Advertisement

Husserl Studies

, Volume 33, Issue 3, pp 211–227 | Cite as

Surrogates and Empty Intentions: Husserl’s “On the Logic of Signs” as the Blueprint for his First Logical Investigation

  • Thomas ByrneEmail author
Article

Abstract

This paper accomplishes two tasks. First, I examine in detail Edmund Husserl’s earliest philosophy of surrogates, as it is found in his 1890 “On the Logic of Signs (Semiotic)”. I analyze his psychological and logical investigations of surrogates, where the former is concerned with explaining how these signs function and the latter with how they do so reliably. His differentiation of surrogates on the basis of their genetic origins and degrees of necessity is discussed. Second, the historical importance of this text is disclosed by showing how Semiotic serves as both the inspiration for, and the foil to, Husserl’s 1901 First Logical Investigation. Husserl not only adopts the idea that linguistic signs can function via association, but also maintains that such signs can motivate me to execute one of two experiences. The key difference between the texts is that Husserl abandons his theory of surrogates in 1901, instead holding that I can experience absent objects by means of empty intentions. The reasons why Husserl found it necessary to transform this tenet of his philosophy are discussed at length.

Keywords

Logical Investigation Intentional Object Associative Link Mental Energy Linguistic Sign 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank Ullrich Melle, Julia Jansen, Carlo Ierna, Diego D’Angelo, and Claudio Majolino for their most helpful comments on this essay.

References

  1. Bar-Hillel, Y. (1957). Husserl’s conception of a purely logical grammar. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 17(3), 362–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bernet, R., Marbach, E., & Kern, I. (1993). An introduction to husserlian phenomenology. Evanston: Northwestern.Google Scholar
  3. Byrne, T. (Forthcoming). Husserl’s early semiotics and number signs: Philosophy of Arithmetic through the lens of “On the Logic of Signs (Semiotic)”. Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology.Google Scholar
  4. Crowell, S. (1996). Husserl, Derrida, and the phenomenology of expression. Philosophy Today, 40(1), 61–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. D’Angelo, D. (2013). The foundations of alterity. Husserl on referencing and indicating. Investigaciones Fenomenológicas, 10, 53–71.Google Scholar
  6. Derrida, J. (1967). La voix et le phénomènen. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. Voice and Phenomena L. Lawlor (Trans.). Evanston: Northwestern 2011.Google Scholar
  7. Drummond, J. (2002). The Logical Investigations: Paving the way to a transcendental logic. In D. Zahavi & F. Stjernfelt (Eds.), One hundred years of phenomenology: Husserl’s Logical investigations reconsidered (pp. 31–40). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Drummond, J. (2003). Pure logical grammar: Anticipatory categoriality and articulated categoriality. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 11(2), 125–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Edie, J. (1972). Husserl’s conception of “the grammatical” and contemporary linguistics. In L. Embree (Ed.), Life-world and consciousness (pp. 137–161). Evanston: Northwestern.Google Scholar
  10. Hopkins, B. (1985). Derrida’s reading of Husserl in Speech and Phenomena: Ontologism and the metaphysics of presence. Husserl Studies, 2(2), 193–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hopkins, B. (2002). Authentic and symbolic numbers in Husserl’s Philosophy of Arithmetic. The New Yearbook for Phenomenology and Phenomenological Philosophy, 2, 39–71.Google Scholar
  12. Hua XII. Husserl, E. (1970). Philosophie der Arithmetik. Mit ergänzenden Texten. L. Eley (Ed.), Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff; Philosophy of arithmetic. Psychological and logical investigations with supplementary texts from 1887-1901 D. Willard (Trans.). New York: Springer 2003.Google Scholar
  13. Hua XIX. Husserl, E. (1984). Logische Untersuchungen. Zweiter Teil. Untersuchungen zur Phänomenologie und Theorie der Erkenntnis. U. Panzer (Ed.). Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  14. Hua XX-1. Husserl, E. (2002). Logische Untersuchungen. Ergänzungsband. Erster Teil. Entwürfe zur Umarbeitung der VI. Untersuchung und zur Vorrede für die Neuauflage der Logischen Untersuchungen. U. Melle (Ed.). Den Haag: Kluwer Publishers.Google Scholar
  15. Hua XX-2. Husserl, E. (2005). Logische Untersuchungen. Ergänzungsband. Zweiter Teil. Texte für die Neufassung der VI. Untersuchung. Zur Phänomenologie des Ausdrucks und der Erkenntnis. U. Melle (Ed.). Den Haag: Kluwer Publishers.Google Scholar
  16. Hua XXI. Husserl, E. (1983). Studien zur Arithmetik und Geometrie. Texte aus dem Nachlass. I. Strohmeyer (Ed.). Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  17. Hua XXII. Husserl, E. (1979). Aufsätze und Rezensionen. B. Rang (Ed.). Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  18. Husserl, E. (1970). Logical investigations Vol. I and II. J. N. Findlay (Trans.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Husserl, E. (1994a). Early writings in the philosophy of logic and mathematics. D. Willard (Trans.). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  20. Husserl, E. (1994b). Intuition and Repräsention. towards a classification of Repräsentation. In Early writings in the philosophy of logic and arithmetic (pp. 452–458). D. Willard (Trans.). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  21. Husserl, E. (1994c). Letter from E. Husserl to Carl Stumpf. In Early writings in the philosophy of logic and arithmetic (pp. 12–19). D. Willard (Trans.). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  22. Husserl, E. (1994d). On a logic of signs (semiotic). In Early writings in the philosophy of logic and arithmetic (pp. 20–51). D. Willard (Trans.). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  23. Husserl, E. (1994e). Psychological studies in the elements of logic. In Early writings in the philosophy of logic and arithmetic (pp. 139–170). D. Willard (Trans.). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  24. Ierna, C. (2003). Husserl and the infinite. Studia Phaenomenologica, 1–2, 179–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ierna, C. (2005). The beginnings of Husserl’s philosophy, Part 1: From “Über den Begriff der Zahl” to Philosophie der Arithmetic. The New Yearbook for Phenomenology and Phenomenological Philosophy, 5, 1–56.Google Scholar
  26. Ierna, C. (2009). Relations in the early works of Meinong and Husserl. Meinong Studies, 3, 7–36.Google Scholar
  27. Majolino, C. (2010). Structure de l’indice et équivocité du signe. A l’origine du partage. Anzeige/Ausdruck dans les ‘Recherches logiques’. Histoire Épistémologie Langage, 32(2), 1–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Majolino, C. (2012). La fabrique du renvoi. Sur quelques thèmes sémiotiques chez le premier Husserl. In C. Majolino (Ed.), Sémiotique et phénoméologie (pp. 93–114). Paraddigmi: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
  29. Parpan, R. (1984). Zeichen und Bedeutung: Eine Untersuchung zu Edmund Husserls Theorie des Sprachzeichens. Diss. Ruper-Karl U.Google Scholar
  30. Rolf, G. (2003). Bolzano and the problem of psychologism. In D. Fisette (Ed.), Husserl’s logical investigations reconsidered (pp. 95–108). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  31. Rollinger, R. (1993). Meinong and Husserl on abstraction and universals: From Hume studies I to Logical Investigations II. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
  32. Rollinger, R. (2004). Austrian theories of judgment: Bolzano, Brentano, Meinong, and Husserl. In A. Chrudzimski & W. Huemer (Eds.), Phenomenology and analysis: Essays in central European philosophy (pp. 257–284). Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag.Google Scholar
  33. Schubert, K., & Luise, M. (1978). Alexius Meinong on objects of higher order and Husserl’s phenomenology. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  34. Schuhmann, K. (1990). Husserl’s doppelter Vorstellungsbegriff: Die Texte von 1893. Brentano Studies, 3, 119–136.Google Scholar
  35. Sebestik, J. (2003). Husserl reader of Bolzano. In D. Fisette (Ed.), Husserl’s logical investigations reconsidered (pp. 59–81). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sokolowski, R. (1968). The logic of parts and wholes in Husserl’s Investigations. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 28(4), 537–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tillman, M. (2011). Empty and filled intentions in Husserl’s early work. Diss: Catholic University of America.Google Scholar
  38. Willard, D. (1980). Husserl on a logic that failed. The Philosophical Review, 89(1), 46–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zuh, D. (2008). How do categorial representations influence everyday intuition? On Husserl’s early attempt to grasp the horizontal structure of consciousness. Studia Universitatis Babes Bolyai Philosophia, 12, 49–62.Google Scholar
  40. Zuh, D. (2012). Wogegen wandte sich Husserl 1891? Ein Beitrag zur neueren Rezeption des Verhältnisses von Husserl und Frege. Husserl Studies, 28, 95–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Husserl-Archives: Centre for Phenomenology and Continental PhilosophyKU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium

Personalised recommendations