Journal of the History of Biology

, Volume 48, Issue 1, pp 67–98 | Cite as

James V. Neel and Yuri E. Dubrova: Cold War Debates and the Genetic Effects of Low-Dose Radiation

Article

Abstract

This article traces disagreements about the genetic effects of low-dose radiation exposure as waged by James Neel (1915–2000), a central figure in radiation studies of Japanese populations after World War II, and Yuri Dubrova (1955–), who analyzed the 1986 Chernobyl nuclear power plant accident. In a 1996 article in Nature, Dubrova reported a statistically significant increase in the minisatellite (junk) DNA mutation rate in the children of parents who received a high dose of radiation from the Chernobyl accident, contradicting studies that found no significant inherited genetic effects among offspring of Japanese A-bomb survivors. Neel’s subsequent defense of his large-scale longitudinal studies of the genetic effects of ionizing radiation consolidated current scientific understandings of low-dose ionizing radiation. The article seeks to explain how the Hiroshima/Nagasaki data remain hegemonic in radiation studies, contextualizing the debate with attention to the perceived inferiority of Soviet genetic science during the Cold War.

Keywords

Radiation studies Low-dose radiation Genetic effects Cold War James V. Neel Yuri E. Dubrova 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Altukhov, Yuri. 1990. Population Genetics: Diversity and Stability. Switzerland: Harwood Academic Publishers GmbH.Google Scholar
  2. Altukhov, Yuri. 2006. Intraspecific Genetic Diversity: Monitoring, Conservation, and Management. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  3. Balonov, Mikhail. 2011. “Review of volume 1181.” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. www.nyas.org/publications/annals/Detail.aspx?cid=f3f3bd1651ba4d7ba086753f44b3bfc1/. Accessed 2 February 2013.
  4. Bauer, Susanne. 2010. “Tracing Mutations: Biodosimetry Tools in Post-Cold War Radiation Epidemiology.” Luis Campos and Alexander von Schwerin (eds.), Making Mutations: Objects, Practices, Contexts. Preprint 393. Berlin: Max Planck Institute for the History of Science, pp. 209–224.Google Scholar
  5. Beral, Valerie, Fraser, Patricia, Carpenter, Lucy, et al. 1988. “Mortality of Employees of the Atomic Weapons Establishment, 1951–82.” British Medical Journal 297: 757–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bertell, Rosalie. 1985. No Immediate Danger: Prognosis for a Radioactive Earth. London: Women’s Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bird, Kai, and Sherwin, Martin J. 2005. American Prometheus: The Triumph and Tragedy of J. Robert Oppenheimer. New York: A.A. Knopf.Google Scholar
  8. Bouffler, Simon, Bridges, Bryn, Cooper, David, Dubrova, Yuri, et al. 2006. “Assessing Radiation-Associated Mutational Risk to the Germline: Repetitive DNA Sequences as Mutational Targets and Biomarkers.” Radiation Research 165(3): 249–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bouffler, Simon, and Lloyd, David. 2002. Minisatellite Mutations: Second Dubrova Study and NRPB Commentary on Second Dubrova Study. Committee Examining Radiation Risks of Internal Emitters (CERRIE). Radiological Protection Bulletin 1. http://www.hpa.org.uk/webc/HPAwebFile/HPAweb_C/1211528166233. Accessed 13 March 2012.
  10. Brent, Robert L. 2004. “Utilization of Animal Studies to Determine the Effects and Human Risks of Environmental Toxicants (Drugs, Chemicals, and Physical Agents).” Pediatrics 113(4): 984–995.Google Scholar
  11. Brown, Kate. 2012. “A People’s Truth.” Aeon Magazine. http://www.aeonmagazine.com/world-views/kate-brown-nuclear-downwinders/. Accessed 13 March 2013.
  12. Brown, Kate. 2013. Plutopia: Nuclear Families, Atomic Cities, and the Great Soviet and American Plutonium Disasters. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Button, Gregory. 2010. Disaster Culture: Knowledge and Uncertainty in the Wake of Human and Environmental Catastrophe. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.Google Scholar
  14. Chernobyl Forum. 2006. Chernobyl’s Legacy: Health, Environmental and Socio-Economic Impacts. Vienna: IAEA.Google Scholar
  15. Coulthart, Michael, Rhomberg, Lorenz, and Singh, Rama. 1984. “The Nature of Genetic Variation for Species Formation.” Evolution 38(3): 689–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. DeJong-Lambert, William. 2010. “Hermann J. Muller and the Biopolitics of Mutations and Heredity.” Luis Campos and Alexander von Schwerin (eds.), Making Mutations: Objects, Practices, Contexts. Preprint 393. Berlin: Max Planck Institute for the History of Science, pp. 151–175.Google Scholar
  17. DeJong-Lambert, William. 2012. The Cold War Politics of Genetic Research: An Introduction to the Lysenko Affair. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dreicer, Mona. 2010. “Book Review. Chernobyl: Consequences of the Catastrophe for People and the Environment.” Environmental Health Perspectives 118(11): A500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dubinin, Nikolai, and Altukhov, Yuri. 1979. “Gene Mutations (De Novo) Found in Electrophoretic Studies of Blood Proteins of Infants with Anomalous Development.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 76(10): 6226–5229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dubrova, Yuri. 2003. “Germline Mutation Induction at Mouse and Human Tandem Repeat DNA Loci.” Advanced Experimental Medical Biology 518: 115–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dubrova, Yuri. 2005. “Radiation-Induced Mutation at Tandem Repeat DNA Loci in the Mouse Germline: Spectra and Doubling Doses.” Radiation Research 162(2): 200–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dubrova, Yuri. 2006. “Genomic Instability in the Offspring of Irradiated Parents: Facts and Interpretations.” Russian Journal of Genetics 42(10): 1116–1126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dubrova, Yuri. 2012. “Reply to the Letter by S.V. Jargin.” Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis 749: 103–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dubrova, Yuri, Bersimgaev, Rakhmetkaji, Djansugurova, Leyla, et al. 2002. “Nuclear Weapons Tests and Human Germline Mutation Rate.” Science 295: 1037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dubrova, Yuri, Nesterov, Valeri, Krouchinsky, Nickolay, et al. 1996. “Human Minisatellite Mutation Rate After the Chernobyl Accident.” Nature 380: 683–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Dubrova, Yuri, Plumb, Mark, Brown, Julia, Jeffreys, Alec. 1998. “Radiation-Induced Germline Instability at Minisatellite Loci.” International Journal of Radiation Biology 74(6): 689–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fujimura, Joan. 1998. “Authorizing Knowledge in Science and Anthropology.” American Anthropologist, New Series 100(2): 347–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Geltzer, Anna. 2012. In a Distorted Mirror: The Cold War and U.S.-Soviet Biomedical Cooperation and (Mis) Understanding, 1956–1977. Journal of Cold War Studies 14(3): 39–63.Google Scholar
  29. Gofman, John. 1981. Radiation and Human Health. San Francisco: Sierra Club Books.Google Scholar
  30. Goldstein, Donna M. 2012. “Experimentalité: Pharmaceutical Insights into Anthropology’s Epistemologically Fractured Self.” Susan Levine (ed.), Medicine and the Politics of Knowledge. Cape Town, South Africa: HSRC, pp. 118–151.Google Scholar
  31. Grady, Denise. 2011. “Radiation is everywhere, but how to rate harm?” New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/05/health/05radiation.html?pagewanted=all. Accessed 2 February 2013.
  32. Green, Gayle. 1999. The Woman Who Knew Too Much – Alice Stewart and the Secrets of Radiation. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  33. Gusterson, Hugh. 2007. “Anthropology and Militarism.” Annual Review of Anthropology 36(1): 155–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hecht, Gabrielle. 2012. Being Nuclear: Africans and the Global Uranium Trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  35. Hodge, Russ, and Wegner, Anna-Lynn. 2006. “Alec Jeffreys Interview: A Pioneer on the Frontier of Human Diversity.” Science in School 3: 16–19.Google Scholar
  36. IPPNW. 2011. Health Effects of Chernobyl: 25 Years After the Reactor Catastrophe. Berlin: IPPNW.Google Scholar
  37. Jargin, Sergei. 2012. “Some Aspects of Mutation Research After a Low-Dose Radiation Exposure.” Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis 749(1–2): 101–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Johnston, B.R. 2007. “Half-lives, Half-Truths, and Other Radioactive Legacies of the Cold War.” Barbara R. Johnston (ed.), Half-lives & Half-Truths: Confronting the Radioactive Legacies of the Cold War. Santa Fe, NM: A School for Advanced Research Resident Scholar Book, pp. 1–23.Google Scholar
  39. Johnston, B.R. 2011. In This Nuclear World, What is the Meaning of ‘Safe’? Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. http://thebulletin.org/web-edition/features/nuclear-world-what-themeaning-of-safe. Accessed 2 February 2013.
  40. Johnston, B.R., and Barker, Holly M. 2008. The Consequential Damages of Nuclear War: The Rongelap Report. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.Google Scholar
  41. Jolly, Christopher. 2003. Thresholds of Uncertainty: Radiation and Responsibility in the Fallout Controversy. Ph.D. Thesis, Oregon State University.Google Scholar
  42. Kato, Hiroo, Schull, William, and Neel, James. 1966. “A Cohort-Type Study of Survival in the Children of Parents Exposed to Atomic Bombings.” American Journal of Human Genetics 18: 339–373.Google Scholar
  43. Kneale, George, and Stewart, Alice. 1995. “Factors Affecting Recognition of Cancer Risks of Nuclear Workers.” Occupational and Environmental Medicine 52: 512–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kodaira, Mieko, Satoh, Chiyoko, Hiyama, Keiko, et al. 1995. “Lack of Effects of Atomic Bomb Radiation on Genetic Instability of Tandem-Repetitive Elements in Human Germ Cells.” American Journal of Human Genetics 57(6): 1275–1283.Google Scholar
  45. Kojevnikov, Alexei. 2004. Stalin’s Great Science: The Times and Adventures of Soviet Physicists. London: Imperial College Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kolata, Gina. 2012. “Bits of Mystery DNA, far from ‘Junk,’ Play crucial Role.” New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/06/science/far-from-junk-dna-dark-matter-proves-crucial-to-health.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0. Accessed 2 February 2013.
  47. Krementsov, Nikolai. 2005. International Science Between the World Wars: The Case of Genetics. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  48. Latour, Bruno. 1987. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Latour, Bruno. 1988. The Pasteurization of France. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Latour, Bruno, and Woolgar, Steve. 1986 [Original 1979]. Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Lindee, Susan. 1994. Suffering Made Real: American Science and the Survivors at Hiroshima. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Lubrano, Linda, and Solomon, Susan Gross. 1980. The Social Context of Soviet Science. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  53. Mancuso, Thomas, Stewart, Alice, and Kneale, George. 1977. “Radiation Exposures of Hanford Workers Dying from Cancer and Other Causes.” Health Physics 33: 369–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Masco, Joseph. 2002. “Lie Detectors: On Secrets and Hypersecurity in Los Alamos.” Public Culture 14(3): 441–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Medvedev, Zhores. 1976. “Two Decades of Dissidence.” New Scientist 72(1025): 264–267.Google Scholar
  56. Moore, LeRoy. 2002. “Lowering the Bar.” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 58: 28–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Morgenstern, Hal, Froines, John, Ritz, Beate, et al. 1997. Final Report: Epidemiologic Study to Determine Possible Adverse Effects to Rocketdyne/Atomics International Workers from Exposure to Ionizing Radiation. Contract No. 324A-8701-S0163. Berkeley, CA: Public Health Institute.Google Scholar
  58. Mousseau, Timothy, and Møller, Anders. 2011. “Landscape Portrait: A Look at the Impacts of Radioactive Contaminants on Chernobyl’s Wildlife.” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 67(2): 38–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Muller, Hermann. 1927. “Artificial Transmutation of the Gene.” Science 66(1699): 84–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. National Research Council (US). 2006. Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation: BEIR VII Phase 2, Vol. 7. Committee to Assess Health Risks from Exposure to Low Level of Ionizing Radiation. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  61. Neel, James V. 1958. “Study of Major Congenital Defects in Japanese Infants.” American Journal of Human Genetics 10(4): 398–445.Google Scholar
  62. Neel, James V. 1959. Correspondence, James V. Neel to Theodosius Dobzhansky, July 8, 1959, James Van Gundia Neel Papers, Correspondence with Theodosius Dobzhansky from 1946–1971. American Philosophical Society.Google Scholar
  63. Neel, James. 1987. “Curt Stern 1902–1981.” Biographical Memoirs, Volume 56. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
  64. Neel, James V. 1994. Physician to the Gene Pool: Genetic lessons and Other Stories. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  65. Neel, James V. 1996. The Genetic Effects of Ionizing Radiation on Humans. Proceedings of the 9th International Congress of Human Genetics. http://ibisbirthdefects.org/start/neelppr.htm. Accessed 2 February 2013.
  66. Neel, James V. 1998. “Genetic Studies at the Atomic Bomb Casualty Commission-Radiation Effects Research Foundation: 1946–1997.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 95(10): 5432–5436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Neel, James V. 1999a. “Two Recent Radiation-Related Genetic False Alarms: Leukemia in West Cumbria, England, and Minisatellite Mutations in Belarus.” Teratology 59(4): 302–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Neel, James V. 1999b. “Changing Perspectives on the Genetic Doubling Dose of Ionizing Radiation for Humans, Mice, and Drosophila.” Teratology 59(4): 216–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Neel, James V., and Lewis, Susan. 1990. “The Comparative Radiation Genetics of Humans and Mice.” Annual Review of Genetics 24: 327–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Neel, James V., and Mohrenweiser, Harvey. 1984. “Failure to Demonstrate Mutations Affecting Protein Structure or Function in Children with Congenital Defects or Born Prematurely.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 81: 5499–5503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Neel, James V., and Schull, William. 1956. The Effect of Exposure to the Atomic Bomb on Pregnancy Termination in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences National Research Council, Publ. No. 461.Google Scholar
  72. Neel, James V., and Schull, William. 1991a. “Orientation.” James Neel and William Schull (eds.), The Children of Atomic Bomb Survivors: A Genetic Study. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, pp. 1–8.Google Scholar
  73. Neel, James V., and Schull, William. 1991b. “The Future of These Studies.” James Neel and William Schull (eds.), The Children of Atomic Bomb Survivors: A Genetic Study. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, pp. 487–494.Google Scholar
  74. Neel, James V., and Schull, William. 1991c. The Children of Atomic Bomb Survivors: A Genetic Study. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  75. Ozasa, Kotaro, Shimizu, Yukiko, Suyama, Akihiko, et al. 2012. “Studies of the Mortality of Atomic Bomb Survivors, Report 14, 1950–2003: An Overview of Cancer and Noncancer Diseases.” Radiation Research 177(3): 229–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Petryna, Adriana. 2002. Life Exposed: Biological Citizens After Chernobyl. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  77. Petryna, Adriana. 2004. Biological Citizenship: The Science and Politics of Chernobyl-Exposed Populations. Osiris, 2nd series, vol. 19, Landscapes of Exposure: Knowledge and Illness in Modern Environments, pp. 250–265.Google Scholar
  78. Pollock, Ethan. 2006. Stalin and the Soviet Science Wars. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  79. Richardson, David. 2012. “Lessons from Hiroshima and Nagasaki: The Most Exposed and Most Vulnerable.” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 68(3): 29–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Rader, Karen. 2004. Making Mice: Standardizing Animals for American Biomedical Research, 1900–1955. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  81. Roberts, Leslie. 1990. “British Radiation Study Throws Experts into Tizzy.” Science 248: 24–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Russell, Bill, Selby, Paul, von Halle, E., et al. 1981. “The Mouse Specific-Locus Test with Agents Other Than Radiations: Interpretation of Data and Recommendations for Future Work. A Report of the US EPA’s Gene-Tox Program.” Mutation Research 86: 329–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Russell, Liane, and Russell, William. 1996. “Spontaneous Mutations Recovered as Mosaics in the Mouse Specific-Locus Test.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 93: 13072–13077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Salmenkova, Elena, and Politov, Dmitri. 2011. “On the 75th Anniversary of the Birth of Yurii Petrovich Altukhov.” Russian Journal of Genetics 47(11): 1269–1276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Schull, William, and Neel, James. 1965. The Effects of Inbreeding on Japanese Children. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  86. Schull, William, Otake, Masanori, and Neel, James. 1981. “Genetic Effects of the Atomic Bomb: A Reappraisal.” Science 213: 1220–1225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Soyfer, Valery. 2001. “The Consequences of Political Dictatorship for Russian Science.” Nature Reviews: Genetics 2(9): 723–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Spencer, Warren, and Stern, Curt. 1948. “Experiments to Test the Validity of the Linear R-Dose/Mutation Frequency Relation in Drosophila at Low Dosage.” Genetics 33(1): 43–74.Google Scholar
  89. Tredici, Robert. 1987. At Work in the Fields of the Bomb. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  90. Vidal, John. 2010. “Chernobyl Nuclear Accident: Figures for Deaths and Cancers Still in Dispute.” The Guardian. http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2010/jan/10/chernobyl-nuclear-deaths-cancers-dispute. Accessed 10 October 2013.
  91. Walker J. Samuel. 1994. “The Atomic Energy Commission and the Politics of Radiation Protection, 1967–1971.” Isis 85(1): 57–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Welsome, Eileen. 1999. The Plutonium Files: America’s Secret Medical Experiments in the Cold War. New York: Dial Press.Google Scholar
  93. Wing, Steve, Richardson, David, and Stewart, Alice. 1999. “The Relevance of Occupational Epidemiology to Radiation Protection Standards.” New Solutions 9(2): 133–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Wolfe, Audra. 2012. “The Cold War Context of the Golden Jubilee, or, Why We Think of Mendel as the Father of Genetics.” Journal of the History of Biology 45(3): 389–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Wyrobek, Andy, Mulvihill, John, Wassom, John, et al. 2007. “Assessing Human Germ-Cell Mutagenesis in the Postgenome Era: A Celebration of the Legacy of William Lawson (Bill) Russell.” Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis 48(2): 71–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Yablokov, Alexey, Nesterenko, Vassily, Nesterenko, Alexey, et al. 2009. Chernobyl: Consequences of the Catastrophe for People and the Environment. Boston, MA: Blackwell/New York Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Anthropology Hale Building, Campus Box 233University of Colorado-BoulderBoulderUSA

Personalised recommendations