Skip to main content

The Emergence of Modern Statistics in Agricultural Science: Analysis of Variance, Experimental Design and the Reshaping of Research at Rothamsted Experimental Station, 1919–1933

Abstract

During the twentieth century statistical methods have transformed research in the experimental and social sciences. Qualitative evidence has largely been replaced by quantitative results and the tools of statistical inference have helped foster a new ideal of objectivity in scientific knowledge. The paper will investigate this transformation by considering the genesis of analysis of variance and experimental design, statistical methods nowadays taught in every elementary course of statistics for the experimental and social sciences. These methods were developed by the mathematician and geneticist R. A. Fisher during the 1920s, while he was working at Rothamsted Experimental Station, where agricultural research was in turn reshaped by Fisher’s methods. Analysis of variance and experimental design required new practices and instruments in field and laboratory research, and imposed a redistribution of expertise among statisticians, experimental scientists and the farm staff. On the other hand the use of statistical methods in agricultural science called for a systematization of information management and made computing an activity integral to the experimental research done at Rothamsted, permanently integrating the statisticians’ tools and expertise into the station research programme. Fisher’s statistical methods did not remain confined within agricultural research and by the end of the 1950s they had come to stay in psychology, sociology, education, chemistry, medicine, engineering, economics, quality control, just to mention a few of the disciplines which adopted them.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Aldrich, John. 2007. “Variance, Analysis of Variance and ANOVA.” In Earliest known uses of some of the words of mathematics, http://jeff560.tripod.com/v.html [accessed 9th April 2014].

  2. Anonymous. 1934. “Note on the Formation of the Industrial and Agricultural Section of the Royal Statistical Society.” Supplement to the Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 1: 1–3.

  3. Brassley, Paul. 1995. “Agricultural Research in Britain, 1850–1914: Failure, Success and Development.” Annals of Science 52: 465–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Brassley, Paul. 2004–2008. “Hall, Sir (Alfred) Daniel (1864–1942).” Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  5. Briggs, G.E., Canny, M.J.P. and Barker, J. 1961. “Ernest John Maskell, 1895–1958.” Biographical Memoirs of Fellows of the Royal Society 7: 161–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Campbell-Kelly, Martin, Croarken, Mary, Flood, Raymond and Robson, Eleanor (eds.). 2003. The History of Mathematical Tables: From Sumer to Spreadsheets. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Charnley, Berris. 2011. Agricultural Science, Plant Breeding and the Emergence of a Mendelian System in Britain, 18801930. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Leeds.

  8. Clarke, E. [rev. A. E. Johnston]. 2004–2008. “Gilbert, Sir Joseph Henry (1817–1901).” Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  9. Cochran, William G. 1976. “Early Development of Techniques in Comparative Experimentation.” D.B. Owen (ed.), On the History of Statistics and Probability. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc., pp. 3–25.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cochran, William G. 1980. “Fisher and the Analysis of Variance.” S.E. Fienberg and D.V. Hinkley (eds.), R. A. Fisher: An Appreciation. Berlin: Springer, pp. 17–34.

  11. Croarken, Mary. 2003. “Table Making by Committee: British Table Makers, 1871–1965.” Martin Campbell-Kelly, Mary Croarken, Raymond Flood and Eleanor Robson (eds.), The History of Mathematical Tables: From Sumer to Spreadsheets. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 235–263.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Crowther, E.M. 1936. “The Technique of Modern Field Experiments.” Journal of the Royal Agricultural Society of England 97: 54–81.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Eden, Thomas. 1935. “The Development of Field Experiments in Agricultural Research.” Tropical Agriculturist 84(63–69): 131–149.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fisher, Ronald A. 1918. “The Correlation Between Relatives on the Supposition of Mendelian Inheritance.” Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 52: 399–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Fisher, Ronald A. 1925. Statistical Methods for Research Workers, 1st ed. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Fisher, Ronald A. 1926. “The Arrangement of Field Experiments.” Journal of the Ministry of Agriculture 33: 503–513.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Fisher, Ronald A. 1931. “Principles of Plot Experimentation in Relation to the Statistical Interpretation of the Results.” In Rothamsted Conferences XIII, The Technique of Field Experiments, pp. 11–13.

  18. Fisher, Ronald A. 1934. “The Contributions of Rothamsted to the Development of the Science of Statistics.” Report 1933, Rothamsted Experimental Station. St. Albans: Gibbs and Bamforth, pp. 43–50.

  19. Fisher, Ronald A. 1946. Statistical Methods for Research Workers, 10th ed. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Fisher, Ronald A. 1947. The Design of Experiments, 4th ed. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Fisher, Ronald A. 1953. “The Expansion of Statistics.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A 116: 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Fisher, Ronald A. and Mackenzie, Winifred A. 1923. “Studies in Crop Variation II: The Manurial Response of Different Potato Varieties.” Journal of Agricultural Science 13: 311–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Fisher, Ronald A. and Wishart, John. 1930. The Arrangement of Field Experiments and the Statistical Reduction of the Results. Imperial Bureau of Soil Science Technical Communication No. 10, 23 pp.

  24. Fisher, Ronald A. and Yates, Frank. 1938. Statistical Tables for Biological, Agricultural and Medical Research. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Fisher Box, Joan. 1978. R. A. Fisher: The Life of a Scientist. New York: Wiley.

  26. Fussell, G.E. 1935. “The Technique of Early Field Experiments.” Journal of the Royal Agricultural Society of England 96: 78–88.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Fussell, G.E. 1976. “Agricultural Science and Experiment in the Eighteenth Century: An Attempt at a Definition.” The Agricultural History Review 24: 44–47.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Gigerenzer, Gerd, Swijtink, Zeno, Porter, Theodore, Daston, Lorraine, Beatty, John and Krüger, Lorenz. 1989. The Empire of Chance. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  29. Gosset, William S. 1962. Letters from W. S. Gosset to R. A. Fisher, 19151936. Dublin: Printed for Private Circulation by Arthur Guinness and Sons.

  30. Grier, David A. 2007. When Computers Were Human. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Hagen, Joel B. 2003. “The Statistical Frame of Mind in Systematic Biology from ‘Quantitative Zoology to Biometry’.” Journal of the History of Biology 36: 353–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hald, Anders. 1998. A History of Mathematical Statistics from 1750 to 1930. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Hald, Anders. 2007. A History of Parametric Statistical Inference from Bernoulli to Fisher, 1713–1935. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Hall, Alfred D. 1909. “The Experimental Error in Field Trials.” The Journal of the Board of Agriculture 16: 365–370.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Hall, Alfred. 1931. “Chairman’s Opening Remarks.” Rothamsted Conferences XIII, The Technique of Field Experiments, p. 9.

  36. Hall, Nancy S. 2002. R. A. Fisher and Randomized Experimental Design. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park.

  37. Hall, Nancy S. 2007. “R. A. Fisher and His Advocacy of Randomization.” Journal of the History of Biology 40: 295–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Harwood, Jonathan. 2005. Technology’s Dilemma. Bern: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Higgs, Edward. 1996. “The Statistical Big Bang of 1911: Ideology, Technological Innovation and the Production of Medical Statistics.” Social History of Medicine 9: 409–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Horsburgh, E.M. (ed.). 1914. Handbook of the Exhibition of Napier Relics and of Books, Instruments and Devices for Facilitating Calculation. Edinburgh: Royal Society of Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Johnston, A.E. 1994. “The Rothamsted Classical Experiments.” R.A Leigh and A.E. Johnston (eds.), Long-Term Experiments in Agricultural and Ecological Sciences. Wallingford: CAB International, pp. 9–37.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Johnston, James F.W. 1849. Experimental Agriculture. Edinburgh: W. Blackwood and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Kohler, Robert E. 2002. Landscapes and Labscapes. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  44. Lehman, Eric L. 2011. Fisher, Neyman and the Creation of Classical Statistics. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  45. Mackenzie, Donald A. 1981. Statistics in Britain, 1865–1930. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Martin, Ernst [English Translation by P. Aldrich Kidwell and M.R. Williams]. 1992. The Calculating Machines. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

  47. Maskell, Ernest J. 1929. “Experimental Error: A Survey of Recent Advances in Statistical Methods.” Tropical Agriculture Trinidad 5: 306–309; 6: 5–11, 45–48, 97–99.

  48. Mazumdar, Pauline M.H. 2011. Eugenics, Human Genetics and Human Failings: The Eugenics Society, Its Sources and Its Critics in Britain. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Mercer, W.B. and Hall, A.D. 1911. “The Experimental Error of Field Trials (with an Appendix by Student).” The Journal of Agricultural Science 4: 107–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Müller-Wille, Staffan. 2005. “Early Mendelism and the Subversion of Taxonomy: Epistemological Obstacles as Institutions.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 36: 465–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Neyman, Jerzy. 1934. “On the Two Different Aspects of the Representative Method: The Method of Stratified Sampling and the Method of Purposive Selection.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 97: 558–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Pearson, Egon S. 1939. “Student as Statistician.” Biometrika 30: 210–250.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Pearson, Egon S. Student: A Statistical Biography of William Sealy Gosset (Edited and Augmented by R.L. Plackett with the Assistance of G.A. Barnard). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

  54. Pirie, N.W. 2004–2008. “Russell, Sir (Edward) John (1872–1965).” Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  55. Porter, Theodore M. 1986. The Rise of Statistical Thinking, 1820–1900. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Porter, Theodore M. 1996. Trust in Numbers. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Porter, Theodore M. 2006. Karl Pearson: The Scientific Life in a Statistical Age. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Provine, William B. 2001. The Origins of Theoretical Population Genetics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Reid, Constance. 1998. Neyman. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Ross, Gavin. 2012. “Fisher and the Millionaire: The Statistician and the Calculator.” Significance 9(6): 46–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Rossiter, Margaret W. 1975. The Emergence of Agricultural Science. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Rothamsted Experimental Station. Undated. Programme of Work at the Rothamsted Experimental Station for the Years 19191920. Harpenden: Printed by D. J. Jeffery.

  63. Rothamsted Experimental Station 1921. Report 1918–1920 With the Supplement to the ‘Guide to Experimental Plots’. Harpenden: Printed by D. J. Jeffery.

  64. Rothamsted Experimental Station 1925. Report 1923–1924 with the Supplement to the ‘Guide to Experimental Plots’. Harpenden: Printed by D. J. Jeffery.

  65. Rothamsted Experimental Station. 1927. Report 1925–26 with the Supplement to the ‘Guide to Experimental Plots’. Harpenden: Printed by D. J. Jeffery.

  66. Rothamsted Experimental Station. 1929. Report 1927–28 with the Supplement to the ‘Guide to Experimental Plots’. Harpenden: Printed by D. J. Jeffery.

  67. Rothamsted Experimental Station. 1930. Report for 1929. Harpenden: Printed by D. J. Jeffery.

  68. Rothamsted Experimental Station. 1931. Report for 1930. St. Albans: Gibbs and Bamforth.

  69. Rothamsted Experimental Station. 1934. Report for 1933. St. Albans: Gibbs and Bamforth.

  70. Rothamsted Experimental Station. 1962. Report of the Rothamsted Experimental Station for 1961. Harpenden: Rothamsted Experimental Station.

  71. Rothamsted Research. 2006. Guide to the Classical and Other Long-Term Experiments, Datasets and Sample Archive. http://www.rothamsted.ac.uk/sites/default/files/ attachments/2013-10-25/LongTermExperiments_small.pdf [accessed 8th April 2014].

  72. Russell, E. John. 1935. “Rothamsted in 1933–1934.” Records of the Rothamsted Staff Harpenden 5: 7–9.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Russell, E. John. 1956. The Land Called Me. London: George Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Russell, E. John. 1966. A History of Agricultural Science in Great Britain, 1620–1954. London: George Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Salvage, Leonard J. 1976. “On Re-Reading R. A. Fisher.” The Annals of Statistics 4: 441–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Stigler, S.M. 1986. The History of Statistics: The Measurement of Uncertainty Before 1900. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Street, Deborah J. 1990. “Fisher’s Contributions to Agricultural Statistics.” Biometrics 46: 937–945.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Student (alias W. S. Gosset). 1908. “The Probable Error of a Mean.” Biometrika 6: 1–25.

  79. Student (alias W. S. Gosset) 1923. “On Testing Varieties of Cereals.” Biometrika 15: 271–293.

  80. Swijtink, Zeno G. 1994. “Probability and Statistics in Agronomy.” I. Grattan-Guinness (ed.), Companion Encyclopedia of the History and Philosophy of the Mathematical Sciences 2. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 1363–1369.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Thompson, F.M.L. 2004–2008. “Lawes, Sir John Bennet, First Baronet (1814–1900).” Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  82. Upton, G. and Cook, I. 2008. “Tukey, John Wilder.” A Dictionary of Statistics, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  83. Weston, B. 1962. Fifty Years at Rothamsted, 19101960. Privately Printed.

  84. Wood, T.B. and Stratton, F.J.M. 1910. “The Interpretation of Experimental Results.” The Journal of Agricultural Science 3: 417–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Yates, Frank. 1951. “The Influence of Statistical Methods for Research Workers on the Development of the Science of Statistics.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 46: 19–34.

    Google Scholar 

  86. Yates, Frank. 1960. “The Use of Electronic Computers in the Analysis of Replicated Experiments, and Groups of Experiments of the Same Design.” Bulletin de l’Institut Agronomique et des Stations de Recherches de Gembloux, Hors série 1: 201–210.

    Google Scholar 

  87. Yates, Frank. 1990. “Foreword.” Ronald A. Fisher (ed.), Statistical Methods, Experimental Design and Scientific Inference. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. vii–xxxii.

  88. Yates, JoAnne. 2008. Structuring the Information Age: Life Insurance and Technology in the Twentieth Century. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  89. Young, Arthur. 1770. A Course of Experimental Agriculture I. London: J. Dodsley.

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giuditta Parolini.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Parolini, G. The Emergence of Modern Statistics in Agricultural Science: Analysis of Variance, Experimental Design and the Reshaping of Research at Rothamsted Experimental Station, 1919–1933. J Hist Biol 48, 301–335 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-014-9394-z

Download citation

Keywords

  • Agriculture
  • Archives
  • Computing
  • Experimentation
  • R. A. Fisher
  • Statistics