Journal of the History of Biology

, Volume 48, Issue 1, pp 1–36 | Cite as

Field Studies in Absentia: Counting and Monitoring from a Distance as Technologies of Government in Norwegian Wolf Management (1960s–2010s)

Article

Abstract

The article investigates how national and international measures to protect wolves turned the whole of Norway into a field of study for wildlife biologists, and how the extensiveness of this “field” prompted a transformation in the methods employed to count and monitor wolves. As it was not possible to conduct traditional field studies throughout the whole of Norway, the biologists constructed an extensive infrastructure, which I have termed a “counting complex,” in order to count wolves from a distance. The article identifies three decisive periods in the construction of this complex: the 1960s, the 1980s, and the first decade of the new millennium. During the first two periods, biologists used the infrastructure to mobilize ordinary people’s observations; they did this by first searching through newspaper notes, then enrolling people more directly through local committees of game management. However, the public’s observations often turned out to be unreliable, and, in the 2000s, molecular biologists helped to incorporate genetic techniques into the counting complex. By using the infrastructure to mobilize wolf scat, rather than observations, and by constructing DNA profiles for individual wolves, the molecular biologists enabled research that I have termed “nationwide field studies in absentia.” The article argues that the biologists’ main motive for constructing and refining the counting complex was to make wolves amenable to government, as they considered this a vital premise for the successful practice of protecting wolves. The increased intensity in monitoring in the last period, however, was also driven by international conventions and detailed regulations.

Keywords

Biodiversity Field sciences Endangered species management Conservation biology Wolves 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

Archives

  1. The Directorate for Nature Management.Google Scholar

References

  1. Aaseth, Arne L. 1935. Våre ville pelsdyr. Ulven [Our Wild Fur-Bearing Animals. Wolves]. Norsk Jæger & Fisker-Forening Tidsskrift 64: 253–258, 288–294.Google Scholar
  2. Alagona, Peter S. 2004. “Biography of a “Feathered Pig”: The California Condor Conservation Controversy.” Journal of the History of Biology 37: 557–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alagona, Peter S. 2012. “A Sanctuary for Science: The Hastings Natural History Reservation and the Origins of the University of California’s Natural Reserve System.” Journal of the History of Biology 45: 651–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alagona, Peter S. 2013. After the Grizzly: Endangered Species and the Politics of Place in California. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  5. Asbjørnsen, Peter C. 1840. Om Ulve- og Rævefangst: En Beskrivelse over forskjellige Maader, hvorpaa man I Sverige fanger, jager og finder Ulv og Ræv [On Hunting Wolves and Foxes: A Description of Various Swedish Ways to Catch, Hunt, and Find Wolves and Foxes]. Christiania: Oversætterens Forlag.Google Scholar
  6. Asdal, Kristin. 2008. “Enacting Things Through Numbers: Taking Nature into Accounting.” Geoforum 39(1): 123–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Asdal, Kristin. 2011a. Politikkens natur – Naturens politikk [The Nature of Politics – The Politics of Nature]. Oslo:Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
  8. Asdal, Kristin. 2011b. “The Office. The Weakness of Numbers and the Production of Non-authority.” Accounting, Organizations and Society 36(1): 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Barrow, Mark V. Jr. 2009a. Nature’s Ghosts: Confronting Extinction from the Age of Jefferson to the Age of Ecology. Chicago:The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Barrow, Mark V. Jr. 2009b. “Dragons in Distress: Naturalists as Bioactivists in the Campaign to Save the American Alligator.” Journal of the History of Biology 42: 267–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Barrow, Mark V. Jr. 2011. “The Specter of Extinction: Taking a Long View of Species Loss.” Environmental History 16: 428–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Barry, Andrew. 2001. Political Machines: Governing a Technological Society. London: Athlone Press.Google Scholar
  13. Benson, Etienne. 2010. Wired Wilderness: Technologies of Tracking and the Making of Modern Wildlife. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Berntsen, Bredo. 2011. Grønne linjer: Natur- og miljøvernets historie i Norge [Green Lines: The History of Nature Conservation and Environmentalism in Norway]. Unipub.Google Scholar
  15. Bocking, Stephen (ed.). 2000. Biodiversity in Canada: Ecology, Ideas, and Action. Peterborough: Broadview Press.Google Scholar
  16. Bocking, Stephen. 2012. “Science, Salmon, and Sea Lice: Constructing Practice and Place in an Environmental Controversy.” Journal of the History of Biology 45: 681–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Braa, Jørund T., Brainerd, Scott M., Brøseth, Henrik, Knutsen, Even and Linnell, John D.C. 1999. Forslag til Nasjonalt overvåkingsprogram for store rovdyr [Proposal for a National Program for Monitoring Large Carnivores]. Utredning for DN 2000-1. Trondheim: Direktoratet for naturforvaltning.Google Scholar
  18. Coleman, Jon T. 2004. Vicious: Wolves and Men in America. London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Collett, Robert. 1912. Norges hvirveldyr I: Norges pattedyr [Norwegian Vertebrates I: Norwegian Mammals]. Kristiania: Aschehoug.Google Scholar
  20. Dean, Michell. 2010. Governmentality: Power and Rule in Modern Society. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  21. Direktoratet for naturforvaltning. 1995. Strategi for overvåking av biologisk mangfold [Strategy for Monitoring Biological Diversity]. DN-rapport 19957. Trondheim: Direktoratet for naturforvaltning.Google Scholar
  22. Direktoratet for naturforvaltning. 1998. Plan for overvåking av biologisk mangfold [Plan for Monitoring Biological Diversity]. DN-rapport 1998-1. Trondheim: Direktoratet for naturforvaltning.Google Scholar
  23. Drabløs, Dagfinn. 2003. Gjetartradisjonar i Noreg: Sosiale, biologiske og teknologiske utviklingsdrag [Norwegian Herding Traditions: Social, Biological, and Technological Developments]. Høvik: Kolofon.Google Scholar
  24. Dunlap, Thomas R. 1988. Saving America’s Wildlife. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Ellegren, Hans. 1999. “Inbreeding and Relatedness in Scandinavian Gray Wolves Canis lupus.” Hereditas 130: 239–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ellegren, Hans, Savolainen, Peter and Rosén, Björn. 1996. “The Genetical History of an Isolated Population of the Endangered Gray Wolf Canis lupus: A Study of Nuclear and Mitochondrial Polymorphisms.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society: Biological Sciences 351: 1661–1669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ellis, Rebecca and Waterton, Claire. 2005. “Caught Between the Cartographic and the Ethnographic Imagination: The Whereabouts of Amateurs, Professionals, and Nature in Knowing Biodiversity.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 23: 673–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Falleth, Eva Irene and Saglie, Inger-Lise. 2005. Evaluering av Statens Naturoppsyn [Evaluation of the Norwegian Nature Inspectorate]. Oslo: Norsk institutt for by- og regionforskning.Google Scholar
  29. Farnham, Timothy J. 2007. Saving Nature’s Legacy: Origins of the Idea of Biological Diversity. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Figari, Helene and Skogen, Ketil. 2011. “Social Representations of the Wolf.” Acta Sociologica 54(4): 315–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Finnegan, Diarmid A. 2008. “The Spatial Turn: Geographical Approaches in the History of Science.” Journal of the History of Biology 41: 369–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Flagstad, Øystein and BrØseth, Henrik. 2002. Populasjonsovervåking av jerv ved hjelp av ikke-invasiv DNA analyse [Monitoring Populations of Wolverines by Non-invasive DNA Analysis]. Trondheim: Norsk institutt for naturforskning.Google Scholar
  33. Flagstad, Øystein, Walker, C.W., Vila, C., Sundquist, A.-K., Fernholm, B., Hufthammer, A.K., Wiig, Ø., Koyola, I. and Ellegren, H. 2003. “Two Centuries of the Scandinavian Wolf Population: Patterns of Genetic Variability and Migration During an Era of Dramatic Decline.” Molecular Biology 12: 869–880.Google Scholar
  34. Flagstad, Øystein, Balstad, Torveig, Johansson, Malin, Eriksen, Line Birkeland, Wärdig, Cecilia, Hagen, Merethe and Ellegren, Hans. 2009. DNA-analyser i overvåkingen av den norske ulvebestanden 2007–2009 [DNA Analyses in the Monitoring of the Norwegian Wolf Population 2007–2009]. NINA Rapport 410. Trondheim: Norsk institutt for naturforskning.Google Scholar
  35. Forskrift om forvaltning av rovvilt [Regulation Concerning Management of Carnivores]. 2005. FOR 2005-03-18, nr. 242. Miljøverndepartementet.Google Scholar
  36. Hagen, Yngvar. 1952. Rovfuglene og viltpleien [Raptors and Game Management]. Oslo: Gyldendal Norsk Forlag.Google Scholar
  37. Helland, Amund. 1914. Rovdyrene i Norge [Norwegian Carnivores]. Kristiania: Grøndahl & Søns Boktrykkeri.Google Scholar
  38. Hayward, Matt W. and Somers, Michael J. (eds.). 2009. Reintroduction of Top-Order Predators. London: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  39. Innst. S. nr. 301. 1996–1997. Innstilling fra energi- og miljøkomiteen om rovviltforvaltning [Recommendations from the Committee on Energy and the Environment Concerning Carnivore Management]. Energi- og miljøkomiteen, Stortinget.Google Scholar
  40. Jones, Karen R. 2002. Wolf Mountains: A History of Wolves Along the Great Divide. Calgary: University of Calgary Press.Google Scholar
  41. Johnsen, Sigurd. 1957. RovdyreneNorges dyreliv I [The Carnivores – Norwegian Wildlife I.]. Oslo: Cappelen.Google Scholar
  42. Kohler, Robert E. 2012. “Practice and Place in Twentieth-Century Field Biology: A Comment.” Journal of the History of Biology 45: 579–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Krange, Olve and Skogen, Ketil. 2011. When the Lads Go Hunting. The ‘Hammertown Mechanism’ and the Conflict over Wolves in Norway. Ethnography 12(4): 466–489.Google Scholar
  44. Kvam, Tor and Sørensen, Ole J. 1984. “Jerven på Dovre som forskningsobjekt [Wolverines at Dovre as Objects of Research].” Svein Myrberget (ed.), Festskrift til Dr. Yngvar Hagens 75-års dag [Homage Volume for Dr. Yngvar Hagen’s 75th Birthday] Viltrapport 29. Trondheim: Direktoratet for vilt og ferskvannsfisk, pp. 65–72.Google Scholar
  45. Landa, Arild, Sørensen, Ole J. and Kvam, Tor. 1984. Rovdyrregistrering på Sørlandet 1983 [Carnivore Registrations at Sørlandet 1983]. Arbeidsrapport nr. 8 fra Rovviltprosjektet. Trondheim: Direktoratet for vilt og ferskvannsfisk.Google Scholar
  46. Latour, Bruno. 1987. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Law, John. 1986. “On the Methods of Long-Distance Control: Vessels, Navigation and the Portugese Route to India.” John Law (ed.), Power, Action and Belief. A New Sociology of Knowledge?. London: Routledge, pp. 234–263.Google Scholar
  48. Liberg, Olof, Aronson, Åke, Sand, HÅkan, Wabakken, Petter, Maartmann, Erling, Svensson, Linn and Åkesson, Mikael. 2012. “Monitoring of Wolves in Scandinavia.” Hystrix, the Italian Journal of Mammalogy 23(1): 29–34.Google Scholar
  49. Linnell, John D.C., Swenson, Jon E., Landa, Arild and Kvam, Tor. 1998. Metodikk for bestandsovervåking av store rovdyr – En litteraturgjennomgang [Methodology for Population Monitoring of Large Carnivores – A Literature Review]. NINA oppdragsmelding 550. Trondheim: Norsk institutt for naturforskning.Google Scholar
  50. Lopez, Barry. 1978. Of Wolves and Men. New York: Scribner.Google Scholar
  51. Lowe, Celia. 2006. Wild Profusion: Biodiversity Conservation in an Indonesian Archipelago. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Manganiello, Christopher J. 2009. “From a Howling Wilderness to Howling Safaris: Science, Policy and Red Wolves in the American South.” Journal of the History of Biology 42: 325–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Mech, David L. and Boitani, Luigi (eds.). 2003. Wolves: Behaviour, Ecology, and Conservation. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  54. Miller, Peter and Rose, Nikolas. 2008. Governing the Present: Administering Economic, Social and Personal Life. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  55. Myrberget, Svein. 1969a. “Den norske bestand av ulv, Canis lupus [The Norwegian Population of Wolves, Canuis lupus].” Meddelelser fra statens viltundersøkelser 32: 1–17.Google Scholar
  56. Myrberget, Svein. 1969b. “Ulvens status i Fennoskandia [The Status of Wolves in FennoScandia].” Naturen 3: 160–172.Google Scholar
  57. Myrberget, Svein. 1978. Registrering av store rovpattedyr i Norge [Registration of Large Carnivorous mammals in Norway].” Svein Myrberget (ed.), De store rovdyr i Norden: NKV’s møte Sognli 1978 [The Large Carnivores of the Nordic Countries: NKV’s Meeting at Sognli 1978]. Viltrapport 9. Trondheim: Direktoratet for vilt og ferskvannsfisk, pp. 75–78.Google Scholar
  58. Myrberget, Svein and Sørensen, Ole J. (eds). 1981. Spor og sportegn etter store rovdyr [Tracks and Signs of Large Carnivores]. Viltrapport 15. Trondheim: Direktoratet for vilt og ferskvannsfisk.Google Scholar
  59. Mysterud, Ivar. 2001. Yngvar Hagen. Norsk biografisk leksikon [Norwegian Biographical Encyclopedia]. http://nbl.snl.no/Yngvar_Hagen.
  60. Nie, Martin A. 2003. Beyond Wolves: The Politics of Wolf Recovery and Management. Minneapolis:University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  61. NOU 1977: 13. Erstatning for tap av tamrein og bufé [Compensation for Loss of Livestock]. Landbruksdepartementet.Google Scholar
  62. Olstad, Ola. 1945. Jaktzoologi [Hunting Zoology]. Oslo: Cappelen.Google Scholar
  63. Porter, Theodore M. 1995. Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Robinson, Michael J. 2005. Predatory Bureaucracy: The Extermination of Wolves and the Transformation of the West. Colorado: University of Colorado Press.Google Scholar
  65. Rose, Nikolas. 1989. Governing the Soul: The Shaping of the Private Self. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  66. Rumore, Gina. 2012. “Preservation for Science: The Ecological Society of America and the campaign for Glacier Bay National Monument.” Journal of the History of Biology 45: 613–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Schei, Peter J. 1978. “Problemer i norsk rovdyrforvaltning [Problems in Norwegian Management of Carnivores].” Svein Myrberget (ed.), De store rovdyr i Norden: NKV’s møte Sognli 1978 [The Large Carnivores of the Nordic Countries: NKV’s Meeting at Sognli 1978]. Viltrapport 9. Trondheim: Direktoratet for vilt og ferskvannsfisk, pp. 3–9.Google Scholar
  68. Scott, James C. 1998. Seeing Like a State. London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  69. Skavhaug, Svein. 2005. Historiske tilbakeblikk på vilt- og fiskeforvaltningen i Norge [Historical Retrospects at the Norwegian Management of Game and Fish]. Trondheim: Direktoratet for naturforvaltning.Google Scholar
  70. Skogen, Ketil and Krange, Olve. 2003. “A Wolf at the Gate: The Anti-carnivore Alliance and the Symbolic Construction of Community.” Sociologica Ruralis 43(3): 309–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Skogen, Ketil, Krange, Olve and Figari, Helene. 2013. Ulvekonflikter: En sosiologisk studie [Wolf Conflicts: A Sociological Study]. Oslo: Akademika forlag.Google Scholar
  72. Star, Susan Leigh and Griesemer, James R. 1989. “Institutional Ecology, ‘Translations’ and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39.” Social Studies of Science 19: 387–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Stokland, Håkon B. 2013. “Molecularising Nature: How Scandinavian Wolves Became Natural.” Forum 16: 1–9.Google Scholar
  74. St. meld. nr. 13. 1992–1993. Om FN-konferansen om miljø og utvikling i Rio de Janeiro [On the UN Conference on Environment and Development in Rio de Janeiro]. Oslo: Miljøverndepartementet.Google Scholar
  75. St. meld. nr. 35. 1996–1997. Om rovviltforvaltning [On Management of Carnivores]. Oslo: Miljøverndepartementet.Google Scholar
  76. St. meld. nr. 24. 2001. Regjeringens miljøvernpolitikk og rikets miljøtilstand [The Government’s Environmental Protection Politics and the Environmental State of the Nation]. Oslo: Miljøverndepartementet.Google Scholar
  77. St. meld. nr. 15. 2003–2004. Rovvilt i norsk natur [Carnivores in Norwegian Nature]. Oslo: Miljøverndepartementet.Google Scholar
  78. Søilen, Espen. 1995. Sportsmenn i veideland. [Sportsmen in Hunter’s Land]. Billingstad: StikkaTrykk.Google Scholar
  79. Sørensen, Ole J. and Kvam, Tor. 1984. Rovviltprosjektet 1980–1984 [The Carnivore Project 1980–1984]. Viltrapport 34. Trondheim: Direktoratet for vilt og ferskvannsfisk.Google Scholar
  80. Sørensen, Ole J., Kvam, Tor and Mysterud, Ivar. 1984. Sentral registrering av store rovdyr i Norge [Central Registration of Large Carnivores in Norway]. Viltrapport 30. Trondheim: Direktoratet for vilt og ferskvannsfisk.Google Scholar
  81. Sørensen, Ole J., Mysterud, Ivar and Kvam, Tor. 1984c. “Central Registration of Large Carnivores in Norway.” Acta Zool. Fennica 172: 213–214.Google Scholar
  82. Sørensen, Ole J., Kvam, Tor, Wabakken, Petter and Landa, Arild. 1986. Ulven (Canis lupus l.) i Norge 1948–84 [Wolves (Canis lupus l.) in Norway 1948–84]. Viltrapport 33. Trondheim: Direktoratet for vilt og ferskvannsfisk.Google Scholar
  83. Takacs, David. 1996. The Idea of Biodiversity: Philosophies of Paradise. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  84. United Nations. 1992. The Convention on Biological Diversity.Google Scholar
  85. Vaag, Arne B., Haga, Atle and Granstuen, Hellik. 1986. Forslag til landsplan for forvaltning av bjørn, jerv og ulv i Norge [Proposition to a National Plan for Management of Bear, Wolverine, and Wolf in Norway]. Viltrapport 39. Trondheim: Direktoratet for naturforvaltning.Google Scholar
  86. Vetter, Jeremy. 2012. “Labs in the Field? Rocky Mountain Biological Stations in the Early Twentieth Century.” Journal of the History of Biology 45: 587–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Vila, Charles, Sundquist, Anna-Karin, Flagstad, Øystein, Seddon, Jennifer, Björnerfeldt, Susanne, Kojola, Ilpo, Casulli, Adriano, Sand, Håkan, Wabakken, Petter and Ellegren, Hans. 2003. “Rescue of a Severely Bottlenecked Wolf (Canis lupus) Population by a Single Immigrant.” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 270: 91–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Wabakken, Petter, Sørensen, Ole J. and Kvam, Tor. 1982a. Ulv Canis lupus i Sørøst-Norge: Registreringsproblemer og minimumsbestand [Wolves Canis lupus in Southeastern Norway: Problems of Registration and Minimum Population]. Viltrapport 20. Trondheim: Direktoratet for vilt og ferskvannsfisk.Google Scholar
  89. Wabakken, Petter, Sørensen, Ole J. and Kvam, Tor. 1982b. “Wolves (Canis lupus) in Southeastern Norway.” Acta Zoologica Fennica 174: 227.Google Scholar
  90. Wabakken, Petter, Aronson, Åke, Sand, HÅkan, Steinset, Ole Knut and Kojola, Ilpo. 2001. Ulv i Skandinavia: Statusrapport for vinteren 2000–2001 [Wolves in Scandinavia: Status Report for the Winter 2000–2001]. Oppdragsrapport nr. 1-2001. Elverum: Høgskolen i Hedmark.Google Scholar
  91. Wabakken, Petter, Maartmann, Erling and Strømseth, Thomas H. 2013a. Ulv i Norge pr. 15. mars 2013. Foreløpige konklusjoner for vinteren 2012/2013 [Wolves in Norway per March 15, 2013. Preliminary Conclusions for the Winter 2012/2013]. Rapport 6. Elverum: Høgskolen i Hedmark.Google Scholar
  92. Wabakken, Petter, Svensson, Linn, Kojola, Ilpo, Maartmann, Erling, Strømseth, Thomas H., Flagstad, øystein, Åkesson, Mikael, and Andreas Zetterberg. 2013b. Ulv i Skandinavia og Finland. Sluttrapport for bestandsovervÅking av ulv vinteren 2012–2013 [Wolves in Scandinavia and Finland. Final report on population monitoring of wolves in the winter 2012–2013]. Oppdragsrapport nr. 52013. Høyskolen i Hedmark.Google Scholar
  93. Walker, Brett L. 2005. The Lost Wolves of Japan. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
  94. Worster, Donald. 1994. Nature’s Economy: A History of Ecological Ideas, 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Interdisciplinary Studies of CultureNorwegian University of Science and TechnologyTrondheimNorway

Personalised recommendations