Advertisement

Teaching-focused social networks among college faculty: exploring conditions for the development of social capital

  • Ross J. Benbow
  • Changhee Lee
Article

Abstract

Scholars have long recognized that teachers’ social interactions play an important role in their learning and professional development. Still, while a growing body of research shows that teaching-focused social ties can give precollege educators access to valuable information, knowledge, and advice—or “social capital”—that improves professional practice and student learning, empirical, mixed methods studies on the phenomenon in the higher education sector are rare, and few investigate what conditions are necessary for these social ties to develop among college instructors. Focusing on college faculty in 17 associate- and baccalaureate-level institutions in one U.S. city, this study uses survey and interview data to explore the connections between structural and positional educator characteristics and the “social networks,” or compilations of social ties, in which faculty reported discussing teaching. Regression analyses of survey responses (n = 244) indicate that fewer years of teaching experience, the time faculty take preparing to teach, discipline, and institution type are correlated with social network dimensions linked to improved professional practice. An inductive analysis of interview data from a subset of faculty (n = 22) supplements survey findings with descriptions of how teaching experience, organizational support, and other factors constrain and reinforce the development of teaching-focused social ties. Results confirm and extend prior research indicating that the development of teaching-focused social networks and the accrual of ties linked to social capital demand faculty and organizational investment. Findings also suggest that leaders hoping to foster beneficial ties should tailor instructional initiatives to more closely align with faculty experience and time commitments.

Keywords

Social networks Higher education Faculty Professional development Mixed methods Social capital 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Drs. Matthew Hora, Kelly Norris Martin, Bailey Smolarek, and Benjamin Zwickl for their data collection efforts. We would also like to thank Dr. Joseph Ferrare, Dr. Hugo Horta, and three anonymous reviewers for providing thoughtful insights and suggestions on earlier versions of this manuscript.

Funding information

This work was supported by the National Science Foundation (Award # 1561686).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ambler, T., Harvey, M., & Cahir, J. (2016). University academics’ experiences of learning through mentoring. The Australian Educational Researcher, 43(5), 609–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Austin, A. E., & Sorcinelli, M. D. (2013). The future of faculty development: where are we going? New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2013(133), 85–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baker-Doyle, K. J., & Yoon, S. A. (2011). In search of practitioner-based social capital: a social network analysis tool for understanding and facilitating teacher collaboration in a US-based STEM professional development program. Professional Development in Education, 37(1), 75–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  5. Borgatti, S. P., & Halgin, D. S. (2011). On network theory. Organization Science, 22(5), 1168–1181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Johnson, J. C. (2013). Analyzing social networks. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  7. Borko, H., & Putnam, R. (1995). Expanding a teachers’ knowledge base: a cognitive psychological perspective on professional development. In T. Guskey & M. Huberman (Eds.), Professional development in education: new paradigms and practices (pp. 35–66). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). New York: Greenwood.Google Scholar
  9. Burt, R. S. (1984). Network items and the general social survey. Social Networks, 6(4), 293–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Burt, R. S. (2000). The network structure of social capital. Research in Organizational Behavior, 22, 345–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Burt, R. S. (2003). The social structure of competition. Networks in the Knowledge Economy, 13–56.Google Scholar
  13. Burt, R. S. (2004). Structural holes and good ideas. American Journal of Sociology, 110(2), 349–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Carolan, B. V. (2013). Social network analysis and education: Theory, methods & applications. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  15. Cela, K. L., Sicilia, M. A., & Sanchez, S. (2015). Social network analysis in e-learning environments: a preliminary systematic review. Educational Psychology Review, 27, 219–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  17. Coburn, C. E., & Russell, J. L. (2008). District policy and teachers’ social networks. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 30(3), 203–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  19. Crossley, N., Bellotti, E., Edwards, G., Everett, M. G., Koskinen, J., & Tranmer, M. (2015). Social network analysis for ego-nets. Thousand Oaks: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Daly, A. J., Moolenaar, N. M., Bolivar, J. M., & Burke, P. (2010). Relationships in reform: the role of teachers’ social networks. Journal of Educational Administration, 48(3), 359–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. De Janasz, S. C., & Sullivan, S. E. (2004). Multiple mentoring in academe: developing the professorial network. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 64(2), 263–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: a restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educational process. Lexington, MA: Health, 35(64), 690–698.Google Scholar
  23. Fleming, S. S., Goldman, A. W., Correli, S. J., & Taylor, C. J. (2016). Settling in: the role of individual and departmental tactics in the development of new faculty networks. The Journal of Higher Education, 87(4), 544–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fletcher, J. A. (2018). Peer observation of teaching: a practical tool in higher education. The Journal of Faculty Development, 32(1), 51–64.Google Scholar
  25. Freeman, L. C., Roeder, D., & Mulholland, R. R. (1979). Centrality in social networks: II. Experimental results. Social Networks, 2(2), 119–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. García, L. M., & Roblin, N. P. (2008). Innovation, research and professional development in higher education: learning from our own experience. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(1), 104–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gargiulo, M., & Benassi, M. (2000). Trapped in your own net? Network cohesion, structural holes, and the adaptation of social capital. Organization Science, 11(2), 183–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gast, I., Schildkamp, K., & Van Der Veen, J. T. (2017). Team-based professional development interventions in higher education: a systematic review. Review of Educational Research, 87(4), 736–767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gehrke, S., & Kezar, A. (2017). The roles of STEM faculty communities of practice in institutional and departmental reform in higher education. American Educational Research Journal, 54(5), 803–833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  31. Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Green, W., Hibbins, R., Houghton, L., & Ruutz, A. (2013). Reviving praxis: stories of continual professional learning and practice architectures in a faculty-based teaching community of practice. Oxford Review of Education, 39(2), 247–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Grunspan, D. Z., Wiggins, B. L., & Goodreau, S. M. (2014). Understanding classrooms through social network analysis: a primer for social network analysis in education research. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 13(2), 167–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Halgin, D. S., & Borgatti, S. P. (2012). An introduction to personal network analysis and tie churn statistics using E-NET. Connections, 32(1), 37–48.Google Scholar
  35. Hammersley-Fletcher, L., & Orsmond, P. (2005). Reflecting on reflective practices within peer observation. Studies in Higher Education, 30(2), 213–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Harwood, T., & Clarke, J. (2006). Grounding continuous professional development (CPD) in teaching practice. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 43(1), 29–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hatton, N., & Smith, D. (1995). Reflection in teacher education: towards definition and implementation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11(1), 33–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Heldens, H., Bakx, A., & Den Brok, P. (2015). Teacher educators’ collaboration in subject departments: collaborative activities and social relations. Educational Research and Evaluation, 21(7–8), 515–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hilliard, A. T. (2012). Practices and value of a professional learning community in higher education. Contemporary Issues in Education Research, 5(2), 71–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hollstein, B. (2014). Mixed methods social network research: an introduction. In S. Domínguez & B. Hollstein (Eds.), Mixed methods social networks research: design and applications (pp. 3–34). Cambridge: University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Houghton, L., Ruutz, A., Green, W., & Hibbins, R. (2015). I just do not have time for new ideas: resistance, resonance and micro-mobilisation in a teaching community of practice. Higher Education Research & Development, 34(3), 527–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hubball, H., Collins, J., & Pratt, D. (2005). Enhancing reflective teaching practices: implications for faculty development programs. The Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 35(3), 57.Google Scholar
  43. Jan, S. K. (2018). Identifying online communities of inquiry in higher education using social network analysis. Research in Learning Technology, 26, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Jordan, K. (2016, May). Academics’ online connections: characterising the structure of personal networks on academic social networking sites and Twitter. Paper presented at the Tenth International Conference on Networked Learning, Lancaster, UK, Retrieved from http://www.lancaster.ac.uk/fss/organisations/netlc/abstracts/pdf/P45.pdf.
  45. Kezar, A., Gehrke, S., & Bernstein-Sierra, S. (2017). Designing for success in STEM communities of practice: philosophy and personal interactions. The Review of Higher Education, 40(2), 217–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kilduff, M., & Krackhardt, D. (1994). Bringing the individual back in: A structural analysis of the internal market for reputation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 37(1), 87–108.Google Scholar
  47. Kitchen, J., Ciuffetelli Parker, D., & Gallagher, T. (2008). Authentic conversation as faculty development: establishing a self-study group in a faculty of education. Studying Teacher Education, 4(2), 157–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Knight, P., Tait, J., & Yorke, M. (2006). The professional learning of teachers in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 31(03), 319–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Krackhardt, D., & Stern, R. N. (1988). Informal networks and organizational crises: an experimental simulation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 51(2), 123–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lawless, J. F. (1987). Negative binomial and mixed Poisson regression. Canadian Journal of Statistics, 15(3), 209–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Leslie, D. W. (2002). Resolving the dispute: Teaching is academe’s core value. The Journal of Higher Education, 73(1), 49–73.Google Scholar
  52. Lieberman, A., & Miller, L. (1999). Teachers: transforming their world and their work. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  53. Lin, N. (1999). Building a network theory of social capital. Connections, 22(1), 28–51.Google Scholar
  54. Lin, N. (2001). Social capital: a theory of social structure and action. Cambridge: University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Lin, N., Ye, X., & Ensel, W. M. (1999). Social support and depressed mood: a structural analysis. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 344–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Little, J. W. (1982). Norms of collegiality and experimentation: workplace conditions of school success. American Educational Research Journal, 19(3), 325–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Louis, K. S., Marks, H. M., & Kruse, S. (1996). Teachers’ professional community in restructuring schools. American Educational Research Journal, 33(4), 757–798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Manouchehri, A. (2002). Developing teaching knowledge through peer discourse. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(6), 715–737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Marin, A., & Hampton, K. N. (2007). Simplifying the personal network name generator: alternatives to traditional multiple and single name generators. Field Methods, 19(2), 163–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Marsden, P. V. (1987). Core discussion networks of Americans. American Sociological Review, 52(6), 122–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Martin, G. A., & Double, J. M. (1998). Developing higher education teaching skills through peer observation and collaborative reflection. Innovations in Education and Training International, 35(2), 161–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. McDonald, J., & Cater-Steel, A. (Eds.). (2016). Communities of practice: Facilitating social learning in higher education. Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar
  63. McLaughlin, M. W., & Talbert, J. E. (2001). Professional communities and the work of high school teaching. Chicago: University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  65. Milardo, R. M. (1992). Comparative methods for delineating social networks. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 9(3), 447–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Milem, J. F., Berger, J. B., & Dey, E. L. (2000). Faculty time allocation: a study of change over twenty years. The Journal of Higher Education, 71(4), 454–475.Google Scholar
  67. Moolenaar, N. M. (2012). A social network perspective on teacher collaboration in schools: theory, methodology, and applications. American Journal of Education, 119(1), 7–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Moolenaar, N. M., Sleegers, P. J., & Daly, A. J. (2012). Teaming up: linking collaboration networks, collective efficacy, and student achievement. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(2), 251–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Moolenaar, N. M., Karsten, S., Sleegers, P. J., & Daly, A. J. (2014). Linking social networks and trust at multiple levels: examining Dutch elementary schools. In D. Van Maele, P. B. Forsyth, & M. Van Houtte (Eds.), Trust and school life (pp. 207–228). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Morrison, E. W. (2002). Newcomers’ relationships: the role of social network ties during socialization. Academy of Management Journal, 45(6), 1149–1160.Google Scholar
  71. Neumann, R. (2001). Disciplinary differences and university teaching. Studies in Higher Education, 26(2), 135–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Newman, M. E. (2001). The structure of scientific collaboration networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98(2), 404–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Niehaus, E., & O’Meara, K. (2015). Invisible but essential: the role of professional networks in promoting faculty agency in career advancement. Innovative Higher Education, 40(2), 159–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Occupational Information Network. (2016). O*Net Online. Retrieved from https://www.onetonline.org/.
  75. Pataraia, N., Margaryan, A., Falconer, I., & Littlejohn, A. (2015). How and what do academics learn through their personal networks. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 39(3), 336–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Penuel, W. R., Sun, M., Frank, K. A., & Gallagher, H. A. (2012). Using social network analysis to study how collegial interactions can augment teacher learning from external professional development. American Journal of Education, 119(1), 103–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Pifer, M. J., Baker, V. L., & Lunsford, L. G. (2015). Academic departments as networks of informal learning: faculty development at liberal arts colleges. International Journal for Academic Development, 20(2), 178–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Pil, F. K., & Leana, C. (2009). Applying organizational research to public school reform: the effects of teacher human and social capital on student performance. Academy of Management Journal, 52(6), 1101–1124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Ponjuan, L., Conley, V. M., & Trower, C. (2011). Career stage differences in pre-tenure track faculty perceptions of professional and personal relationships with colleagues. Journal of Higher Education, 82(3), 319–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Portes, A., & Landolt, P. (1996). The downside of social capital. The American Prospect, 94, 18–21.Google Scholar
  81. Quardokus, K., & Henderson, C. (2015). Promoting instructional change: using social network analysis to understand the informal structure of academic departments. Higher Education, 70(3), 315–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Quinlan, K. M., & Åkerlind, G. S. (2000). Factors affecting departmental peer collaboration for faculty development: two cases in context. Higher Education, 40(1), 23–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Reagans, R., & McEvily, B. (2003). Network structure and knowledge transfer: the effects of cohesion and range. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 240–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Rienties, B., & Kinchin, I. (2014). Understanding (in)formal learning in an academic development programme: a social network perspective. Teaching and Teacher Education, 39, 123–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Roblin, N., & Margalef, L. (2013). Learning from dilemmas: teacher professional development through collaborative action and reflection. Teachers and Teaching, 19(1), 18–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Rothwell, J. (2013). The hidden STEM economy. Washington D.C.: Brookings Institute Retrieved from http://www.brookings.edu/research/reports/ 2013/06/10-stem-economyrothwell.Google Scholar
  87. Roxå, T., & Mårtensson, K. (2009a). Significant conversations and significant networks–exploring the backstage of the teaching arena. Studies in Higher Education, 34(5), 547–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Roxå, T., & Mårtensson, K. (2009b). Teaching and learning regimes from within: significant networks as a locus for the social construction of teaching and learning. In C. Kreber (Ed.), The university and its disciplines: teaching and learning within and beyond disciplinary boundaries (pp. 209–218). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  89. Ryan, G. W., & Bernard, H. R. (2003). Techniques to identify themes. Field Methods, 15(1), 85–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Saldaña, J. (2015). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  91. Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action (Vol. 1). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  92. Singell, L. D., & Lillydahl, J. H. (1996). Will changing times change the allocation of faculty time? Journal of Human Resources, 429–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Smither, J. W., London, M., & Reilly, R. R. (2005). Does performance improve following multisource feedback? A theoretical model, meta-analysis, and review of empirical findings. Personnel Psychology, 58(1), 33–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Spillane, J. P., Hopkins, M., & Sweet, T. M. (2015). Intra-and interschool interactions about instruction: exploring the conditions for social capital development. American Journal of Education, 122(1), 71–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Stake, R. E. (2006). Multiple case study analysis. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  96. Street, R. L., Makoul, G., Arora, N. K., & Epstein, R. M. (2009). How does communication heal? Pathways linking clinician–patient communication to health outcomes. Patient Education and Counseling, 74(3), 295–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Supovitz, J., Sirinides, P., & May, H. (2010). How principals and peers influence teaching and learning. Educational Administration Quarterly, 46(1), 31–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Tirado, R., Hernando, Á., & Aguaded, J. I. (2015). The effect of centralization and cohesion on the social construction of knowledge in discussion forums. Interactive Learning Environments, 23(3), 293–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2016, May). Metropolitan and nonmetropolitan area occupational employment and wage estimates. Retrieved from https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oessrcma.htm.
  100. U.S. Census Bureau. (2016). North American Industry Classification System: introduction to NAICS [Webpage]. Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/eos/www/naics/.
  101. Van Waes, S., Van den Bossche, P., Moolenaar, N. M., De Maeyer, S., & Van Petegem, P. (2015). Know-who? Linking faculty’s networks to stages of instructional development. Higher Education, 70(5), 807–826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Van Waes, S., Moolenaar, N. M., Daly, A. J., Heldens, H. H., Donche, V., Van Petegem, P., & Van den Bossche, P. (2016). The networked instructor: the quality of networks in different stages of professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 59, 295–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Van Waes, S., De Maeyer, S., Moolenaar, N. M., Van Petegem, P., & Van den Bossche, P. (2018). Strengthening networks: a social network intervention among higher education teachers. Learning and Instruction, 53, 34–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Veletsianos, G., & Kimmons, R. (2013). Scholars and faculty members’ lived experiences in online social networks. The Internet and Higher Education, 16, 43–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Villena, V. H., Revilla, E., & Choi, T. Y. (2011). The dark side of buyer–supplier relationships: a social capital perspective. Journal of Operations Management, 29(6), 561–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Viskovic, A. (2006). Becoming a tertiary teacher: learning in communities of practice. Higher Education Research & Development, 25(4), 323–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge: University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Wellman, B. (2007). Challenges in collecting personal network data: the nature of personal network analysis. Field Methods, 19(2), 111–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Wieman, C., Perkins, K., & Gilbert, S. (2010). Transforming science education at large research universities: a case study in progress. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 42(2), 6–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Wright, M. C., Assar, N., Kain, E. L., Kramer, L., Howery, C. B., McKinney, K., et al. (2004). Greedy institutions: the importance of institutional context for teaching in higher education. Teaching Sociology, 32(2), 144–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Wisconsin Center for Education ResearchUniversity of Wisconsin-MadisonMadisonUSA

Personalised recommendations