Skip to main content
Log in

Complementing information from incremental net benefit: a Bayesian perspective

  • Published:
Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cost-effectiveness analysis of a treatment is typically based on specific functions of the expectation of the effectiveness and cost of the treatment, and treatment comparisons are made in the same vein. The mathematical expectation has been the cornerstone for defining the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio and the incremental net benefit, the most popular tools for cost-effectiveness analysis for pairwise treatment comparisons. In this paper we propose a framework for cost-effectiveness analysis based on the whole posterior distribution of effectiveness and cost. We adopt a Bayesian perspective and use the predictive posterior distribution of the net benefit. The analysis based on the whole posterior distribution captures the uncertainty about the value of effectiveness and cost of the treatment and overcomes some limitations presented by the mean, as a summary measure, when skewed data are considered. Furthermore, it allows us to compare more than two treatments. An illustration with real data is provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al, M.J., van Hout, B.A.: A Bayesian approach to economic analyses of clinical trials: the case of stenting versus balloon angioplasty. Health Econ. 9, 599–609 (2000)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ashby, D., Smith, A.F.M.: Evidence-based medicine as Bayesian decision-making. Stat. Med. 19, 3291–3202 (2000)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bala, M.V., Zarkin, G.A., Mauskopf, J.: Presenting results of probabilistic sensitivity analysis: the incremental benefit curve. Health Econ. 17, 435–440 (2008)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, J.: The case for objective Bayesian analysis. Bayesian Anal 1, 385–402 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, J., Bernardo, J.M.: On the development of reference priors. In: Bernardo, J.M., Berger, J.O., Dawid, A.P., Smith, A.F.M. (eds.) Bayesian Statistics 4, pp. 35–60. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, J., Bernardo, J.M., Sun, D.: Objective Bayesian inference. Technical Report (2006)

  • Briggs, A.H.: Handling uncertainty in economic evaluation. BMJ 319, 120–120 (1999a)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Briggs, A.H.: A Bayesian approach to stochastic cost-effectiveness analysis. Health Econ. 8, 257–261 (1999b)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Briggs, A.H.: A Bayesian approach to stochastic cost-effectiveness analysis. An illustration and application to blood pressure control in Type 2 Diabetes. Int. J. Tech. Ass. Health Care 17, 69–82 (2001)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fenwick, E., Claxton, K., Sculpher, M.: Representing uncertainty: the role of cost-effectiveness acceptability curves. Health Econ. 10, 779–787 (2001)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fryback, D.G., Chinnis, J.O., Ulvila, J.W.: Bayesian cost-effectiveness analysis. Int. J. Tech. Ass. Health Care 17, 83–97 (2001)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gelman, A., Carlin, J.B., Stern, H.S., Rubin, D.B.: Bayesian Data Analysis (2nd ed.) Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • Heitjan, D.F., Li, H.: Bayesian estimation of cost-effectiveness: an importance-sampling approach. Health Econ. 13, 191–198 (2004)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heitjan, D.F., Moskowitz, A.J., Whang, W.: Bayesian estimation of cost-effectiveness ratios from clinical trials. Health Econ. 8, 191–201 (1999)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hoch, J.S., Rockx, M.A., Krahn, A.: Using the net benefit regression framework to construct cost-effectiveness acceptability curves: an example using data from a trial of external loop recorders versus Holter monitoring for ambulatory monitoring of “community acquired” syncope. BMC Health Services Res 6, 68 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jakubczyk M., Kaminski B.: Cost-effectiveness acceptability curves—caveats quantified. Health Econ. (2009) doi:10.1002/hec.1534

  • Jeffreys, H.: Theory of Probability (3rd. ed.). Oxford University Press, New York (1961)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D.A.: Bayesian approach to the economic evaluation of health care technologies. In: Spicker (ed.) Quality of Life and Phamaeconomics in Clinical Trials, pp. 1189–1196. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia (1996)

  • Koerkamp, B.G., Hunink, M.G.M., Stijnen, T., Hammitt, J.K., Kuntz, K.M., Winstein, M.C.: Limitations of acceptability curves for presenting uncertainty in cost-effectiveness analysis. Med. Decis. Making 27, 101–111 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Löthgren, M., Zethraeus, N.: Definition, interpretation and calculation of cost-effectiveness acceptability curves. Health Econ. 9, 623–630 (2000)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mishan, E.J.: Evaluation of life and limb: a theoretical approach. J. Pol. Econ. 79, 687–705 (1971)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Hagan, A., Stevens, J.W.: A framework for cost-effectiveness analysis from clinical trial data. Health Econ. 10, 303–315 (2001)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O’Hagan, A., Stevens, J.W., Montmartin, J.: Bayesian cost-effectiveness analysis from clinical trial data. Stat. Med. 20, 733–753 (2001)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O’Hagan, A., Stevens, J.W.: Bayesian methods for design and analysis of cost-effectiveness trials in the evaluation of health care technologies. Stat. Methods Med. Res. 1, 469–490 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parmigiani, G.: Modelling in Medical Decision Making: A Bayesian Approach (Statistics in Practice). Wiley, Chichester (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinto J.L., López C., Badía X., Coma A. et al.: Análisis coste-efectividad del tratamiento antirretroviral de gran actividad en pacientes infectados por el VIH asintomáticos. Medicina Clínica 114, 62–67 (2000)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson G., Manca A.: Calculation of quality adjusted life years in the published literature: a review of methodology and transparency. Health Econ. 13, 1203–1210 (2004)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spiegelhalter, D.J., Feedman, L.S., Parmar, M.K.B.: Bayesian approaches to randomized trials (with discussion). J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. A 157, 357–456 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, J.W., O’Hagan, A., Miller, P.: Case study in the Bayesian analysis of a cost-effectiveness trial in the evaluation of health care technologies: depression. Pharm. Stat. 2, 51–68 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stinnett, A.A., Mullahy, J.: Net health benefits: a new framework for the analysis of uncertainty in cost-effectiveness analysis. Med. Decis. Making 18, S68–S80 (1998)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vanness, D.J., Mullahy, J.: Perspectives on mean-based evaluation of health care. In: Jones A.M. (ed.) Elgar Companion to Health Economics, pp. 526–536. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham (2006)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research has been partially support by the grants SEJ-02814 (Junta de Andalucía), SEJ2007-65200, SEJ2006-12685 (Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia (MEC), Spain) and ECO2009-14152 (MICINN, Spain).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. J. Vázquez-Polo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moreno, E., Girón, F.J., Vázquez-Polo, F.J. et al. Complementing information from incremental net benefit: a Bayesian perspective. Health Serv Outcomes Res Method 10, 86–99 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10742-010-0059-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10742-010-0059-x

Keywords

Navigation