It is time to escape the constraints of the Systematics Wars narrative and pursue new questions that are better positioned to establish the relevance of the field in this time period to broader issues in the history of biology and history of science. To date, the underlying assumptions of the Systematics Wars narrative have led historians to prioritize theory over practice and the conflicts of a few leading theorists over the less-polarized interactions of systematists at large. We show how shifting to a practice-oriented view of methodology, centered on the trajectory of mathematization in systematics, demonstrates problems with the common view that one camp (cladistics) straightforwardly “won” over the other (phenetics). In particular, we critique David Hull’s historical account in Science as a Process by demonstrating exactly the sort of intermediate level of positive sharing between phenetic and cladistic theories that undermines their mutually exclusive individuality as conceptual systems over time. It is misleading, or at least inadequate, to treat them simply as holistically opposed theories that can only interact by competition to the death. Looking to the future, we suggest that the concept of workflow provides an important new perspective on the history of mathematization and computerization in biology after World War II.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Abrantes, Paulo and El-Hani, Charbel Niño. 2009. “Gould, Hull, and the Individuation of Scientific Theories.” Foundations of Science 14(4): 295–313.
Adams, Edward N., III. 1986. “N-Trees as Nestings: Complexity, Similarity, and Consensus.” Journal of Classification 3(2): 299–317.
Adams, Edward N., III. 1972. “Consensus Techniques and the Comparison of Taxonomic Trees.” Systematic Zoology 21(4): 390–397.
Agar, Jon. 2006. “What Difference Did Computers Make?’ Social Studies of Science 36(6): 869–907.
Allen, Garland E. 1991. Science as a Process: An Evolutionary Account of the Social and Conceptual Development of Science David L. Hull; The Metaphysics of Evolution David L. Hull. Isis 82(4): 698.
Almeida, M.T. and Bisby, F.A. 1984. “A Simple Method for Establishing Taxonomic Characters from Measurement Data.” Taxon 33(3): 405–409.
Archie, James W. 1985. “Methods for Coding Variable Morphological Features for Numerical Taxonomic Analysis.” Systematic Zoology 34(3): 326–345.
Bardram, Jakob E. 1997. Plans as Situated Action: an Activity Theory Approach to Workflow Systems. In Proceedings of the Fifth European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, pp. 17–32.
Barrett, Martin, Donoghue, Michael J. and Sober, Elliott. 1991. “Against Consensus.” Systematic Zoology 40(4): 486.
Beatty, John. 1982. Classes and Cladists. Systematic Zoology 31(1): 25–111.
Bisby, F.A. 1970. “The Evaluation and Selection of Characters in Angiosperm Taxonomy: an Example From Crotalaria.” The New Phytologist 69(4): 1149–1160.
Bowers, John, Button, Graham, and Sharrock, Wes. 1995. Workflow from Within and Without: Technology and Cooperative Work on the Print Industry Shopfloor. In Proceedings of the Fourth European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work ECSCW’95. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, pp. 51–66.
Cain, Joe. 2000. “Woodger, Positivism, and the Evolutionary Synthesis.” Biology & Philosophy 15: 535–551.
Camin, Joseph H. and Sokal, Robert R. 1965. “A Method for Deducing Branching Sequences in Phylogeny.” Evolution 19(3): 311–326.
Cranston, PS and Humphries, CJ. 1988. “Cladistics and computers: a chironomid conundrum?” Cladistics 4:72–92.
Craw, Robin. 1992. “Margins of Cladistics: Identity, Difference and Place in the Emergence of Phylogenetic Systematics 1864–1975.” Paul E. Griffiths (ed.), Trees of Life: Essays in Philosophy of Biology. Boston: Kluwer, pp. 65–107.
Daston, Lorraine and Galison, Peter. 2007. Objectivity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Day, William H.E. 1985. “Optimal-Algorithms for Comparing Trees with Labeled Leaves.” Journal of Classification 2(1): 7–28.
De Bivort, Benjamin L., Clouse, Ronald M. and Giribet, Gonzalo. 2010. “A Morphometrics-Based Phylogeny of the Temperate Gondwanan Mite Harvestmen (Opiliones, Cyphophthalmi, Pettalidae).” Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research 48(4): 294–309.
Dourish, Paul. 2001. Process Descriptions as Organisational Accounting Devices: the Dual Use of Workflow Technologies. In The 2001 International ACM SIGGROUP Conference. New York: ACM
Duncan, Thomas and Baum, Bernard R. 1981. “Numerical Phenetics: Its Uses in Botanical Systematics.” Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 12: 387–404.
Farris, James S. 1969. “A Successive Approximations Approach to Character Weighting.” Systematic Biology 18(4): 374–385.
Farris, James S. 1970. “Methods for Computing Wagner Trees.” Systematic Zoology 19(1): 83–92.
Farris, James S. 1977. “On the Phenetic Approach to Vertebrate Classification.” Max K. Hecht, Peter C. Goody and Bessie M. Hecht (eds.), Major Patterns in Vertebrate Evolution. Boston: Springer, pp. 823–850.
Farris, James S. 1989. “Lord of the Flies: The Systematist as Study Animal.” Cladistics 5: 295–310.
Farris, James S. 2008. “Parsimony and Explanatory Power.” Cladistics. 24(5): 825–847.
Farris, James S. 2012. “Early Wagner Trees and ‘the Cladistic Redux’.” Cladistics 28(5): 545–547.
Farris, James S., Kluge, Arnold G. and Eckardt, Michael J. 1970. “A Numerical Approach to Phylogenetic Systematics.” Systematic Zoology 19(2): 172–189.
Felsenstein, Joe. 1983. “Parsimony in Systematics: Biological and Statistical Issues.” Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 14: 313–333.
Felsenstein, Joe. 1988. “Phylogenies and Quantitative Characters.” Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 19: 445–471.
Felsenstein, Joe. 2001. “The Troubled Growth of Statistical Phylogenetics.” Systematic Biology 50(4): 465–467.
Felsenstein, Joe. 2004. “A Digression on History and Philosophy.” Joe Felsenstein (ed.), Inferring Phylogenies. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates Inc., pp. 123–146.
García-Sancho, Miguel. 2012. Biology, Computing, and the History of Molecular Sequencing: From Proteins to DNA, 1945–2000. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Gerson, Elihu M. 2008. “Reach, Bracket, and the Limits of Rationalized Coordination: Some Challenges for CSCW.” Mark S. Ackerman, Christine A. Halverson, Thomas Erickson and Wendy A. Kellogg (eds.), Resources, Co-Evolution and Artifacts: Theory in CSCW. London: Springer, pp. 193–220.
Gilmour, John Scott Lennox. 1940. “Taxonomy and Philosophy.” Julian Huxley (ed.), The New Systematics. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 461–474.
Goldman, Nick. 1988. “Methods for Discrete Coding of Morphological Characters for Numerical Analysis.” Cladistics 4(1): 59–71.
Goodfellow, Michael, Jones, Dorothy and Priest, Fergus G. (eds.). 1985. Computer-Assisted Bacterial Systematics New York: Academic Press.
Grantham, Todd A. 2000. “Evolutionary Epistemology, Social Epistemology, and the Demic Structure of Science.” Biology & Philosophy 15(3): 443–463.
Grantham, Todd A. 1994. “Does Science Have a ‘Global Goal?’: A Critique of Hull’s View of Conceptual Progress.” Biology & Philosophy 9(1): 85–97.
Griesemer, James R. 2007. “Tracking Organic Processes: Representations and Research Styles in Classical Embryology and Genetics.” Jane Maienschein and Manfred D. Laubichler (eds.), From Embryology to Evo-Devo: a History of Developmental Evolution. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 375–435.
Haber, Matthew. 2009. Phylogenetic Inference. In A Companion to the Philosophy of History and Historiography, ed Aviezer Tucker. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell, 231–242.
Hagen, Joel B. 1999. “Naturalists, Molecular Biologists, and the Challenges of Molecular Evolution.” Journal of the History of Biology 32(2): 321–341.
Hagen, Joel B. 2001. “The Introduction of Computers Into Systematic Research in the United States During the 1960s.” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 32(2): 291–314.
Hagen, Joel B. 2003. “The Statistical Frame of Mind in Systematic Biology From Quantitative Zoology to Biometry.” Journal of the History of Biology 36(2): 353–384.
Hamilton, Andrew (ed.). 2014. The Evolution of Phylogenetic Systematics. Los Angeles:University of California Press.
Helfenbein, Kevin G. and DeSalle, Rob. 2005. “Falsifications and Corroborations: Karl Popper’s Influence on Systematics.” Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 35(1): 271–280.
Hofer, Veronika. 2013. “Philosophy of Biology in Early Logical Empiricism.” Hanne Andersen, Dennis Dieks, Wenceslao J. Gonzalez, Thomas Uebel and Gregory Wheeler (eds.), New Challenges to Philosophy of Science. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, pp. 351–363.
Hogeweg, P. 1976. “Iterative Character Weighing in Numerical Taxonomy.” Computers in Biology and Medicine 6(3): 199–211.
Hull, David L. 1982. “Exemplars and Scientific Change.” PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982: 479–503.
Hull, David L. 1988. Science as a Process: An Evolutionary Account of the Social and Conceptual Development of Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hull, David L. 2001. “The Role of Theories in Biological Systematics.” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 32(2): 221–238.
Huxley, Julian (ed.). 1940. The New Systematics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Jensen, Richard J. 2009. “Phenetics: Revolution, Reform or Natural Consequence?’ Taxon 58(1): 50–60.
Kitcher, Philip. 1988. “Selection Among the Systematists.” Nature 336(6196): 277–278.
Kitching, Ian J., Forey, Peter L., Humphries, Christopher J. and Williams, David M. 1998. Cladistics: The Theory and Practice of Parsimony Analysis, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kluge, Arnold G. and Farris, James S. 1969. “Quantitative Phyletics and the Evolution of Anurans.” Systematic Zoology 18(1): 1–32.
Koyré, Alexandre. 1978. Galileo Studies. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.
Latour, Bruno. 1990. “Review: Science as a Process: An Evolutionary Account of the Social and Conceptual Development of Science.” Contemporary Sociology 19(2): 281.
Le Quesne, Walter, J. 1982. “Compatibility Analysis and Its Applications.” Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 74(3): 267–275.
Legendre, Pierre. 1975. “A Posteriori Weighting of Descriptors.” Taxon 24(5/6): 603–608.
Leonelli, Sabina and Ankeny, Rachel A. 2012. “Re-Thinking Organisms: The Impact of Databases on Model Organism Biology.” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 43(1): 29–36.
Ludäscher, Bertram, Weske, Mathias, McPhillips, Timothy and Bowers, Shawn. 2009. “Scientific Workflows: Business as Usual?’ Business Process Management 5701: 31–47.
Ludäscher, Bertram, Altintas, Ilkay, Berkley, Chad, Higgins, Dan, Jaeger, Efrat, Jones, Matthew, Lee, Edward A., Tao, Jing and Zhao, Yang. 2006. “Scientific Workflow Management and the Kepler System.” Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience 18(10): 1039–1065.
Maynard-Smith, John. 1988. “Mechanisms of Advance.” Science 242(4882): 1182–1183.
Mayr, Ernst. 1942. Systematics and the Origin of Species From the Viewpoint of a Zoologist, 1st ed. New York: Columbia University Press.
Mayr, Ernst. 1965. “Classification and Phylogeny.” American Zoologist 5(1): 165–174.
Mayr, Ernst. 1969. Principles of Systematic Zoology New York: McGraw-Hill.
McGuire, James B. 1979. “On the Consensus Construction of an Evolutionary Tree.” Journal of Social and Biological Systems 2(2): 107–118.
McGuire, James B. and Thompson, Colin J. 1978. “On the Reconstruction of an Evolutionary Order.” Journal of Theoretical Biology 75(2): 141–147.
McMorris, F.R. and Neumann, Dean. 1983. “Consensus Functions Defined on Trees.” Mathematical Social Sciences 4(2): 131–136.
Mickevich, M.F. and Johnson, Michael S. 1976. “Congruence Between Morphological and Allozyme Data in Evolutionary Inference and Character Evolution.” Systematic Zoology 25(3): 260–270.
Mickevich, M.F. and Platnick, N.I. 1989. “On the Information Content of Classifications.” Cladistics 5(1): 33–47.
Mishler, Brent D. 2005. “The Logic of the Data Matrix in Phylogenetic Analysis.” Victor A. Albert (ed.), Parsimony, Phylogeny, and Genomics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 57–70.
Morgan, Gregory J. 1998. “Emile Zuckerkandl, Linus Pauling, and the Molecular Evolutionary Clock, 1959–1965.” Journal of the History of Biology 31(2): 155–178.
Nelson, Gareth. 1979. “Cladistic Analysis and Synthesis: Principles and Definitions, with a Historical Note on Adanson’s Familles Des Plantes (1763–1764).” Systematic Zoology 28(1): 1–21.
Nicholson, Daniel J. and Gawne, Richard. 2013. “Rethinking Woodger’s Legacy in the Philosophy of Biology.” Journal of the History of Biology 47(2): 243–292.
Nixon, Kevin C. and Carpenter, James M. 1996. “On Consensus, Collapsibility, and Clade Concordance.” Cladistics 12(4): 305–321.
November, Joseph A. 2012. Biomedical Computing: Digitizing Life in the United States. Baltimore:Johns Hopkins University Press.
O’Hara, Robert J. 1994. “Evolutionary History and the Species Problem.” American Zoologist 34(1): 12–22.
Pante, Eric, Schoelinck, Charlotte and Puillandre, Nicolas. 2015. “From Integrative Taxonomy to Species Description: One Step Beyond.” Systematic Biology 64(1): 152–160.
Pimentel, Richard A. and Riggins, Rhonda. 1987. “The Nature of Cladistic Data.” Cladistics 3(3): 201–209.
Pullan, Martin R., Watson, Mark F., Kennedy, Jessie B., Raguenaud, Cédric and Hyam, Roger. 2000. “The Prometheus Taxonomic Model: A Practical Approach to Representing Multiple Classifications.” Taxon 49(1): 55–75.
Renzi, Barbara Gabriella and Napolitano, Giulio. 2011. Evolutionary Analogies: Is the Process of Scientific Change Analogous to the Organic Change?. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Richards, Robert J. 1981. “Natural Selection and Other Models in the Historiography of Science.” Donald T. Campbell, Marilynn B. Brewer and Barry E. Collins (eds.), Scientific Inquiry and the Social Sciences. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers, pp. 37–76.
Rieppel, Olivier. 2003. “Popper and Systematics.” Systematic Biology 52(2): 259–271.
Rieppel, Olivier. 2006. “Willi Hennig on Transformation Series: Metaphysics and Epistemology.” Taxon 55(2): 377–385.
Rieppel, Olivier. 2007. “The Metaphysics of Hennig’s Phylogenetic Systematics: Substance, Events and Laws of Nature.” Systematics and Biodiversity 5(4): 345–360.
Rieppel, Olivier. 2008. “Re-Writing Popper’s Philosophy of Science for Systematics.” History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 30(3/4): 293–316.
Rieppel, Olivier. 2009. “Hennig’s Enkaptic System.” Cladistics 25(3): 311–317.
Rieppel, Olivier. 2011. “Willi Hennig’s Dichotomization of Nature.” Cladistics 27(1): 103–112.
Rieppel, Olivier. 2013. “The Early Cladogenesis of Cladistics.” Andrew Hamilton (ed.), The Evolution of Phylogenetic Systematics. Los Angeles: University of California Press, pp. 117–137.
Rieppel, Olivier. 2016. Phylogenetic Systematics: Haeckel to Hennig. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
Rieppel, Olivier, Williams, David M. and Ebach, Malte C. 2012. “Adolf Naef (1883–1949): On Foundational Concepts and Principles of Systematic Morphology.” Journal of the History of Biology 46(3): 445–510.
Schuh, Randall T and Pohlemus, John T. 1980. “Analysis of Taxonomic Congruence Among Morphological, Ecological, and Biogeographic Data Sets for the Leptopodomorpha (Hemiptera).” Systematic Zoology 29 (1): 1–26.
Schuh, Randall T. and Farris, James S. 1981. “Methods for Investigating Taxonomie Congruence and Their Application to the Leptopodomorpha.” Systematic Zoology 30(3): 331–351.
Schuh, Randall T. and Farris, James S. 2000. Biological Systematics: Principles and Applications. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Scott-Ram, N.R. 1990. Transformed Cladistics, Taxonomy, and Evolution. New York:Cambridge University Press.
Sepkoski, David. 2012. Rereading the Fossil Record: the Growth of Paleobiology as an Evolutionary Discipline. Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
Sepkoski, David and Ruse, Michael E. (eds.). 2009. The Paleobiological Revolution: Essays on the Growth of Modern Paleontology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Shipman, Frank M. and Marshall, Catherine C. 1999. “Formality Considered Harmful: Experiences, Emerging Themes, and Directions on the Use of Formal Representations in Interactive Systems.” Computer Supported Cooperative Work 8(4): 333–352.
Simpson, George Gaylord. 1961. Principles of Animal Taxonomy. New York: Columbia University Press.
Sneath, Peter H.A. and Sokal, Robert R. 1973. Numerical Taxonomy: the Principles and Practice of Numerical Classification. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman and Company.
Sokal, Robert R. and Rohlf, F. James. 1969. Biometry: the Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research, 1st ed. San Francisco:W. H. Freeman and Company.
Sokal, Robert R. and Rohlf, F. James. 1981. “Taxonomic Congruence in the Leptopodomorpha Re-Examined.” Systematic Zoology 30(3): 309–325.
Sokal, Robert R. and Rohlf, F. James. 2012. Biometry: the Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.
Sokal, Robert R. and Sneath, Peter H.A. 1963. Principles of Numerical Taxonomy. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman and Company.
Sterelny, Kim. 1994. “Science and Selection.” Biology & Philosophy 9(1): 45–62.
Sterner, Beckett. 2014. “Well-Structured Biology: Numerical Taxonomy and Its Methodological Vision for Systematics.” Andrew Hamilton (ed.), The Evolution of Phylogenetic Systematics. Los Angeles: University of California Press, pp. 213–244.
Sterner, Beckett and Lidgard, Scott. 2014. “The Normative Structure of Mathematization in Systematic Biology.” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 46: 44–54.
Strasser, Bruno J. 2010. Collecting, Comparing, and Computing Sequences: The Making of Margaret O. Dayhoff’s Atlas of Protein Sequence and Structure, 1954–1965. Journal of the History of Biology 43(4): 623-660.
Strasser, Bruno J. 2011. “The Experimenter’s Museum: GenBank, Natural History, and the Moral Economies of Biomedicine.” Isis 102(1): 60–96.
Strasser, Bruno J. 2012. “Collecting Nature: Practices, Styles, and Narratives.” Osiris 27(1): 303–340.
Strasser, Bruno J. and de Chadarevian, Soraya. 2011. The Comparative and the Exemplary: Revisiting the Early History of Molecular Biology. History of Science xlix: 317–226.
Suárez-Díaz, Edna. 2013. “The Long and Winding Road of Molecular Data in Phylogenetic Analysis.” Journal of the History of Biology 47(3): 443–478.
Suárez-Díaz, Edna and Anaya-Muñoz, Victor H. 2008. “History, Objectivity, and the Construction of Molecular Phylogenies.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 39(4): 451–468.
Suchman, Lucy. 1993. “Do Categories Have Politics? the Language/Action Perspective Reconsidered.” G. De Michelis, C. Simone and K. Schmidt (eds.) Proceedings of the Third European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 1–14.
The Editors. 2016. Editorial. Cladistics 32(1): 1–1.
Varma, Charissa S. 2013. Beyond Set Theory: the Relationship Between Logic and Taxonomy From the Early 1930 to 1960 (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://tspace.library.utoronto.ca/bitstream/1807/68972/1/Varma_Charissa_S_201301_ PhD_thesis.pdf
Vergara-Silva, Francisco. 2009. “Pattern Cladistics and the ‘Realism–Antirealism Debate’ in the Philosophy of Biology.” Acta Biotheoretica 57(1–2): 269–294.
Vernon, Keith. 1988. “The Founding of Numerical Taxonomy.” British Journal for the History of Science. 21(2): 143–159.
Vernon, Keith. 2001. “A Truly Taxonomic Revolution? Numerical Taxonomy 1957–1970.” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 32(2): 315–341.
Wheeler, Quentin D. 1986. “Character Weighting and Cladistic Analysis.” Systematic Zoology 35(1): 102–109.
Wilkins, John S. 1998. “The Evolutionary Structure of Scientific Theories.” Biology & Philosophy 13: 479–504.
Wilkinson, Mark. 1994. “Common Cladistic Information and Its Consensus Representation: Reduced Adams and Reduced Cladistic Consensus Trees and Profiles.” Systematic Biology 43(3): 343–368.
Williams, David M. and Ebach, Malte C. 2008. Foundations of Systematics and Biogeography. Boston, MA: Springer.
Williams, David M. and Ebach, Malte C. 2009. “What, Exactly, Is Cladistics? Re-Writing the History of Systematics and Biogeography.” Acta Biotheoretica 57(1–2): 249–268.
Williams, David M. and Forey, Peter L. (eds.). 2004. Milestones in Systematics. New York: CRC Press.
Winograd, Terry. 1994. “Categories, Disciplines, and Social Coordination.” Computer Supported Cooperative Work 2(3): 191–197.
About this article
Cite this article
Sterner, B., Lidgard, S. Moving Past the Systematics Wars. J Hist Biol 51, 31–67 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-017-9471-1
- David Hull
- Numerical taxonomy
- Evolutionary epistemology