Advertisement

Journal of the History of Biology

, Volume 40, Issue 3, pp 467–507 | Cite as

Inbreeding, eugenics, and Helen Dean King (1869–1955)

  • Marilyn Bailey Ogilvie
Article

Abstract

Helen Dean King’s scientific work focused on inbreeding using experimental data collected from standardized laboratory rats to elucidate problems in human heredity. The meticulous care with which she carried on her inbreeding experiments assured that her results were dependable and her theoretical explanations credible. By using her nearly homozygous rats as desired commodities, she also was granted access to venues and people otherwise unavailable to her as a woman. King’s scientific career was made possible through her life experiences. She earned a doctorate from Bryn Mawr College under Thomas Hunt Morgan and spent a productive career at the Wistar Institute of Anatomy and Biology in Philadelphia where she had access to the experimental subjects which made her career possible. In this paper I examine King’s work on inbreeding, her participation in the debates over eugenics, her position at the Wistar Institute, her status as a woman working with mostly male scientists, and her involvement with popular science.

Keywords

Eugenics Helen Dean King Inbreeding Wistar Institute 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

I want to thank the many people and institutions who made this paper possible, including the University of Oklahoma Research Council and the College of Arts and Sciences for their financial support. Vital resources were provided by the American Philosophical Society, the Wistar Institute, the University of Pennsylvania Archives, the Bryn Mawr College Archives, Temple University Urban Archives, and the Philadelphia Free Library. Although I am indebted to many individuals for their help, I want to especially acknowledge Nina Long of␣the␣Wistar Institute, Bonnie Tocher Clause, Joy Harvey, Kerry Magruder and Clifford Choquette for their help.

References

  1. Allen Garland E. 1986. The Eugenics Record Office at Cold Spring Harbor, 1910–1940: An Essay in Institutional History. Osiris, 2nd ser. 2: 225–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. —— 1991. “Old Wine in New Bottles: From Eugenics to Population Control in the Work of Raymond Pearl.” Keith Benson, Jane Maienschein and Ronald Rainger (eds.), The American Biology. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University PressGoogle Scholar
  3. American Eugenics Society Records, American Philosophical SocietyGoogle Scholar
  4. American Men of Science. 1938. King, Helen DeanGoogle Scholar
  5. Anderson, W. S. 1911. A Study in Heredity. Report Sixth Annual Kentucky State Farmer’s InstituteGoogle Scholar
  6. Asbury Park, NJ. Press. 1915a, Breaks Up Old Theory of Intermarriage. September 30Google Scholar
  7. —— 1915b. Rats Upset Ideas of Intermarriages. September 30Google Scholar
  8. Baker, Henry J., Russell Lindsey, J. and Weisbroth, Steven H. (eds.) 1979. Biology and Diseases. Vol. 1 of The Laboratory Rat. New York: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
  9. Bryn Mawr College. Studies Pursued in the College, Bryn Mawr College, hand-written bookGoogle Scholar
  10. Browne, Janet. 2002. Charles Darwin. The Power of Place. London: Jonathan CapeGoogle Scholar
  11. Castle, W. E., Carpenter, F. W., et al. 1906. “The Effects of Inbreeding, Cross-Breeding and Selection upon Fertility and Variability of Drosophila.” Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences. Vol. 41Google Scholar
  12. Castle and King, Helen D. 1935. “Linkage Studies of the Rat (Rattus norvegicus).” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 21Google Scholar
  13. Chapeaurouge, A. de. 1909. Einiges ueber Inzucht und ihre Leistung auf verschiedenen Zuchtgebieten. Hamburg: F.W. RademacherGoogle Scholar
  14. Charles B. Davenport Papers, American Philosophical Society, BD27Google Scholar
  15. Clark Eliot R. 1955. Brief Biography of Dr. Helen Dean King. Anatomical Record 122(August): 650–651Google Scholar
  16. Clause Bonnie Tocher. 1993. The Wistar Rat as a Right Choice: Establishing Mammalian Standards and the Ideal of a Standardized Mammal. Journal of the History of Biology 26(Summer): 329–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. —— 1998. “Rats (Not Mice) and History.” Mendel Newsletter, n.s. 7 (February): 3–8. In The Wistar Institute ArchivesGoogle Scholar
  18. Conklin Edwin G. 1919. Biology and Democracy. Scribner’s Magazine 65(April): 403–412Google Scholar
  19. —— 1921. The Direction of Human Evolution. New York: ScribnersGoogle Scholar
  20. —— (anonymous). 1928. “The Future of America: A Biological Forecast.” Harper’s Magazine 156 (April): 529–539Google Scholar
  21. The Correspondence of Charles Darwin. Vol. 10, 1862. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 1997Google Scholar
  22. Crampe H. 1883. Zuchtversuche mit zahmen Wanderratten. I. Resultate der Zucht in Verwandtschaft. Landwirtschaftliche Jahrbuch, 12: 389–458Google Scholar
  23. Crowe James F.. 1998. 90 Years Ago: the Beginning of Hybrid Maize. Genetics 148(March): 923–928Google Scholar
  24. Darwin Charles. 1876. The Effects of Cross and Self Fertilization in the Vegetable Kingdom. London: John MurrayGoogle Scholar
  25. Darwin Charles. 1862. On the Various Contrivances by Which British and Foreign Orchids are Fertilised by Insects, and on the Good Effects of Intercrossing. London: John MurrayGoogle Scholar
  26. Darwin Charles. 1875. The Variation of Animals and Plants under Domestication. 2 vols. London: John MurrayGoogle Scholar
  27. —— 1877. The Various Contrivances by Which Orchids are Fertilized. 2d. ed. rev. London: John MurrayGoogle Scholar
  28. Darwin George H. 1875. Marriages between First Cousins in England and Their Effects. Journal of the Statistical Society of London 38(2):153–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Donaldson, Henry Herbert. 1915. The Rat; Reference Tables and Data for the Albino Rat (Mus norvegicus albinus) and the Norway rat (Mus norvegicus. PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  30. Düsing, Karl. 1883. Die Factoren, welche die Sexualität. Jena: Doctoral ThesisGoogle Scholar
  31. East Edward M., Jones Donald F. 1919. Inbreeding and Outbreeding. Their Genetic and Sociological Significance. Philadelphia: J. B. LippincottGoogle Scholar
  32. Eugenics Record Office Records, American Philosophical Society. Ser. 1. A:062#1Google Scholar
  33. Fink Arthur E. 1938. Causes of Crime: Biological Theories in the United States, 1800–1915. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania PressGoogle Scholar
  34. Gentry N. W. 1905. Inbreeding Berkshires. Vol. 1. Proceedings of the American Breeders Association, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  35. Greenman Milton Jay, Duhring Fannie Louise. 1923. Breeding and Care of the Albino Rat for Research Purposes. Philadelphia: Wistar InstituteGoogle Scholar
  36. Guaita, G. von. 1898; 1900. Versuche mit Kreuzungen von verscheidenen Rassen der Hausmaus. 10, 317–332. und Zweite Mittheilung ueber Versuche mit Kreuzungen von verschiedenen Hausmausrassen. Ber. Naturf. Gesselschaft zu Freiburg. 11: 131–143Google Scholar
  37. Huth, Alfred Henry. 1887. The Marriage of Near Kin. 2nd ed. rev. London: Longmans, Green, and CoGoogle Scholar
  38. Kevles Daniel J. 1995. In the Name of Eugenics. Genetics and the Uses of Human Heredity. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
  39. King, Helen Dean. 1898. Regeneration in Asterias vulgaris. Archiv für Entwickelungsmechanik der Organismen 7(May 2): 361–363 + platesGoogle Scholar
  40. —— 1899. Autobiographical sketch appended to King’s Ph.D. dissertation. See belowGoogle Scholar
  41. —— The Maturation and Fertilization of the Egg of Bufo lentiginosus. A dissertation presented to the faculty of Bryn Mawr College for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. 1901. Boston: Ginn and Company, the Athenaeum PressGoogle Scholar
  42. —— 1910. The Effects of Various Fixatives on the Brain of the Albino Rat. Biological Bulletin 18(3): 131–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. —— 1918a. Studies on Inbreeding I. The Effects of Inbreeding on the Growth and Variability in the Body Weight of the Albino Rat. Journal of Experimental Zoology 26(1): 1–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. —— 1918b. Studies on Inbreeding II. The Effects of Inbreeding on the Fertility and on the Constitutional Vigor of the Albino Rat. Journal of Experimental Zoology 26(2): 335–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. King Helen Dean. 1918c. Studies on Inbreeding III. The Effects of Inbreeding, With Selection, on the Sex Ratio of the Albino Rat. Journal of Experimental Zoology 27(October): 1–35Google Scholar
  46. —— 1919, Studies on Inbreeding IV. A Further Study of the Effects of Inbreeding on the Growth and Variability in the Body Weight of the Albino Rat. Journal of Experimental Zoology 29(1): 71–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. —— 1921. A Comparative Study of the Birth Mortality in the Albino Rat and in Man. Anatomical Record 20(March): 321–354Google Scholar
  48. —— 1936. “Is Inbreeding Injurious?” V. Robinson (ed.), Encyclopaedia sexualis: a Comprehensive Encyclopaedia – Dictionary of the Sexual Sciences. New York: Dingwall-Rock, Ltd., pp. 270–277, in Collaboration with Medical Review of ReviewsGoogle Scholar
  49. Kohler Robert E. 1993. Drosophila, A Life in the Laboratory. Journal of the History of Biology 26(summer): 281–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kohler Robert E. 1994. Lords of the Fly: Drosophila Genetics and the Experimental Life. Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
  51. Leslie Clarence Dunn Papers, American Philosophical Society, BD917Google Scholar
  52. Ludmerer Kenneth M. 1972. Genetics and American Society. A Historical Appraisal. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University PressGoogle Scholar
  53. Moenkhaus W. J. 1911. The Effects of Inbreeding, Cross-Breeding and Selection upon the Fertility and Variability of Drosophila Ampelophila. Journal of Morphology 22: 123–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Nelson Oliver E. 1993. A Notable Triumvirate of Maize Geneticists. Genetics 135(December): 937–941Google Scholar
  55. Ogilvie Marilyn Bailey, Choquette Clifford J.. 1981. Nettie Maria Stevens (1861–1912): Her Life and Contributions to Cytogenetics. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 125(August): 292–311Google Scholar
  56. Ogilvie and Harvey, Joy (eds.). 2000. The Biographical Dictionary of Women in Science: Pioneering Lives from Ancient Times to the Mid-20th Century. New York: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  57. Oppenheimer Jane M. 1983. Thomas Hunt Morgan as an Embryologist: The View from Bryn Mawr. American Zoologist 23: 845–854Google Scholar
  58. Osborn, Henry Fairfield. 1923. Address of Welcome in Eugenics, Genetics and the Family. Scientific Papers of the Second International Congress of Eugenics Held at American Museum of Natural History, New York, September 22–28, 1921. Baltimore: Williams and WilliamsGoogle Scholar
  59. Ottenheimer, Martin. 1996. Forbidden Relatives. The American Myth of Cousin Marriage. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois PressGoogle Scholar
  60. New York Times. 1955. Obituary. “Dr. Helen King, 85, noted Zoologist.” March 10Google Scholar
  61. Paul, Diane. 1995. Controlling Human Heredity: 1865 to the Present. Atlantic Highlands, N: Humanities PressGoogle Scholar
  62. Paul, Diane. 1998. The Politics of Heredity: Essays on Eugenics, Biomedicine, and the Nature-Nurture Debate. Albany, NY: State University of New YorkGoogle Scholar
  63. Pearl Raymond. 1927. The Biology of Superiority. American Mercury 1:257–266Google Scholar
  64. Pearl, Raymond and Salaman, Redcliffe N. 1913. “Fertilization of the Ovum and the Sex Ratio Amongst Jews.” American Anthropologist. New Series 15(October). 668–674Google Scholar
  65. Philadelphia Bulletin. 1919. “Dr. King Quizzed on Kin Marriage Theory.” November 2Google Scholar
  66. —— 1955. “Dr. Helen King, Zoologist, Dies.” March 9Google Scholar
  67. Philadelphia Evening Bulletin. “Receive Research Prize, 1932.” May 2Google Scholar
  68. Philadelphia Evening Ledger. 1915a “Woman Professor Says Theory May Predetermine Sex.” September 30Google Scholar
  69. —— 1915b. “Ministers Reaffirm Stand on Wedlock of Close Relatives.” December 2Google Scholar
  70. —— 1939. “Waltzing Wabbly Rats Developed by Noted Wistar Institute Scientist.” September 11Google Scholar
  71. Philadelphia Evening Public Ledger, 1922. “Women Afraid of Rats? Here’s One Who Raises ‚Em.” January 4Google Scholar
  72. —— “Many Happy Returns.” 1933, September 27Google Scholar
  73. Philadelphia North American. 1922. “Dr. King Quizzed on Kin Marriage Theory.” January 13Google Scholar
  74. Philadelphia Public Ledger. 1932. “2 to Divide $2000 Award for Research in Science.” May 2Google Scholar
  75. Philadelphia Record. 1937. “Rats Waltz Beside the Beautiful Schuylkill, Not to Eat, Not for Love – They Can’t help it.” March 21Google Scholar
  76. —— 1939. “So the Bride Killed Her First Two Husbands,” March 5Google Scholar
  77. Raymond Pearl Papers, American Philosophical Society. BP 312Google Scholar
  78. Rader, Karen A. 2004. Making Mice. Standardizing Animals for American Biomedical Research, 1900–1955. Princeton: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
  79. Ritzema-Bos J. 1894. Untersuchungen ueber die Folgen den Zucht in engster Blutverwandtschaft. Biologische Centralblatt Bd. 14: 75–81Google Scholar
  80. Rosenberg Charles E. 1976. No Other Gods: On Science and American Social Thought. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University PressGoogle Scholar
  81. Shull George Harrison. 1908. The Composition of a Field of Maize. Report of the American Breeders Association 4: 296–301Google Scholar
  82. —— 1914. Duplicated Genes for Capsule Form in Bursa bursa-pastoris. Z. Indukt. Abstammungs u. Verbungsl. 12: 97–149Google Scholar
  83. —— 1948. What is Heterosis? Genetics 33(September): 439–446Google Scholar
  84. Talbot Eugene S. 1901. Degeneracy, its Causes, Signs, and Results. London: W. ScottGoogle Scholar
  85. Weston, Rose D. 1916? “Woman Professor in Biology Research Roots for Phillies.” No date of name of newspaper is given. In The University Archives and Records Center, University of PennsylvaniaGoogle Scholar
  86. Williams, E. C. 1924. Eugenics Record Office Records, American Philosophical Society. A:062#1Google Scholar
  87. Wistar Institute of Anatomy and Biology, Philadelphia. Archives. “Salary Increases Recommended,” Folio 148, 1917. February 15Google Scholar
  88. Wistar Institute. Minutes of the Board of Managers 1955Google Scholar
  89. Wistar Institute of Anatomy and Biology, Philadelphia. Report of the Director, 1908–1955. The Reports through 1923 are typed and arranged in two bound volumes. Those after 1923 are printed and boundGoogle Scholar
  90. Yearsley, Macleod. 1914. “The Question of Concubitancy and Cousin Marriages.” Lancet (no. 47160): 167–169. In Eugenics Record office Records, APSGoogle Scholar
  91. Zallen, Doris T. 1993. “The ‚Light’ Organism for the Job: Green Algae and Photosynthesis Research.” Journal of the History of Biology. 26(Summer): 269–279Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, B.V. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.History of Science CollectionsUniversity of Oklahoma LibrariesNormanUSA

Personalised recommendations