Abstract
Academics have always been endowed with the privilege of autonomy, but the diffusion of evaluation systems based on publication outcomes potentially jeopardizes the benefits deriving from behaviors that address other pillars of higher education. Besides research and teaching, academic citizenship, i.e., the service behaviors carried out within and outside organizational boundaries, are in fact cornerstones of university functioning. We investigate the relationship between academic citizenship and research after the introduction of an evaluation system that moves research performance to center stage on a dataset collecting publication records and service activities of 353 Italian scholars in the accounting discipline in the 2004–2013 period. A cluster analysis reveals different academics’ orientations towards research and academic citizenship. We contribute to the debate on academic choices by showing that a large number of university members tend to focus on a single type of academic citizenship or to adopt a research orientation, while a significant part remains stuck in the middle without achieving satisfying performance in any domains according to international standards, and discuss implications for the design of behavioral incentives.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
We downloaded the CVs of the first wave of 2016 from the following website: http://abilitazione.miur.it/public/pubblicacandidati_16.php
References
Abramo, G., Cicero, T., & D’Angelo, C. A. (2011). The dangers of performance-based research funding in non-competitive higher education systems. Scientometrics, 87(3), 641–654. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0355-4.
Abramo, G., Cicero, T., & D’Angelo, C. A. (2013a). The impact of unproductive and top researchers on overall university research performance. Journal of Informetrics, 7(1), 166–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2012.10.006.
Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., & Murgia, G. (2013b). Gender differences in research collaboration. Journal of Informetrics, 7(4), 811–822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2013.07.002.
Abramo, G., Cicero, T., & D’Angelo, C. A. (2014). Are the authors of highly cited articles also the most productive ones? Journal of Informetrics, 8(1), 89–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2013.10.011.
Abreu, M., Grinevich, V., Hughes, A., & Kitson, M. (2009). Knowledge exchange between academics and the business, public and third sectors. London: University of Cambridge; Imperial College London.
Agenzia Nazionale di Valutazione del Sistema Universitario e della Ricerca (ANVUR). (2013). Valutazione della Qualità della Ricerca 2004–2010. Roma.
Aguinis, H., Shapiro, D. L., Antonacopoulou, E. P., & Cummings, T. G. (2014). Scholarly impact: a pluralist conceptualization. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 13(4), 623–639. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2014.0121.
Ancaiani, A., Anfossi, A. F., Barbara, A., Benedetto, S., Blasi, B., Carletti, V., et al. (2015). Evaluating scientific research in Italy: the 2004–10 research evaluation exercise. Research Evaluation, 24(3), 242–255. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvv008.
Antonio, A. L., Astin, H. S., & Cress, C. M. (2000). Community Service in Higher Education: a look at the Nation’s faculty. The Review of Higher Education, 23(4), 373–397. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2000.0015.
Ashforth, B. E. (2001). Role transitions in organizational life: an identity-based perspective. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Ashforth, B. E., Schinoff, B. S., & Rogers, K. M. (2016). “I Identify with Her,” “I Identify with Him”: unpacking the dynamics of personal identification in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 41(1), 28–60. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2014.0033.
Assessment time. (2010). Nature, 468(7327), 1001–2.
Austin, A. E. (2002). Preparing the next generation of faculty: graduate school as socialization to the academic career. The Journal of Higher Education, 73(1), 94–122. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.2002.0001.
Baccini, A., Barabesi, L., Cioni, M., & Pisani, C. (2014). Crossing the hurdle: The determinants of individual scientific performance. Scientometrics, 101(3), 2035–2062. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1395-3.
Baez, B. (2000). Race-related service and faculty of color: conceptualizing critical agency in academe. Higher Education, 39(3), 363–391. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003972214943.
Bagues, M., Sylos-Labini, M., & Zinovyeva, N. (2017). Does the gender composition of scientific committees matter? American Economic Review, 107(4), 1207–1238. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20151211.
Bak, H.-J., & Kim, D. H. (2015). Too much emphasis on research? An empirical examination of the relationship between research and teaching in multitasking environments. Research in Higher Education, 56(8), 843–860. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-015-9372-0.
Baruffaldi, S., Visentin, F., & Conti, A. (2016). The productivity of science & engineering PhD students hired from supervisors’ networks. Research Policy, 45(4), 785–796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.12.006.
Beech, N., MacIntosh, R., & MacLean, D. (2010). Dialogues between academics and practitioners: the role of generative dialogic encounters. Organization Studies, 31(9–10), 1341–1367. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840610374396.
Benedetto, S., Cicero, T., & Malgarini, M. (2016). Determinants of research quality in Italian universities: evidence from the 2004 to 2010 evaluation exercise. Research Evaluation, 25(3), 257–263. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvw017.
Beyer, J. M., Chanove, R. G., & Fox, W. B. (1995). The review process and the fates of manuscripts submitted to AMJ. Academy of Management Journal, 38(5), 1219–1260. https://doi.org/10.2307/256856.
Bolden, R., Gosling, J., & O’Brien, A. (2014). Citizens of the academic community? A societal perspective on leadership in UK higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 39(5), 754–770. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2012.754855.
Bonaccorsi, A., Daraio, C., & Simar, L. (2006). Advanced indicators of productivity of universities: An application of robust nonparametric methods to Italian data. Scientometrics, 66(2), 389–410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0028-x.
Bonaccorsi, A., Cicero, T., Ferrara, A., & Malgarini, M. (2015). Journal ratings as predictors of articles quality in arts, humanities and social sciences: an analysis based on the Italian research evaluation exercise. F1000Research, 4, 196. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.6478.1.
Bonaccorsi, A., Daraio, C., Fantoni, S., Folli, V., Leonetti, M., & Ruocco, G. (2017). Do social sciences and humanities behave like life and hard sciences? Scientometrics, 112(1), 607–653. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2384-0.
Brida, J. G., Osti, L., & Barquet, A. (2010). Segmenting resident perceptions towards tourism - a cluster analysis with a multinomial logit model of a mountain community. International Journal of Tourism Research, 12, 591–602. https://doi.org/10.1002/jtr.778.
Burton, C. (1997). Gender equity in Australian university staffing. Canberra: AGPS.
Butler, N., Delaney, H., & Spoelstra, S. (2015). Problematizing ‘relevance’ in the business school: The case of leadership studies: problematizing ‘relevance’ in the business school. British Journal of Management, 26(4), 731–744. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12121.
Calcagnini, G., Favaretto, I., Giombini, G., Perugini, F., & Rombaldoni, R. (2016). The role of universities in the location of innovative start-ups. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 41(4), 670–693. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-015-9396-9.
Cañibano, C., & Bozeman, B. (2009). Curriculum vitae method in science policy and research evaluation: The state-of-the-art. Research Evaluation, 18(2), 86–94. https://doi.org/10.3152/095820209X441754.
Capano, G. (2011). Government continues to do its job. A comparative study of governance shifts in the higher education sector. Public Administration, 89(4), 1622–1642. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.01936.x.
Cartlidge, E. (2010). Italian parliament passes controversial university reforms. Science, 330(6010), 1462–1463. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.330.6010.1462-a.
Chavarro, D., Tang, P., & Ràfols, I. (2017). Why researchers publish in non-mainstream journals: training, knowledge bridging, and gap filling. Research Policy, 46(9), 1666–1680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.08.002.
Crittenden, K. S., & Hill, R. J. (1971). Coding reliability and validity of interview data. American Sociological Review, 36(6), 1073–1080. https://doi.org/10.2307/2093766.
Daraio, C., & Moed, H. F. (2011). Is Italian science declining? Research Policy, 40(10), 1380–1392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.06.013.
Degn, L. (2016). Academic sensemaking and behavioural responses – exploring how academics perceive and respond to identity threats in times of turmoil. Studies in Higher Education, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2016.1168796.
Dietz, J., & Bozeman, B. (2005). Academic careers, patents, and productivity: industry experience as scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy, 34(3), 349–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.008.
Dietz, J., Chompalov, I., Bozeman, B., Lane, E., & Park, J. (2000). Using the curriculum vita to study the career paths of scientists and engineers: an exploratory assessment. Scientometrics, 49(3), 419–442.
Duda, R. O., & Hart, P. E. (1973). Pattern classification and scene analysis. New York: Wiley.
Empson, L. (2013). My affair with the “other”: identity journeys across the research–practice divide. Journal of Management Inquiry, 22(2), 229–248. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492612446068.
Everitt, B. S., Landau, S., Leese, M., & Stahl, D. (2011). Cluster analysis. Hoboken: Wiley.
Fabel, O. (2008). Editorial: Zum Schwerpunkt Forschungs-Rankings. Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, 9(3), 252–253. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2516.2008.00278.x.
Franceschini, F., & Maisano, D. (2017). Critical remarks on the Italian research assessment exercise VQR 2011–2014. Journal of Informetrics, 11(2), 337–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.02.005.
Frischknecht, F. (2008). Small countries are unexpected winners in ERC grant tables. Nature, 454(7205), 690–690. https://doi.org/10.1038/454690a.
Frølich, N. (2011). Multi-layered accountability. Performance-based funding of universities. Public Administration, 89(3), 840–859. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01867.x.
Fussy, D. S. (2017). Policy directions for promoting university research in Tanzania. Studies in Higher Education, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2016.1266611.
Gaughan, M. (2009). Using the curriculum vitae for policy research: an evaluation of National Institutes of Health center and training support on career trajectories. Research Evaluation, 18(2), 117–124. https://doi.org/10.3152/095820209X441781.
Gaughan, M., & Bozeman, B. (2002). Using curriculum vitae to compare some impacts of NSF research grants with research center funding. Research Evaluation, 11(1), 17–26. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154402781776952.
George, J. M., & Jones, G. R. (2012). Understanding and managing organizational behavior (6th ed.). Boston: Pearson.
Gillan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Greene, W. H. (2012). Econometric analysis (7th ed.). Boston: Prentice Hall.
Groot, T., & García-Valderrama, T. (2006). Research quality and efficiency. Research Policy, 35(9), 1362–1376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.07.002.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
Hattie, J., & Marsh, H. W. (1996). The relationship between research and teaching: a meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 66(4), 507–542. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543066004507.
Hausman, J. (1978). Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica, 46(6), 1251. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913827.
Hodgkinson, G. P., & Starkey, K. (2011). Not simply returning to the same answer over and over again: reframing relevance: reframing relevance. British Journal of Management, 22(3), 355–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2011.00757.x.
Holland, B. A. (2016). Factors and strategies that influence faculty involvement in public service. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 20(1), 63–72.
Holmstrom, B., & Milgrom, P. (1994). The firm as an incentive system. The American Economic Review, 84(4), 972–991.
Kennedy, D. (1997). Academic duty. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Ketchen, D. J., & Shook, C. L. (1996). The application of cluster analysis in strategic management research: an analysis and critique. Strategic Management Journal, 17(6), 441–458. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199606)17:6<441::AID-SMJ819>3.0.CO;2-G.
Kieser, A., Nicolai, A., & Seidl, D. (2015). The practical relevance of management research: turning the debate on relevance into a rigorous scientific research program. The Academy of Management Annals, 9(1), 143–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2015.1011853.
Knights, D., & Clarke, C. A. (2014). It’s a bittersweet symphony, this life: fragile academic selves and insecure identities at work. Organization Studies, 35(3), 335–357. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840613508396.
Kutner, M. H., Nachtsheim, C., & Neter, J. (2004). Applied linear regression models. In Boston. New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Landry, R., Saïhi, M., Amara, N., & Ouimet, M. (2010). Evidence on how academics manage their portfolio of knowledge transfer activities. Research Policy, 39(10), 1387–1403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.08.003.
Larivière, V., Vignola-Gagné, E., Villeneuve, C., Gélinas, P., & Gingras, Y. (2011). Sex differences in research funding, productivity and impact: An analysis of Québec university professors. Scientometrics, 87(3), 483–498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0369-y.
Lawrence, J., Ott, M., & Bell, A. (2012). Faculty organizational commitment and citizenship. Research in Higher Education, 53(3), 325–352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-011-9230-7.
Leahey, E. (2006). Gender differences in productivity: research specialization as a missing link. Gender & Society, 20(6), 754–780.
Lee, Y.-N., Walsh, J. P., & Wang, J. (2015). Creativity in scientific teams: unpacking novelty and impact. Research Policy, 44(3), 684–697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.10.007.
Lewis, J. M. (2014). Individual and institutional accountability: the case of research assessment: individual and institutional accountability. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 73(4), 408–416. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12105.
Macfarlane, B. (2005). The disengaged academic: the retreat from citizenship. Higher Education Quarterly, 59(4), 296–312. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2273.2005.00299.x.
Macfarlane, B. (2007). Defining and rewarding academic citizenship: the implications for university promotions policy. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 29(3), 261–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600800701457863.
Macfarlane, B. (2011). The morphing of academic practice: unbundling and the rise of the para-academic: the morphing of academic practice. Higher Education Quarterly, 65(1), 59–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2273.2010.00467.x.
Macfarlane, B. (2018). The CV as a symbol of the changing nature of academic life: performativity, prestige and self-presentation. Studies in Higher Education, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2018.1554638.
Martin, B. R. (2011). The research excellence framework and the “impact agenda”: are we creating a Frankenstein monster? Research Evaluation, 20(3), 247–254. https://doi.org/10.3152/095820211X13118583635693.
McFadden, D. (1973). Conditional Logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. Frontiers in Econometrics, 105–142.
McIntyre, R. M., & Blashfield, R. K. (1980). A nearest-centroid technique for evaluating the minimum-variance clustering procedure. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 15(2), 225–238. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr1502_7.
Milligan, G. W. (1980). An examination of the effect of six types of error perturbation on fifteen clustering algorithms. Psychometrika, 45(3), 325–342. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02293907.
Ministero dell’Istruzione dell’Università e della Ricerca - Ufficio di Statistica. (2014). Elaborazione su dati Anagrafe Nazionale degli Studenti Universitari.
Misra, J., Lundquist, J. H., Holmes, E., & Agiomavritis, S. (2011). The ivory ceiling of service work. Academe, 97(1), 22–26.
Nederhof, A. J. (2006). Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the social sciences and the humanities: a review. Scientometrics, 66(1), 81–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0007-2.
Neumann, A., & Terosky, A. L. (2007). To give and to receive: recently tenured professors’ experiences of service in major research universities. The Journal of Higher Education, 78(3), 282–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2007.11772317.
Nørgård, R. T., & Bengtsen, S. S. E. (2016). Academic citizenship beyond the campus: a call for the placeful university. Higher Education Research & Development, 35(1), 4–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2015.1131669.
Organ, D. W., Podsakoff, P. M., & MacKenzie, S. B. (2005). Organizational citizenship behavior: its nature, antecedents, and consequences. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
Over, R. (1982). Does research productivity decline with age? Higher Education, 11(5). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00194416.
Pifer, M., & Baker, V. (2013). Identity as a theoretical construct in research about academic careers. In J. Huisman & M. Tight (Eds.), International Perspectives on Higher Education Research (Vol. 9, pp. 115–132). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-3628(2013)0000009010.
Plater, W. (1998). Using tenure: citizenship within the new academic workforce. American Behavioral Scientist, 41(5), 680–715. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764298041005007.
Punj, G., & Stewart, D. W. (1983). Cluster analysis in marketing research: review and suggestions for application. Journal of Marketing Research, 20(2), 134. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151680.
Rebora, G., & Turri, M. (2013). The UK and Italian research assessment exercises face to face. Research Policy, 42(9), 1657–1666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.06.009.
Salter, A., Salandra, R., & Walker, J. (2017). Exploring preferences for impact versus publications among UK business and management academics. Research Policy, 46(10), 1769–1782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.08.005.
Shils, E. (1997). The calling of education: the academic ethic and other essays on higher education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Starkey, K., Hatchuel, A., & Tempest, S. (2009). Management research and the new logics of discovery and engagement. Journal of Management Studies, 46(3), 547–558. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00833.x.
Swann, W. B., Johnson, R. E., & Bosson, J. K. (2009). Identity negotiation at work. Research in Organizational Behavior, 29, 81–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2009.06.005.
Taylor, B. J., & Cantwell, B. (2015). Global competition, US research universities, and international doctoral education: growth and consolidation of an organizational field. Research in Higher Education, 56(5), 411–441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-014-9355-6.
Teelken, C. (2015). Hybridity, coping mechanisms, and academic performance management: comparing three countries. Public Administration, 93(2), 307–323. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12138.
Thompson, P., Constantineau, P., & Fallis, G. (2005). Academic citizenship: an academic colleagues’ working paper. Journal of Academic Ethics, 3(2–4), 127–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-006-9010-8.
Tien, F. F., & Blackburn, R. T. (1996). Faculty rank system, research motivation, and faculty research productivity: measure refinement and theory testing. The Journal of Higher Education, 67(1), 2–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.1996.11780246.
Vogelgesang, L. J., Denson, N., & Jayakumar, U. M. (2010). What determines faculty-engaged scholarship? The Review of Higher Education, 33(4), 437–472. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.0.0175.
Wernimont, P. F., & Campbell, J. P. (1968). Signs, samples, and criteria. Journal of Applied Psychology, 52(5), 372–376. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0026244.
Whitchurch, C. (2009). The rise of the blended professional in higher education: a comparison between the United Kingdom, Australia and the United States. Higher Education, 58(3), 407–418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-009-9202-4.
Whitchurch, C. (2010). Some implications of ‘public/private’ space for professional identities in higher education. Higher Education, 60(6), 627–640. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-010-9320-z.
Wiley, C., Wallingford, V., Monllor-Tormos, M., & Konyu-Fogel, G. (2016). Faculty promotion in business schools: what counts and what should count? Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 16(4), 105.
Williamson, I. O., & Cable, D. M. (2003). Predicting early career research productivity: the case of management faculty. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24(1), 25–44. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.178.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tagliaventi, M.R., Carli, G. & Cutolo, D. Excellent researcher or good public servant? The interplay between research and academic citizenship. High Educ 79, 1057–1078 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00456-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00456-7