# Causal difference-in-differences estimation for evaluating the impact of semi-continuous medical home scores on health care for children

- 104 Downloads

## Abstract

Difference-in-differences (DID) is a popular approach in observational and quasi-experimental studies to estimate the effects of a treatment with discrete statuses. In many studies, however, the treatment can have a range of dosages or exposure levels. In our paper, “medical homeness” is a semi-continuous score ranging from 0 to 100 to indicate the extent to which a patient-centered medical home model is achieved. We developed a causal DID approach to estimating the effects of a treatment with semi-continuous dosages. The proposed approach allows for mixed-type designs as well as different propensity models. We applied the proposed approach to evaluate the dosage effect of medical homeness scores on the utilization and quality of children’s health care. We found that there was a roughly linear effect of medical homeness scores on the annual number of visits to doctor offices when medical homeness scores were below 60 points. The number of office visits did not further increase when medical homeness scores were above 60. A similar relationship was found between medical homeness scores and ratings for health care quality.

## Keywords

Medical home Difference-in-differences Causal inference## Notes

### Funding

This study was funded by the Grant R21HD078881 from Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human Development and by the Grant R01HS023336 from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

### Compliance with ethical standards

### Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

### Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

## References

- Abadie, A.: Semiparametric difference-in-differences estimators. Rev. Econ. Stud.
**72**(1), 1–19 (2005)Google Scholar - American Academy of Pediatrics Medical Home Initiatives for Children With Special Needs Project Advisory Committee and others. Policy statement: organizational principles to guide and define the child health care system and/or improve the health of all children. Pediatrics
**113**(5 Suppl), 1545 (2004)Google Scholar - Andersen, R.M.: Revisiting the behavioral model and access to medical care: does it matter? J. Health Soc. Behav.
**36**, 1–10 (1995)Google Scholar - Beal, A., Hernandez, S., Doty, M.: Latino access to the patient-centered medical home. J. Gen. Internal Med.
**24**(3), 514 (2009)Google Scholar - Bethell, C.D., Read, D., Brockwood, K.: Using existing population-based data sets to measure the american academy of pediatrics definition of medical home for all children and children with special health care needs. Pediatrics
**113**(Supplement 4), 1529–1537 (2004)Google Scholar - Cohen, J.W., Monheit, A.C., Beauregard, K.M., Cohen, S.B., Lefkowitz, D.C., Potter, D., Sommers, J.P., Taylor, A.K., Arnett III, R.H.: The medical expenditure panel survey: a national health information resource. Inquiry
**33**, 373–389 (1996)Google Scholar - Conley, T.G., Taber, C.R.: Inference with difference in differences with a small number of policy changes. Rev. Econ. Stat.
**93**(1), 113–125 (2011)Google Scholar - Damiano, P.C., Momany, E.T., Tyler, M.C., Penziner, A.J., Lobas, J.G.: Cost of outpatient medical care for children and youth with special health care needs: investigating the impact of the medical home. Pediatrics
**118**(4), e1187–e1194 (2006)Google Scholar - Dickens, M.D., Green, J.L., Kohrt, A.E., Pearson, H.A.: The medical home. Pediatrics
**90**(5), 774–774 (1992)Google Scholar - Domino, M.E., Humble, C., Lawrence Jr., W.W., Wegner, S.: Enhancing the medical homes model for children with asthma. Med. Care
**47**(11), 1113–1120 (2009)Google Scholar - Ferrari, S., Cribari-Neto, F.: Beta regression for modelling rates and proportions. J. Appl. Stat.
**31**(7), 799–815 (2004)Google Scholar - Fisher, E.S.: Building a medical neighborhood for the medical home. N. Engl. J. Med.
**359**(12), 1202–1205 (2008)Google Scholar - Fu, A.Z., Dow, W.H., Liu, G.G.: Propensity score and difference-in-difference methods: a study of second-generation antidepressant use in patients with bipolar disorder. Health Serv. Outcomes Res. Methodol.
**7**(1–2), 23–38 (2007)Google Scholar - Han, B., Yu, H., Friedberg, M.W.: Evaluating the impact of parent-reported medical home status on children’s health care utilization, expenditures, and quality: a difference-in-differences analysis with causal inference methods. Health Serv. Res.
**52**(2), 786–806 (2017)Google Scholar - Hastie, T.J. (ed.): Generalized additive models. In: Statistical Models in S. Routledge, New York (2017)Google Scholar
- Hirano, K., Imbens, G.W.: The propensity score with continuous treatments. In: Shewhart, W.A., Wilks, S.S., Gelman, A., Meng, X. (eds.) Applied Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference from Incomplete-Data Perspectives (2005)Google Scholar
- Homer, C.J., Klatka, K., Romm, D., Kuhlthau, K., Bloom, S., Newacheck, P., Van Cleave, J., Perrin, J.M.: A review of the evidence for the medical home for children with special health care needs. Pediatrics
**122**(4), e922–e937 (2008)Google Scholar - Imai, K., Van Dyk, D.A.: Causal inference with general treatment regimes: generalizing the propensity score. J. Am. Stat. Assoc.
**99**(467), 854–866 (2004)Google Scholar - Lechner, M.: The estimation of causal effects by difference-in-difference methods. Found. Trends Econom.
**4**(3), 165–224 (2011)Google Scholar - Li, Q., Racine, J.S.: Nonparametric Econometrics: Theory and Practice. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2007)Google Scholar
- MacCallum, R.C., Zhang, S., Preacher, K.J., Rucker, D.D.: On the practice of dichotomization of quantitative variables. Psychol. Methods
**7**(1), 19 (2002)Google Scholar - Rittenhouse, D.R., Shortell, S.M.: The patient-centered medical home: will it stand the test of health reform? JAMA
**301**(19), 2038–2040 (2009)Google Scholar - Rittenhouse, D.R., Thom, D.H., Schmittdiel, J.A.: Developing a policy-relevant research agenda for the patient-centered medical home: a focus on outcomes. J. Gen. Internal Med.
**25**(6), 593–600 (2010)Google Scholar - Romaire, M.A., Bell, J.F.: The medical home, preventive care screenings, and counseling for children: evidence from the medical expenditure panel survey. Acad. Pediatrics
**10**(5), 338–345 (2010)Google Scholar - Romaire, M.A., Bell, J.F., Grossman, D.C.: Health care use and expenditures associated with access to the medical home for children and youth. Med. Care
**50**, 262–269 (2012)Google Scholar - Rosenbaum, P.R.: The consquences of adjustment for a concomitant variable that has been affected by the treatment. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. A (General)
**147**, 656–666 (1984)Google Scholar - Rosenbaum, P.R., Rubin, D.B.: The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika
**70**(1), 41–55 (1983)Google Scholar - Sia, C., Tonniges, T.F., Osterhus, E., Taba, S.: History of the medical home concept. Pediatrics
**113**(Supplement 4), 1473–1478 (2004)Google Scholar - Slusky, D.J.: Significant placebo results in difference-in-differences analysis: the case of the acas parental mandate. East. Econ. J.
**43**(4), 580–603 (2017)Google Scholar - Stange, K.C., Nutting, P.A., Miller, W.L., Jaén, C.R., Crabtree, B.F., Flocke, S.A., Gill, J.M.: Defining and measuring the patient-centered medical home. J. Gen. Internal Med.
**25**(6), 601–612 (2010)Google Scholar - Stevens, G.D., Seid, M., Pickering, T.A., Tsai, K.-Y.: National disparities in the quality of a medical home for children. Maternal Child Health J.
**14**(4), 580–589 (2010)Google Scholar - Strickland, B., McPherson, M., Weissman, G., Van Dyck, P., Huang, Z.J., Newacheck, P.: Access to the medical home: results of the national survey of children with special health care needs. Pediatrics
**113**(Supplement 4), 1485–1492 (2004)Google Scholar - Strickland, B.B., Jones, J.R., Ghandour, R.M., Kogan, M.D., Newacheck, P.W.: The medical home: health care access and impact for children and youth in the United States. Pediatrics
**127**, 604–611 (2011)Google Scholar - Stuart, E.A., Huskamp, H.A., Duckworth, K., Simmons, J., Song, Z., Chernew, M.E., Barry, C.L.: Using propensity scores in difference-in-differences models to estimate the effects of a policy change. Health Serv. Outcomes Res. Methodol.
**14**(4), 166–182 (2014)Google Scholar - Yang, L., Tsiatis, A.A.: Efficiency study of estimators for a treatment effect in a pretest-posttest trial. Am. Stat.
**55**(4), 314–321 (2001)Google Scholar