Dispersal of biota by humans is a hallmark of civilization, but the results are often unforeseen and sometimes costly. Like kudzu vine in the American South, some examples become the stuff of regional folklore. In recent decades, “invasion biology,” conservation-motivated scientists and their allies have focused largely on the most negative outcomes and often promoted the perception that introduced species are monsters. However, cases of monstering by scientists preceded the rise of popular environmentalism. The story of tamarisk (Tamarix spp.), flowering trees and shrubs imported to New England sometime before 1818, provides an example of scientific “monstering” and shows how slaying the monster, rather than allaying its impacts, became a goal in itself. Tamarisks’ drought and salt tolerance suggested usefulness for both coastal and inland erosion control, and politicians as well as academic and agency scientists promoted planting them in the southern Great Plains and Southwest. But when erosion control efforts in Arizona, New Mexico and Texas became entangled with water shortages, economic development during the Depression and copper mining for national defense during World War Two, federal hydrologists moved quickly to recast tamarisks as water-wasting foreign monsters. Demonstrating significant water salvage was difficult and became subsidiary to focusing on ways to eradicate the plants, and a federal interagency effort devoted specifically to the latter purpose was organized and continued until it, in turn, conflicted with regional environmental concerns in the late 1960s.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Albertson, FW, Weaver, JE. 1945. ‹Injury and Death or Recovery of Trees in Prairie Climate.’ Ecological Monographs 15: 393–433.
Anonymous. 2000. “Biographical Sketch.” Register of the Louis E. and Carmen K. Freudenthal Family Papers, 1837–1990. Archives and Special Collections, NM State Univ. Library. http://rmoa.unm.edu/docviewer.php?docId=nmlcu1ms2.xml. Accessed 3 September 2008.
Baskervill, Bill. 2002. “Army Posts Fight Botanical Beast Kudzu.” Arizona Republic [Associated Press], August 23, 2002, p. A10.
Baum, Bernard R. 1967. ‹Introduced and Naturalized Tamarisks in the United States and Canada [Tamaricaceae].’ Baileya 15: 19–25.
Baum, Bernard R. 1978. The Genus Tamarix. Jerusalem:Israeli Academy of Sciences and Humanities.
Bredehoeft, John D. 2008. “An Interview with C.V. Theis.” Hydrogeology Journal 16:5–9.
Brown, A.F., Koogler, J.G., Palmer, R.F. and Elmendorf, H.B. 1951. Report to the Salt Cedar Interagency Council by the Salt Cedar Interagency Task Force. Albuquerque (unpubl.).
Bryan, Kirk and Hosea, R.G. 1934. “Tamarisk – An Introduced Plant and Its Geographic Effect” (1932 Conference Abstract). Annals of the Association of American Geographers 24: 44–45.
Bryan, Kirk and Post, G.M. 1927. “Erosion and Control of Silt on the Rio Puerco, New Mexico.” Report to the Chief Engineer, Middle Rio Grande Conservancy District, Albuquerque (unpubl.).
Cannon, WA. 1912. ‹Some Features of the Root-Systems of Desert Plants.’ The Popular Science Monthly 81: 90–99.
Carleton, Mark A. 1914. ‹Adaptation of the Tamarisk for Dry Lands.’ Science 39: 692–694.
Chew, Matthew K. 2006. Ending with Elton: Preludes to Invasion Biology. Doctoral Dissertation, Arizona State University.
Chew, Matthew K, Laubichler, Manfred D. 2003. ‹Natural Enemies – Metaphor or Misconception?’ Science 301: 52–53.
Clover, Elzada U, Jotter, Lois. 1944. ‹Floristic Studies in the Canyon of the Colorado and Tributaries.’ American Midland Naturalist 32(3): 591–642.
Colby, Charles C, White, Gilbert F. 1961. ‹Harlan H. Barrows, 1877–1960.’ Annals of the Association of American Geographers 51: 395–400.
Cook, WE. 1987. The WEN, the Botany, and the Mexican Hat: The Adventures of the First Women Through Grand Canyon on the Nevills Expedition. Callisto:Orangevale.
Davis, Lucius D. 1899. Ornamental Shrubs for Garden, Lawn and Park Planting. New York:G.P. Putnam’s Sons.
Deming, David. 2001. Introduction to Hydrogeology. Boston:McGraw-Hill.
Everitt, Benjamin L. 1980. ‹Ecology of Saltcedar – A Plea for Research.’ Environmental Geology 3: 77–84.
Foucault, Michel. 1970. “The Order of Discourse.” Transl. Ian McLeod. Young, Robert (ed.), 1981. Untying the Text: A Post-structuralist Reader. Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul, pp. 48–78.
Freudenthal, LE. 1933. ‹Flood and Erosion Control as Possible Unemployment Relief Measures.’ Science 78: 445–449.
Gaskin, John F, Shafroth, Patrick B. 2005. ‹Hybridization of Tamarix ramosissima and T. chinensis (saltcedars) with T. Aphylla (Athel) (Tamaricaceae) in the Southwestern USA Determined from DNA Sequence Data.’ Madroño 52: 1–10.
Gatewood, J.S., Robinson, T.W., Colby, B.R., Hem, J.D. and Halpenny, L.C. 1950. Use of Water by Bottom-Land Vegetation in Lower Safford Valley Arizona. USGS and Defense Plant Corporation. Washington: US Government Printing Office.
Gilmore, David D. 2003. Monsters: Evil Beings, Mythical Beasts, and All Manner of Imaginary Terrors. Philadelphia:University of Pennsylvania Press.
Hartmann, Todd. 2001. “With Luck, Beetles may Spill Salt Cedars.” Rocky Mountain News 18 August 2001.
Hefley, Harold M. 1937a. ‹The Relations of Some Native Insects to Introduced Food Plants.’ The Journal of Animal Ecology 6: 138–144.
Hefley, Harold M. 1937b. “Ecological Studies on the Canadian River Floodplain in Cleveland County, Oklahoma.” Ecological Monographs 7: 345–402 [University of Oklahoma Doctoral Thesis, 1935].
Hoover, JW. 1937. ‹Navajo Land Problems.’ Economic Geography 13: 281–300.
Horton, Jerome S. 1964. Notes on the Introduction of Deciduous Tamarisk. Fort Collins, CO:US Forest Service Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station.
Isern, Thomas D. 1997. “Science or Myth” Plains Folk. North Dakota State University. http://www.ext.nodak.edu/extnews/newsrelease/back-issues/000296.txt. Accessed 25 August 2008.
Isern, Thomas D. 2000. ‹Wheat Explorer the World Over: Mark Carleton of Kansas.’ Kansas History 23: 12–25.
Jackson, Donald C. 1991. Horseshoe Dam: Technical Report, HAER-AZ-24. Loveland, CO:US Bureau of Reclamation.
Jaeger, Edmund C. 1933. The California Deserts: A Visitor’s Handbook. Palo Alto:Stanford University Press.
Johnson, AI. 1972. ‹Groundwater Hydrology – An Introduction.’ Water Resources Bulletin 8: 99–100.
Joor, Joseph F. 1877. ‹The Tamarisk Naturalized.’ Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 6(32): 166.
Kearney, Richard. 2003. Strangers, Gods and Monsters: Interpreting Otherness. London:Routledge.
Larson, Brendon MH. 2007. ‹Thirteen Ways of Looking at Invasive Species, Invasive Plants: Inventories, Strategies, Action.’ DR Clements, S Darbyshire (eds.), Invasive Plants: Inventories, Strategies, and Action. Sainte-Anne-de Bellevue, Québec:Canadian Weed Science Society – Société Canadienne de Malherbiologie.
Lund, JWG. 1979. ‹The Mystery of Elodea Michx in Great Britain.’ Watsonia 12: 338.
Mansfield, S.M. 1886. “Appendix S: Improvement of Rivers and Harbors in the State of Texas.” Annual Report of the Chief of Engineers, United States Army, to the Secretary of War, for the Year 1886, Part 2. Washington: US Government Printing Office, pp. 1291–1336.
Marks, John Brady. 1950. ‹Vegetation and Soil Relations in the Lower Colorado Desert.’ Ecology 31: 176–193.
McAtee, WL. 1914. ‹“Further Notes on Tamarisk” [letter].’ Science 39: 906.
Measures, Joseph A. 1933. ‹Habits and Bloom of the Tamarisk.’ Flower Grower 19: 331.
Meigs, Peveril. 1952. ‹Water Problems in the United States.’ Geographical Review 42: 346–366.
Meine, Curt. 1988. Aldo Leopold: His Life and Work. Madison, WI:University of Wisconsin Press.
Meinzer, Oscar Edward. 1920. ‹Quantitative Methods of Estimating Ground-water Supplies.’ Bulletin of the Geological Society of America 31: 329–338.
Meinzer, Oscar Edward. 1923. Outline of Ground-Water Hydrology with Definitions. USGS Water-Supply Paper 494. Washington: US Government Printing Office.
Meinzer, Oscar Edward. 1926. ‹Plants as Indicators of Ground Water.’ Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences 16: 553–564.
Meinzer, Oscar Edward. 1927. Plants as Indicators of Ground Water. USGS Water Supply Paper 577. Washington: US Government Printing Office.
Mermel, TW. 1958. Register of Dams in the United States. New York:McGraw-Hill.
Miller, C.C. 1928. “Tamarix as a Windbreak.” California Cultivator, January 7, p. 16.
National Resources Committee. 1936. Drainage Basin Problems and Programs. Washington:US Government Printing Office.
National Resources Committee. 1938. The Rio Grande Joint Investigation in the Upper Rio Grande Basin in Colorado, New Mexico and Texas, 1936–1937. Washington:US Government Printing Office.
National Resources Planning Board. 1942. The Pecos River Joint Investigation: Reports of the Participating Agencies. Washington:US Government Printing Office.
Oberholser, Harry C. 1925. ‹The Relations of Vegetation to Bird Life in Texas.’ American Midland Naturalist 9: 564–594.
Pauly, Philip J. 1996. ‹The Beauty and Menace of the Japanese Cherry Trees: Conflicting Visions of American Ecological Independence.’ Isis 87: 51–73.
Pauly, Philip J. 2002. ‹Fighting the Hessian Fly: American and British Responses to Insect Invasion 1776–1789.’ Environmental History 7: 378–399.
Pauly, Philip J. 2007. Fruits and Plains: The Horticultural Transformation of America. Cambridge:Harvard University Press.
Peck, William D. 1818. A Catalogue of American and Foreign Plants, Cultivated in the Botanic Garden, Cambridge, Massachusetts. [Harvard] University Press:Cambridge.
Penfound, William T. 1953. ‹Plant Communities of Oklahoma Lakes.’ Ecology 34: 561–583.
Phreatophyte Subcommittee. 1951–1959. Minutes of Phreatophyte Subcommittee Meetings, Vol. 1. Pacific Southwest Inter-Agency Committee. Various Locations (Private Collection.).
Pisani, Donald J. 1992. To Reclaim a Divided West: Water, Law and Public Policy 1848–1902. Albuquerque:University of New Mexico Press.
Pisani, Donald J. 2002. Water and American Government: The Reclamation Bureau, National Water Policy, and the West. Berkeley:University of California Press.
Ridley, Henry N. 1930. The Dispersal of Plants Throughout the World. London:L. Reeve.
Robinson, TW. 1952a. ‹Water Thieves.’ Chemurgic Digest 11: 12–15.
Robinson, TW. 1952b. ‹Phreatophytes and their Relationship to Water in Western United States.’ Transactions American Geophysical Union 33: 57–61.
Robinson, T.W. 1965. Introduction, Spread, and Areal Extent of Saltcedar (Tamarix) in the Western States. USGS. Washington: US Government Printing Office.
Shafroth, Patrick B, Cleverly, James R, Dudley, Tom L, Taylor, John P, Van Riper, Charles, Stuart, James N. 2005. ‹Control of Tamarix in the Western United States: Implications for Water Salvage, Wildlife Use, and Riparian Restoration.’ Environmental Management 35: 231–246.
Shinners, Lloyd H. 1948. ‹Geographic Limits of Some Alien Weeds in Texas.’ Texas Geographic Magazine 12: 16–25.
Simpson, DE. 1984. ‹A Short History of the Introduction and Spread of Elodea Michx in the British Isles.’ Watsonia 15: 1–9.
Stromberg, Juliet C, Chew, MK. 2002. ‹Foreign Visitors in Riparian Corridors of the Southwest is Xenophytophobia Justified.’ B Tellman (ed.), Invasive Exotic Species in the Sonoran Region. Tucson, AZ:University of Arizona Press and The Arizona-Sonora Desert Museum.
Stromberg, Juliet C, Chew, MK. 2003. ‹Flood Pulses and Restoration of Riparian Vegetation in the American Southwest.’ BA Middleton (ed.), Flood Pulsing in Wetlands: Restoring the Natural Hydrological Balance. New York, NY:Wiley.
Stromberg, Juliet C., Chew, M.K., Nagler, P.L. and Glenn, E. 2009. “Changing Perceptions of Change: The Role of Scientists in Tamarix and River Management.” Restoration Ecology 17(2): in press.
Swingle, Walter T. 1924. The Athel, Tamarix aphylla (also called T. articulata), a Promising Windbreak for the Hot Irrigated Valleys of the Southwest. Indio, CA. Mimeograph. Walter Tennyson Swingle Collection, University of Miami, FL.
Taylor, T.U. 1930. “Silting of Reservoirs.” University of Texas Bulletin 3025.
Thomas, H.E. and Gatewood, J.S. 1963. Drought in the Southwest, 1942–56. USGS Professional Paper 372-D. Washington: US Government Printing Office.
Thornber, J.J. 1916. “Tamarisks for Southwestern Planting.” Timely Hints for Farmers. Tucson: University of Arizona Agricultural Experiment Station.
Turner, RM. 1974. Quantitative and Historical Evidence of Vegetation Changes Along the Upper Gila River, Arizona, US USGS Professional Paper 655H. Washington:US Government Printing Office.
Turner, SF, Halpenny, LC. 1941. ‹Ground-Water Inventory in the Upper Gila River Valley in New Mexico and Arizona, Scope of Investigation and Methods Used.’ Transactions American Geophysical Union 22(Part 3): 738–744.
Turner, S.F. and others [sic]. 1941. Water Resources of Safford and Duncan-Virden Valleys, Arizona and New Mexico: USGS (unpubl.) Albuquerque.
Van Deventer, C William. 1934. ‹“Some Influences of Man on Biotic Communities”. (Presentation Abstract).’ Transactions of the Illinois State Academy of Sciences 26: 137.
Ware, George H, Penfound, WT. 1949. ‹The Vegetation of the Lower Levels of the Floodplain of the South Canadian River in Central Oklahoma.’ Ecology 30: 478–484.
Warken, Philip W. 1979. A History of the National Resources Planning Board. Garland:New York.
Wells, H.G. 2005 . The War of the Worlds. London: Penguin.
White, Robert R. and Alfred, Clebsch. 1994. “C.V. Theis: The Man and His Contributions to Hydrogeology.” Selected Contributions to Ground-Water Hydrology by C.V. Theis, and a Review of His Life and Work. USGS Water-Supply Paper 2415. Washington: US Government Printing Office, pp. 45–56.
Material help and encouragement for this (continuing) study have been provided by Juliet C. Stromberg, Jane Maienschein, Manfred Laubichler, the Arizona State University (ASU) Center for Biology and Society and the ASU School of Life Sciences.
About this article
Cite this article
Chew, M.K. The Monstering of Tamarisk: How Scientists made a Plant into a Problem. J Hist Biol 42, 231–266 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-009-9181-4
- introduced species
- salt cedar
- plant ecology
- new deal
- Reclamation Act
- scientific practice
- erosion control
- phreato-phyte control
- Southwestern United States