Abstract
While innovative teaching behavior is a promising type of competency that can equip faculty members with the necessary capability to adapt their teaching to fit their specific teaching context, how to achieve it remains underexplored. This study explored ten faculty members’ perceptions of the kind of values pertaining to innovative teaching behavior in English medium instruction (EMI) settings created by the co-participatory learning opportunities provided by their EMI community of practice (CoP). Using semi-structured interviews and thematic analysis underpinned by the value creation framework, we identified three themes illustrating faculty members’ conceptualization of (1) prospects of value creation associated with membership in the community, (2) attained values, created through participating in the CoP, and (3) aspirational values, needed to sustain the community. Expectations of gains in professional development and peer support motivated members to join the community, and the values attained through co-participatory learning were underpinned by a sense of camaraderie and psychological safety that the community offered its members. Language-related support for developing English competencies and tailored support towards EMI issues constituted the main aspirational values members sought to gain. Finally, organizational support was highlighted as a crucial ingredient for sustaining the community’s activities. The implications of the results with respect to sustainable development of a faculty member’s innovative instructional practices are discussed.

Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
Due to privacy and ethical concerns, supporting data cannot be made openly available.
References
Abigail, L. K. M. (2016). Do communities of practice enhance faculty development? Health Professions Education, 2(2), 61–74.
Battistelli, A., Odoardi, C., Vandenberghe, C., Di Napoli, G., & Piccione, L. (2019). Information sharing and innovative work behavior: The role of work-based learning, challenging tasks, and organizational commitment. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 30(3), 361–381.
Boaler, J. (2008). Promoting ‘relational equity’and high mathematics achievement through an innovative mixed-ability approach. British Educational Research Journal, 34(2), 167–194.
Bond, M. A., & Blevins, S. J. (2020). Using faculty professional development to foster organizational change: A social learning framework. TechTrends, 64(2), 229–237.
Bos-Nehles, A., Renkema, M., & Janssen, M. (2017). HRM and innovative work behaviour: A systematic literature review. Personnel Review, 46(7), 1228–1253.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
Cangialosi, N., Odoardi, C., & Battistelli, A. (2020). Learning climate and innovative work behavior, the mediating role of the learning potential of the workplace. Vocations and Learning, 13(2), 263–280.
Dang, T. K. A., Bonar, G., & Yao, J. (2021). Professional learning for educators teaching in English-medium-instruction in higher education: A systematic review. Teaching in Higher Education, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1863350
Delgado, J., Siow, S., de Groot, J., McLane, B., & Hedlin, M. (2021). Towards collective moral resilience: The potential of communities of practice during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond. Journal of Medical Ethics, 47(6), 374–382.
Farrell, T. S. (2020). Professional development through reflective practice for English-medium instruction (EMI) teachers. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 23(3), 277–286.
Galloway, N., & Ruegg, R. (2022). English medium instruction (EMI) lecturer support needs in Japan and China. System, 102728.
Ghamrawi, N. (2022). Teachers’ virtual communities of practice: A strong response in times of crisis or just another Fad? Education and Information Technologies, 27(5), 5889–5915.
Goodyear, V. A., & Casey, A. (2015). Innovation with change: Developing a community of practice to help teachers move beyond the ‘honeymoon’of pedagogical renovation. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 20(2), 186–203.
Guldberg, K., Achtypi, A., D’Alonzo, L., Laskaridou, K., Milton, D., Molteni, P., & Wood, R. (2021). Using the value creation framework to capture knowledge co-creation and pathways to impact in a transnational community of practice in autism education. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 44(1), 96–111.
Hosseini, S., & Haghighi Shirazi, Z. R. (2021). Towards teacher innovative work behavior: A conceptual model. Cogent Education, 8(1), 1869364.
Hu, G., & Lei, J. (2014). English-medium instruction in Chinese higher education: A case study. Higher Education, 67(5), 551–567.
Istance, D., & Paniagua, A. (2019). Learning to leapfrog: Innovative pedagogies to transform education. Center for Universal Education at The Brookings Institution.
Johnson, K. G., Jakopovic, P., & von Renesse, C. (2021). Supporting teaching and learning reform in college mathematics: Finding value in communities of practice. Journal for STEM Education Research, 4(3), 380–396.
Kennedy, A. (2014). Understanding continuing professional development: The need for theory to impact on policy and practice. Professional Development in Education, 40(5), 688–697.
Konttinen, M. (2022). Towards more learning-centred English-medium education: Promoting the combination of backward design and community of practice in teacher training. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 16(4–5), 381–391.
Lantz-Andersson, A., Lundin, M., & Selwyn, N. (2018). Twenty years of online teacher communities: A systematic review of formally-organized and informally-developed professional learning groups. Teaching and Teacher Education, 75, 302–315.
Lanvers, U., & Hultgren, A. K. (2018). The Englishization of European education: Concluding remarks. European Journal of Language Policy, 10(1), 147–152.
Lasagabaster, D. (2022). Teacher preparedness for English-medium instruction. Journal of English-Medium Instruction, 1(1), 48–64.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
Lincoln, Y. S., Lynham, S. A., & Guba, E. G. (2011). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences, revisited. The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, 4(2), 97–128.
Mercieca, B. M., & McDonald, J. (2021). Sustaining communities of practice with early career teachers. Springer.
Messmann, G., & Mulder, R. H. (2012). Development of a measurement instrument for innovative work behaviour as a dynamic and context-bound construct. Human Resource Development International, 15(1), 43–59.
Messmann, G., & Mulder, R. H. (2015). Reflection as a facilitator of teachers’ innovative work behaviour. International Journal of Training and Development, 19(2), 125–137.
Naz, F., & Murad, H. S. (2017). Innovative teaching has a positive impact on the performance of diverse students. SAGE Open, 7(4), 2158244017734022.
Peng, J.-E., & Xie, X. S. (2021). English-medium instruction as a pedagogical strategy for the sustainable development of EFL learners in the Chinese context: A meta-analysis of its effectiveness. Sustainability, 13(10), 5637.
Rose, H., & McKinley, J. (2018). Japan’s English-medium instruction initiatives and the globalization of higher education. Higher Education, 75(1), 111–129.
Sahan, K., Mikolajewska, A., Rose, H., Macaro, E., Searle, M., Aizawa, I., Zhou, S., & Veitch, A. (2021). Global mapping of English as a medium of instruction in higher education: 2020 and beyond. British Council. Retrieved July 12, 2022, from https://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/sites/teacheng/files/5.%20Global%20mapping%20of%20English_artwork.pdf
Spilker, M., Prinsen, F., & Kalz, M. (2020). Valuing technology-enhanced academic conferences for continuing professional development. A systematic literature review. Professional Development in Education, 46(3), 482–499.
Uehara, T., & Kojima, N. (2021). Prioritizing English-medium instruction teachers’ needs for faculty development and institutional support: A best–worst scaling approach. Education Sciences, 11(8), 384.
Wächter, B., & Maiworm, F. (2014). English-taught programmes in European higher education: The state of play in 2014. Lemmens Medien GmbH.
Wenger, E., Trayner, B., & De Laat, M. (2011). Promoting and assessing value creation in communities and networks: A conceptual framework. In: Rapport.
Wenger, E., & Wenger-Trayner, B. (2015). Learning in a landscape of practice: A framework. Learning in landscapes of practice: Boundaries, identity, and knowledgeability in practice-based learning, 1.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning as a social system. Systems Thinker, 9(5), 2–3.
Wilson, A., Wilson, C., & Witthaus, G. (2020). Using a community of practice in higher education: Understanding the demographics of participation and impact on teaching. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 32(1), 39–48.
Winks, L., Green, N., & Dyer, S. (2020). Nurturing innovation and creativity in educational practice: Principles for supporting faculty peer learning through campus design. Higher Education, 80(1), 119–135.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval
This study was approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of the National Cheng Kung University prior to data collection (reference number: Edu152).
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Nkambule, N.S., Tang, CW. Building a case for communities of practice as drivers of innovative teaching in English medium instruction context. High Educ 87, 721–740 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-023-01032-w
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-023-01032-w