costeros en el Gran Caribe: Resiliencia, Adaptación y Diversidad Comunitaria, Mayol/IDRC, Bogotá.Google Scholar
  29. Gadgil, M., Hemam, N. S., et al. (1998). People, refugia and resilience. In Berkes, F., and Folke, C. (eds.), Linking Social and Ecological Systems. Management Practices and Social Mechanisms for Building Resilience, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 30–47.Google Scholar
  30. Geisler, C. (2003). Your park, my poverty. Using impact assessment to counter the displacement effects of environmental greenlining. In Brechin, S. R., Wilshusen, P. R., Fortwangler, C. L., and West, P. C. (eds.), Contested Nature. Promoting International Biodiversity with Social Justice in the Twenty-first Century, State University of New York, Albany, New York, pp. 217–230.Google Scholar
  31. Ghimire, K., and Pimbert, M. (1997). Social change and conservation: An overview of issues and concepts. In Ghimire, K., and Pimbert, M. (eds.), Social Change and Conservation. Environmental Politics and Impacts of National Parks and Protected Areas, Earthscan, London.Google Scholar
  32. Goudie, A. (2000). The Human Impact on the Natural Environment. The MIT Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  33. Gunderson, L. H., and Holling, C. H. (eds.) (2002). Panarchy. Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems, Island Press, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  34. Haenn, N. (1999). The power of environmental knowledge: Ethnoecology and environmental conflicts in Mexican conservation. Human Ecology 27(3): 477–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hamú, D., Pellerano, M., et al. (2004). Strategic communication to build support for protected areas: principles, lessons and recommendations. In Hamú, D., Auchincloss, E., and Goldstein, W. (eds.), Communicating Protected Areas, Commission on Education and Communication, IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK, pp. 9–23.Google Scholar
  36. INEGI (2006a). Población total por municipio según grandes grupos de edad, 2005, Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Geografía e Informática, Aguascalientes, Mexico.Google Scholar
  37. INEGI (2006b). Programa de Ordenamiento Ecológico Territorial Costero del Estado de Yucatán. Principales flujos migratorios: Comportamiento migratorio 1995–2000. Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del I.P.N., Mérida, México.Google Scholar
  38. INEGI (2006c). Programa de Ordenamiento Ecológico Territorial Costero del Estado de Yucatán. Principales flujos migratorios: Inmigración. Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del I.P.N., Mérida, México.Google Scholar
  39. Kobelkowsky, R. (2003). Qué son las áreas naturales protegidas, Comisión Nacional de Áreas Naturales Protegidas, Mexico, D.F., 2003.Google Scholar
  40. Kuppe, R. (1999). Indígenas y medio ambiente. Conservacionismo a espaldas de los guardianes de la tierra. Boletín de Antropología Americana 35: 96–104.Google Scholar
  41. Lavides, M., Plantilla, A., et al. (2004). Building support for and beyond protected areas in the Phillippines: A Haribon’s journey of transformations. In Hamú, D., Auchincloss, E., and Goldstein, W. (eds.), Communicating Protected Areas, Commission on Education and Communication, IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK, pp. 46–57.Google Scholar
  42. Méndez-Contreras, J. I. (2004). Actitudes hacia los recursos naturales y su uso en los jóvenes de Celestún. Un estudio de caso. Departamento de Ecología Humana. Mérida, México, Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del I.P.N., Unidad Mérida, p. 194. Unpublished master thesis. This work could be read at http://www.mda.cinvestav.mx/eh02b.htm.
  43. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being Synthesis, Island Press, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  44. Moran, E. (1993). La ecología humana de los pueblos de la Amazonia, Fondo de Cultura Económica, México, D.F.Google Scholar
  45. Müller-Glodde, U. (1994). ProzeBbegleitende Beratung im Resource Management, GTZ, Bonn.Google Scholar
  46. O’Riordan, T., and Stoll-Kleeman, S. (2002). Deliberative democracy and participatory biodiversity. In O’Riordan, T., and Stoll-Kleeman, S. (eds.), Biodiversity, Sustainability and Human Communities. Protecting beyond the protected, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 87–112.Google Scholar
  47. Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons. The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  48. Pennington, D. C., Gillen, K., et al. (1999). Social Psychology, Arnold, London.Google Scholar
  49. Pérez-Farfante, I., and Kensley, B. (1997). Penaeoid and Sergestoid Shrimps and Prawns of the Word. Keys and diagnoses for the Families and Genera. Paris.Google Scholar
  50. Reid, F. (1997). A Field Guide to the Mammals of Central America and Southeast Mexico, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  51. Rigel, B. A. (1978). Censo de patos cazados en Yucatán. Temporada de 1977–1978. Programa de Desarrollo Faunístico del Mayab. Secretaría de Agricultura y Recursos Hidráhulicos, Mérida, México.Google Scholar
  52. Robles de Benito, R. (2005). Apropiación de recursos naturales y relaciones sociales en la Reserva de la Biosfera Ría Celestún, Yucatán. Departamento de Ecología Humana, Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del I.P.N., Unidad Mérida, Mérida, México, pp. vii+203. Unpublished master thesis. This work could be read at http://www.mda.cinvestav.mx/eh02b.htm.
  53. Salud, C. D. (2004). Microdiagnóstico Familiar de Celestún, Secretaría de Salud, Celestún, México.Google Scholar
  54. Singleton, S. (2001). Communities, states, and the governance of Pacific Northwest salmon fisheries. In Argawal, A., and Gibson, C. C. (eds.), Communities and the Environment.Ethnicity, Gender, and the State in Community-Based Conservation, Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, New Jersey, pp. 138–156.Google Scholar
  55. Smardon, R. C., and Faust, B. B. (2006). Introduction: International policy in the biosphere reserves of Mexico’s Yucatan Peninsula. Landscape and Urban Planning 74(3–4): 160–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. SPP (1982). Manual de Estadísticas Básicas del estado de Yucatán. Tomo I. México, D. F., Secretaría de Programación y Presupuesto, Coordinación General de Servicios Nacionales del INEGI, Gobierno del Estado de Yucatán.Google Scholar
  57. Stern, M. J. (2004). Understanding local reactions to protected areas. In Hamú, D., Auchincloss, E., and Goldstein, W. (eds.), Communicating Protected Areas, Commission on Education and Communication, IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK, pp. 40–45.Google Scholar
  58. Stoll-Kleeman, S. (2001). Barriers to nature conservation in Germany: A model explaining opposition to protected areas. Journal of Environmental Psychology 21(4): 369–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Taylor, S. J., and Bogdan, R. (1984). Introducción a los Métodos Cualitativos de Investigación, Paidós, Barcelona.Google Scholar
  60. Taylor, S. J., and Bogdan R. (1996). Introducción a los Métodos Cualitativos de Investigación, Paidós, Barcelona.Google Scholar
  61. Terborgh, J. (1999). Requiem for Nature, Island Press, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  62. van Weerd, M., van Boven, G., et al. (2004). Using communication to involve local communities and local governments in protected area management: Two related cases from northeast Luzon, Philippines. In Hamú, D., Auchincloss, E., and Goldstein, W. (eds.), Communicating Protected Areas, Commission on Education and Communication, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK, pp. 139–154.Google Scholar
  63. Vidal, R. M., Lucia, G., et al. (2004). Strategic communication planning for a national system of protected areas, Mexico. In Hamú, D., Auchincloss, E., and Goldstein, W. (eds.), Communicating Protected Areas, Commission on Education and Communication, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK, pp. 69–86.Google Scholar
  64. Western, D., Wright, R. M., et al. (eds.) (1994). Natural Connections. Perspectives in Community-based Conservation, Island Press, Washington DC.Google Scholar
  65. Wilshusen, P. R. (2003). Territory, nature, and culture. Negotiating the boundaries of biodiversity conservation in Colombia’s Pacific coastal region. In Brechin, S. R., Wilshusen, P. R., Fortwangler, C. L., and West, P. C. (eds.), Contested Nature. Promoting International Biodiversity with Social Justice in the Twenty-first Century, State University of New York Press, Albany, New York, pp. 73–88.Google Scholar
  66. Wilshusen, P. R., Brechin, S. R., et al. (2003). Contested nature. Conservation and development at the turn of the twenty-first century. In Brechin, S. R., Wilshusen, P. R., Fortwangler, C. L., and West, P. C. (eds.), Contested Nature. Promoting International Biodiversity with Social Justice in the Twenty-first Century, State University of New York Press, Albany, New York, pp. 1–22.Google Scholar
  67. Wilson, E. O. (1992). The Diversity of Life, Norton, New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jessica Méndez-Contreras
    • 1
  • Federico Dickinson
    • 1
  • Teresa Castillo-Burguete
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Human EcologyCINVESTAV, Unidad MeridaMeridaMexico

Personalised recommendations