Abstract
Anton de Bary is best known for his elucidation of the life cycle of Phytopthora infestans, the causal organism of late blight of potato and the crop losses that caused famine in nineteenth-century Europe. But while practitioner histories often claim this accomplishment as a founding moment of modern plant pathology, closer examination of de Bary’s experiments and his published work suggest that his primary motiviation for pursing this research was based in developmental biology, not agriculture. De Bary shied away from making any recommendations for agricultural practice, and instead focused nearly exclusively on spontaneous generation and fungal development – both concepts promoted through prize questions posted by the Académie des Sciences in the 1850s and 1860s. De Bary’s submission to the Académie’s 1859 Alhumbert prize question illustrates his own contributions to debates about spontaneous generation and demonstrates the practical applications of seemingly philosophical questions – such as the origin of life.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Académie des Sciences. 1856. ‘Grand Prix des Sciences Physiques, proposé pour 1857.’ Comptes rendus 42: 161–163.
Académie des Sciences. 1859. ‘Prix Alhumbert pour les sciences naturelles, proposé pour 1862.’ Comptes rendus 48: 535–537.
1861. “Rapport sur le concours pour le grand prix des sciences physiques. Question proposée en 1856 pour 1857, prorogée a1860. Nouvelle question proposée pour 1863.” Comptes rendus 52: 607–608
Académie des Sciences 1862. Prix Alhumbert pour l’année 1862. Rapport sur ce concours fait dans le comité secret de la séance du 1er décembre. Comptes rendus. 55: 977–979.
Arny, D. C., Moore, J. Duain, and Schwebke, Ruth N. (eds.). 1969. Investigations of the Brand Fungi and the diseases of plants caused by them with reference to grain and other useful plants. Trans. R.M.S. Heffner, D.C. Arny, and J. Duain Moore. Minneapolis: APS Press.
Bergman, M. 1967. “The potato blight in the Netherlands and its social consequences (1845–1847).”International review of social history [Netherlands] 12: 390–431
Berkeley, Miles J. 1846. ‘Observations, Botanical, and Physiological, on the Potato Murrain.’ Journal of the Horticultural Society of London 1: 9–34.
Braun, Hans. 1965. Geschichte der Phytomedizin. Berlin:Paul Parey.
de Bary, Anton. 1853. Untersuchungen über die Brandpilze und die durch sie verursachten Krankheiten der Pflanzen, mit Rücksicht auf das Getreide und andere Nutzpflanzen. Berlin:GWF Müller.
de Bary, Anton. 1861. ‘Ueber die Geschlechtsorgane von Peronospora.’ Botanische Zeitung. 19(14): 89–91.
de Bary, Anton 1862 and 1863. Die neuesten Arbeiten ueber Entstehung und Vegetation der niederen Pilze; insbesondere Pasteurs Untersuchungen. Flora, oder Allgemeine botanische Zeitung. 45: 355–365 and 46: 9–12, 17–24, 43–47.
de Bary, Anton. 1863. ‘Recherches sur le développement de quelques champignons parasites.’ Annales des sciences naturelles, Botanique 20: 5–143.
de Bary, Anton. 1876. ‘Researches into the nature of the potato fungus – Phytophthora infestans.’ Journal of the Royal Agricultural Society of England 12: 239–269.
de Chadarevian, Soraya. 1993. ‘Instruments, Illustrations, Skills, and Laboratories in 19th-century German Botany.’ R Mazzolini (ed.), Non-Verbal Communication in Science Prior to 1900. Firenze:L.S. Olschke, pp. 529–562.
de Chadarevian, Soraya. 1996. ‘Laboratory Science Versus Country-House Experiments: The Controversy Between Julius Sachs and Charles Darwin.’ British Journal for the History of Science 29: 17–41.
Ferdinand, Cohn. 1875. ‘Untersuchungen über Bacterien, II.’ Beiträge zur Biologie der Pflanzen 1: 141–207.
Farley, John. 1977. The Spontaneous Generation Controversy from Descartes to Oparin. Baltimore:The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Farley, John. 1982. Gametes and Spores: Ideas About Sexual Reproduction 1750–1914. Baltimore:The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Farley, John. 1992. ‘Parasites and the Germ Theory of Disease.’ Charles E Rosenberg, Janet Golden (eds.), Framing Disease: Studies in Cultural History. New Brunswick:Rutgers University Press, pp. 133–149.
Farley, John, Geison, Gerald L. 1974. ‘Science, Politics and Spontaneous Generation in Nineteenth-Century France: The Pasteur-Pouchet Debate.’ Bulletin of the History of Medicine 48(2): 161–198.
Gallegly, ME, Galindo, J. 1958. ‘Mating types and oospores of Phytophthora infestans in nature in Mexico.’ Phytopathology 48: 274–277.
Gálvez, Antonio. 1988. ‘The Role of the French Academy of Sciences in the Clarification of the Issue of Spontaneous Generation in the Mid-Nineteenth Century.’ Annals of Science 45: 345–365.
Geison, Gerald. 1995. The Private Science of Louis Pasteur. Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.
Gliboff, Sandor. 1998. ‘Evolution, Revolution, and Reform in Vienna: Franz Unger’s Ideas on Descent and their Post-1848 Reception.’ Journal of the History of Biology 31: 179–209.
Klemm, Margot. 2002. Ferdinand Julius Cohn 1828–1898. Pflanzenphysiologe, Mikrobiologe, Begründer der Bakteriologie, Gründer des ersten Pflanzenphysiologischen Instituts in Preußen. D. Phil. Thesis, Universität Stuttgart
Large, EC. 1940. The Advance of the Fungi. New York:Henry Holt and Company.
Mazumdar, Pauline M H. 1995. Species and Specificity: An Interpretation of the History of Immunology. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
Mylott, Anne. 2002. Roots of cell theory in sap, spores, Schleiden. Ph.D. dissertation, Indiana University
Pasteur, Louis. 1861. Mémoire sur les corpuscles organisés qui existent dans l’atmosphere. Examen de la doctrine des générations spontanées. Annales des sciences naturelles, zoologique. 16: 5–98, 494–504, 509–516.
Pouchet, Félix-Archimède. 1859. Hétérogenie ou la Traité de la génération spontanée, basé sur de nouvelles expériences. Paris:J.B. Baillière et Fils.
Roll-Hansen, Nils. 1979. ‘Experimental Method and Spontaneous Generation: The Controversy Between Pasteur and Pouchet, 1859–64.’ Journal of the History of Medicine 34: 273–292.
Rosen, Felix. 1901. “Der Gründung des Pflanzephysiologischen Instituts.” Pauline Cohn (ed.), Ferdinand Cohn, Blätter der Erinnerung. Breslau: J.A. Kern’s Verlag
Salaman, Redcliffe N. 1985. The history and social influence of the potato, second edition. J.G. Hawkes (ed.). Cambridge University Press
Speerschneider, J. 1857. Dass das Faulen der Kartoffelknollen bei der sogennanten Kartoffelkrankheit durch die ausgestreuten und keimenden Sporen des Blattpilzes (Peronospora devastatrix) verursacht wird, durch Experimente bewiesen von Dr. J. Speerschneider. Flora 6: 81–87.
Strick, James. 2000. Sparks of Life: Darwinism and the Victorian Debates Over Spontaneous Generation. Cambridge:Harvard.
Turner, Gerard L’E. 1980. Essays on the history of the microscope. Oxford: Senecio
Unger, Franz. 1833. Die Exantheme der Pflanzen und einige mit diesen verwandte Krankheiten der Gewächse pathogenetisch und nosographisch dargestellt. Wien:C. Gerold.
Waterhouse, Grace M. 1970. The Genus Phytophthora de Bary. Diagnoses (or descriptions) and figures from the original papers, second edition. Mycological Papers 122: 1–59.
Woodham-Smith, Cecil. 1962. The Great Hunger: Ireland 1845–1849. London:Hamish Hamilton.
Archival Materials
de Bary, Anton. Undated. de Bary Nachlass, Staatsbibliothek zu Berlin, Preussischer Kulturbesitz.
J.D. Hooker to Charles Darwin, 3 March 1874, Cambridge University Library, DAR 103: 189–192.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Matta, C. Spontaneous Generation and Disease Causation: Anton de Bary’s Experiments with Phytophthora infestans and Late Blight of Potato. J Hist Biol 43, 459–491 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-009-9220-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-009-9220-1