Advertisement

Journal of the History of Biology

, Volume 48, Issue 2, pp 169–199 | Cite as

Camels, Cormorants, and Kangaroo Rats: Integration and Synthesis in Organismal Biology After World War II

  • Joel B. HagenEmail author
Article

Abstract

During the decades following World War II diverse groups of American biologists established a variety of distinctive approaches to organismal biology. Rhetorically, organismal biology could be used defensively to distinguish established research traditions from perceived threats from newly emerging fields such as molecular biology. But, organismal biologists were also interested in integrating biological disciplines and using a focus on organisms to synthesize levels of organization from molecules and cells to populations and communities. Part of this broad movement was the development of an area of research variously referred to as physiological ecology, environmental physiology, or ecophysiology. This area of research was distinctive in its self-conscious blend of field and laboratory practices and its explicit integration with other areas of biology such as ecology, animal behavior, and evolution in order to study adaptation. Comparing the intersecting careers of Knut Schmidt-Nielsen and George Bartholomew highlights two strikingly different approaches to physiological ecology. These alternative approaches to studying the interactions of organisms and environments also differed in important ways from the organismal biology championed by leading figures in the modern synthesis.

Keywords

Physiological ecology Comparative physiology Organism Organismal biology Adaptation Homeostasis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adolph, Edward F. 1943. “Do Rats Thrive When Drinking Seawater?” American Journal of Physiology 140: 25–32.Google Scholar
  2. Adolph, Edward F. 1949. “Quantitative Relations in the Physiological Constitutions of Mammals.” Science 109: 579–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adolph, Edward F., et al. 1947. The Physiology of Man in the Desert. New York: Interscience.Google Scholar
  4. Adolph, E.F. and Dill, D.B. 1938. “Observations on Water Metabolism in the Desert.” American Journal of Physiology 123: 369–378.Google Scholar
  5. Anderson, Warwick. 2003. The Cultivation of Whiteness: Science, Health, and Racial Destiny in Australia. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  6. Bartholomew, George A. 1958. “The Role of Physiology in the Distribution of Terrestrial Vertebrates.” Carl L. Hubbs (ed.), Zoogeography. Washington, D.C.: American Association for the Advancement of Science, pp. 81–95.Google Scholar
  7. Bartholomew, George A. 1964. “The Roles of Physiology and Behaviour in the Maintenance of Homeostasis in the Desert Environment.” Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology 18: 7–29.Google Scholar
  8. Bartholomew, George A. 1986. “The Role of Natural History in Contemporary Biology.” Bioscience 36: 324–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bartholomew, George A. 1987. “Interspecific Comparison as a Tool for Ecological Physiologists.” Martin E. Feder, Albert F. Bennett, Warren W. Burggren, and Raymond B. Huey (eds.), New Directions in Ecological Physiology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 11–35.Google Scholar
  10. Bartholomew, George A. and Cade, Tom J. 1963. “The Water Economy of Land Birds.” Auk 80: 504–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bartholomew, George A. and Hudson, Jack W. 1959. “Effects of Sodium Chloride on Weight and Drinking in the Antelope Ground Squirrel.” Journal of Mammalogy 40: 354–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bartholomew, George A. 1960. “Aestivation in the Mohave Ground Squirrel (Citellus mohavensis).” Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology 124: 193–208.Google Scholar
  13. Bartholomew, George A. 1961. “Desert Ground Squirrels.” Scientific American 205: 107–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Batisse, Michel. 1994. “A Long Look at the World’s Arid Lands.” UNESCO Courier 47(1): 34–39.Google Scholar
  15. Beatty, John. 1994. “The Proximate – Ultimate Distinction in the Multiple Careers of Ernst Mayr.” Biology and Philosophy 9: 333–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bennett, Albert F. 2003. “Experimental Evolution and the Krogh Principle: Generating Biological Novelty for Functional and Genetic Analyses.” Physiological and Biochemical Zoology 76: 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bennett, Albert F. and Lowe, Charles. 2005. “The Academic Genealogy of George A. Bartholomew.” Integrative and Comparative Biology 45: 231–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Braun, Eldon J. 2009. “Osmotic and Ionic Regulation in Birds.” David H Evans (ed.), Osmotic and Ionic Regulation: Cells and Animals. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, pp. 505–524.Google Scholar
  19. Burkhardt, Richard W. 1994. “Ernst Mayr: Biologist – Historian.” Biology and Philosophy 9: 359–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cade, Tom J. and Bartholomew, George A. 1959. “Sea-Water and Salt Utilization by Savannah Sparrows.” Physiological Zoology 32: 230–238.Google Scholar
  21. Cain, Joe. 2009. “Rethinking the Synthesis Period in Evolutionary Studies.” Journal of the History of Biology 42: 621–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cook, John S. 1987. “Sectionalization.” John R. Brobeck, Orr E. Reynolds, and Tobey A. Appel (eds.), History of the American Physiological Society: the First Century, 1887–1987. Bethesda, MD: American Physiological Society, pp. 435–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dawson, William R. 1955. “The Relation of Oxygen Consumption to Temperature in Desert Rodents.” Journal of Mammalogy 36: 543–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dawson, William R. 2005. “George A. Bartholomew’s Contributions to Integrative and Comparative Biology.” Integrative and Comparative Biology 45: 219–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dawson, William R. 2007. “Laurence Irving: An Appreciation.” Physiological and Biochemical Zoology 80: 9–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Dawson, William R. 2011. George A. Bartholomew 1919–2006. Washington D.C.: Biographical Memoirs of the National Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
  27. Dietrich, Michael R. 1998. “Paradox and Persuasion: Negotiating the Place of Molecular Evolution Within Evolutionary Biology.” Journal of the History of Biology 31: 85–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Dill, David Bruce. 1938. Life, Heat, And altitude: Physiological Effects of Hot Climates and Great Heights. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Dumitrescu, Sorin. 2006. “The Essence of Life.” P. Petitjean, V. Zharov, G. Glaser, J. Richardson, B. de Padirac, and G. Archibald (eds.), Sixty Years of Science at UNESCO, 19452005. Paris: UNESCO Publishing, pp. 201–232.Google Scholar
  30. Elsner, Robert. 2000. “The Irving-Scholander Legacy in Polar Physiology.” Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology, Part A 126: 137–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Goldsmith, Maurice. 1951. “A New Deal for the World’s Arid Lands.” UNESCO Courier 4(6): 13.Google Scholar
  32. Gracey, Andrew and Cossens, Andrew. 2003. “Application of Microarray Technology in Environmental and Comparative Physiology.” Annual Review of Physiology 65: 231–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hadley, Malcolm. 2006. “Nature to the Fore: The Early Years of UNESCO’s Environmental Program, 1945–1965.” P. Petitjean, V. Zharov, G. Glaser, J. Richardson, B. de Padirac, and G. Archibald (eds.), Sixty Years of Science at UNESCO, 19452005. Paris. UNESCO Publishing, pp. 201–232.Google Scholar
  34. Hagen, Joel B. 1999. “Naturalists, Molecular Biologists, and the Challenges of Molecular Evolution.” Journal of the History of Biology 32: 321–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hiltzik, Michael. 2010. Colossus: Hoover Dam and the Making of the American Century. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  36. Johnson, Kristin. 2009. “The Return of the Phoenix: The 1963 International Congress on Zoology and the American Zoologists in the Twentieth Century.” Journal of the History of Biology 42: 417–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Junker, Thomas. 2007. “Ernst Mayr (1904–2005) and the New Philosophy of Biology.” Journal for General Philosophy of Science 38: 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Krogh, August. 1940. “A Micro-Climate Recorder.” Ecology 21: 275–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mayr, Ernst. 1963. Animal Species and Evolution. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mayr, Ernst. 1982. The Growth of Biological Thought: Diversity, Evolution, and Inheritance. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
  41. Milam, Erika Lorraine. 2009. “The Experimental Animal from the Naturalist’s Point of View.” Joe Cain and Michael Ruse (eds.), Descended from Darwin: Insights into American Evolutionary Studies, 1925–1950. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society, pp. 157–178.Google Scholar
  42. Milam, Erika Lorraine. 2010. “The Equally Wonderful Field. Ernst Mayr and Organismic Biology.” Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences. 40: 279–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Perlman, Robert L. 2000. “The Concept of Organism in Physiology.” Theory in Biosciences 119: 174–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Prosser, C. Ladd. 1950. “Introduction.” C. Ladd Prosser (ed.), Comparative Animal Physiology. Philadelphia: Saunders, pp. 1–5.Google Scholar
  45. Poulson, Thomas L. and Bartholomew, George A. 1962. “Salt Balance in the Savannah Sparrow.” Physiological Zoology 35: 109–199.Google Scholar
  46. Saunders, Joseph F. and Taylor, Aubrey E. 1987. “Membership.” John R. Brobeck, Orr E. Reynolds, and Tobey A. Appel (eds.), History of the American Physiological Society: the First Century, 1887–1987. Bethesda, MD: American Physiological Society, pp. 301–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Schmidt-Nielsen, Bodil. 1954. “Water conservation in small desert rodents.” J.L. Cloudsley Thompson (ed.), Biology of Deserts. London: Institute of Biology, pp. 182–187.Google Scholar
  48. Schmidt-Nielsen, Bodil. 1958. “The Resourcefulness of Nature in Physiological Adaptation to the Environment.” Physiologist 1: 4–20.Google Scholar
  49. Schmidt-Nielsen, Bodil and O’Dell, Roberta. 1961. “Structure and Concentrating Mechanism in the Mammalian Kidney.” American Journal of Physiology 200: 1119–1124.Google Scholar
  50. Schmidt-Nielsen, Bodil and Schmidt-Nielsen, Knut. 1949. “The Water Economy of Desert Mammals.” Scientific Monthly 69: 180–185.Google Scholar
  51. Schmidt-Nielsen, Bodil and Schmidt-Nielsen, Knut. 1950a. “Do Kangaroo Rats Thrive When Drinking Seawater?” American Journal of Physiology 160: 291–294.Google Scholar
  52. Schmidt-Nielsen, Bodil and Schmidt-Nielsen, Knut. 1950b. “Evaporative Water Loss in Desert Rodents in Their Natural Habitat.” Ecology 31: 75–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Schmidt-Nielsen, Bodil and Schmidt-Nielsen, Knut. 1955. “The Camel: Facts and Fables.” UNESCO Courier 8(28–32): 63.Google Scholar
  54. Schmidt-Nielsen, Knut. 1954. “Heat Regulation in Small and Large Desert Mammals.” J.L. Cloudsley Thompson (ed.), Biology of Deserts. London: Institute of Biology, pp. 182–187.Google Scholar
  55. Schmidt-Nielsen, Knut. 1959. “The Physiology of the Camel.” Scientific American 201(6): 140–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Schmidt-Nielsen, Knut. 1960. “The Salt-Secreting Gland of Marine Birds.” Circulation 21: 955–967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Schmidt-Nielsen, Knut. 1962. Comparative Physiology of Desert Mammals. Brody Lecture II. University of Missouri Agricultural Experiment Station Special Report #21.Google Scholar
  58. Schmidt-Nielsen, Knut. 1964a. Desert Animals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Schmidt-Nielsen, Knut. 1964b. “The Significance of Field and Laboratory Studies on Domestic Animals in Arid Climates.” Environmental Physiology and Psychology in Arid Conditions: Proceedings of the Lucknow Symposium. Liege: UNESCO, pp. 243–247.Google Scholar
  60. Schmidt-Nielsen, Knut. 1972. How Animals Work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Schmidt-Nielsen, Knut. 1998. The Camel’s Nose: Memoirs of a Curious Scientist. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.Google Scholar
  62. Schmidt-Nielsen, Knut and Fange, Ragnär. 1958. “Salt Glands in Marine Reptiles.” Nature 182: 783–785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Schmidt-Nielsen, Knut and Schmidt-Nielsen, Bodil. 1953. “The Desert Rat.” Scientific American 189: 73–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Smocovitis, Vassiliki Betty. 1996. Unifying Biology: The Evolutionary Synthesis and Evolutionary Biology. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Sunderland, Mary E. 2013. “Modernizing Natural History: Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology in Transition.” Journal of the History of Biology 46: 369–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Tracy, Randall L. and Walsberg, Glenn E. 2002. “Kangaroo Rats Revisited: Re-evaluating a Classic Case of Desert Survival.” Oecologia 133: 449–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Vogel, Steven. 2008. “Knut Schmidt-Nielsen: 24 September 1915–25 January 2007.” Biographical Memoirs of the Fellows of the Royal Society 54: 319–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Walsberg, Glenn E. 2000. “Small Mammals in Hot Deserts: Some Generalizations Revisited.” Bioscience 50: 109–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of BiologyRadford UniversityRadfordUSA

Personalised recommendations