Financing tertiary education in Indonesia: assessing the feasibility of an income-contingent loan system

  • Elza Elmira
  • Daniel SuryadarmaEmail author


This paper examines the feasibility of an income-contingent loan system to finance tertiary education in Indonesia. Using graduates’ income data from the 2015 National Labor Force Survey, we modeled the life-cycle income distribution of university graduates using unconditional quantile regression. We used these estimates to simulate different income-contingent loan (ICL) schemes to observe the effect on the amount of repayment, length of repayment, government subsidy, and repayment burden of males and females in different quantiles of income. We simulated three loan schemes: without real interest, with a 25% surcharge on the total loan, and with 2% real interest. Implicit government subsidy was lowest with the 25% surcharge scheme. Results showed that ICL with a lower repayment burden is feasible in Indonesia and can increase access to tertiary education. We also discussed the administrative capacity among tax authorities.


Income-contingent loan Student loan Tertiary education financing Indonesia 



  1. Armstrong, S., Dearden, L., Kobayashi, M., & Nagase, N. (2018). Student loans in Japan: current problems and possible solutions. Economics of Education Review. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
  2. Arnold, J. (2012). Improving the tax system in Indonesia. OECD Economic Department Working Papers (no. 998). Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  3. Barr, N., Chapman, B., Dearden, L., & Dynarski, S. (2018). The US college loans system: lessons from Australia and England. Economics of Education Review. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
  4. Bellemare, M. F., Barrett, C. B., & Just, D. R. (2013). The welfare impacts of commodity price volatility: evidence from rural Ethiopia. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 95(4), 877–899.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Britton, J., van der Erve, L., & Higgins, T. (2018). Income contingent student loan design: lessons from around the world. Economics of Education Review. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
  6. Cai, Y., Chapman, B., & Wang, Q. (2018). Repayment burdens of mortgage-style student loans in China and steps toward income-contingent loans. Economics of Education Review. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
  7. Chapman, B., & Doris, A. (2018). Modelling higher education financing reform for Ireland. Economics of Education Review. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
  8. Chapman, B., & Liu, A. Y. (2013). Repayment burdens of student loans for Vietnamese higher education. Economics of Education Review, 37(78), 298–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chapman, B., & Sinning, M. (2014). Student loan reforms for German higher education: financing tuition fees. Education Economics, 22(6), 569–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chapman, B., & Suryadarma, D. (2013). Financing higher education: the viability of a commercial student loan in Indonesia. In D. Suryadarma & G. W. Jones (Eds.), Education in Indonesia (pp. 203–215). Singapore: ISEAS.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chapman, B., Lounkaew, K., Polsiri, P., Sarachitti, R., & Sitthipongpanich, T. (2010). Thailand’s student loans fund: interest rate subsidies and repayment burdens. Economics of Education Review, 29(5), 685–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chapman, B., Higgins, T., & Stiglitz, J. (2014). Income contingent loans: theory, practice, and prospects. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gross, J. P., Cekic, O., Hossler, D., & Hillman, N. (2009). What matters in student loan default: a review of the research literature. Journal of Student Financial Aid, 39(1), 19–29.Google Scholar
  14. Hamilton-Hart, N., & Schulze, G. G. (2016). Taxing times in Indonesia: the challenge of restoring competitiveness and the search for fiscal space. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 52(3), 265–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Higgins, T., & Sinning, M. (2013). Modeling income dynamics for public policy design: an application to income contingent student loans. Economics of Education Review, 37, 273–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hill, H., & Thee, K. W. (2013). Indonesian universities: rapid growth, major challenges. In D. Suryadarma & G. Jones (Eds.), Education in Indonesia (pp. 160–179). Singapore: ISEAS.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lorraine Dearden, (2018) Evaluating and designing student loan systems: An overview of empirical approaches. Economics of Education ReviewGoogle Scholar
  18. Ristekdikti (2016). Puspawarna Pendidikan Tinggi Indonesia, Retrieved from [Many Colors of Higher Education in Indonesia].
  19. Shen, H., & Ziderman, A. (2009). Student loans repayment and recovery: international comparisons. Higher Education, 57(3), 315–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Wicaksono, T. Y., & Friawan, D. (2006). Recent developments in higher education in Indonesia: Issues and challenges. In S. Armstrong & B. Chapman (Eds.), Financing higher education and economic development in East Asia (pp. 159–187). Canberra: ANU Press.Google Scholar
  21. World Bank (2012). Putting higher education to work: skills and research for growth in East Asia.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The SMERU Research InstituteJakartaIndonesia

Personalised recommendations