Human Ecology

, Volume 33, Issue 1, pp 1–16

Environmental Stressors, Perceived Control, and Health: The Case of Residents Near Large-Scale Hog Farms in Eastern North Carolina

Article

Abstract

This study first explores the physical and psychological health effects of residence near industrial hog farms. The study compares differences in specific health symptoms, psychological distress, and perceived control between a group of 48 nearby residents and a control group (n = 34) with no exposure to hog farms. The process through which nearby residence affects psychological distress is then explored by examining for mediating effects of either physical health symptoms or perceived control. Findings suggest that nearby residence is associated with increases in 12 of the 22 reported physical symptoms. Most of these significantly different symptoms are related to respiratory, sinus, and nausea problems. Nearby residence is also associated with increased psychological distress and decreased perceptions of control. Nearby residence appears to affect psychological distress by increasing physical health symptoms. Although nearby residents report significantly lower perceived control, perceived control does not play a significant role in the process through which nearby residence affects psychological distress.

Keywords

agricultural pollution health psychological distress perceived control 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alloy, L. B., Koenig, L. J., and Clements, C. M. (1993). Perceptions of control: Determinants and mechanisms. In Weary, G., Gleicher, F., and Marsh, K. (eds.), Control Motivation and Social Cognition, Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 32–73.Google Scholar
  2. Aneshensel, C. S. (1992). Social Stress: Theory and research. Annual Review of Sociology 18: 15–38.Google Scholar
  3. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-Efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review 84: 191–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bullers, S. (1994). Women’s roles and health: The mediating effect of perceived control. Women and Health 22(2): 11–31.Google Scholar
  5. Bullers, S. (1996). Selection Effects in the Relationship Between Women’s Employment and Perceived Control. Paper presented at the American Sociological Association meetings, New York City.Google Scholar
  6. Cook, T. D., and Campbell, D. T. (1986). The causal assumptions of quasi-experimental practice. Synthese 86: 141–180.Google Scholar
  7. Devins, G., and Orme, C. M. (1985). Centers for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale. Test Critiques, Vol. II., Test Corporation of America.Google Scholar
  8. Edwards, R., and Ladd, A. E. (2000). Environmental justice, swine production and farm loss in North Carolina. Sociological Spectrum 20: 263–290.Google Scholar
  9. Evans, G. W., Jacobs, S. V., Dooley, D., and Catalano, R. (1987). The interaction of stressful life events and chronic strains on community mental health. American Journal of Community Psychology 15(1): 23–34.Google Scholar
  10. Furseth, O. J. (1997). Restructuring of Hog farming in North Carolina: Explosion and implosion. Professional Geographer 49(4): 391–403.Google Scholar
  11. Gecas, V. (1989). The social psychology of self-efficacy. Annual Review of Sociology 15: 291–316.Google Scholar
  12. Gecas, V., and Schwalbe, M. L. (1983). Beyond the looking-glass self: Social structure and efficacy-based self-esteem. Social Psychology Quarterly 46(2): 77–88.Google Scholar
  13. Kohn, M. L. (1989). Social structure and personality. A quintessentially sociological approach to social psychology. Social Forces 68(1): 26–33.Google Scholar
  14. Lazurus, R. S., and Launier, R. (1978). Stress related transactions between person and environment. In Pervin, L. A., and Lewis, M. (eds.), Perspectives in Interactional Psychology, Plenum, New York, pp. 287–327.Google Scholar
  15. Luginaah, I. N., Taylor, S. M., Elliot, S. J., and Eyles, J. D. (2002). Community reappraisal of the perceived health effects of a petroleum refinery. Social Science and Medicine 55: 47–61.Google Scholar
  16. Mirowsky, J., and Ross, C. E. (1989). Social Causes of Psychological Distress, Aldine de Gruyter, New York.Google Scholar
  17. Okun, M. (1997). Whats that Smell in the Air? Hog Population Report. University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, School of Public Health, Environmental Resource Program. Checc.sph.unc.edu/rooms/library/docs/hogs/hogcase.html.Google Scholar
  18. Pearlin, L. I., and Schooler, C. (1978). The structure of coping. Journal of Health and Social Behavior 19: 2–21.Google Scholar
  19. Rice, P. L. (1992). Stress and Health, Brooks/Cole, Pacific Grove, CA.Google Scholar
  20. Ross, C. E., Mirowsky, J., and Goldsteen, K. (1990). The impact of the family on health: A decade in review. Journal of Marriage and the Family 52: 1059–1078.Google Scholar
  21. Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied 80(1): Whole No. 609.Google Scholar
  22. Schiffman, S. S., Sattterly Miller, E. A., Suggs, M. S., and Graham, B. G. (1995). The effects of environmental odors emanating from commercial swine operations on the mood of nearby residents. Brain Research Bulletin 37: 369–375.Google Scholar
  23. Selye H. (1956). The Stress of Life, McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  24. Thoits, P. A. (1987). Gender and marital status differences in control and distress: Common stress versus unique stress explanations. Journal of Health and Social Behavior 28: 7–22.Google Scholar
  25. Thompson, S. C. (1993). Naturally occurring perceptions of control: A model of bounded flexibility. In Weary, G., Gleicher, F., and Marsh, K. (eds.), Control Motivation and Social Cognition, Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 74–93.Google Scholar
  26. Thu, K., Donham, K., Reynolds, S., Thorne, P. S., Subramanian, P., Whitten, P., and Stookesberry, J. (1997). A control study of the physical and mental health of residents living near a large-scale swine operation. Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health 3: 13–26.Google Scholar
  27. Turner, J. R., and Noh, S. (1983). Class and psychological vulnerability among women: The significance of social support and personal control. Journal of Health and Social Behavior 24: 2–15.Google Scholar
  28. Wallston, B. A., and Wallston, K. A. (1978). Locus of control and health: A review of the literature. Health Education Monographs 6: 107–117.Google Scholar
  29. Wheaton, B. (1980). The sociogenesis of psychological disorder. Journal of Health and Social Behavior 21: 100–124.Google Scholar
  30. Wilson, L. (1994). Environmental destruction is hazardous to your health. Social Policy 24(4): 16–24.Google Scholar
  31. Wing, S., Grant, G., Green, M., and Stewart, C. (1996). Community based collaboration for environmental justice: South-east Halifax county. Environment and Urbanization 8(2): 129–140.Google Scholar
  32. Wing, S., and Wolf, S. (1999). Intensive Livestock Operations, Health and Quality of Life Among Eastern North Carolina Residents. Report Prepared for North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Public Health.Google Scholar
  33. Zimmerman, M. A., and Rappaport, J. (1988). Citizen participation, perceived control, and psychological empowerment. American Journal of Community Psychology 16(5): 725–750.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Sociology and Criminal JusticeUniversity of North Carolina WilmingtonWilmington

Personalised recommendations