Abstract
Recent interest in understanding the effect of interventions on patient-reported outcomes as well as traditional clinical endpoints has led to an expansion of methods for simultaneous modeling of longitudinal and survival data in clinical trials. Such joint models link the multiple outcome measures using an underlying latent structure, typically a collection of individual-level random effects. They can estimate treatment effects separately on different aspects of a disease process, as well as illuminate associations among outcomes and individual variability. In communicating model output to clinicians and patients, it is challenging to convey a meaningful interpretation of multiple treatment effects, complex outcome associations, and important underlying assumptions. This paper presents graphical displays designed to make the output of Bayesian joint models accessible to non-technical audiences, while preserving important methodological features. We emphasize individual-level posterior predictions of longitudinal and survival outcomes, illustrating our methods using patient-reported symptom severity and survival in a clinical trial example.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Carlin, B., Louis, T.: Bayesian Methods for Data Analysis, 3rd edn. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton (2009)
Fairclough, D.: Patient reported outcomes as endpoints in medical research. Stat. Methods Med. Res. 13, 115–138 (2004)
Gelman, A.: Prior distributions for variance parameters in hierarchical models. Bayesian Anal. 3, 515–533 (2006)
Gray, S., Brookmeyer, R.: Multidimensional longitudinal data: estimating a treatment effect from continuous, discrete, or time-to-event response variables. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 95, 396–406 (2000)
Hatfield, L., Boye, M., Carlin, B.: Joint modeling of multiple longitudinal patient-reported outcomes and survival. J. Biopharm. Stat. 21, 971–991 (2011)
Hatfield, L., Boye, M., Hackshaw, M., Carlin, B.: Multilevel Bayesian models for survival times and longitudinal patient-reported outcomes with many zeros. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. (to appear) (2012a)
Hatfield, L., Hodges, J., Carlin, B.: Combining longitudinal and survival information in Bayesian joint models: when are treatment estimates improved? Technical report, Division of Biostatistics, University of Minnesota, Research Report # 2012-002 (2012b)
Kurland, B., Johnson, L., Egleston, B., Diehr, P.: Longitudinal data with follow-up truncated by death: match the analysis method to research aims. Stat. Sci. 24, 211–222 (2009)
Rizopoulos, D.: Dynamic predictions and prospective accuracy in joint models for longitudinal and time-to-event data. Biometrics 67, 819–829 (2011)
Rubin, D.: Inference and missing data (with discussion). Biometrika 63, 581–592 (1976)
Soto, G., Spertus, J.: EPOCH® and ePRISM®: a web-based translational framework for bridging outcomes research and clinical practice. Comput. Cardiol. 34, 205–208 (2007)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hatfield, L.A., Carlin, B.P. Clinically relevant graphical predictions from Bayesian joint longitudinal-survival models. Health Serv Outcomes Res Method 12, 169–181 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10742-012-0087-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10742-012-0087-9