Journal of the History of Biology

, Volume 50, Issue 3, pp 645–671

The Sparrow Question: Social and Scientific Accord in Britain, 1850–1900

Open Access


During the latter-half of the nineteenth century, the utility of the house sparrow (Passer domesticus) to humankind was a contentious topic. In Britain, numerous actors from various backgrounds including natural history, acclimatisation, agriculture and economic ornithology converged on the bird, as contemporaries sought to calculate its economic cost and benefit to growers. Periodicals and newspapers provided an accessible and anonymous means of expression, through which the debate raged for over 50 years. By the end of the century, sparrows had been cast as detrimental to agriculture. Yet consensus was not achieved through new scientific methods, instruments, or changes in practice. This study instead argues that the rise and fall of scientific disciplines and movements paved the way for consensus on “the sparrow question.” The decline of natural history and acclimatisation stifled a raging debate, while the rising science of economic ornithology sought to align itself with agricultural interests: the latter overwhelmingly hostile to sparrows.


Acclimatisation Agriculture Economic ornithology Natural history Species history 


Archival Sources

  1. House of Commons Parliamentary Papers; referred to as PP.Google Scholar

Published Sources

  1. “A plague of sparrows.” 1878. The Derby Mercury, 05 June.Google Scholar
  2. Allen, D. E. 1976. The Naturalist in Britain: A Social History. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  3. Allen, D. E. 1996. “Tastes and Crazes.” N. Jardine, J. A. Secord and E. C. Spary (eds.), Cultures of Natural History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 394–407.Google Scholar
  4. Allen, D. E. 1998. “On parallel lines: natural history and biology from the late Victorian period.” Archives of Natural History 25: 361–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anderson, W. 1992. “Climates of Opinion: Acclimatization in Nineteenth-Century France and England.” Victorian Studies 35: 135–157.Google Scholar
  6. “Another plea for sparrows.” 1868. Glasgow Herald, 12 September.Google Scholar
  7. Argyll. 1884. “The unity of nature.” Nature 29: 524–525.Google Scholar
  8. Atran, S. 1990. Cognitive Foundations of Natural History: Towards Anthropology of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Barber, L. 1980. The Heyday of Natural History 1820–1870. London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
  10. Barrow, M. V. Jr. 1998. A Passion for Birds: American Ornithology After Audubon. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Becher, R. A. 1885. “Sparrows Feeding on Ants.” The Zoologist 3: 259.Google Scholar
  12. Bellon, R. 2001. “Joseph Dalton Hooker’s ideals for a professional man of science.” Journal of the History of Biology 34: 51–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bellon, R. 2011. “Inspiration in the harness of daily labor: Darwin, botany, and the triumph of evolution, 1859-1868.” Isis 102: 393–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bircham, P. 2007. A History of Ornithology. London: HarperCollins Publishers.Google Scholar
  15. Bowdler Sharpe, R. 1896. “Books on birds.” Nature 54: 58–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Brodhead, M. J. 1971. “Elliot Coues and the Sparrow War.” New England Quarterly 44: 420–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Broks, P. 1996. Media Science before the Great War. London: Macmillan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Burkhardt, R. W. Jr. 2005. Patterns of Behavior: Konrad Lorenz, Niko Tinbergen, and the Founding of Ethology. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  19. Camerini, J. R. 1996. “Wallace in the Field.” Osiris 11: 44–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Caron, J. A. 1988. “‘Biology’ in the Life Sciences: A Historiographical Contribution.” History of Science 26: 223–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cathcart, A. F. 1892. “Agriculturally economic ornithology.” The Times, 16 May.Google Scholar
  22. Coates, P. A. 1998. Nature: Western Attitudes since Ancient Times. London: Polity.Google Scholar
  23. Coates, P, A. 2006. American Perceptions of Immigrant and Invasive Species: Strangers on the Land. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  24. Collinge, W. E. 1913. The Food of Some British Wild Birds: A Study in Economic Ornithology. London: Dulau and Co.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Coues, E. 1885. “The English Sparrow in America.” J. H. Gurney (ed.), The House Sparrow. London: William Wesley and Son, pp. 50–62.Google Scholar
  26. Cowles, H. M. 2013. “A Victorian Extinction: Alfred Newton and the Evolution of Animal Protection.” The British Journal for the History of Science 46: 695–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. De Tschudi, F. (Ibbetson, H. L. B, Trans.). 1862. “Destructive Insects and the Immense Utility of Birds.” The Journal of the Royal Agricultural Society of England 23: 231–246.Google Scholar
  28. Dearce, M. 2008. “Correspondence of Charles Darwin on James Torbitt’s Project to Breed Blight-Resistant Potatoes.” Archives of Natural History 35: 208–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. “Destruction of small birds.” 1862. The Times, 29 April.Google Scholar
  30. “Destruction of sparrows.” 1841. The Quarterly Journal of Agriculture 11: 432-434.Google Scholar
  31. Di Gregorio, M. A. 2009. “Zoology.” P. J. Bowler and J. V. Pickstone (eds.), The Cambridge History of Science: The Modern Biological and Earth Sciences, Six vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 205–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Dunlap, T. R. 1999. Nature and the English Diaspora: Environment and History in the United States, Canada, Australia and New Zealand. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Evenden, M. D. 1995. “The Laborers of Nature: Economic Ornithology and the Role of Birds as Agents of Biological Pest Control in North American Agriculture, ca. 1880–1930.” Forest & Conservation History 39: 172–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Farber, P. L. 2000. Finding Order in Nature: The Naturalist Tradition from Linnaeus to E. O. Wilson. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  35. “Farmers and sparrows.” 1867. The Essex Standard, and General Advertiser for the Eastern Counties, 25 December.Google Scholar
  36. “Farmers and sparrows.”—— 1897. The Morning Post, 15 April.Google Scholar
  37. Finnegan, D. A. 2005. “Natural History Societies in Late Victorian Scotland and the Pursuit of Local Civic Science.” The British Journal for the History of Science 38: 53–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Gates, B. T. 1998. Kindred Nature: Victorian and Edwardian Women Embrace the Living World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  39. Goldsmith, O. 1816, c. 1774. A History of the Earth and Animated Nature. Volume One. London: Wingrave and Collingwood.Google Scholar
  40. Gurney, J. H. 1885. The House Sparrow. London: William Wesley and Son.Google Scholar
  41. Horn, P. 1984. Rural life in England in the First World War. New York: Gill and Macmillan.Google Scholar
  42. Johnson, K. 2012. Ordering Life: Karl Jordan and the Naturalist Tradition. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Lever, C. 1992. They Dined on Eland: The Story of the Acclimatisation Societies. London: Quiller Press.Google Scholar
  44. Lovegrove, R. 2007. Silent Fields: The Long Decline of a Nation’s Wildlife. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  45. MacDonald, D. G. F. 1865. “Our little birds.” The Times, 11 October.Google Scholar
  46. McNeill, J. R. 2003. “Observations on the nature and culture of environmental history.” History and Theory 42: 5–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Nelson, D. L. 2016. “The Ravages of Teredo: the Rise and Fall of Shipworm in US history, 1860–1940.” Environmental History 21: 100–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Newman, C. 1861. “Destructive powers of sparrows.” Nottinghamshire Guardian, 05 November.Google Scholar
  49. Newton, A. 1899. A Dictionary of Birds. London: Adam and Charles Black.Google Scholar
  50. Nunn J. P. 1897. “Yorkshire farmers and sparrows.” The Times, 21 December.Google Scholar
  51. Nyhart, L. K. 1996. “Natural history and the “new” biology.” N. Jardine, J. A. Secord and E. C. Spary (eds.), Cultures of Natural History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 426–443.Google Scholar
  52. Nyhart, L. K. 2009. Modern Nature: The Rise of the Biological Perspective in Germany. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Ormerod, E. A. and Tegetmeier, W. B. 1897–1998. “The house sparrow.” Journal of the Royal Horticultural Society 21: 413–425.Google Scholar
  54. Osborne, M. A. 2000. “Acclimatizing the World: A History of Pragmatic Colonial Science.” Osiris 15: 135–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Outram, D. 1996. “New Spaces in Natural History.” N. Jardine, J. A. Secord and E. C. Spary (eds.), Cultures of Natural History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 249–265.Google Scholar
  56. Rehbock, P. F. 1983. The Philosophical Naturalists: Themes in Early Nineteenth-CenturyBritish Biology. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  57. Richardson, E. W. 1916. A Veteran Naturalist. London: Witherby & Co.Google Scholar
  58. Ritvo, H. 1987. The Animal Estate: The English and other Creatures in the Victorian Age. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Ritvo, H. 2012. “Going Forth and Multiplying: Animal Acclimatization and Invasion.” Environmental History 17: 404–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Romanes, GJ. 1884. “The Unity of Nature.” Nature 29: 474–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Russell, C. 1883. “Martins and Sparrows.” Essex Field Club 3: 20–23.Google Scholar
  62. Russell, C. 1885. “The house sparrow: by a friend of the farmers.” J. H. Gurney (ed.), The House Sparrow. London: William Wesley and Son, pp. 19–45.Google Scholar
  63. Seebohm, H. 1883. A History of British Birds, Volume 1. London: RH Porter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Seeley, J., Skabelund, A. 2015. “Tigers—Real and Imagined—In Korea’s Physical and Cultural Landscape.” Environmental History 20: 475–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Seitz, J. 2007. “Three Hundred Years of House Sparrow (Passer domesticus) Persecution in Germany.” Archives of Natural History 34: 307–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Sheail, J. 1976. “Land Improvement and Reclamation: The Experiences of the First World War in England and Wales.” Agricultural History Review 24: 110–125.Google Scholar
  67. “Sparrows and corn.” 1884. The York Herald, 10 July.Google Scholar
  68. “Sparrows and agricultural crops.” 1885. Berrow’s Worcester Journal, 22 August.Google Scholar
  69. “Sparrows and the crops.” 1885. Western Mail, 27 August.Google Scholar
  70. Specht, J. 2016. “The Rise, Fall, and Rebirth of the Texas Longhorn: An Evolutionary History.” Environmental History 21: 343–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Star, S. L. and Griesemer, J. R. 1989. “Institutional Ecology, ‘Translations’ and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–1939.” Social Studies of Science 19: 387–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Strasser, B. J. 2010. “Laboratories, Museums, and the Comparative Perspective: Alan A. Boyden’s Quest for Objectivity in Serological Taxonomy, 1924–1962.” Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences 40: 149–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Tegetmeier, W. B. 1899. The House Sparrow (The Avian Rat): In Relation to Agriculture and Gardening, with Practical Suggestions for Lessening its Numbers. London: Vinton & Co.Google Scholar
  74. “The destruction of sparrows.” 1862. Jackson’s Oxford Journal, 06 December.Google Scholar
  75. “The farmers and the sparrows.” 1889. Leicester Chronicle and the Leicestershire Mercury, 28 December.Google Scholar
  76. “The house sparrow (the avian rat) in relation to agriculture and gardening with practical suggestions for lessening its numbers. By W. B. Tegetmeier, F. Z. S., &c. Vinton & Co.” 1899. The Zoologist 3: 375.Google Scholar
  77. “The increase and destructiveness of sparrows.” 1884. The Ipswich Journal, 12 August.Google Scholar
  78. “The sparrow in the United States.” 1889. The Times, 29 October.Google Scholar
  79. “The troubles of our friends in Australia.” 1868. The Times, 02 December.Google Scholar
  80. “The sparrow club.” 1855. The Times, 20 December.Google Scholar
  81. “The English sparrow.” 1868. The Times, 13 August.Google Scholar
  82. “The ubiquitous sparrow.” 1889. Rural World, 07 September: 452.Google Scholar
  83. “The poor sparrows.” 1895. The Morning Post, 08 June.Google Scholar
  84. Thomas, K. 1983. Man and the Natural World. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
  85. Todd, K. 2012. Sparrow. London: Reaktion Books.Google Scholar
  86. Wallace, R. (Ed.). 1904. Eleanor Ormerod, LL.D. Economic Entomologist. Auto-Biography and Correspondence. New York: E.P. Dutton and Company.Google Scholar
  87. “Wholesale destruction of sparrows.” 1855. Bell’s Life in London and Sporting Chronicle, 02 December.Google Scholar
  88. Willis, R. G. 1974. Man and Beast. London:Hart-Davis, MacGibbon.Google Scholar
  89. Wilmot, S. 1985. The Business of Improvement: Agriculture and Scientific Culture in Britain, c. 1770–c.1870. Cheltenham:Institute of British Geographers.Google Scholar
  90. Worster, D. 1985. Nature’s Economy: A History of Ecological Ideas, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  91. Yarrel, W. 1843. A History of British Birds, Volume 1. London: John Van Voorst.Google Scholar
  92. “Yorkshire farmers and sparrows.” 1896. The Times, 08 December.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for the History and Philosophy of Science, School of Philosophy, Religion and the History of ScienceUniversity of LeedsLeedsUK

Personalised recommendations