Journal of the History of Biology

, Volume 43, Issue 4, pp 697–725 | Cite as

Waiting for Sequences: Morris Goodman, Immunodiffusion Experiments, and the Origins of Molecular Anthropology

Article

Abstract

During the early 1960s, Morris Goodman used a variety of immunological tests to demonstrate the very close genetic relationships among humans, chimpanzees, and gorillas. Molecular anthropologists often point to this early research as a critical step in establishing their new specialty. Based on his molecular results, Goodman challenged the widely accepted taxonomic classification that separated humans from chimpanzees and gorillas in two separate families. His claim that chimpanzees and gorillas should join humans in family Hominidae sparked a well-known conflict with George Gaylord Simpson, Ernst Mayr, and other prominent evolutionary biologists. Less well known, but equally significant, were a series of disagreements between Goodman and other prominent molecular evolutionists concerning both methodological and theoretical issues. These included qualitative versus quantitative data, the role of natural selection, rates of evolution, and the reality of molecular clocks. These controversies continued throughout Goodman’s career, even as he moved from immunological techniques to protein and DNA sequence analysis. This episode highlights the diversity of methods used by molecular evolutionists and the conflicting conclusions drawn from the data that these methods generated.

Keywords

Molecular anthropology Immunodiffusion Ouchterlony plate Primate phylogeny Molecular evolution Parsimony Molecular clock Molecular systematics Cladistics 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aronson, Jay. 2002. ‘Molecules and Monkeys: George Gaylord Simpson and the Challenge of Molecular Evolution.’ History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 24: 441–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boyden, Allan. 1953. ‘Fifty Years of Systematic Serology.’ Systematic Zoology 2: 19–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boyden, Allan. 1958. ‘Introductory Remarks.’ Allan Boyden (ed.), Serological and Biochemical Comparisons of Proteins. Rutgers University Press:New Brunswick, pp. 1–2.Google Scholar
  4. Boyden, Allan. 1963. ‘Precipitin Testing and Classification.’ Systematic Zoology 12: 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boyden, Allan. 1964. ‘Perspectives in Systematic Serology.’ Charles A. Leone (ed.), Taxonomic Biochemistry and Serology. New York:Ronald Press, pp. 75–99.Google Scholar
  6. Boyden, Allan. 1973. Perspectives in Zoology. New York:Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  7. Clark, Wilfrid Le Gros. 1959. The Antecedents of Man. Edinburgh:Edinburgh University Press, pp. 308–314.Google Scholar
  8. Daston, Lorraine, Galison, Peter. 2007. Objectivity. New York:Zone Books.Google Scholar
  9. Dietrich, Michael. 1994. ‘The Origins of the Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution.’ Journal of the History of Biology 27: 21–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dietrich, Michael. 1998. ‘Paradox and Persuasion: Negotiating the Place of Molecular Evolution within Evolutionary Biology.’ Journal of the History of Biology 31: 85–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Doolittle, Russell F. 1996. ‘Overview of the Symposium on Molecular Anthropology.’ Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 5: 266–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Felsenstein, Joseph. 2004. Inferring Phylogenies. Sunderland, Massachusetts:Sinauer, pp. 145–146.Google Scholar
  13. Gannett, Lisa, Griesemer, James R. 2004. ‘The ABO Blood Groups: Mapping the History and Geography of Genes in Homo sapiens.’ Hans-Jörg Rheinberger, Jean-Paul Gaudilliére (eds.), Classical Genetic Research and its Legacy: The Mapping Cultures of Twentieth-Century Genetics. New York:Routledge, pp. 119–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gibbons, Ann. 1995. ‘When It Comes to Evolution, Humans are in the Slow Class.’ Science 267: 1907–1908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Goodman, Morris. 1960a. ‘On the Emergence of Intraspecific Differences in the Protein Antigens of Human Beings.’ American Naturalist 94: 153–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Goodman, Morris. 1960b. ‘The Species Specificity of Proteins as Observed in the Wilson Comparative Analysis Plates.’ American Naturalist 94: 184–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Goodman, Morris. 1961. ‘The Role of Immunochemical Differences in the Phyletic Development of Human Behavior.’ Human Biology 33: 131–166.Google Scholar
  18. Goodman, Morris. 1962a. ‘Man’s Place in the Phylogeny of the Primates as Reflected in Serum Proteins.’ Sherwood L Washburn (ed.), Classification and Human Evolution. Chicago:Aldine, pp. 204–234.Google Scholar
  19. Goodman, Morris. 1962b. ‘Immunochemistry of the Primates and Primate Evolution.’ Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 102: 219–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Goodman, Morris. 1996. ‘Epilogue: A Personal Account of the Origins of a New Paradigm.’ Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 5: 269–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Goodman, Morris, Moore, G William. 1971. ‘Immunodiffusion Systematics of the Primates I. The Catarrhini.’ Systematic Zoology 20: 19–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Goodman, Morris, Moore, G William, Matsuda, Genji. 1975. ‘Darwinian Evolution in the Genealogy of Haemoglobin.’ Nature 253: 603–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hagen, Joel B. 1999. ‘Naturalists, Molecular Biologists, and the Challenges of Molecular Evolution.’ Journal of the History of Biology 32: 321–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hagen, Joel B. 2001. ‘The Introduction of Computers into Systematic Research in the United States during the 1960s.’ Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 32: 291–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hagen, Joel B. 2009. ‘Descended from Darwin? George Gaylord Simpson, Morris Goodman, and Primate Systematics.’ Joe Cain, Michael Ruse (eds.), Descended from Darwin: Insights into the History of Evolutionary Studies, 1900–1970. Philadelphia:American Philosophical Society, pp. 93–209.Google Scholar
  26. Holmgren, Jan, Nilsson, Lars-Åke. 2007. ‘Commentary.’ Acta Pathologic, Microbiologica et Immunologica Scandinavica 115: 496–498.Google Scholar
  27. Jukes, Thomas H. 1991. ‘Early Development of the Neutral Theory.’ Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 34: 473–485.Google Scholar
  28. Kimura, Motoo. 1983. The Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. King, Jack Lester, Jukes, Thomas H. 1969. ‘Non-Darwinian Evolution.’ Science 164: 788–798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Korngold, Leonhard. 1956. ‘Immunological Cross-Reactions Studied by the Ouchterlony Gel Diffusion Technique: Theory and Practice.’ The Journal of Immunology 77: 119–122.Google Scholar
  31. Lewin, Roger. 1990. “Molecular Clocks Run Out of Time.” New Scientist 125 (February 10): 38–41.Google Scholar
  32. Lewin, Roger. 1997. Bones of Contention: Controversies in the Search for Human Origins, 2nd ed. Chicago:University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  33. Lewin, Roger, Foley, Robert. 2004. Principles of Human Evolution, 2nd ed. Malden, Massachusetts:Blackwell.Google Scholar
  34. Marks, Jonathan. 2002. What it Means to be 98% Chimpanzee: Apes, People, and their Genes. Berkeley:University of California Press, pp. 261–262.Google Scholar
  35. Moore, G William, Goodman, Morris. 1968. ‘A Set Theoretical Approach to Immunotaxonomy: Analysis of Species Comparisons in Modified Ouchterlony Plates.’ Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics 30: 279–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Morgan, Gregory J. 1998. ‘Emile Zuckerkandl, Linus Pauling, and the Molecular Evolutionary Clock, 1959–1965.’ Journal of the History of Biology 31: 155–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Nuttall, George H F. 1904. Blood Immunity and Blood Relationship: A Demonstration of Certain Blood Relationships Among Animals by Means of The Precipitin Test for Blood. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Perutz, MF. 1983. ‘Species Adaptation in a Protein Molecule.’ Molecular Biology and Evolution 1: 1–28.Google Scholar
  39. Powell, JR. 1995. ‘Molecular Techniques in Population Genetics: A Brief History.’ B Schierwater, B Streit, GP Wagner, R DeSalle (eds.), Molecular Ecology and Evolution: Approaches and Applications. Boston:Birkhauser Verlag, pp. 131–153.Google Scholar
  40. Sarich, Vincent M. 1968. “The Origins of the Hominids: An Immunological Approach.” S. L. Washburn and Phyllis C. Jay (eds.), Perspectives on Human Evolution, vol. 1., New York: Holt Rinehart, and Winston, pp. 94–121.Google Scholar
  41. Sarich, Vincent M. 1983. ‘Retrospective on Hominoid Macromolecular Systematics.’ Russell L Ciochon, Robert S Corruccini (eds.), New Interpretations of Ape and Human Ancestry. New York:Plenum Press, pp. 137–150.Google Scholar
  42. Sarich, Vincent M. 1993. ‘Mammalian Systematics: Twenty-five Years Among their Albumins and Transferins.’ Frederic S Szalay, Michael J Novacek, Malcolm C McKenna (eds.), Mammal Phylogeny: Placentals. New York:Springer-Verlag, pp. 103–114.Google Scholar
  43. Sarich, Vincent, Frank, Miele. 2004. Race: The Reality of Human Differences. Boulder:Westview Press.Google Scholar
  44. Sarich, Vincent M, Wilson, Allan C. 1966. ‘Quantitative Immunochemistry and the Evolution of Primate Albumins: Micro-Complement Fixation.’ Science 154: 1563–1566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sarich, Vincent M, Wilson, Allan C. 1967. ‘Immunological Time Scale for Hominid Evolution.’ Science 158: 1200–1203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sommer, Marianne. 2008. ‘History in the Gene: Negotiations between Molecular and Organismal Anthropology.’ Journal of the History of Biology 41: 473–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wildman, Derek E., Goodman, Morris. 2004. ‘Humankind’s Place in a Phylogenetic Classification of Primates.’ Solomon P Wasser (ed.), Evolutionary Theory and Processes: Modern Horizons, Papers in Honour of Eviator Nevo. Dordrecht:Kluwer, pp. 293–311.Google Scholar
  48. Wildman, Derek E., Chen, Caoyi, Erez, Offer, Grossman, Lawrence I., Goodman, Morris, Romero, Roberto. 2006. ‘Evolution of the Mammalian Placenta Revealed by Phylogenetic Analysis.’ Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 103: 3203–3208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Zuckerkandl, Emile. 1962. ‘Perspectives on Molecular Anthropology.’ Sherwood L Washburn (ed.), Classification and Human Evolution. Chicago:Aldine, pp. 243–272.Google Scholar
  50. Zuckerkandl, Emile. 1964. ‘Further Principles of Chemical Paleogenetics as Applied to the Evolution of Hemoglobin.’ Hubert Peeters (ed.), Protides of the Biological Fluids. Amsterdam:Elsevier, pp. 102–109.Google Scholar
  51. Zuckerkandl, Emile. 1987. ‘On the Molecular Evolutionary Clock.’ Journal of Molecular Evolution 26: 34–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Zuckerkandl, Emile, Pauling, Linus. 1965a. ‘Evolutionary Divergence and Convergence in Proteins.’ Vernon Bryson, Henry J. Vogel (eds.), Evolving Genes and Proteins. New York:Academic Press, pp. 97–166.Google Scholar
  53. Zuckerkandl, Emile, Pauling, Linus. 1965b. ‘Molecules as Documents of Evolutionary History.’ Journal of Theoretical Biology 8: 357–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of BiologyRadford UniversityRadfordUSA

Personalised recommendations