Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Organisational legitimacy of private providers: Regulators’ ratings and perspectives

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study was conducted to gauge the nature and level of organizational legitimacy of private higher education institutions (PHEIs) in Ethiopia through the perspectives of regulators involved in accrediting and auditing private institutions. The study adopted a mixed-methods approach, particularly the explanatory sequential design, and used questionnaire, documentary evidence, and interview as principal means of data collection. One hundred and twenty-one regulators were involved in the survey and ten regulators participated in the in-depth interview. The findings revealed that both the overall rating of PHEIs and the various categories of legitimacy identified as procedural, consequential, structural, personal, and linkage received average ratings by regulators. This denotes a threshold level of acceptance suggesting the need for a more substantial legitimacy level that the Ethiopian private higher education sector should attain if it seeks to earn heightened credibility and active support from stakeholders. Conclusions and implications of the study at the nexus of theory, policy, and practice are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aldrich, H. E., & Fiol, C. M. (1994). Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation. The Academy of Management Review, 19(4), 645–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altbach, P. G., & Levy, D. C. (2005). Private higher education: A global revolution. Sense-Brill.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ashforth, B. E., & Gibbs, B. W. (1990). The double-edge of organizational legitimation. Organization Science, 1, 177–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernasconi, A. (2013). The for-profit motive. International Higher Education, 71, 8–10. https://doi.org/10.6017/ihe.2013.71.6079

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bitektine, A. (2011). Toward a theory of social judgements of organizations: The case of legitimacy, reputation and status. Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 151–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bitektine, A., & Haack, P. (2015). The macro and the micro of legitimacy: Towards a multi-level theory of the legitimacy process. Academy of Management Review, 40, 49–75.

  • Bjarnason, S., Cheng, K.-M., Fielden, J., Lemaitre, M.-J., Levy, D., & Varghese, N. V. (2009). A new dynamic: Private higher education. UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyadjieva, P., & Slantcheva, S. (2007). Public perceptions of private universities and colleges in Bulgaria. In S. Slantcheva & D. C. Levy (Eds.), Private higher education in post- communist Europe: In search of legitimacy (pp. 223–238). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Brinkerhoff, D.W. (2005). Organizational Legitimacy, Capacity and Capacity Development, Discussion Paper 58A. European Centre for Development Policy Management (ECDPM).

  • Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry & research design: choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deephouse, D. L. (1996). Does isomorphism legitimate? The Academy of Management Journal, 39(4), 1024–1039.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deephouse, D. L., & Carter, S. M. (2005). An examination of differences between organizational legitimacy and organizational reputation. Journal of Management Studies, 42(2), 329–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowling, J., & Pfeffer, J. (1975). Organizational legitimacy: Social values and organizational behaviour. The Pacific Sociological Review, 18(1), 122–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drori, I., & Honig, B. (2013). A process model of internal and external legitimacy. Organization Studies, 34(3), 345–376.

  • Elsbach, K. D., & Sutton, R. I. (1992). Acquiring organizational legitimacy through illegitimate actions: A marriage of institutional and impression management theories. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 699–738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia, FDRE. (2003). Higher Education Proclamation 351/03. FDRE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia, FDRE. (2009). Higher Education Proclamation 650/09. FDRE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia, FDRE. (2019). Higher Education Proclamation 1152. FDRE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giesecke, H. C. (2006). Legitimacy seeking among new private institutions of higher education in central and eastern Europe. Higher Education in Europe, 31(1), 11–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giesecke, H.C. (2007). Gaining legitimacy: A continuum on the attainment of recognition. In: Slantcheva, S., Levy, D.C. (eds) Private Higher Education in Post-Communist Europe. Issues in Higher Education. Palgrave Macmillan, New York.

  • Higher Education Relevance and Quality Agency, HERQA. (2019). Disciplinary code set for Private higher education institutions (in Amharic). HERQA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamshidi, L., Arasteh, H., Naveh Ebrahim, A., Zeinabadi, H., & Rasmussen, P. D. (2012). Developmental patterns of privatization in higher education: A comparative study. Higher Education, 64(6), 789–803.

  • Lee, Y. J. (2017). understanding higher education institutions’ publicness: Do public universities produce more public outcomes than private universities? Higher Education Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12120.

  • Levy, D.C. (2002). Unanticipated Development: Perspectives on Private Higher Education’s Emerging Role. PROPHE’s Working Paper No 1.

  • Levy, D.C. (2003). Profits and practicality: How South Africa epitomizes the global surge in commercial private higher education. PROPHE Working Paper Series No. 2. http://www.albany.edu/dept/eaps/prophe

  • Levy, D. (2005). Private higher education’s surprise roles. In P. G. Altbach & D. Levy (Eds.), Private higher education: A global revolution (pp. 33–36). Sense Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, D. (2006). Private-public interfaces in higher education development: Two sectors in sync? In Paper presented at the Conference on Higher Education and Development.

  • Levy, D. (2015). Private higher education: patterns and trends. International Higher Education, 50. https://doi.org/10.6017/ihe.2008.50.8003.

  • Levy, D. C. (2013). The decline of private higher education. Higher Education Policy, 26, 25–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1984). The new institutionalism: Organizational factors in political life. American Political Science Review, 78(3), 734–749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFarland, D. & Gomez, C. J. (2013). Organizational analysis. (unpublished textbook of Stanford course).

  • Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. W., & Scott, W. R. (1983). Centralization and the legitimacy problems of local government’. In J. W. Meyer & W. R. Scott (Eds.), Organizational Environments: Ritual and Rationality (pp. 199–215). Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education, MoE. (2017). Education Statistics Annual Abstract 2015/16. MoE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicolescu, L. (2007). Institutional efforts for legislative recognition and market acceptance: Romanian private higher education. In S. Slantcheva & D. Levy (Eds.), Private Higher Education in Post-Communist Europe (pp. 201–222). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, A., & Starkey, K. (2016). The legitimacy and impact of business schools - key issues and a research agenda. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 15(4), 649–664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reisz, D. R. (2007). Legitimacy discourse and mission statements of private higher education institutions in Romania. In S. Slantcheva & D. Levy (Eds.), Private Higher Education in Post-Communist Europe. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and Organisations: Foundations for Organizational Science. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. R. (2003). Organizations: Rational, natural and open systems. Pearson Education, Inc.

  • Slantcheva, S. (2007). Legitimating the difference; private higher education institutions in Central and Eastern Europe. In S. Slantcheva & D. Levy (Eds.), Private Higher Education in Post-Communist Europe (pp. 55–74). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Slantcheva, S., & Levy, D. (Eds.). (2007). Private Higher Education in Post-Communist Europe. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spender, J. C. (2014). The business school model: a flawed organizational design? Journal of Management Development, 33(5), 429–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suddaby, R., Bitektine, A., & Haack, P. (2017). Legitimacy. Academy of Management Annals, 11(1), 451–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suspitsin, D. (2007). Between the State and the Market: Sources of Sponsorship and legitimacy in Russian Nonstate Higher Education. In S. Slantcheva & D. Levy (Eds.), Private Higher Education in Post-Communist Europe (pp. 157–178). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tamrat, W. (2012). The evolving quality assurance framework in Ethiopian higher education. St. Mary’s University College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamrat, W. (2019). Raising the potential of not-for-profit private higher education. University World News (27, April).

  • Tamrat, W. (2020). Inside the Blackbox of family-owned institutions in Ethiopia. In The Global Phenomenon of Family-owned or Family-Managed Universities (pp. 142-161). Sense-Brill.

  • Tamrat, W., & Teferra, D. (2019). Private higher education in Ethiopia: risks, stakes and stocks. Studies in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1582010

  • Teferra, D. (2005). Private higher education in Ethiopia: the current landscape. In P. Altbach & D. Levy (Eds.), Private higher education: A global revolution (pp. 71–74). Sense.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Vergne, J. P. (2011). Toward a New Measure of Organizational Legitimacy: Method, Validation and Illustration. Organizational Research Methods, 14(3), 484–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. (1976). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.2307/2391875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, D. G., Edwards, P., & Birkin, F. (1996). Organizational legitimacy and stakeholder information provision. British Journal of Management, 7(4), 329–347. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.1996.tb00123.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, M. A., & Zeitz, G. J. (2002). Beyond survival: Achieving new venture growth by building legitimacy. Academy of Management Review, 27, 414–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zucker, L. G. (1987). Institutional theories of organization. Annual Review of Sociology, 13, 443–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Graduate Studies, St. Mary’s University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

    Wondwosen Tamrat

  2. University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa

    Damtew Teferra

Authors
  1. Wondwosen Tamrat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Damtew Teferra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wondwosen Tamrat.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there exists no competing financial interest or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tamrat, W., Teferra, D. Organisational legitimacy of private providers: Regulators’ ratings and perspectives. High Educ 87, 201–219 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-023-01002-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-023-01002-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation