Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effects of chronotropic incompetence on exercise capacity in people with heart failure versus age-matched controls

  • Published:
Heart Failure Reviews Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Chronotropic incompetence (CI) is an inability to adequately raise heart rate during physiological stress. We established CI prevalence and exercise capacity in heart failure versus healthy age-matched controls. We conducted a systematic search (1966–July 1, 2020) and meta-analysis of studies reporting peak VO2 in people with heart failure with reduced (HFrEF) and preserved (HFpEF) left ventricular ejection fraction and controls. Seventeen studies of 4410 participants were included, 4167 with heart failure and 243 age-matched controls. In both heart failure phenotypes, CI was more prevalent in HFrEF (51.7%) and HFpEF (55.8%) than in healthy controls (9%). Mortality was 24% higher in people with HFrEF and CI versus those with HFrEF and without CI; OR −1.24 (95% CI −2.20 to −0.28; p = 0.01). People with heart failure and CI had lower peak VO2 than those without CI (MD) −3.30 ml kg−1 min−1 (95% CI −4.25 to −2.35, p < 0.01), and this was primarily driven by the HFrEF sub-population (MD) −3.86 ml kg−1 min−1 (95% CI −4.83 to −2.89, p < 0.01). Maximum heart rate MD −37.51 beats min−1 (95% CI −41.99 to −33.03, p < 0.01) and maximum-resting heart rate were lower MD −29.44 beats min−1 (95% CI −34.55 to −24.33, p < 0.01) in people with heart failure with CI vs without CI. People with heart failure and CI demonstrated similar respiratory exchange ratios (RER) to people with heart failure but without CI; (MD) −0.02 (95% CI −0.03 to −0.01), p < 0.01, suggesting that poor effort was unlikely to explain CI. CI is more prevalent in heart failure than in age-matched controls and although it is associated with lower peak VO2 in HFrEF, it is unrelated to the lower peak VO2 in HFpEF. RER values suggest poor effort is unlikely to explain these findings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brubaker PH, Kitzman DW (2011) Chronotropic incompetence: causes, consequences, and management. Circulation 123(9):1010–1020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Keteyian SJ et al (2016) Variables measured during cardiopulmonary exercise testing as predictors of mortality in chronic systolic heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 67(7):780–789

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Smart N et al (2005) Determinants of functional capacity in patients with chronic heart failure: role of filling pressure and systolic and diastolic function. Am Heart J 149(1):152–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Smart NA et al (2012) Exercise training in heart failure with preserved systolic function: a randomized controlled trial of the effects on cardiac function and functional capacity. Congest Heart Fail (Greenwich, Conn) 18(6):295–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Loftin M et al (2004) Comparison of VO2 peak during treadmill and cycle ergometry in severely overweight youth. J Sports Sci Med 3(4):554–560

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Cohen-Solal A et al (1999) Cardiac and peripheral responses to exercise in patients with chronic heart failure. Eur Heart J 20(13):931–945

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Higgins JPT, TS, Deeks JJ, Altman DG (2003) Measuring inconsistency in meta-analysis. Br Med J 327(7414):557–60

  8. Huedo-Medina TB et al (2006) Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q statistic or I2 index? Psychol Methods 11(2):193–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Egger M et al (1997) Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 315(7109):629–634

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sterne JA, Gavaghan D, Egger M (2000) Publication and related bias in meta-analysis: power of statistical tests and prevalence in the literature. J Clin Epidemiol 53(11):1119–1129

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Wells G, BS, O'Connell D, Peterson J, Welch V, Losos L, Tugwell P (2019) The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. [cited 21 July 2020]; Available from: http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp

  12. Brubaker PH et al (2006) Chronotropic incompetence and its contribution to exercise intolerance in older heart failure patients. J Cardiopulm Rehabil 26(2):86–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Clark AL, Coats AJ (1995) Chronotropic incompetence in chronic heart failure. Int J Cardiol 49(3):225–231

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Fei L et al (1996) Decreased heart rate variability in patients with congestive heart failure and chronotropic incompetence. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 19(4 Pt 1):477–483

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hajdusek P et al (2017) Heart rate response to exercise in heart failure patients: the prognostic role of metabolic-chronotropic relation and heart rate recovery. Int J Cardiol 228:588–593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jamil HA et al (2016) Chronotropic incompetence does not limit exercise capacity in chronic heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 67(16):1885–1896

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jorde UP et al (2008) Chronotropic incompetence, beta-blockers, and functional capacity in advanced congestive heart failure: time to pace? Eur J Heart Fail 10(1):96–101

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Klein DA et al (2015) Association of chronic kidney disease with chronotropic incompetence in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Am J Cardiol 116(7):1093–1100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Magri D et al (2012) Chronotropic incompentence and functional capacity in chronic heart failure: no role of beta-blockers and beta-blocker dose. Cardiovasc Ther 30(2):100–108

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Magri D et al (2014) Cardiovascular mortality and chronotropic incompetence in systolic heart failure: the importance of a reappraisal of current cut-off criteria. Eur J Heart Fail 16(2):201–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Al-Najjar Y, Witte KK, Clark AL (2012) Chronotropic incompetence and survival in chronic heart failure. Int J Cardiol 157(1):48–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Patel HC et al (2020) The prognostic significance of chronotropic incompetence in patients with severe left ventricular systolic function referred for cardiac transplant assessment. Eur J Prev Cardiol 27(3):328–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Roche F et al (2001) Chronotropic incompetence response to exercise in congestive heart failure, relationship with the cardiac autonomic status. Clin Physiol 21(3):335–342

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Santos M et al (2018) Resting heart rate and chronotropic response to exercise: prognostic implications in heart failure across the left ventricular ejection fraction spectrum. J Card Fail 24(11):753–762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sarma S et al (2020) Mechanisms of chronotropic incompetence in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Circ Heart Fail 13(3):e006331

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Smart NA et al (2012b) Exercise training in heart failure with preserved systolic function: a randomized controlled trial of the effects on cardiac function and functional capacity. Congest Heart Fail 18(6):295–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Witte KK, Cleland JG, Clark AL (2006) Chronic heart failure, chronotropic incompetence, and the effects of beta blockade. Heart 92(4):481–486

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Mancini D, LeJemtel T, Aaronson K (2000) Peak VO(2): a simple yet enduring standard. Circulation 101(10):1080–1082

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Sarullo FM et al (2010) Cardiopulmonary exercise testing in patients with chronic heart failure: prognostic comparison from peak VO2 and VE/VCO2 slope. Open Cardiovasc Med J 4:127–134

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Butler J et al (2004) Selection of patients for heart transplantation in the current era of heart failure therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol 43(5):787–793

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Hill AB (1965) The environment and disease: association or causation? Proc R Soc Med 58:295–300

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Tse HF et al (2005) The incremental benefit of rate-adaptive pacing on exercise performance during cardiac resynchronization therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol 46(12):2292–2297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Mehra MR et al (2006) Listing criteria for heart transplantation: International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation guidelines for the care of cardiac transplant candidates–2006. J Heart Lung Transplant 25(9):1024–1042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Smart N et al (2007) Exercise training in systolic and diastolic dysfunction: effects on cardiac function, functional capacity, and quality of life. Am Heart J 153(4):530–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Zweerink A et al (2018) Chronotropic incompetence in chronic heart failure. Circ Heart Fail 11(8):e004969

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Gierula J et al (2020) Personalized rate-response programming improves exercise tolerance after 6 months in people with cardiac implantable electronic devices and heart failure: a phase II study. Circulation 141(21):1693–1703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Smart NA et al (2010) The effects of exercise training on systemic brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) and N-terminal BNP expression in heart failure patients: an individual patient meta-analysis. Circulation 122(21)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Smart NA.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Hannah Clark is currently receiving an Australian Government Research Training Program (RTP) Scholarship for Doctoral Candidature. Peter Brubaker receives financial support as a consultant from Merck, Corvia Medical, and Boehringer Ingelheim. John Gierula is currently receiving National Institute for Health Research (UK), Post-Doctoral Fellowship award (Does not relate to this work).

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 61020 KB)

Supplementary file2 (DOCX 866 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

NA, S., H, C., P, B. et al. Effects of chronotropic incompetence on exercise capacity in people with heart failure versus age-matched controls. Heart Fail Rev 27, 795–809 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10741-021-10081-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10741-021-10081-1

Keywords

Navigation