Skip to main content
Log in

A simulation study to compare methods for constructing confidence intervals for the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio

  • Published:
Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) is a well accepted measure of cost-effectiveness in health sciences. Due to the complexity of a ratio of random variables, constructing an appropriate confidence interval for the ICER is challenging. Many methods have been proposed, yet systematic comparisons of these methods are rare. Also, there have been conflicting recommendations for the optimum methodology. Polsky et al. (Health Econ. 6:243–252, 1997) and Briggs et al. (Stat. Med. 18:3245–3262, 1999) have performed simulation studies comparing four and eight methods, respectively. Cook and Heyse (Stat. Med. 19:2989–3003, 2000) have proposed an angular transformation for addressing the problem of improper ordering of ICER estimates using bootstrap resampling, and compared several methods with and without the transformation. In this paper we have conducted an extensive simulation to compare the most commonly used methods as well as new methods that have not yet been evaluated in the aforementioned simulation studies. We simulated samples from a wide range of distributions, and considered the less desired scenarios when the true standardized incremental effect was near zero. The results suggest that confidence intervals based on Fieller’s method, bootstrap-percentile method, and bootstrap-standard method consistently yield reasonable coverage percentages across different sample distributions. Other methods depend heavily on sample sizes, as well as how far the standardized incremental effect is away from zero. Confidence intervals based on the transformed methods are exceptionally problematic when the standardized incremental effect is small. We have also illustrated our results with a real example.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Briggs, A.H., Mooney, C.Z., Wonderling, D.E.: Constructing confidence intervals for cost-effectiveness ratios: an evaluation of parametric and non-parametric techniquest using Monte Carlo simulation. Stat. Med. 18, 3245–3262 (1999)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Buonaccorsi, J.P., Iyer, H.K.: A comparison of confidence regions and designs in estimating a ratio. Commun. Stat. Simulat. 13, 723–741 (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhary, M.A., Stearns, S.C.: Estimating confidence intervals for cost-effectiveness ratios: an example from a randomized trial. Stat. Med. 15, 1447–1458 (1996)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, J.R., Heyse, J.F.: Use of an angular transformation for ratio estimation in cost-effectiveness analysis. Stat. Med. 19, 2989–3003 (2000)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, C.: Fieller’s theorem, the likelihood and the delta method. Biometrics 46, 709–718 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Efron, B.: Better bootstrap confidence intervals. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 82, 171–185 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  • Efron, B., Tibshirani, R.J.: An introduction to the bootstrap. Chapman & Hall/CRC (1993)

  • Fieller, E.C.: Some problems in interval estimation. J R Stat Soc [Ser B] 16, 175–183 (1954)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, S., Whitehead, A.: An illustration of the modelling of cost and efficacy data from a clinical trial. Stat. Med. 22, 1009–1024 (2003)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P., Martin, M.: On the bootstrap and two-sample problems. Austral. J. Statist. 30A, 179–192 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heitjan, D.F., Moskowitz, A.J., Whang, W.: Bayesian estimation of cost-effectiveness ratios from clinical trials. Health Econ. 8(3), 191–201 (1999)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heitjan, D.F., Moskowitz, A.J., Whang, W.: Problems with interval estimates of the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. Med. Decis. Making 19(1), 9–15 (1999)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, J.T.G.: Fieller’s problems and resampling techniques. Statistical Sinica 5, 161–171 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, G., Wu, J., Williams, G.R.: Fieller’s interval and the bootstrap-fieller interval for the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. Health Serv. Outcomes Res. Methodol. 1, 291–303 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R.J. Jr.: Beyond Anova, basics of applied statistics. John Wiley, New York (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  • Katon, W.J., Roy-Byrne, P., Russo, J., Cowley, D.: Cost-effectiveness and cost offset of a collaborative care intervention for primary care patients with panic disorder. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 59(12), 1098–1104 (2002)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, B.J., Drummond, M.F., Labelle, R.J., Willan, A.: In search of power and significance: issues in the design and analysis of stochastic cost-effectiveness studies in health care. Med. Care 32, 150–163 (1994)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, B.J., Briggs, A.H.: Analysis of uncertainty in health care cost-effectiveness studies: an introduction to statistical issues and methods. Stat. Methods Med. Res. 11, 455–468 (2002)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Polsky, D., Glick, H.A., Willke, R., Schulman, K.: Confidence intervals for cost-effectiveness ratios: a comparison of four methods. Health Econ. 6, 243-252 (1997)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roy-Byrne, P., Katon, W., Cowley, D.S., Russo, J.: A randomized trial of collaborative care for patients with panic disorder in primary care. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 58(9), 869–876 (2001)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sitter, R.R., Wu, C.F.J.: On the accuracy of Fieller intervals for binary response data. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 88, 1021–1025 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sykes, A.M.: Ratio estimates and Fieller’s theorem in regression modelling. Commun. Stat. Theor. 29, 2055–2063 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wakker, P., Klaassen, M.P.: Confidence intervals for cost/effectiveness ratios. Health Econ. 4, 373–381 (1995)

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yee, K.F.: The calculation of probabilities in rejecting bioequivalence. Biometrics 42, 961–965 (1986)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zerbe, G.O.: On Fieller’s theorem and the general linear model. Am. Stat. 32, 103–105 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported in part by NIH grant AHRQ R01HS013105-01 and grants from the John A. Hartford Foundation.

We are grateful to Drs. Jürgen Unützer, Joan Russo, and Wayne Katon for their helpful and insightful comments. We also would like to thank Dr. Roy-Byrne for generously providing his data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ming-Yu Fan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fan, MY., Zhou, XH. A simulation study to compare methods for constructing confidence intervals for the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. Health Serv Outcomes Res Method 7, 57–77 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10742-006-0017-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10742-006-0017-9

Keywords

Navigation