Journal of the History of Biology

, Volume 44, Issue 1, pp 103–123 | Cite as

A Difficult Time with the Permit Process

Special issue: Environmental History

Abstract

In the 1970s, new forms of public scrutiny were applied to the research methods of field biologists in the United States, particularly those studying endangered species and marine mammals. This paper shows how such scrutiny affected researchers’ choice of research methods through an analysis of a key moment in a decade-long controversy over the conservation of bowhead whales. In 1978, researchers at the Naval Arctic Research Laboratory received funding from the Bureau of Land Management to radio-tag bowhead whales. Although this promising but still largely untested technique might have answered one of the central scientific questions in the controversy, it ultimately went unused. Technical considerations played a role in the decision not to use the technique, but the most important factor was scientists’ concerns about potential backlash from Iñupiat whalers and animal protectionists. The same forces that had made marine mammalogists more influential than ever and that had put into their hands the resources necessary to develop more effective research techniques also placed serious constraints on where, when, and how they could do their research.

Keywords

animal welfare bowhead whales endangered species environmental regulation indigenous hunting 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alaska Eskimo Whaling Commission. 1981. Prospectus and Proceedings of the Science Advisory Committee of the Alaska Eskimo Whaling Commission, October 1980 to May 1981. Barrow, AK: Alaska Eskimo Whaling Commission.Google Scholar
  2. Albert, Thomas F. Jr. 2001. “The influence of Harry Brower, Sr., an Iñupiak Eskimo Hunter, on the Bowhead Whale Research Program Conducted at the UIC-NARL Facility by the North Slope Borough.” David W. Norton (ed.), Fifty More Years Below Zero: Tributes and Meditations for the Naval Arctic Research Laboratory’s First Half Century at Barrow, Alaska. Fairbanks: Arctic Institute of North America and University of Alaska Press, pp. 265–276.Google Scholar
  3. Anonymous. 1972a. “Conservationists Back Natives.” Tundra Times, 17 May.Google Scholar
  4. Anonymous. 1972b. “Importance of Sea Mammals to Natives.” Tundra Times, 29 March.Google Scholar
  5. Anonymous. 1977. “Arctic Eskimos Fight Whale Ban.” Tundra Times, 17 August.Google Scholar
  6. Anonymous. 1978a. “Scientific Programs at the NARL.” NARL News 2, March, 1.Google Scholar
  7. Anonymous. 1978b. “Project Whales – New Research Program Proposed for NARL.” NARL News 2, September, 1–2.Google Scholar
  8. Anonymous. 1979a. “Plans for Project Whales Spring Experiment Underway.” NARL News 3, January, 7.Google Scholar
  9. Anonymous. 1979b. “Arctic Research Workshop Held at the NARL.” NARL News 3, December, 1–2.Google Scholar
  10. Anonymous. 1980. “The NARL Mourns the Death of Mayor Eben Hopson.” NARL News 4, July, 1.Google Scholar
  11. Arctic Institute of North America. 1997. Remembrances on the Event of the 50th Anniversary of the NARL, 19471997. Fairbanks, AK: Arctic Institute of North America.Google Scholar
  12. Barrow, Mark V. Jr. 1998. A Passion for Birds: American Ornithology After Audubon. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Barrow, Mark V., Jr. 2009. Nature’s Ghosts: Confronting Extinction from the Age of Jefferson to the Age of Ecology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  14. Bean, Michael J. and Rowland, Melanie J. 1997. The Evolution of National Wildlife Law. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
  15. Beers, Diane L. 2006. For the Prevention of Cruelty: The History and Legacy of Animal Rights Activism in the United States. Athens: Swallow Press/Ohio University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Bockstoce, John R. 1986. Whales, Ice, and Men: The History of Whaling in the Western Arctic. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
  17. Bockstoce, John R. and Burns, John J. 1993. “Commercial Whaling in the North Pacific Sector.” John J. Burns, J. Jerome Montague and Cleveland J. Cowles (eds.), The Bowhead Whale. Lawrence, KS: Society for Marine Mammalogy, pp. 563–577.Google Scholar
  18. Brenneman, Betsy. 1976. “27th Annual Science Conference.” Tundra Times, 11 August.Google Scholar
  19. Brewster, Karen. 2004. The Whales, They Give Themselves: Conversations with Harry Brower, Sr. Fairbanks: University of Alaska Press.Google Scholar
  20. Brody, Hugh. 2000. The Other Side of Eden: Hunters, Farmers, and the Shaping of the World. New York: North Point.Google Scholar
  21. Cioc, Mark. 2009. The Game of Conservation: International Treaties to Protect the World’s Migratory Animals. Athens: Ohio University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Clark, Tim W., Reading, Richard P. and Clarke, Alice L. (eds.). 1994. Endangered Species Recovery: Finding the Lessons, Improving the Process. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  23. Cruikshank, Julie. 2004. “Uses and Abuses of ‘Traditional Knowledge’: Perspectives from the Yukon Territory.” David G. Anderson and Mark Nuttall (eds.), Cultivating Arctic Landscapes: Knowing and Managing Animals in the Circumpolar North. New York: Berghahn, pp. 17–32.Google Scholar
  24. Dronenburg, Ray. 1978. “Marine Bioacoustics.” NARL News 2, May, 1.Google Scholar
  25. Dunlap, Thomas. 1988. Saving America’s Wildlife: Ecology and the American Mind, 1850–1990. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Fienup-Riordan, Ann. 1990. Eskimo Essays: Yup’ik Lives and How We See Them. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Follmann, Erich. 1979a. “Gray Whales Radio-Tagged in Mexico.” NARL News 3, March, 5–6.Google Scholar
  28. Follmann, Erich. 1979b. “Tagged Grey Whale Located off West Coast.” NARL News 3, May, 1.Google Scholar
  29. Follmann, Erich. 1979c. “Flash!! Grey Whale with Radio Tag Located at Unimak Pass.” NARL News 3, June, 4.Google Scholar
  30. Follmann, Erich. 1980. “Two Gray Whales Tagged in Mexico.” NARL News 4, April, 3.Google Scholar
  31. Follmann, Erich H. and Manning, Arthur E. 1989. “The Use of Radio Telemetry as an Aid in the Retrieval of Bowhead Whales (Balaena mysticetus) Struck During the Annual Eskimo Subsistence Hunt in Alaska.” Arctic 42: 189–198.Google Scholar
  32. Gehringer, Jack W. 1975. “G. Carleton Ray and Douglas Wartzok: Issuance of Permit for Marine Mammals.” Federal Register 40: 25702.Google Scholar
  33. Haldiman, Jerrold T. and Tarpley, Raymond J. 1993. “Anatomy and Physiology.” John J. Burns, J. Jerome Montague and Cleveland J. Cowles (eds.), The Bowhead Whale. Lawrence, KS: Society for Marine Mammalogy, pp. 71–156.Google Scholar
  34. Harkin, Michael E. and Lewis, David Rich (eds.). 2007. Native Americans and the Environment: Perspectives on the Ecological Indian. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  35. Hensley, William L. Iġġiaġruk. 2009. Fifty Miles from Tomorrow: A Memoir of Alaska and the Real People. New York: Sarah Crichton.Google Scholar
  36. House Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries. 1975. Hearings Before the Subcommittee on Fisheries and Wildlife Conservation and the Environment of the Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries, House of Representatives, Ninety-Fourth Congress, on Oversight of the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972; To Review the Implementation, Administration, and Enforcement of the Act, October 21, 29, 30, December 9, 1975. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  37. Ingold, Tom. 2004. “Foreword”. David G. Anderson and Mark Nuttall (eds.), Cultivating Arctic Landscapes: Knowing and Managing Animals in the Circumpolar North. New York: Berghahn, pp. vii–xiii.Google Scholar
  38. Jasanoff, Sheila. 1990. The Fifth Branch: Science Advisers as Policymakers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Kelley, John J. 1980. “Plans for NARL Operations During 1980.” NARL News 3, August, 1.Google Scholar
  40. Kofinas, Gary P. 2005. “Caribou Hunters and Researchers at the Co-management Interface: Emergent Dilemmas and the Dynamics of Legitimacy in Power Sharing.” Anthropologica 47: 179–196.Google Scholar
  41. Koski, William R., Davis, Rolph A., Miller, Gary W. and Withrow, David E. 1993. “Reproduction.” John J. Burns, J. Jerome Montague, and Cleveland J. Cowles (eds.), The Bowhead Whale. Lawrence, KS: Society for Marine Mammalogy, pp. 239–274.Google Scholar
  42. Krech, Shepard, III. 1999. The Ecological Indian: Myth and History. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  43. Laursen, Gary A. 1979. BLM/NARL Project Whales. NARL News 3, April, 2.Google Scholar
  44. Mate, Bruce and Krutzikowsky, Gregory K. 1995. Application of Remote Methods of Large Cetacean Tracking: Bowhead Whales, Final Report, MMS 95-0053. Washington, DC: Bureau of Land Management, Minerals Management Service.Google Scholar
  45. McBeath, Gerald A. and Morehouse, Thomas A. 1980. The Dynamics of Alaska Native Self-Government. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar
  46. McCartney, Allen P. (ed.). 2003. Indigenous Ways to the Present: Native Whaling in the Western Arctic. Edmonton: Canadian Circumpolar Institute Press.Google Scholar
  47. McLeod, Samuel A., Whitmore, Frank C. Jr. and Barnes, Lawrence G. 1993. “Evolutionary Relationships and Classification.” John J. Burns, J. Jerome Montague and Cleveland J. Cowles (eds.), The Bowhead Whale. Lawrence, KS: Society for Marine Mammalogy, pp. 45–70.Google Scholar
  48. Montague, J. Jerome. 1993. “Introduction.” John J. Burns, J. Jerome Montague and Cleveland J. Cowles (eds.), The Bowhead Whale. Lawrence, KS: Society for Marine Mammalogy, pp. 1–21.Google Scholar
  49. Montgomery, Suzanne (ed.). 1987. Report on the 24–26 February 1987 Workshop to Assess Possible Systems for Tracking Large Cetaceans. Washington, DC: Marine Mammal Commission.Google Scholar
  50. Moore, Sue E. and Reeves, Randall R. 1993. “Distribution and Movement.” John J. Burns, J. Jerome Montague, and Cleveland J. Cowles (eds.), The Bowhead Whale. Lawrence, KS: Society for Marine Mammalogy, pp. 313–386.Google Scholar
  51. Ralls, Katherine and Brownell, Robert L. Jr. 1989. “Protected Species: Research Permits and the Value of Basic Research.” BioScience 39: 394–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Ray, G.C., Mitchell, E.D., Wartzok, D., Kozicki, V.M. and Maiefski, R. 1978. “Radio Tracking of a Fin Whale (Baleanoptera physalus).” Science 202: 524–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Schevill, William E., Ray, G. Carleton and Norris, Kenneth S. (eds.). 1974. The Whale Problem: A Status Report. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Schoning, Robert W. 1975. “G. Carleton Ray and Douglas Wartzok: Issuance of Endangered Species Permit.” Federal Register 40: 31824.Google Scholar
  55. Stoker, Sam W. and Krupnik, Igor I. 1993. “Subsistence Whaling.” John J. Burns, J. Jerome Montague and Cleveland J. Cowles (eds.), The Bowhead Whale. Lawrence, KS: Society for Marine Mammalogy, pp. 579–629.Google Scholar
  56. Thomas, Jack Ward. 2000. “From Managing a Deer Herd to Moving a Mountain: One Pilgrim’s Progress.” Journal of Wildlife Management 64: 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Watkins, W.A., Wartzok, D., Würsig, B., Kelly, B.P. and Fistrup, K. 1989. “Radio Tracking of Bowhead Whales.” Proceedings of the Eighth Biennial Conference on the Biology of Marine Mammals, Asilomar, CA.Google Scholar
  58. Watkins, William A. and Schevill, William E. 1977. Development and Testing of a Radio Whale Tag, Technical Report 77–58. Woods Hole, MA: Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution.Google Scholar
  59. Wohlforth, Charles P. 2004. The Whale and the Supercomputer: On the Northern Front of Climate Change. New York: North Point Press.Google Scholar
  60. Yaffee, Steven L. 1982. Prohibitive Policy: Implementing the Federal Endangered Species Act. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  61. Zeh, Judith E., Clark, Christopher W., George, John C., Withrow, David, Carroll, Geoffrey M. and Koski, William R. 1993. “Current Population Size and Dynamics.” John J. Burns, J. Jerome Montague and Cleveland J. Cowles (eds.), The Bowhead Whale. Lawrence, KS: Society for Marine Mammalogy, pp. 409–489.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Max Planck Institute for the History of ScienceBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations