Journal of the History of Biology

, Volume 47, Issue 3, pp 443–478 | Cite as

The Long and Winding Road of Molecular Data in Phylogenetic Analysis

  • Edna Suárez-Díaz


The use of molecules and reactions as evidence, markers and/or traits for evolutionary processes has a history more than a century long. Molecules have been used in studies of intra-specific variation and studies of similarity among species that do not necessarily result in the analysis of phylogenetic relations. Promoters of the use of molecular data have sustained the need for quantification as the main argument to make use of them. Moreover, quantification has allowed intensive statistical analysis, as a condition and a product of increasing automation. All of these analyses are subject to the methodological anxiety characteristic of a community in search of objectivity (Suárez-Díaz and Anaya-Muñoz, Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci 39:451–458, 2008). It is in this context that scientists compared and evaluated protein and nucleic acid sequence data with other types of molecular data – including immunological, electrophoretic and hybridization data. This paper argues that by looking at long-term historical processes, such as the use of molecular evidence in evolutionary biology, we gain valuable insights into the history of science. In that sense, it accompanies a growing concern among historians for big-pictures of science that incorporate the fruitful historical research on local cases of the last decades.


Serology Protein sequences DNA sequences Nucleic acid hybridization Phylogenetic analysis Quantification Objectivity 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anfinsen, Christian B. 1959. “The Molecular Basis of Evolution”. New York: John Wiley and SonsGoogle Scholar
  2. Aronson, Jay D. 2002. “‘Molecules and Monkeys’: George Gaylord Simpson and the Challenge of Molecular Evolution.” History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 24: 441–465.Google Scholar
  3. Avise, John C. 1974. “Systematic Value of Electrophoretic Data.” Systematic Zoology, 23: 465–481.Google Scholar
  4. Avise, John C. 2004. Molecular Markers, Natural History and Evolution, 2nd Edn. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Association.Google Scholar
  5. Beatty, John. 1990. “Evolutionary Anti-Reductionism: Historical Reflections.” Biology and Philosophy 5: 199–210.Google Scholar
  6. Boyd, William C. 1963. “Genetics and the Human Race.” Science 140: 1057–1063.Google Scholar
  7. Britten, Roy J., and Davidson, Eric H. 1969. “Gene regulation for higher cells: a theory.” Science 165(3891):349–357Google Scholar
  8. Britten, Roy J., and Kohne, David. 1968. “Repeated Sequences in DNA.” Science 161(3841): 529–540.Google Scholar
  9. Buettner-Janusch, John. 1962. “Biochemical Genetics of the Primates Hemoglobins and Transferrins.” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 102: 235–248.Google Scholar
  10. Burke, Adrianne. 2002. “GenBank turns 20.”
  11. Cavalli-Sforza, Luigi, L., Edwards, and Scott, V. 1967. “Phylogenetic Analysis: Models and Estimation Procedures.” Evolution 21(3): 550–570.Google Scholar
  12. Ceruzzi, P.E. 1998. A History of Modern Computing, 2nd Edn. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  13. Chiang, Howard H.H. 2009. “The Laboratory Technology of Discrete Molecular Separation: The Historical Development of Gel Electrophoresis and the Material Epistemology of Biomolecular Science, 1945–1970.” Journal of the History of Biology 42(3): 495–527.Google Scholar
  14. Cracraft, Joel L. 1987. M.R. Hecht, B. Wallace, and G.T. Prance (eds.), DNA Hybridization and Avian Phylogenetics. New York: Plenum, pp. 47–96.Google Scholar
  15. Daston, Lorraine, and Galison, Peter. 1992. “The Image of Objectivity.” Representations 40: 81–128.Google Scholar
  16. Daston, Lorraine, and Galison, Peter. 2007. Objectivity. Brooklyn, NY: Zone Books.Google Scholar
  17. Dayhoff, Margaret O. 1969. “Computer Analysis of Protein Evolution.” Scientific American 221: 86–95.Google Scholar
  18. Dayhoff, Margaret O., Eck, Richard V., Chang, Marie A., and Sochard, Minie R. 1965. Atlas of Protein Sequence and Structure. Silver Spring: National Biomedical Research Foundation.Google Scholar
  19. Dayhoff, Margaret O., Schwartz, R.M., and Orcutt, B.C. 1978. “A Model of Evolutionary Change in Proteins.” M.O. Dayhoff and R.M. Schwartz (eds.), Atlas of Protein Sequence and Structure, Vol. 5. Silver Spring, MD: National Biomedical Research Foundation, pp. 345–352.Google Scholar
  20. De Chadarevian, Soraya. 1998. S. de Chadarevian and H. Kamminga (eds.), Following Molecules: Hemoglobin Between the Clinic and the Laboratory. Amsterdam: Harwood, pp. 171–201.Google Scholar
  21. De Chadarevian, Soraya. 2002. Designs for Life: Molecular Biology after World War II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  22. De Chadarevian, Soarya, and Kammimga, Harmke (eds.). 1998. Molecularizing Biology and Medicine. New Practices and Alliances 19101970s. Australia: Harwood Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  23. Dickerman, A.W. 1991. “Among-Run Artifacts in DNA Hybridization.” Systematic Zoology 40(4): 494–499.Google Scholar
  24. Dietrich, Michael R. 1994. “The Origins of the Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution.” Journal of the History of Biology 27(1): 21–59.Google Scholar
  25. Dietrich, Michael R. 1998. “Paradox and Persuasion: Negotiating the Place of Molecular Evolution Within Evolutionary Biology.” Journal of the History of Biology 31: 85–111.Google Scholar
  26. Doolittle, W. Ford. 1999. “Phylogenetic Classification and the Universal Tree.” Science 284(5423): 212–2124.Google Scholar
  27. Doolittle, W. Ford. 2005. “If the Tree of Life Fell, Would It Make a Sound?” J. Sapp (ed.), Microbial Phylogeny and Evolution. Concepts and Controversies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 119–133.Google Scholar
  28. Doty, Paul, Julius, Marmur, Eigner, J., and Schilkdraut, C. 1960. “Strand Separation and Specific Recombination in Deoxyribonucleic Acids: Physical Chemical Studies.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 46(4): 461–476.Google Scholar
  29. Edman, Pehr, and Begg, Geoffrey. 1967. “A Protein Sequenator.” European Journal of Biochemistry 1: 80–91.Google Scholar
  30. Edwards, Paul N. 1996. The Closed World. Computers and Politics of Discourse in Cold War America. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  31. Felsenstein, Joseph. 1987. “Estimation of Hominoid Phylogeny from a DNA Hybridization Data Set.” Journal of Molecular Evolution 3: 123–131.Google Scholar
  32. Felsenstein, Joseph. 2001. “The Troubled Growth of Statistical Phylogenetics.” Systematic Biology 50(4): 465–467.Google Scholar
  33. Feng, D.F., Johnson, M.S., and Doolittle, R.F. 1985. “Aligning Amino Acid Sequences: Comparison of Commonly Used Methods.” Journal of Molecular Biology 21: 112–125.Google Scholar
  34. Fitch, Walter M. 1966. “The Relation Between Frequencies of Amino Acids and Ordered Trinucleotides.” Journal of Molecular Biology 16: 1–8.Google Scholar
  35. Fitch, Walter M. 2000. “Homology, a Personal View on Some of the Problems.” Trends in Genetics 16(5): 227–231.Google Scholar
  36. Fitch, Walter M., and Margoliash, Emanuel. 1967. “Construction of Phylogenetic Trees.” Science 155(3760): 279–284.Google Scholar
  37. Fitch, Walter M., and Margoliash, Emanuel. 1968. “The Construction of Phylogenetic Trees. II. How Well Do They Reflect Past History?” Brookhaven Symposium of Biology 21: 217.Google Scholar
  38. Florkin, Marcel. 1949. Biochemical Evolution. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  39. Gannett, Lisa, and Griesemer, James. 2004. “Classical Genetics and the Geography of Genes.” H.J. Rheinberger and J.P. Gaudilliere (eds.), The Mapping Cultures of Twentieth Century Genetics. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  40. Garcia-Deister, Vivette. 2011. “The Old Man and the Sea Urchin Genome: Theory and Data in the work of Eric Davidson (1969–2006). History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 33: 147–164Google Scholar
  41. Garcia-Deister, Vivette. 2013. Interruptores, Baterias y Redes. El manejo de complejidad en la regulación genética. México City: Centro de Estudios Filosóficos, Políticos y Sociales Vicente Lombardo ToledanoGoogle Scholar
  42. García-Sancho, Miguel. 2009. “The Perception of an Information Society and the Emergence of the First Computerized Biological Databases.” A. Matsumoto and M. Nakano (eds.), Human Genome. Features, Variations and Genetic Disorders. New York: Nova Publishers, pp. 257–276.Google Scholar
  43. García-Sancho, Miguel. 2010. “A New Insight into Sanger’s Development of Sequencing: From Proteins to DANN, 1943–1977.” Journal of the History of Biology 43(2): 263–265.Google Scholar
  44. García-Sancho, Miguel. 2011. “From Metaphor to Practices: The Introduction of Information Engineers into the First DNA Sequence Database.” History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 33(1): 71–104.Google Scholar
  45. García-Sancho, Miguel. 2012. Biology, Computing, and the History of Molecular Sequencing. From Proteins to DANN, 19452000. London: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
  46. Giacomoni, Dario. 1993. “The Origin of DNA:RNA Hybridization.” Journal of the History of Biology 26: 189–197.Google Scholar
  47. Gogarten, Johann, Doolittle, Ford, and Lawrence, J.G. 2002. “Prokaryotic Evolution in Light of Gene Transfer.” Molecular Biology and Evolution 19(12): 2226–2238.Google Scholar
  48. Goodman, Morris. 1960. “On the Emergence of Intraspecific Differences in the Protein Antigens of Human Beings.” The American Naturalist 94(875): 153–166.Google Scholar
  49. Goodman, Morris. 1962. “Immunochemistry of the Primates and Primate Evolution.” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 102: 219–234.Google Scholar
  50. Goodman, Morris. 1964. “Man’s Place in the Phylogeny of the Primates as Reflected in Serum Proteins.” S.L. Washburn (ed.), Classification and Human Evolution. London: Methuen and Co. Limited, pp. 204–234.Google Scholar
  51. Goodman, Morris. 1996. “Epilogue: A Personal Account of the Origins of a New Paradigm.” Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 5(1): 269–285.Google Scholar
  52. Gould, Stephen J. 1985. “A Clock of Evolution.” Natural History 85(4): 12–25.Google Scholar
  53. Hagen, Joel. 1999. “Naturalists, Molecular Biologists, and the Challenges of Molecular Evolution.” Journal of the History of Biology 32: 321–341.Google Scholar
  54. Hagen, Joel. 2001. “The Introduction of Computers into Systematic Research in the United States During the 1960s.” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 32: 291–314.Google Scholar
  55. Hagen, Joel. 2003. “The Statistical Frame of Mind in Systematic Biology from Quantitative Zoology to Biometry.” Journal of the History of Biology 36: 353–384.Google Scholar
  56. Hagen, Joel. 2010. “Waiting for Sequences: Morris Goodman, Immunodiffusion Experiments, and the Origins of Molecular Anthropology.” Journal of the History of Biology 43(4): 697–725.Google Scholar
  57. Harris, Harry. 1966. “Enzyme Polymorphisms in Man.” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 164(995): 298–310.Google Scholar
  58. Hirs, C.H.W., Moore, S., and Stein, W.H. (1960). “The Sequence of the Amino Acid Residues in Performic Acid-Oxidized Ribonuclease”. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 235: 633–647Google Scholar
  59. Hirszfeld, Ludwik, and Hirszfeld, Hanna. 1919. “Serological Differences Between Blood of Different Races.” Lancet 2: 675–679.Google Scholar
  60. Horowitz, N.H. 1965. “The Evolution of Biochemical Synthesis-Retrospect and Prospect.” V. Bryson and H.J. Vogel (eds.), Evolving Genes and Proteins. New York: Academic Press, pp. 15–24.Google Scholar
  61. Houde, P. 1987. “Critical Evaluation of DNA Hybridization Studies in Avian Systematics.” The Auk 104: 17–32.Google Scholar
  62. Hubby, John L., and Lewontin, Richard C. 1966. “A Molecular Approach to the Study of Genic Heterozygosity in Natural Populations I. The Number of Alleles at Different Loci in Drosophila pseudoobscura.” Genetics 54: 577–594.Google Scholar
  63. Hull, David L. 1988. Science as a Process. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  64. Ingram, Vernon M. 1956. “A Specific Chemical Difference Between Globins of Normal and Sickle-Cell Anemia Hemoglobins.” Nature 178: 792–794.Google Scholar
  65. Jukes, Thomas H. 1966. “Molecules and Evolution”. New York: Columbia University PressGoogle Scholar
  66. Jukes, Thomas H., and Cantor, Charles R. 1969. “Evolution of Protein Molecules.” H.N. Munro (ed.), Mammalian Protein Metabolism, Vol. 3. New York: Academic Press, pp. 21–132.Google Scholar
  67. Kay, Lily. 2000. Who Wrote the Book of Life? A History of the Genetic Code. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  68. Kaye, Jane, Heeney, Catherine, Hawkins, Naomi, Hawkins, de Vries, Jantina, and Boddington, Paula. 2009. “Data Sharing in Genomics – Re-shaping Scientific Practice.” Nature Reviews Genetics 10: 331–335.Google Scholar
  69. Keating, Peter, Limoges, Camille, and Cambrosio, Alberto. 1999. “The Automated Laboratory.” Fortun Michael and Mendelsohn Everett (eds.), The Practices of Human Genetics. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 125–142.Google Scholar
  70. Kevles, Daniel J. 1995. In the Name of Eugenics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  71. Klein, Ronald R. 2006. “Cybernetics, Management Science, and Technology Policy: The Emergence of ‘Information Technology’ as a Keyword, 1948–1985.” Technology and Culture 47: 513–535.Google Scholar
  72. Lenoir, Timothy. 1999. “Shaping Biomedicine as an Information Science.” M.E. Bowden, T.B. Hahn, and R.V. Williams (eds.), Proceedings of the 1998 Conference on the History and Heritage of Science Information Systems. ASIS Monographic Series. Medford, NJ: Information Today, Inc., pp. 27–45.Google Scholar
  73. Lewontin, Richard C. 1974. The Genetic Basis of Evolutionary Change. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  74. Lindee, Susan and Santos Ventura Ricardo. 2012. “The Biological Anthropology of Living Human Populations: World Histories, National Styles and International Networks: An Introduction to Supplement 5”. Current Anthropology, 53(5S): 3–16Google Scholar
  75. Lipphardt, Veronika. 2010. “The Jewish Community of Rome: An Isolated Population? Bio-historical narratives in Genetic Analysis in the 1950s”. Biosocieties, 5(3): 306–329Google Scholar
  76. Lipphardt, Veronika. 2012. “Isolates and Crosses in Human Population Genetics or: A Contextualization of German Race Science”. Current Anthropology, 53 (5): 69–82Google Scholar
  77. Lovejoy, C.O., Burstein, A.H., Herple, K.G. “Primate Phylogeny and Immunological Distance”. Science, 176(4036): 803–805Google Scholar
  78. Margoliash, Emanuel. 1963. “Primary Structure and Evolution of Cytochrome C.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 50(4): 672–679.Google Scholar
  79. Marks, Jonathan. 1996. “The Legacy of Serological Studies in American Physical Anthropology.” History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 18: 345–362.Google Scholar
  80. Marks, Jonathan. 2002. What it Means to be 98% Chimpanzee. Apes, People and Their Genes. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  81. Marks, Jonathan. 2008. “Myths of Molecular Anthropology.” Unpublished Paper for the Making Sequence Matter Conference, Yale University, June 20–21, 2008.Google Scholar
  82. Marks, Jonathan, Schmid, Carl W., and Sarich, Vincent M. 1988. “DNA Hybridization as a Guide to Phylogeny: Relations of the Hominidae.” Journal of Human Evolution 18: 165–166.Google Scholar
  83. Marmur, Julius, and Doty, Paul. 1959. “Heterogeneity in Deoxyribonucleic Acids: I. Dependence on Composition of the Configuration Stability of DNA’s.” Nature 183: 1427–1428.Google Scholar
  84. Mazumdar, P.M.H. 1992. Eugenics, Human Genetics an Human Failings. The Eugenic Society and Its Critics in Britain. London: Routledge Press.Google Scholar
  85. Mazumdar, Pauline M.H. 1995. Species and Specificity. An Interpretation of the History of Immunology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  86. Morgan, Gregory J. 1998. “Emile Zuckerkandl, Linus Pauling and the Molecular Evolutionary Clock, 1959–1965.” Journal of the History of Biology 31: 155–178.Google Scholar
  87. Müller, T., and Vingron, Martin. 2000. “Modeling Amino Acid Replacement.” Journal of Computational Biology 7(6): 761–776.Google Scholar
  88. Needleman, S., and Wunsch, Christian. 1970. “A General Method Applicable to the Search for Similarities in the Amino Acid Sequence of Two Proteins.” Journal of Molecular Biology 48(3): 443–453.Google Scholar
  89. November, Joseph. 2006. “Digitalizing Life: The Introduction of Computers to Biology and Medicine.” Unpublished PhD Dissertation, Princeton University.Google Scholar
  90. November, Joseph. 2012. Biomedical Computing. Digitalizing Life in the United States. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  91. Nuttall, George H.F. 1904. Blood Immunity and Blood Relationship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  92. O’Hara, Richard. 1991. “Review of “Phylogeny and Classification of Birds: A Study in Molecular Evolution” by Charles Sibley and Jon Ahlquist.” The Auk 108(4): 990–994.Google Scholar
  93. O’Malley, Maureen A., and Boucher, Y. 2005. “Paradigm Change in Evolutionary Microbiology.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 36: 183–208.Google Scholar
  94. Pickstone, John. 1993. “Ways of Knowing. Towards a Historical Sociology of Science, Technology and Medicine.” British Journal for the History of Science 26: 433–458.Google Scholar
  95. Porter, T.M. 1992. “Quantification and the Accounting Ideal in Science.” Social Studies of Science 22(4): 633–651.Google Scholar
  96. Porter, T.M. 1995. Trust in Numbers, The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  97. Powell, J.R. 1994. “Molecular Techniques in Population Genetics: A Brief History.” B. Schierwater, B. Streit, G.P. Wagner, and R. De Salle (eds.), Molecular Ecology and Evolution. Approaches and Applications. Bazel: Verlag Birkhauser; pp. 131–156.Google Scholar
  98. Rieppel, O., and Kearney, M. 2007. “The Poverty of Taxonomic Characters.” Biology and Philosophy 22(1): 95–113.Google Scholar
  99. Roger, Lewin. 1988. “DNA Clock Conflict Continues.” Science 241: 1756–1759.Google Scholar
  100. Ruvolo, Maryellen, and Smith, T.F. 1986. “Phylogeny and DNA–DNA Hybridization.” Molecular Biology and Evolution 23: 285–289.Google Scholar
  101. Sapp, Jan (ed.). 2005. Microbial Phylogeny and Evolution. Concepts and Controversies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  102. Sarich, Vincent, Schmid, Carl W., and Jonathan, Marks. 1988. “DNA Hybridization as a Guide to Phylogeny: A Critical Analysis.” Cladistics 5: 3–32.Google Scholar
  103. Sarich, Vincent M., and Wilson, Alan C. 1967. “Immunological Time-Scale for Hominoid Evolution.” Science 158: 1200–1203.Google Scholar
  104. Secord, James A. 1993. “Introduction”. The British Journal for the History of Science, 26: 387–389Google Scholar
  105. Schmid, Carl W., and Marks, Jonathan. 1990. “DNA Hybridization as a Guide into Phylogeny: Physical and Chemical Limits.” Journal of Molecular Evolution 30: 237–246.Google Scholar
  106. Sibley, Charles G., and Ahlquist, Jon E. 1984. “The Phylogeny of the Hominoid Primates, as Indicated by DNA–DNA Hybridization.” Journal of Molecular Evolution 20: 2–15.Google Scholar
  107. Sibley, Charles G., and Ahlquist, Jon E. 1987. “DNA Hybridization Evidence of a Hominoid Phylogeny; Evidence from an Expanded Data Set.” Journal of Molecular Evolution 26: 99–121.Google Scholar
  108. Sibley, Charles G., and Ahlquist, Jon E. 1990. Phylogeny and Classification of Birds: A Study in Molecular Evolution. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  109. Sibley, Charles G., Comstock, John A., and Ahlquist, Jon E. 1990. “DNA Hybridization Evidence of Hominoid Phylogeny: A Reanalysis of the Data.” Journal of Molecular Evolution 30: 202–236.Google Scholar
  110. Simpson, G.G. 1964. “The Meaning of Taxonomic Statements.” SL Washburn (ed.), Classification and Human Evolution. London: Methuen and Co. Ltd., pp. 1–31.Google Scholar
  111. Smith, Temple F. 1990. “The History of the Genetic Sequence Databases.” Genomics 6: 701–707.Google Scholar
  112. Sommer, Marianne. 2008. “History in the Gene: Negotiations Between Molecular and Organismal Anthropology.” Journal of the History of Biology 41(3): 473–528.Google Scholar
  113. Sommer, Marianne. 2012. “Human Evolution Across the Disciplines: Spotlights on American Anthropology and genetics”. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences. 34: 211–236Google Scholar
  114. Strasser, Bruno J. 1999. “Sickle Cell Anemia, a Molecular Disease.” Science 286(5444): 1488–1490.Google Scholar
  115. Strasser, Bruno J. 2006. “Collecting and Experimenting: The Moral Economies of Biological Research, 1960–1980s.” H.J. Rheinberger and S. de Chadarevian (eds.), History and Epistemology of Molecular Biology and Beyond: Problems and Perspectives. Berlin: Max Planck Institute for the History of Science. Preprint 310, pp. 105–123.Google Scholar
  116. Strasser, Bruno J. 2008. GenBank. Natural History in the 21st Century? Science 322: 537–538.Google Scholar
  117. Strasser, Bruno J. 2010a. “Laboratories, Museums, and the Comparative Perspective: Alan A. Boyden’s Quest for Objectivity in Serological taxonomy, 1924–1962.” Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences 40(2): 149–182.Google Scholar
  118. Strasser, Bruno J. 2010b. “Collecting, Comparing, and Computing Sequences: The Making of Margaret O. Dayhoff’s “Atlas of Protein Sequence and Structure”, 1954–1965.” Journal of the History of Biology 43: 623–660.Google Scholar
  119. Strasser, Bruno J. 2011. “The Experimenter’s Museum: Genbank, Natural History and the Moral Economies of Biomedicine.” Isis 102(1): 60–96.Google Scholar
  120. Suárez, E. 2001. “Satellite-DNA: A Case Study for the Evolution of Experimental Techniques.” Studies in the History and Philosophy of the Biological and Biomedical Sciences 32(1): 31–57.Google Scholar
  121. Suárez-Díaz, Edna. 2007. “The Rhetoric of Informational Molecules. Authority and Promises in the Early Days of Molecular Evolution.” Science in Context 20(4): 649–677.Google Scholar
  122. Suárez-Díaz, Edna. 2010. “Making Room for New Faces. Evolution, Genomics and the Growth of Bioinformatics.” History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 32: 65–90.Google Scholar
  123. Suárez, Edna, and Barahona, Ana. 1996. “The Experimental Roots of the Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution.” History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 18: 55–81.Google Scholar
  124. Suárez-Díaz, Edna, and Anaya-Muñoz, Victor. 2008. “History, Objectivity and the Construction of Molecular Phylogenies.” Studies in the History and Philosophy of the Biological and Biomedical Sciences 39: 451–458.Google Scholar
  125. Templeton, A.R. 1988. “The Phylogeny of the Hominoid Primates: A Statistical Analysis of the DNA–DNA Hybridization Data.” Molecular Biology and Evolution 2: 428–433.Google Scholar
  126. Wilson, Edward O. 1994. Naturalist. Washington, DC: Island Press/Shearwater Books.Google Scholar
  127. Wilson, A.C., and Sarich, V.M. 1969. “A Molecular Time – Scale for Human Evolution.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 63: 1088–1093.Google Scholar
  128. Wintrobe, M.M. 1980. Blood Pure and Simple. A Story of Discovery, of People and of Ideas. New York: McGraw-Hill Company.Google Scholar
  129. Zuckerkandl, Emilé. 1964. “Perspectives in Molecular Anthropology.” S.L. Washburn (ed.), Classification and Human Evolution. London: Methuen and Co. Limited, pp. 243–272.Google Scholar
  130. Zuckerkandl, Emilé, Jones, Richard T., and Pauling, Linus. 1960. “A Comparison of Animal Hemoglobins by Tryptic Peptide Pattern Analysis.” PNAS 46: 1349–1360.Google Scholar
  131. Zuckerkandl, Emilé, and Pauling, Linus. 1962. “Molecular Disease, Evolution and Genic Heterogeneity.” M. Kasha and B. Pullman (eds.), Horizons in Biochemistry: Albert Szent-Györyi Dedicatory Volume. New York: Academic Press, pp. 189–225.Google Scholar
  132. Zuckerkandl, Emile, Pauling, Linus. 1965a. “Molecules as Documents of Evolutionary History.” Journal of Theoretical Biology 8: 357–366.Google Scholar
  133. Zuckerkandl, Emilé, Pauling, Linus. 1965b. “Evolutionary Divergence and Convergence in Proteins.” Vernon Bryson, Henry Vogel (eds.), Evolving Genes and Proteins. New York:Academic Press, pp. 97–166.Google Scholar
  134. Zuckerkandl, Emilé, and Schroeder, Walter A. 1961. “Amino-Acid Composition of the Polypeptide Chains of Gorilla Hemoglobin”. Nature 192: 984–985.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Departamento de Biología Evolutiva, Facultad de CienciasUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM)MexicoMexico

Personalised recommendations