Advertisement

Journal of the History of Biology

, Volume 41, Issue 3, pp 409–433 | Cite as

Civic Biology and the Origin of the School Antievolution Movement

  • Adam R. Shapiro
Article

Abstract

In discussing the origins of the antievolution movement in American high schools within the framework of science and religion, much is overlooked about the influence of educational trends in shaping this phenomenon. This was especially true in the years before the 1925 Scopes trial, the beginnings of the school antievolution movement. There was no sudden realization in the 1920’s – sixty years after the Origin of Species was published – that Darwinism conflicted with the Bible, but until evolution was being taught in the high schools, there was no impetus to outlaw it. The creation of “civic biology” curricula in the late 1910’s and early 20’s, spearheaded by a close-knit community of textbook authors, brought evolution into the high school classroom as part of a complete reshaping of “biology” as a school subject. It also incorporated progressive ideologies about the purposes of compulsory public education in shaping society, and civic biology was fundamentally focused on the applications of the life sciences to human life. Antievolution legislation was part of a broader response to the ideologies of the new biology field, and was a reaction not only to the content of the new subject, but to the increasingly centralized control and regulation of education. Viewing the early school antievolution movement through the science-religion conflict is an artifact of the Scopes trial’s re-creation of its origins. What largely caused support for␣the school antievolution movement in the South and particularly Tennessee were concerns over public education, which biology came to epitomize.

Keywords

American Book Company antievolution biology education biology textbooks Benjamin C. Gruenberg civic biology George W. Hunter science and religion Scopes trial 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. American Book Company Archives. Syracuse University Library. Syracuse, NYGoogle Scholar
  2. Bailey, Kenneth K. 1950. The Enactment of Tennessee’s Antievolution Law Journal of Southern History 16(4): 472–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bigelow, Maurice A. 1913. Sex-Instruction as a Phase of Social Education. New York: American Social Hygiene AssociationGoogle Scholar
  4. Bryan, William Jennings. 1922. “God and Evolution.” New York Times. February 26, 1922.1: 11Google Scholar
  5. Catalogue of Williams College 1892–1893. 1892. Williamstown, MA: Williams CollegeGoogle Scholar
  6. Co-Author Amazed at His Book’s Part. 1925. Chattanooga Times. June 15, 1925. 5Google Scholar
  7. Cole, William E. 1934. The Teaching of Biology. New York: D. AppletonGoogle Scholar
  8. Cornelius, R. M. (eds.). 1996. Selected Orations of William Jennings Bryan. Dayton, TN: Bryan CollegeGoogle Scholar
  9. Department of Education, Records 1874–1964. Tennessee State Library and Archives. Nashville, TNGoogle Scholar
  10. Dewey, John. 1916/2004. Democracy and Education. Mineola, NY: DoverGoogle Scholar
  11. Grabiner, Judith V. and Miller, Peter D. 1974. Effects of the Scopes Trial. Science 185(4154): 832–837CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gruenberg, Benjamin C. 1919. Elementary Biology. Boston: Ginn and CoGoogle Scholar
  13. Gruenberg, Benjamin C. 1925. Biology and Human Life. Boston: Ginn and CoGoogle Scholar
  14. Gruenberg, Benjamin C. and Sidonie M. Papers. Library of Congress Manuscripts Collection. Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  15. Holt, Reinhart and Winston. 1980. The Beginning of Modern Biology: The Story of a Textbook. New York: Holt Reinhart and WinstonGoogle Scholar
  16. Hunter, George W. 1911. Essentials of Biology. New York: American Book CompanyGoogle Scholar
  17. Hunter, George W. 1914. A Civic Biology: Presented in Problems. New York: American Book CompanyGoogle Scholar
  18. Hunter, George W. 1923. New Essentials of Biology. New York: American Book CompanyGoogle Scholar
  19. Hunter, George W. and Whitman, Walter C. 1921. Civic Science in the Home and Community. New York: ABCGoogle Scholar
  20. Huxley T. H. and Martin, H. N. 1876. Course of Practical Instruction in Elementary Biology. New York: MacmillanGoogle Scholar
  21. Israel, Charles A. 2004. Before Scopes: Evangelism, Education, and Evolution in Tennessee, 1870–1925. Athens, GA: GeorgiaGoogle Scholar
  22. Journal of the Tennessee House 1925. Nashville, TN: State of TennGoogle Scholar
  23. Keith, Jeanette. 1995. Country People in the Old South. Chapel Hill: North Carolina PressGoogle Scholar
  24. Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District 400 F. Supp. 2d 707 (2005)Google Scholar
  25. Ladoucer, Ronald P. 2008. “Ella Thea Smith and the Lost History of American High␣School Biology Textbooks.” Journal of the History of Biology DOI  10.1007/s10739-007-9139-3
  26. Larson, Edward J. 1997. Summer for the Gods. New York: BasicGoogle Scholar
  27. Moon, Truman J. 1921. Biology For Beginners. New York: Henry Holt and CoGoogle Scholar
  28. Moran, Jeffery P. 2000. Teaching Sex: The Shaping of Adolescence in the 20th Century. Cambridge: HarvardGoogle Scholar
  29. Moore, Randy 2001. The Lingering Impact of the Trial on Biology Textbooks. BioScience 51(9): 790–796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Numbers, Ronald L. 1998. Darwinism Comes to America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UPGoogle Scholar
  31. Pauly, Philip J. 1990. The Struggle for Ignorance about Alcohol: American Physiologists, Wilbur Olin Atwater, and the Woman’s Christian Temperance Union. Bulletin of the History of Medicine 64: 366–392Google Scholar
  32. Pauly, Philip J. 1991. The Development of High School Biology: New York City, 1900–1925. Isis 82(4): 662–688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Peabody, James E. and Hunt, Arthur E. 1924. Biology and Human Welfare. New York: MacmillanGoogle Scholar
  34. Peay, Governor Austin Papers. Tennessee State Library and Archives. Nashville, TennesseeGoogle Scholar
  35. Rudolph, John L. 2005. Turning Science to Account: Chicago and the General Science Movement in Secondary Education Isis 96(3): 353–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. “Says School Board Avoided Argument 1925.” Chattanooga Times. June 14, 1925. 3Google Scholar
  37. Scopes, John T. and Presley, James. (1967). Center of the Storm, Memoirs of John T. Scopes. New York: Holt, Rinehart and WinstonGoogle Scholar
  38. Sedgwick, William T. and Wilson, Edmund B. 1886. General Biology. New York: Henry HoltGoogle Scholar
  39. Sheppard, Keith and Robbins, Dennis M. 2006. “A History of the Grade Placement of High School Biology.” The American Biology Teacher 68(7): 86–90Google Scholar
  40. Skoog, Gerald. 2005. The Coverage of Human Evolution in High School Biology Textbooks in the 20th Century and in Current State Science Standards Science and Education 14(3–5): 395–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Smallwood, W. M. et al. 1916. Practical Biology. Boston: Allyn and BaconGoogle Scholar
  42. Smallwood, W. M. et al. 1920. Biology for High Schools. Boston: Allyn and BaconGoogle Scholar
  43. United States Bureau of the Census 1921. Fourteenth Census of the United States. [1920]. 1. Washington, DC: Government Printing OfficeGoogle Scholar
  44. University Archives. University of Chicago. Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
  45. Zimmerman, Jonathan. 1999. Distilling Democracy: Alcohol Education in America’s Public Schools, 1880–1925. Lawrence: KansasGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of HistoryUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations