Abstract
The benefits of paired learning, rather than individual learning, have been pointed by several studies. Although Chevruta, which has been essential in Jewish education for centuries, is arguably the original form of long-term paired learning, little empirical research has focused on exploring its components and consequences. In the current study, Chevruta learning is conceptualized as a combination of (a) structure: the proportion of time/space spent learning together, out of the total learning time on a given day, and (b) practices: the extent of using specific personal character strengths (CS), which resemble Chevruta practices in a positive manner. Their effects are examined on learning satisfaction. Methodologically, this is a dyadic (30 dyads) and longitudinal study with 20 daily measurement points for each participant. An average daily effect of structure on learning satisfaction was found—but no specific effect. This means that merely being together contributes to learning satisfaction over time, but not on the level of daily fluctuations. CS use, however, contributes both on average and on specific time points, and both in terms of the actor’s and the partner’s effects. One’s own CS use contributes to one’s own satisfaction both over time and daily. One’s partner’s Chevruta CS use fluctuation on specific days affects one’s own learning satisfaction that same evening, but this effect does not hold on average. These results indicate that actively engaging, as conceptualized by duration of learning together and strengths use, in this cooperative Jewish learning strategy, provides a substantial mutual benefit to its members.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abercrombie, S., Hushman, C. J., & Carbonneau, K. J. (2019). The influence of timing of peer cooperation on learning. Educational Psychology, 39(7), 881–899. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2019.1567690.
Anderson, T., Linden, L., Allen, M., & Gibbs, E. (2009). New graduate rn work satisfaction after completing an interactive nurse residency. Journal of Nursing Administration, 39(4), 165–169. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNA.0b013e31819c9cac.
Avsec, S., & Kocijancic, S. (2016). A path model of effective technology-intensive inquiry-based learning. Educational Technology and Society, 19(1), 308–320.
Bakker, A. B., Hetland, J., Olsen, O. K., & Espevik, R. (2019). Daily strengths use and employee well-being: The moderating role of personality. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 92, 144–168.
Bakker, A. B., & van Wingerden, J. (2020). Do personal resources and strengths use increase work engagement? The effects of a training intervention. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000266
Bakker, A. B., & Van Woerkom, M. (2018). Strengths use in organizations: A positive approach of occupational health. Canadian Psychology, 59(1), 38–46. https://doi.org/10.1037/cap0000120.
Batson, C. D., & Powell, A. A. (2003). Altruism and Prosocial Behavior. In T. Millon & M. J. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of Psychology (pp. 463–479). https://doi.org/10.1002/0471264385.wei0519
Boud, D. (2001). Making the move to peer learning. In D. Boud, R. Cohen, & J. Sampson (Eds.), Peer Learning in Higher Education: Learning from and with each other (pp. 1–20). London: Kogan Page.
Boulocher-Passet, V., Daly, P., & Sequeira, I. (2016). Fostering creativity understanding: Case study of an exercise designed for a large undergraduate business cohort at EDHEC business school. Journal of Management Development, 35(5), 574–591. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMD-08-2014-0087.
Britton, B. K., & Tesser, A. (1991). Effects of time-management practices on college grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(3), 405–410. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.83.3.405.
Buschor, C., Proyer, R. T., & Ruch, W. (2013). Self- and peer-rated character strengths: How do they relate to satisfaction with life and orientations to happiness? Journal of Positive Psychology, 8(2), 116–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2012.758305.
Ceberio, M., Almudí, J. M., & Franco, Á. (2016). Design and application of interactive simulations in problem-solving in university-level physics education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(4), 590–609. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9615-7.
Chung, E., & Lee, B.-H. (2019). The Effects of a havruta Method on the Self-directed learning and Learning Motivation. Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 6(1), 9–15. https://doi.org/10.24313/jpbl.2019.00143
Davidson, N. (1994). Cooperative and collaborative learning: An integrative perspective. In J. Thousand, R. Villa, & A. Nevin (Eds.), Creativity and collaborative learning: A practical guide to empowering students and teachers (pp. 13–30). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
De-la-Fuente, J., Zapata, L., Martínez-Vicente, J. M., Sander, P., & Cardelle-Elawar, M. (2015). The role of personal self-regulation and regulatory teaching to predict motivational-affective variables, achievement and satisfaction: A structural model. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(MAR), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00399
Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsem, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13.
Dubreuil, P., Forest, J., & Courcy, F. (2014). From strengths use to work performance: The role of harmonious passion, subjective vitality, and concentration. Journal of Positive Psychology, 9(4), 335–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2014.898318.
Freidlin, P., Littman-Ovadia, H., & Niemiec, R. M. (2017). Positive psychopathology: Social anxiety via character strengths underuse and overuse. Personality and Individual Differences, 108,. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.12.003.
Gettinger, M., & White, M. A. (1979). Which is the stronger correlate of school learning? Time to learn or measured intelligence? Journal of Educational Psychology, 71(4), 405–412. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.71.4.405.
Gistelinck, F., & Loeys, T. (2019). The actor-partner interdependence model for longitudinal dyadic data: An implementation in the SEM framework. Structural Equation Modeling, 26(3), 329–347. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2018.1527223.
Grammenos, D., & Antona, M. (2018). Future designers: Introducing creativity, design thinking & design to children. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 16, 16–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2017.10.002.
Grass, J., Strobel, A., & Strobel, A. (2017). Cognitive investments in academic success: The role of need for cognition at university. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(MAY), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00790.
Grissom, S., & Van Gorp, M. (2000). A practical approach to integrating active and collaborative learning into the introductory computer science curriculum. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 16(1), 95–100.
Halbertal, M., & Hartman Halbertal, T. (2005). The Yeshiva. In A. O. Rorty (Ed.), Philosophers on Education: Historical Perspectives (pp. 455–466). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203981610
Harzer, C., & Ruch, W. (2012). When the job is a calling: The role of applying one’s signature strengths at work. Journal of Positive Psychology, 7(5), 362–371. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2012.702784.
Harzer, C., & Ruch, W. (2013). The application of signature character strengths and positive experiences at work. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14(3), 965–983. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-012-9364-0.
Hurtz, G. M., & Williams, K. J. (2009). Attitudinal and motivational antecedents of participation in voluntary employee development activities. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(3), 635–653. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014580.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2009). An educational psychology success story: Social interdependence theory and cooperative learning. Educational Researcher, 38(5), 365–379. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09339057.
Johnson, R. T., & Johnson, D. W. (1994). An overview of cooperative learning. In J. Thousand, R. Villa, & A. Nevin (Eds.), Creativity and Collaborative Learning: A Practical Guide to Empowering Students and Teachers (pp. 31–43). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
Joo, Y. J., Joung, S., & Kim, J. (2014). Structural relationships among self-regulated learning, learning flow, satisfaction, and learning persistence in cyber universities. Interactive Learning Environments, 22(6), 752–770. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2012.745421.
Kent, O. (2010). A theory of havruta learning. Journal of Jewish Education, 76(3), 215–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/15244113.2010.501499.
Kent, O., & Cook, A. (2012). Havruta inspired pedagogy: Fostering an ecology of learning for closely studying texts with others. Journal of Jewish Education, 78(3), 227–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/15244113.2012.707607.
Lavy, S. (2019). A Review of Character Strengths Interventions in Twenty-First-Century Schools: their Importance and How they can be Fostered. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 1–24.
Lavy, S., Littman-Ovadia, H., & Bareli, Y. (2014). Strengths deployment as a mood-repair mechanism: Evidence from a diary study with a relationship exercise group. Journal of Positive Psychology, 9(6), 547–558. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2014.936963.
Lavy, S., Littman-Ovadia, H., & Bareli, Y. (2016). My better half: strengths endorsement and deployment in married couples. Journal of Family Issues, 37(12), 1730–1745. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X14550365.
Liebersohn, A. (2006). World wide agora. USA: Lulu Press.
Littman-Ovadia, H., & Freidlin, P. (2019). Positive Psychopathology and Positive Functioning: OCD, Flourishing and Satisfaction with Life through the Lens of Character Strength Underuse, Overuse and Optimal Use. Applied Research in Quality of Life. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-018-9701-5
Littman-Ovadia, H., & Niemiec, R. M. (2016). Character strengths and mindfulness as core pathways to meaning in life. In P. Russo-Netzer, S. E. Schulenberg, & A. Batthyany (Eds.), Clinical Perspectives on Meaning (pp. 383–405). New York: Springer.
Littman-Ovadia, H., & Steger, M. (2010). Character strengths and well-being among volunteers and employees: Toward an integrative model. Journal of Positive Psychology, 5(6), 419–430. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2010.516765.
McGrath, R. E. (2015a). Character strengths in 75 nations: An update. Journal of Positive Psychology, 10(1), 41–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2014.888580.
McGrath, R. E. (2015b). Integrating psychological and cultural perspectives on virtue: The hierarchical structure of character strengths. Journal of Positive Psychology, 10(5), 407–424. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2014.994222.
McGrath, R. E. (2019). The VIA Assessment Suite for Adults: Development and Initial Evaluation. 1037//0033-2909.I26.1.78
Niemiec, R. M. (2012). Tips for Using Each Character Strength in a New Way. Retrieved December 23, 2020, from VIA Institute on Character website: https://www.viacharacter.org/topics/articles/tips-for-using-each-character-strength-in-a-new-way
Niemiec, R. M. (2018). Character strengths interventions: A Field guide for practitioners. In Character Strengths Interventions: A Field Guide for Practitioners. https://doi.org/10.1027/00492-000.
Nitsche, S., Dickhäuser, O., Fasching, M. S., & Dresel, M. (2013). Teachers’ professional goal orientations: Importance for further training and sick leave. Learning and Individual Differences, 23(1), 272–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.07.017.
Oriol, X., Miranda, R., Oyanedel, J. C., & Torres, J. (2017). The role of self-control and grit in domains of school success in students of primary and secondary school. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(OCT), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01716
Pålsson, Y., Mårtensson, G., Swenne, C. L., Ädel, E., & Engström, M. (2017). A peer learning intervention for nursing students in clinical practice education: A quasi-experimental study. Nurse Education Today, 51, 81–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2017.01.011.
Pan, Y. H. (2013). Relationships among teachers’ self-efficacy and students’ motivation, atmosphere, and satisfaction in physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 33(1), 68–92. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2013-0069.
Park, N., Barton, M., & Pillay, J. (2017). What we know and what we still want to learn. In M. Warren & S. Donaldson (Eds.), Scientific Advances in Positive Psychology (pp. 73–101). Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger Publishers.
Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Titz, W., & Perry, R. P. (2002). Academic emotions in students’ self-regulated learning and achievement: A program of qualitative and quantitative research. Educational Psychologist, 37(2), 91–105. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3702_4.
Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. New York, NY, US: Oxford University Press.
Piasecka, L. (2016). Activating Character Strengths Through Poetic Encounters in a Foreign Language—A Case Study. 75–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32954-3_5
Pinto, G., Tarchi, C., & Bigozzi, L. (2018). Is two better than one? Comparing children’s narrative competence in an individual versus joint storytelling task. Social Psychology of Education, 21(1), 91–109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-017-9411-0.
Proyer, R. T., Gander, F., Wellenzohn, S., & Ruch, W. (2014). Positive psychology interventions in people aged 50–79 years: Long-term effects of placebo-controlled online interventions on well-being and depression. Aging and Mental Health, 18(8), 997–1005. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2014.899978.
Ruch, W., Niemiec, R. M., McGrath, R. E., Gander, F., & Proyer, R. T. (2020). Character strengths-based interventions: Open questions and ideas for future research. Journal of Positive Psychology, 15(5), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2020.1789700.
Sadeghi, A., & Davoudy, S. M. (2019). The Relationship between Cooperative Learning and Skilled Learning with the Satisfaction of Students Studying Foreign Languages (Russian, English, and Arabic). Iranian Evolutionary and Educational Psychology Journal, 1(4), 286–294. https://doi.org/10.29252/ieepj.1.4.5
Schmitz, B., & Wiese, B. S. (2006). New perspectives for the evaluation of training sessions in self-regulated learning: Time-series analyses of diary data. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 31(1), 64–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2005.02.002.
Schneider, M., & Preckel, F. (2017). Variables associated with achievement in higher education: A systematic review of meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 143(6), 565–600. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000098.
Schutte, N. S., & Malouff, J. M. (2019). The impact of signature character strengths interventions: A meta-analysis. Journal of Happiness Studies, 20(4), 1179–1196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-018-9990-2.
Seligman, M. E., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology. An introduction: The American Psychologist. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.5.
Shin, I. S., & Kim, J. H. (2013). The effect of problem-based learning in nursing education: A meta-analysis. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 18(5), 1103–1120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-012-9436-2.
Slavin, R. E. (2010). Cooperative Learning. In International Encyclopedia of Education (3rd ed., pp. 177–183). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-044894-7.00494-2
Storch, N. (2002). Patterns of interaction in ESL pair work. Language Learning, 52(1), 119–158. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00179.
Šverko, I., & Babarović, T. (2019). Applying career construction model of adaptation to career transition in adolescence: A two-study paper. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 111, 59–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2018.10.011.
Topping, K. J. (2005). Trends in peer learning. Educational Psychology, 25(6), 631–645. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410500345172.
Valadas, S. T., Almeida, L. S., & Araújo, A. M. (2017). The mediating effects of approaches to learning on the academic success of first-year college students. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 61(6), 721–734. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2016.1188146.
van Woerkom, M., Oerlemans, W., & Bakker, A. B. (2016). Strengths use and work engagement: a weekly diary study. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 25(3), 384–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2015.1089862.
Wilkins, K. G., Santilli, S., Ferrari, L., Nota, L., Tracey, T. J. G., & Soresi, S. (2014). The relationship among positive emotional dispositions, career adaptability, and satisfaction in Italian high school students. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 85(3), 329–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2014.08.004.
Yang, H., Guo, W., Yu, S., Chen, L., Zhang, H., Pan, L., & Chang, E. C. (2016). Personal and family perfectionism in Chinese school students: Relationships with learning stress, learning satisfaction and self-reported academic performance level. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 25(12), 3675–3683. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-016-0524-4.
Yiping, L., Abrami, P. C., & D’Apollonia, S. (2001). Small group and individual learning with technology: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 71(3), 449–521. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543071003449.
Zhoc, K. C. H., King, R. B., Chung, T. S. H., & Chen, J. (2020). Emotionally intelligent students are more engaged and successful: Examining the role of emotional intelligence in higher education. European Journal of Psychology of Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-019-00458-0.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors listed have made a substantial, direct, and intellectual contribution to the work and approved it for publication.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Littman-Ovadia, H., Freidlin, P. Paired learning duration and character strengths use as predictors of learning satisfaction: a dyadic longitudinal study among Chevruta students in Yeshivas. High Educ 83, 655–672 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-021-00690-y
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-021-00690-y