Do global norms matter? The new logics of engineering accreditation in Canadian universities
New institutionalism predicts a global convergence in how higher education is organized. This convergence might be expected to intensify in professional education given accreditation requirements of professional bodies. Engineering presents an opportunity to study how international mobility agreements facilitate the development and normative diffusion of global norms in accreditation. This paper investigates how changing logics of accreditation influence the academic organization of engineering schools in Canada. Using three case studies of Canadian universities, we show how regulative and normative institutional pressures influence decisions by engineering schools to take visible action to demonstrate their conformity to global norms, while still pursuing local missions. Our findings contribute to understanding the complex mediation processes between professions and universities, and they represent a critique to dominant rationalist perspectives on quality assurance mechanisms in higher education.
KeywordsNeo-institutionalism Sociology of professions Engineering Accreditation Governance
- Abbott, A. (1988). The system of professions: An essay on the division of expert labor. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Abbott, A. (2002). The disciplines and the future. In S. G. Brint (Ed.), The future of the city of intellect: the changing American university (pp. 205–230).Google Scholar
- Brennan, R. W., & Hugo, R. J. (2010). The CDIO syllabus and outcomes-based assessment: a case study of a Canadian mechanical engineering program. Proceedings of the 6th International CDIO Conference, École Polytechnique, Montréal, 15–18.Google Scholar
- Briggs, C. L., Stark, J. S., & Rowland-Poplawski, J. (2003). How do we know a “continuous planning” academic program when we see one? The Journal of Higher Education, 74(4), 361–385.Google Scholar
- Canadian Engineering Accreditation Board. (2015). 2015 accreditation criteria and procedures. Retrieved from Engineers Canada website: https://engineerscanada.ca/sites/default/files/Accreditation_Criteria_Procedures_2015.pdf.
- Case, J. M. (2016). The historical evolution of engineering degrees: competing stakeholders, contestation over ideas, and coherence across national borders. European Journal of Engineering Education, 1–13.Google Scholar
- Cloutier, G., Hugo, R., & Sellens, R. (2010a). Mapping the relationship between the CDIO syllabus and the 2008 CEAB graduate attributes. Proceedings of the 6th International CDIO Conference, École Polytechnique, Montréal.Google Scholar
- Cloutier, G. M., Sellens, R. W., Hugo, R. J., Camarero, R., & Fortin, C. (2010b). Outcomes assessment and curriculum improvement through the cyclical review of results—a model to satisfy CEAB-2009 accreditation requirements. Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association.Google Scholar
- Crawley, E. F. (2001). The CDIO Syllabus: a statement of goals for undergraduate engineering education. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
- Crawley, E. F., Malmqvist, J., Lucas, W. A., & Brodeur, D. R. (2011). The CDIO Syllabus v2. 0. An updated statement of goals for engineering education. Proceedings of 7th International CDIO Conference, Copenhagen, Denmark.Google Scholar
- Divall, C. (1994). Education for design and production: professional organization, employers, and the study of chemical engineering in British universities, 1922-1976. Baltimore: Technology and Culture.Google Scholar
- Downey, G., & Lucena, J. C. (2007). Globalization, diversity, leadership, and problem definition in engineering education. 1st International Conference on Engineering Education Research, p 22–24.Google Scholar
- Engineers Canada. (2018). AU Task Force report to Engineers Canada (p. 38) [Task Force Report]. Retrieved from Engineers Canada website: https://engineerscanada.ca/sites/default/files/accreditation/Report-of-the-AU-Task-Force-FINAL-EN.pdf.
- Faculty of Applied Science and Engineering. (2014). Core Curriculum Review Task Force—final report (p. 76). Retrieved from University of Toronto website: http://www.engineering.utoronto.ca/files/2015/02/07-TF-Core-Curriculum-Review-Final-Report.pdf.
- Frank, B., Fostaty-Young, S., McCahan, S., Wolf, P., Ostafichuck, P., Watts, K. C., & Saleh, N. (2011). Engineering graduate attribute development (EGAD) project. Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association. Retrieved from http://queens.scholarsportal.info/ojs/index.php/PCEEA/article/view/3566.
- Frank, B., Strong, D., Sellens, R., & Clapham, L. (2013). Progress with the professional spine: a four-year engineering design and practice sequence. Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, 19(1) Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.7158/D12-016.2013.19.1.
- Halliday, T. C. (1985). Knowledge mandates: collective influence by scientific, normative and syncretic professions. British Journal of Sociology, 421–447.Google Scholar
- Hanrahan, H. (2008). The Washington Accord: history, development, status and trajectory. 7th ASEE Global Colloquium on Engineering Education, 19–23.Google Scholar
- Hanrahan, H. (2009). Toward consensus global standards for quality assurance of engineering programmes. In Engineering education quality assurance (pp. 51–71). Springer.Google Scholar
- Harvey, L., & Mason, S. (1995). The role of professional bodies in higher education quality monitoring. Birmingham: QHE, Centre for Research into Quality.Google Scholar
- International Engineering Alliance. (2015). Best practices in accreditation of engineering education: an exemplar (p. 15). Retrieved from International Engineering Alliance website: http://www.ieagreements.org/assets/Uploads/Documents/Policy/Best-Prct-Full-Doc.pdf.
- Kaupp, J. (2012). A comparison of institutional approaches to CEAB graduate attribute requirements. Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association. Presented at the Winnipeg, MB. Winnipeg, MB.Google Scholar
- Kaupp, J., & Frank, B. (2017). EGAD national snapshot survey: change, progress and improvement. Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association. Presented at the Canadian Engineering Education Association Annual Conference, Halifax, NS. Retrieved from https://queens.scholarsportal.info/ojs-archive/index.php/PCEEA/article/view/6503.
- Larson, M. S. (1977). The rise of professionalism: a sociological analysis. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Lennon, M. C., & Frank, B. (2014). Learning outcomes assessments in a decentralised environment: the Canadian case. In H. Coates (Ed.), Higher education learning outcomes assessment: International perspectives (pp. 89–112). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
- Malmqvist, J., Hugo, R., & Kjellberg, M. (2015). A survey of CDIO implementation globally—effects on educational quality. Proc. 11th International CDIO Conference, Chengdu University of Information Technology, Chengdu, Sichuan, PR China.Google Scholar
- Millard, J. R. (1988). The master spirit of the age: Canadian engineers and the politics of professionalism (pp. 1887–1922). University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
- Patil, A., & Gray, P. (Eds.). (2009). Engineering education quality assurance: a global perspective. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- Schwarz, S., & Westerheijden, D. F. (Eds.). (2004). Accreditation and evaluation in the European Higher Education Area. Retrieved from http://www.springer.com/gp/book/9781402027963.
- Scott, W. R. (2005). Institutional theory: contributing to a theoretical research program. Great Minds in Management: the Process of Theory Development, 37, 460–484.Google Scholar
- Scott, W. R. (2008b). Institutions and organizations: ideas and interests. SAGE.Google Scholar
- Suddaby, R., & Muzio, D. (2015). Theoretical perspectives on the professions. In B. Hinings (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of professional service firms (pp. 1–29). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- University of Toronto Faculty of Applied Science and Engineering. (2017). Manual of procedures for the Undergraduate Curriculum Committee (p. 11). Retrieved from University of Toronto website: http://www.engineering.utoronto.ca/files/2017/12/UCC-Manual-appd-Dec-12-2017-FC.pdf.
- Yin, R. K. (2013). Case study research (5th ed.). Los Angeles: Sage Publications.Google Scholar