Skip to main content

Students’ university aspirations and attainment grouping in secondary schools

Abstract

International evidence shows that students from more disadvantaged backgrounds are less likely to attend university. We examine the potential link between university aspiration and secondary schools’ attainment grouping practices (tracking/setting). Modelling of longitudinal student questionnaires (N = 6680) completed in England suggests that there is a slight cumulative association between students’ university aspirations and their set placement. Interestingly, we find that students’ self-confidence predicts university aspirations over and above both prior aspirations and attainment. Our findings suggest that to improve our understanding of students’ university aspirations it is crucial to take account of factors other than just prior attainment. The concept of capacity to aspire emphasises the multiplicity of factors involved in enabling or hindering aspirations for university, and their interaction over time. We argue that universities have an important role in realising more socially just patterns in higher education participation through outreach work that can enhance students’ capacity to aspire to university.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Notes

  1. 1.

    Year 7 students are aged 11–12; Year 8 students 12–13

  2. 2.

    Phase of education when pupils are aged 7–11

References

  1. Altbach, P., Reisberg, L., & Rumbley, L. (2009). Trends in global higher education. In Tracking an academic revolution. Paris: Unesco.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Anders, J. (2012). The link between household income, university applications and university attendance. Fiscal Studies, 33, 185–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Anders, J. (2017). The influence of socioeconomic status on changes in young people’s expectations of applying to university. Oxford Review of Education, 43(4), 381–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Appadurai, A. (2004). The capacity to aspire: culture and terms of recognition. In R. Vijayendra & M. Walton (Eds.), Culture and public action (pp. 59–84). Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Archer, L., Hollingworth, S., & Halsall, A. (2007). University’s not for me—I’m a Nike Person’: urban, working-class young people’s negotiations of style’, identity and educational engagement. Sociology, 41(2), 219–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Archer, L., DeWitt, J., & Wong, B. (2014). Spheres of influence: what shapes young people’s aspirations at age 12/13 and what are the implications for education policy? Journal of Education Policy, 29(1), 58–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Archer, L., Francis, B., Miller, S., Taylor, B., Tereshchenko, A., Connolly, P., et al. (2018). The symbolic violence of setting: a Bourdieusian analysis of mixed methods data on secondary students’ views about setting. British Educational Research Journal, 44(1), 119–140.

  8. Ball, S. (2010). New class inequalities in education: why education policy may be looking in the wrong place! Education, civil society and social class. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 30(3/4), 155–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ball, S., Davies, J., David, M., & Reay, D. (2002). ‘Classification’ and ‘judgement’: social class and the ‘cognitive structures’ of choice of higher education. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 23(1), 51–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Berends, M. (1995). Educational stratification and students’ social bonding to school. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 16(3), 327–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Berrington, A., Roberts, S., & Tammes, P. (2016). Educational aspirations among UK young teenagers: exploring the role of gender, class and ethnicity. British Educational Research Journal, 42(5), 729–755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Boaler, J., Wiliam, D., & Brown, M. (2000). Students’ experiences of ability grouping – disaffection, polarisation and the construction of failure. British Educational Research Journal, 26(5), 631–648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bok, J. (2010). The capacity to aspire to higher education: ‘It’s like making them do a play without a script’. Critical Studies in Education, 51(2), 163–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bowden, M., & Doughney, J. (2010). Socio-economic status, cultural diversity and the aspirations of secondary students in the western suburbs of Melbourne, Australia. Higher Education, 59, 115–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Campbell, L., & McKendrick, J. (2017). Beyond aspiration: deploying the capability approach to tackle the under-representation in higher education of young people from deprived communities. Studies in Continuing Education, 39(2), 120–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chowdry, H., Crawford, C., Dearden, L., Goodman, A., & Vignoles, A. (2010). Widening participation in higher education: analysis using linked administrative data. London: Institute for Fiscal Studies.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Dalby, D., & Noyes, A. (2016). Locating mathematics within post-16 vocational education in England. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 68(1), 70–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Davies, P., Qiu, T., & Davies, N. (2014). Cultural and human capital, information and higher education choices. Journal of Education Policy, 29(6), 804–825.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Dunne, M., Humphreys, S., Sebba, J., Dyson, A., Gallannaugh, F., & Muijs, D. (2007). Effective teaching and learning for pupils in low attaining groups. London: DCSF.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Francis, B., Archer, L., Hodgen, J., Pepper, D., Taylor, B., & Travers, M.-C. (2017a). Exploring the relative lack of impact of research on ‘ability grouping’ in England: a discourse analytic account. Cambridge Journal of Education, 1–17.

  21. Francis, B., Connelly, P., Archer, L., Hodgen, J., Mazenod, A., Taylor, B., Tereshchenko, A., & Pepper, D. (2017b). Attainment grouping as self-fulfilling prophesy? A mixed methods exploration of self-confidence and set level among year 7 students. International Journal of Educational Research, 86, 96–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Furlong, A. (2005). Cultural dimensions of decisions about educational participation among 14-19-year-olds: the parts that Tomlinson doesn’t reach. Journal of Education Policy, 20(3), 379–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Gale, T., & Parker, S. (2015). Calculating student aspiration: bourdieu, spatiality and the politics of recognition. Cambridge Journal of Education, 45(1), 81–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gillborn, D., & Youdell, D. (2000). Rationing education: policy, practice, reform and equity. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Gorard, S., See, B., & Davies, P. (2012). The impact of attitudes and aspirations on educational attainment and participation. York: Joseph Rowntree.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hart, S., Dixon, A., Drummond, M., & McIntyre, D. (2004). Learning without limits. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hartas, D. (2016). Young people’s educational aspirations: psychosocial factors and the home environment. Journal of Youth Studies, 19(9), 1145–1163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kintrea, K., St Clair, R. & Houston, M. (2011). The influence of parents, places and poverty on educational attitudes and aspirations. Joseph Rowntree Foundation. https://www.jrf.org.uk/sites/default/files/jrf/migrated/files/young-people-education-attitudes-full.pdf Accessed 10 May 2018.

  29. Kutnick, P., Sebba, J., Blatchford, P., Galton, M., Thorp, J., MacIntyre, H., & Berdondini, L. (2005). The effects of pupil grouping: literature review. London: DfES.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Lehmann, W. (2009). University as vocational education: working-class students’ expectations for university. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 30(2), 137–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Mangan, J., Hughes, A., Davies, P., & Slack, K. (2010). Fair access, achievement and geography: explaining the association between social class and students’ choice of university. Studies in Higher Education, 35(3), 335–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Mazenod, A., Miller, S., Francis B., Archer L., Hodgen, J., Taylor, B. & Tereshchenko, A. (forthcoming). Liking, loving or loathing? Attainment grouping and student liking for school.

  33. McMahon, S., Harwood, V., & Hickey-Moody, A. (2016). ‘Students that just hate school wouldn’t go’: Educationally disengaged and disadvantaged young people’s talk about university education. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 37(8), 1109–1128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Oakes, J. (1985). Keeping track: How schools structure inequality (2nd ed.). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  35. OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 results: what makes schools successful? Resources, policies and practices (Volume IV), PISA, OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/keyfindings/pisa-2012-results-volume-IV.pdf Accessed 1 March 2018.

  36. Parsons, S., & Hallam, I. (2014). The impact of streaming on attainment at age seven: evidence from the millennium cohort study. Oxford Review of Education, 40(5), 567–589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Perna, L. & Titus, M. (2005). The relationship between parental involvement as social capital and college enrollment: an examination of racial/ethnic group differences. Retrieved from hp://repository.upenn.edu/gse_pubs/14.

  38. Santelices, M., Horn, C., & Catalán, X. (2017). Institution-level admissions initiatives in Chile: enhancing equity in higher education? Studies in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2017.1398722.

  39. Smith, L. (2011). Experiential ‘hot’ knowledge and its influence on low-SES students’ capacities to aspire to higher education. Critical Studies in Education, 52(2), 165–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Snijders, T., & Bosker, R. (2012). Multilevel analysis: an introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling (2nd ed.). London: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Taylor, B., Francis, B., Archer, L., Hodgen, J., Pepper, D., Tereshchenko, A., & Travers, M.-C. (2016). Factors deterring schools from mixed attainment teaching practice. Pedagogy, Culture & Society., 25(3), 327–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Taylor, B., Francis, B., Craig, N., Archer, L., Hodgen, J., Mazenod, A., Tereshchenko, A., & Pepper, D. (2018). Why is it difficult for schools to establish equitable practices in allocating students to attainment ‘sets’? British Journal of Educational Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2018.1424317.

  43. Tomaszwewski, W., Perales, F., & Xiang, N. (2017). Career guidance, school experiences and the university participation of young people from low socio-economic backgrounds. International Journal of Educational Research, 85, 11–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Venezia, A., & Kirst, M. (2005). Inequitable opportunities: how current education systems and policies undermine the chances for student persistence and success in college. Educational Policy, 19(2), 283–307. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904804274054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Whitty, G., Hayton, A., & Tang, S. (2015). Who you know, what you know and knowing the ropes: a review of evidence about access to higher education institutions in England. Review of Education, 3(1), 27–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Zipin, L., Sellar, S., Brennan, M., & Gale, T. (2015). Educating for futures in marginalized regions: a sociological framework for rethinking and researching aspirations. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 47(3), 227–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the contribution of the wider Best Practice in Grouping Students team and Dr. Richard Sheldrake.

We would also like to thank the two anonymous referees for their helpful comments.

Funding details

This work was supported by a grant from the Education Endowment Foundation.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna Mazenod.

Ethics declarations

Disclosure statement

There are no conflicts of interest relating to the research reported in this article.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 19 kb)

ESM 2

(DOCX 20 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mazenod, A., Hodgen, J., Francis, B. et al. Students’ university aspirations and attainment grouping in secondary schools. High Educ 78, 511–527 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0355-x

Download citation

Keywords

  • University aspirations
  • Capacity to aspire
  • Setting
  • Tracking
  • Student characteristics
  • Social inequality