Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Measuring changes in institutional diversity: the US context

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The level of diversity present in a national higher education system plays an important role in enabling the system to respond to a variety of demands from society. Within the US context, diversity is often hailed as a strength although research has found a consistent decline in institutional diversity for the last 40 years. This article uses data from 1989 to 2014 to compare the level of diversity present across American higher education. The article draws on institutional theory to understand how institutions change in respond to environmental pressures impacting institutional diversity. The findings demonstrate that institutional diversity has continued to decrease and demonstrates how institutional decisions impact overall diversity present in the system. To conclude, the article discusses the causes and potential concerns for national systems that experience decreased institutional diversity. An improved understanding of the current state of institutional diversity provides useful measures for evaluating national higher education systems and raises critical questions for the mission and activities of higher education institutions themselves.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aldersley, S. F. (1995). “Upward drift” is alive and well: research/doctoral model still attractive to institutions. Change, 27(5), 50–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alm, J., & Winters, J. V. (2009). Distance and intrastate college student migration. Economics of Education Review, 28(6), 728–738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, B. D., & Orr, M. T. (2007). Academic drift, institutional production, and professional distribution of graduate degrees in educational leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 43(3), 279–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belfield, C. R. (2012). Student Loans and Repayment Rates: The Role of For-profit Colleges. Research in Higher Education 54 (1):1-29

  • Birch, E., Perry, D., & Taylor, H. L. (2013). Universities as anchor institutions. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 17(3), 7–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birnbaum, R. (1983). Maintaining diversity in higher education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatterton, P., & Goddard, J. (2000). The response of higher education institutions to regional needs. European Journal of Education, 35(4), 475–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, A. M., & Kisker, C. B. (2010). The shaping of American higher education: emergence and growth of the contemporary system (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, J. R. (2009). The great American university: its rise to preeminence, its indispensable national role, why it must be protected. New York: PublicAffairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cottom, T. M. (2017). Lower Ed: The troubling rise of for-profit colleges in the new economy. New York: The New Press.

  • DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckel, P. D. (2008). Mission diversity and the tension between prestige and effectiveness: an overview of US higher education. Higher Education Policy, 21(2), 175–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elsner, P. A., Boggs, G. R., & Irwin, J. T. (Eds.). (2008). Global development of community colleges, technical colleges, and further education programs. Washington, DC: Community College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairweather, J. S. (1993). Faculty reward structures: Toward institutional and professional homogenization. Research in Higher Education, 34, 603–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Florida, R. (2002). The rise of the creative class: and how it’s transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gandara, D., & Rutherford, A. (2018). Mitigating unintended impacts? The effects of premiums for underserved populations in performance-funding policies for higher education. Research in Higher Education, 59(6), 681–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goddard, J., Coombes, M., Kempton, L., & Vallance, P. (2014). Universities as anchor institutions in cities in a turbulent funding environment: vulnerable institutions and vulnerable places in England. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 7, 307–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldin, C., & Katz, L. F. (2011). Putting the Co in education: Timing, reasons, and consequences of college coeducation from 1835 to the present. Journal of Human Capital, 5(4), 377-417.

  • Harris, M. S. (2013). Understanding institutional diversity in American higher education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, M. S., & Holley, K. A. (2016). Universities as anchor institutions: economic and social potential for urban development. In M. B. Paulsen (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (pp. 393–440). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Huisman, J. (1995). Differentiation, diversity and dependency in higher education. Utrecht: Lemma.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huisman, J. (1998). Differentiation and diversity in higher education systems. Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, 13, 75–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huisman, J., & Morphew, C. C. (1998). Centralization and diversity: evaluating the effects of government policies in the U.S. and Dutch higher education. Higher Education Policy, 11(1), 3–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huisman, J., Kaiser, F., & Vossensteyn, H. (2000). Floating foundations of higher education policy. Higher Education Quarterly, 54(3), 217–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huisman, J., Meek, V. L., & Wood, F. (2007). Institutional diversity in higher education: a cross-national and longitudinal analysis. Higher Education Quarterly, 61(7), 563–577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huisman, J., Lepori, B., Seeber, M., Frolich, N., & Scordato, L. (2015). Measuring institutional diversity across higher education systems. Research Evaluation, 24(4), 369–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraatz, M. S. (1998). Learning by association? Interorganizational networks and adaptation to environmental change. Academy of Management Journal, 41(6), 621–643.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang, D. W. (2000). Similarities and differences: Measuring diversity and selecting peers in higher education. Higher Education, 39(1), 93–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leslie, L. L., & Rhoades, G. (1995). Rising administrative costs: seeking explanations. The Journal of Higher Education, 66(2), 187–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liefner, I. (2003). Funding, resource allocation, and performance in higher education systems. Higher Education, 46(4), 469–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1976). Ambiguity and choice in organizations. Bergen: Universitetsforlaget.

  • Marginson, S. (2011). Higher education and public good. Higher Education Quarterly, 65(4), 411–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClure, K. R., & Titus, M. A. (2018). Spending up the ranks? The relationship between striving for prestige and adminstrative expenditures at U.S. public research universities. The Journal of Higher Education, 89(6), 961–987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meek, V. L. (1991). The transformation of Australian higher education from binary to unitary system. Higher Education, 21(4), 461–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mettler, S. (2014). Degrees of inequality: How the politics of higher education sabotaged the American dream. New York: Basic Books.

  • Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. W., Scott, W. R., & Deal, T. E. (1981). Institutional and technical sources of organizational structure: explaining the structure of educational organizations. In H. D. Stein (Ed.), Organization and the human services (pp. 151–178). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morphew, C. C. (2000). Institutional diversity, program acquisition and faculty members: examining academic drift at a new level. Higher Education Policy, 13(1), 55–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morphew, C. C. (2009). Conceptualizing change in the institutional diversity of U.S. colleges and universities. The Journal of Higher Education, 80(3), 243–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morphew, C. C., & Huisman, J. (2002). Using institutional theory to reframe research on academic drift. Higher Education in Europe, 27(4), 492–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neave, G. (1979). Academic drift: some views from Europe. Studies in Higher Education, 4(2), 143–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, C. (1988). The collective strategy framework: an application to competing predictions of isomorphism. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33(4), 543–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riesman, D. (1956). Constraint and variety in American education. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosinger, K., Taylor, B. J., Coco, L., & Slaughter, S. (2016). Organizational segmentation and the prestige economy: deprofessionalization in high- and low-resource departments. Journal of Higher Education, 87(1), 27–54.

  • Ruef, M., & Scott, W. R. (1998). A multidimensional model of organizational legitimacy: Hospital survival in changing institutional environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(4), 877–904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santoalha, A., Biscaia, R., & Teixeira, P. (2018). Higher education and its contribution to a diverse regional supply of human capital: does the binary/unitary divide matters? Higher Education, 75(2), 209–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. R. (1987). Organizations: rational, natural and open systems (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. R., & Biag, M. (2016). The changing ecology of U.S. higher education: an organizational field perspective. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 46, 25–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stachowiak, K., Pinheiro, R., Sedini, C., & Vaattovaara, M. (2013). Policies aimed at strengthening ties between universities and cities. In S. Musterd & Z. Kovacs (Eds.), Place-making and policies for competitive cities (pp. 263–291). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stadtman, V. A. (1980). Academic adaptations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teichler, U. (2008). Diversification? Trends and explanations of the shape and size of higher education. Higher Education, 56, 349–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tierney, W. G., & Hentschke, G. C. (2007). New players, different game: understanding the rise of for-profit colleges and universities. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toma, J. D., Dubrow, G., & Hartley, M. (2005). The uses of institutional culture: strengthening identification and building brand equity in higher education (Vol. 31). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trow, M. (1979). Aspects of diversity in American higher education. In H. J. Gans, N. Glazer, J. R. Gusfield, & C. Jencks (Eds.), On the making of Americans: Essays in honor of David Riesman. Camden: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Senate. (2012). For profit higher education: The failure to safeguard the federal investment and ensure student success. US Government Printing Office

  • van Vught, F. A. (2007). Diversity and differentiation in higher education systems. Paper presented at the Higher Education in the 21st Century - Diversity of Missions, Dublin.

  • van Vught, F. A. (2009). Diversity and differentiation in higher education. In F. A. van Vught (Ed.), Mapping the higher education landscape: Towards a European classification of higher education (pp. 1–16). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zha, Q. (2009). Diversification or homogenization in higher education: a global allomorphism perspective. Higher Education in Europe, 34(3–4), 459–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Southern Methodist University, Dallas, USA

    Michael S. Harris & Molly K. Ellis

Authors
  1. Michael S. Harris
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Molly K. Ellis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael S. Harris.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Harris, M.S., Ellis, M.K. Measuring changes in institutional diversity: the US context. High Educ 79, 345–360 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00413-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00413-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation