Teaching-focused social networks among college faculty: exploring conditions for the development of social capital
Scholars have long recognized that teachers’ social interactions play an important role in their learning and professional development. Still, while a growing body of research shows that teaching-focused social ties can give precollege educators access to valuable information, knowledge, and advice—or “social capital”—that improves professional practice and student learning, empirical, mixed methods studies on the phenomenon in the higher education sector are rare, and few investigate what conditions are necessary for these social ties to develop among college instructors. Focusing on college faculty in 17 associate- and baccalaureate-level institutions in one U.S. city, this study uses survey and interview data to explore the connections between structural and positional educator characteristics and the “social networks,” or compilations of social ties, in which faculty reported discussing teaching. Regression analyses of survey responses (n = 244) indicate that fewer years of teaching experience, the time faculty take preparing to teach, discipline, and institution type are correlated with social network dimensions linked to improved professional practice. An inductive analysis of interview data from a subset of faculty (n = 22) supplements survey findings with descriptions of how teaching experience, organizational support, and other factors constrain and reinforce the development of teaching-focused social ties. Results confirm and extend prior research indicating that the development of teaching-focused social networks and the accrual of ties linked to social capital demand faculty and organizational investment. Findings also suggest that leaders hoping to foster beneficial ties should tailor instructional initiatives to more closely align with faculty experience and time commitments.
KeywordsSocial networks Higher education Faculty Professional development Mixed methods Social capital
The authors would like to thank Drs. Matthew Hora, Kelly Norris Martin, Bailey Smolarek, and Benjamin Zwickl for their data collection efforts. We would also like to thank Dr. Joseph Ferrare, Dr. Hugo Horta, and three anonymous reviewers for providing thoughtful insights and suggestions on earlier versions of this manuscript.
This work was supported by the National Science Foundation (Award # 1561686).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Baker-Doyle, K. J., & Yoon, S. A. (2011). In search of practitioner-based social capital: a social network analysis tool for understanding and facilitating teacher collaboration in a US-based STEM professional development program. Professional Development in Education, 37(1), 75–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
- Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Johnson, J. C. (2013). Analyzing social networks. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
- Borko, H., & Putnam, R. (1995). Expanding a teachers’ knowledge base: a cognitive psychological perspective on professional development. In T. Guskey & M. Huberman (Eds.), Professional development in education: new paradigms and practices (pp. 35–66). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
- Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). New York: Greenwood.Google Scholar
- Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Burt, R. S. (2003). The social structure of competition. Networks in the Knowledge Economy, 13–56.Google Scholar
- Carolan, B. V. (2013). Social network analysis and education: Theory, methods & applications. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
- Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
- Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: a restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educational process. Lexington, MA: Health, 35(64), 690–698.Google Scholar
- Fletcher, J. A. (2018). Peer observation of teaching: a practical tool in higher education. The Journal of Faculty Development, 32(1), 51–64.Google Scholar
- Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.Google Scholar
- Halgin, D. S., & Borgatti, S. P. (2012). An introduction to personal network analysis and tie churn statistics using E-NET. Connections, 32(1), 37–48.Google Scholar
- Hubball, H., Collins, J., & Pratt, D. (2005). Enhancing reflective teaching practices: implications for faculty development programs. The Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 35(3), 57.Google Scholar
- Jordan, K. (2016, May). Academics’ online connections: characterising the structure of personal networks on academic social networking sites and Twitter. Paper presented at the Tenth International Conference on Networked Learning, Lancaster, UK, Retrieved from http://www.lancaster.ac.uk/fss/organisations/netlc/abstracts/pdf/P45.pdf.
- Kilduff, M., & Krackhardt, D. (1994). Bringing the individual back in: A structural analysis of the internal market for reputation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 37(1), 87–108.Google Scholar
- Leslie, D. W. (2002). Resolving the dispute: Teaching is academe’s core value. The Journal of Higher Education, 73(1), 49–73.Google Scholar
- Lieberman, A., & Miller, L. (1999). Teachers: transforming their world and their work. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
- Lin, N. (1999). Building a network theory of social capital. Connections, 22(1), 28–51.Google Scholar
- McDonald, J., & Cater-Steel, A. (Eds.). (2016). Communities of practice: Facilitating social learning in higher education. Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar
- McLaughlin, M. W., & Talbert, J. E. (2001). Professional communities and the work of high school teaching. Chicago: University Press.Google Scholar
- Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Milem, J. F., Berger, J. B., & Dey, E. L. (2000). Faculty time allocation: a study of change over twenty years. The Journal of Higher Education, 71(4), 454–475.Google Scholar
- Morrison, E. W. (2002). Newcomers’ relationships: the role of social network ties during socialization. Academy of Management Journal, 45(6), 1149–1160.Google Scholar
- Occupational Information Network. (2016). O*Net Online. Retrieved from https://www.onetonline.org/.
- Portes, A., & Landolt, P. (1996). The downside of social capital. The American Prospect, 94, 18–21.Google Scholar
- Roxå, T., & Mårtensson, K. (2009b). Teaching and learning regimes from within: significant networks as a locus for the social construction of teaching and learning. In C. Kreber (Ed.), The university and its disciplines: teaching and learning within and beyond disciplinary boundaries (pp. 209–218). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Saldaña, J. (2015). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
- Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action (Vol. 1). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Stake, R. E. (2006). Multiple case study analysis. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2016, May). Metropolitan and nonmetropolitan area occupational employment and wage estimates. Retrieved from https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oessrcma.htm.
- U.S. Census Bureau. (2016). North American Industry Classification System: introduction to NAICS [Webpage]. Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/eos/www/naics/.