Advertisement

A Reappraisal of Charles Darwin’s Engagement with the Work of William Sharp Macleay

  • Aaron Novick
Original Paper

Abstract

Charles Darwin, in his species notebooks, engaged seriously with the quinarian system of William Sharp Macleay. Much of the attention given to this engagement has focused on Darwin’s attempt to explain, in a transmutationist framework, the intricate patterns that characterized the quinarian system. Here, I show that Darwin’s attempt to explain these quinarian patterns primarily occurred before he had read any work by Macleay. By the time Darwin began reading Macleay’s writings, he had already arrived at a skeptical view of the reality of these patterns. What most interested Darwin, as he read Macleay, was not the quinarian system itself. Rather, Darwin’s notes on his reading primarily concerned certain background principles animating Macleay’s work, in particular: (a) the non-existence of a saltus between human and animal minds, (b) the difficulty of establishing boundaries between species and varieties, and (c) Macleay’s method of variation. Darwin’s interest in the last of these left a mark on his discussion of taxonomic methodology in the Origin.

Keywords

Charles Darwin Quinarian system William Sharp Macleay Human/animal distinction Species Varieties 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The author thanks James Lennox, Jon Hodge, Aleta Quinn, Andrew Brower, and three anonymous reviewers for Journal of the History of Biology for helpful comments and discussion.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The author declares that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Barrett, Paul H, Gautrey, Peter Jack, Herbert, Sandra, Kohn, David, Smith, Sydney (eds.). 2008. Charles Darwin’s Notebooks, 1836-1844. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Darwin, Charles. 1871a. The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. Vol. I. London: John Murray. http://darwin-online.org.uk/content/frameset?itemID=F937.1&viewtype=text&pageseq=1.
  3. Darwin, Charles. 1871b. The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. Vol. II. London: John Murray. http://darwin-online.org.uk/content/frameset?itemID=F937.2&viewtype=text&pageseq=1.
  4. Darwin, Charles. 1872. The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals. London: John Murray. http://darwin-online.org.uk/content/frameset?itemID=F1142&viewtype=text& pageseq=1.
  5. Darwin, Charles. 1964. “On the Origin of Species.” Ernst Mayr (ed.), Facsimile. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Darwin, Charles. 1986. The Foundations of the Origin of Species: Two Essays Written in 1842 and 1844. Edited by Francis Darwin, Paul H. Barrett, and R. B. Freeman. New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar
  7. De Beer, Gavin. 1963. Charles Darwin: Evolution by Natural Selection. Garden City, NY: Doubleday and Company.Google Scholar
  8. Di Gregorio, Mario A. 1996. “The Uniqueness of Charles Darwin: His Reading of W.S. Macleay’s Horae Entomologicae.” Historical Records of Australian Science 11(2): 103–117.  https://doi.org/10.1071/HR9961120103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fleming, John. 1829. “On Systems and Methods in Natural History. By J.E. Bicheno, Esq. 1829. (Linn. Trans., Xv, Part 2.).” Quarterly Review 41: 302–327.Google Scholar
  10. Ghiselin, Michael T. 1969. The Triumph of the Darwinian Method. Berkeley:University of California Press.Google Scholar
  11. Ghiselin, Michael T. 2004. “Mayr and Bock versus Darwin on Genealogical Classification.” Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research 42(2): 165–169.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0469.2004.00258.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gray, John E. 1824a. “On the Arrangement of the Papilionidae.” Annals of Philosophy NS 8: 119–120.Google Scholar
  13. Gray, John E. 1824b. “On the Natural Arrangement of the Pulmonobranchous Mollusca.” Annals of Philosophy NS 8: 107–109.Google Scholar
  14. Gray, John E. 1825a. “A Synopsis of the Genera of Reptiles and Amphibia, with a Description of Some New Species.” Annals of Philosophy NS 10: 193–217.Google Scholar
  15. Gray, John E. 1825b. “An Attempt to Divide the Echinida, or Sea Eggs, into Natural Families.” Annals of Philosophy NS 10: 423–431.Google Scholar
  16. Gray, John E. 1825c. “An Outline of an Attempt at the Disposition of Mammalia into Tribes and Families, with a List of the Genera Apparently Appertaining to Each Tribe.” Annals of Philosophy NS 10: 337–344.Google Scholar
  17. Hodge, Jonathan. 2013. “The Origins of the Origin: Darwin’s First Thoughts About the Tree of Life and Natural Selection, 1837-1839.” Michael Ruse (ed.), The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Darwin and Evolutionary Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 64–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jenyns, Leonard. 1835. “Report on the Recent Progress and Present State of Zoology.” Report of the British Association for the Advancement of Science 4: 143–251.Google Scholar
  19. Lowther, David. 2016. “The Reverent Eye: Scientific Visual Culture and The Origins of Modern British Zoology, 1815-1840.”Google Scholar
  20. Macleay, William Sharp. 1821. Horae Entomologicae: Or Essays on the Annulose Animals. London: S. Bagster.Google Scholar
  21. Macleay, William Sharp. 1827. “On the Structure of the Tarsus in the Tetramerous and Trimerous Coleoptera of the French Entomologists.” Transactions of the Linnean Society of London 15(1): 63–73.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.1826.tb00108.x.
  22. Macleay, William Sharp. 1829a. “Notes on the Genus Capromys of Desmarest.” The Zoological Journal 4: 269–278.Google Scholar
  23. Macleay, William Sharp. 1829b. “A Letter to J. E. Bicheno, Esq., F.R.S., in Examination of His Paper ‘On Systems and Methods’ in the Linnean Transactions.” Philosophical Magazine 6(33): 199–212.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14786442908675120.
  24. Macleay, William Sharp. 1830a. A Letter on the Dying Struggle of the Dichotomous System. London: Richard Taylor.Google Scholar
  25. Macleay, William Sharp. 1830b. “Explanation of the Comparative Anatomy of the Thorax in Winged Insects, with a Review of the Present State of the Nomenclature of Its Parts.” The Zoological Journal 5: 145–179.Google Scholar
  26. Macleay, William Sharp. 1838. Illustrations of the Annulosa of South Africa: Being a Portion of the Objects of Natural History, Chiefly Collected During an Expedition into the Interior of South Africa, Under the Direction of Dr. Andrew Smith, in the Years 1834, 1835, and 1836, Fitted. London: Smith, Elder.Google Scholar
  27. Macleay, William Sharp. 1840. “Observations on Trilobites, Founded on a Comparison of Their Structure with That of Living Crustacea.” Annals and Magazine of Natural History 4(21): 16–22.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00222934009512445.
  28. Macleay, William Sharp. 1842. “On the Natural Arrangement of Fishes.” Annals and Magazine of Natural History 9(57): 197–207.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03745484209445326.
  29. McMillan, Nora F, Cernohorsky, Walter O. 1979. “William Swainson, F.R.S., in New Zealand with Notes on His Drawings Held in New Zealand.” Journal of the Society for the Bibliography of Natural History 9(2): 161–169.  https://doi.org/10.3366/jsbnh.1979.9.2.161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Montagu, George. 1831. Ornithological Dictionary of British Birds. Edited by James Rennie, 2nd ed. London: Hurst, Chance and Co.Google Scholar
  31. Novick, Aaron. 2016. “On the Origins of the Quinarian System of Classification.” Journal of the History of Biology 49(1): 95–133.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-015-9419-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ospovat, Dov. 1981. The Development of Darwin’s Theory: Natural History, Natural Theology, and Natural Selection, 1838–1859. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Reider, William D. 1841. The New Tablet of Memory; or, Recorder of Remarkable Events, Compiled, and Alphabetically Arranged from the Earliest Period to the Present Time. London: John Clements.Google Scholar
  34. Swainson, William. 1835. A Treatise on the Geography and Classification of Animals. London: Longman, Rees, Orme, Brown, Green & Longman.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of History and Philosophy of ScienceUniversity of PittsburghPittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations