Moving, remaining, and returning: international mobility of doctorate holders in the social sciences and humanities

Abstract

International mobility of doctorate holders is one important dimension of the general phenomenon of internationalization and globalization of research systems, which is supposed to have positive effects on economy and society. Although issues of international mobility for doctorate holders have been largely investigated, there is still relatively little information about the factors affecting those with degrees specifically in the social sciences and humanities (SSH). Considering this, the aim of the current paper is twofold: first, to investigate whether the propensity of a doctorate holder in SSH to experience a period of international mobility during the career is influenced by mobility during the educational stage; second, to examine whether the mobility after doctoral degree affects the choice of doctorates to return to their country of origin, as opposed to remaining abroad, controlling for peculiar aspects of the higher education sector of employment. The results show that international mobility during graduate education and at the moment of choosing the first job on attaining the PhD are important factors influencing the future mobility of doctorate holders in the SSH areas. These same factors also influence the individual’s propensity to diverge (continue abroad) or converge (remain, return) with respect to their initial country of employment. The results of this investigation improve our knowledge about the effects generated by the early choices of individuals, which could support decision-makers in designing instruments addressing the international mobility of doctorate holders and, when relevant, creating the conditions for their return.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

  1. 1.

    The POCARIM dataset consist of a cross section (different Ph.D. holders from different countries). The data are treated as being at one point in time, because we are not able to know when the different job steps actually occurred.

  2. 2.

    We use the Hausman specification test to compare the performance of logit and probit models in the first case, and multinomial logit and multinomial probit models in the other cases. The hypothesis that the probit model is better than the logit model is always rejected.

  3. 3.

    The North-western Europe group includes Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Ireland, the Netherlands, Norway, Switzerland, and the UK. The South-western Europe group includes Greece, Italy, Portugal, and Spain. The Eastern Europe group includes Cyprus, Hungary, Latvia, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, and Turkey. The Extra-European countries group includes Brazil, Canada, China, and the USA.

  4. 4.

    The large countries group includes Brazil, Canada, China, France, Germany, the UK, Italy, Spain, Poland, and Turkey. The small countries group includes Belgium, Cyprus, Denmark, Finland, Hungary, Ireland, the Netherlands, Norway, Latvia, Portugal, Romania, Switzerland, and Slovakia.

  5. 5.

    The other variables considered are not significant in any of the models examined.

References

  1. Ackers, L. (2005). Moving people and knowledge. scientific mobility in the European Union. International Migration, 43(5), 99–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ackers, L, Glill, B. (2008). Moving People and Knowledge. Scientific Mobility in an Enlarging European Union. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

  3. Appelt, S., van Beuzekom, B., Galindo-Rueda, F., de Pinho, R. (2015). Which factors influence the international mobility of research scientists? OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, 2015/02, OECD Publishing, Paris.

  4. Auriol, L. (2010). Careers of doctorate holders: employment and mobility patterns. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, 2010/04, OECD Publishing, Paris.

  5. Auriol, L., Misu, M., Freeman, R. (2013). Careers of doctorate holders: analysis of labour market and mobility indicators. OECD science, technology and industry working papers, 2013/04, OECD Publishing, Paris.

  6. Auriol, L., Misu, T. M., & Galindo-Rueda, F. (2016). Doctorate holders’ labor market and mobility: the academic career as the first choice. In L. Gokberg, N. Shmatko, & L. Auriol (Eds.), The science and technology labor force. The value of doctorate holders and development of professional careers (pp. 51–74). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bastow, S., Dunleavy, P., Tinkler, J. (2014). The Impact of the Social Sciences. Los Angeles; London; New Delhi; Singapore; Washington, DC: SAGE.

  8. Becker, T., & Trowler, P. (2001). Academic tribes and territories. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Braun, D. (2012). Why do scientists migrate? A diffusion model. Minerva, 50(4), 471–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bryła, P. (2015). The impact of international student mobility on subsequent employment and professional career: a large - scale survey among polish former ERASMUS students. Procedia - Social and Behavioural Sciences, 176, 633–641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cañibano, C., & Woolley, R. (2015). Towards a socio-economics of the brain drain and distributed human capital. International Migration, 53(1), 115–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cañibano, C. (2017). Scientific mobility and economic assumptions: from the allocation of scientists to the socioeconomics of network transformation. Science as Culture, 26(4), 505–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Coey, C. (2018). International researcher mobility and knowledge transfer in the social sciences and humanities. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 16(2), 208–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Coey, C., Kupiszewska, D., Kupiszewski, M. (2014). POCARIM policy brief 5: Internationalisation and international mobility in social science and humanities careers. http://usir.salford.ac.uk/34886/ Accessed 24 September 2018.

  15. Crossman, J. E., & Clarke, M. (2010). International experience and graduate employability: stakeholder perceptions on the connection. Higher Education, 59(5), 599–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cruz-Castro, L., Jonkers, K., Sanz-Menéndez, L. (2016). International mobility of Spanish doctorate holders. In L. Gokberg, N. Shmatko, L. Auriol (Eds.), The science and technology labor force. The value of doctorate holders and development of professional careers, (pp. 51–74). Dordrecht: Springer.

  17. Di Pietro, G. (2012). Does studying abroad cause international labor mobility? Evidence from Italy. Economic Letters, 117(3), 632–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Duarte, J., Mendoça, J. (2016). Determinant of career patterns for doctorate holders. In L. Gokberg, N. Shmatko, L. Auriol (Eds.), The Science and Technology Labor Force. The value of doctorate holders and development of professional careers, (pp. 193–229). Dordrecht: Springer.

  19. Enders, J. (2002). Serving many masters: the PhD on the labour market, the everlasting need of inequality, and the premature death of Humboldt. Higher Education, 44(3–4), 493–517.

  20. Franzoni, C., Scellato, G., & Stephen, P. (2012). Foreign-born scientists: mobility patterns for 16 countries. Nature Biotechnology, 30(12), 1250–1253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Franzoni, C., Scellato, G., & Stephan, P. (2014). The mover’s advantage: the superior performance of migrant scientists. Economics Letters, 122(1), 89–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Gaulé, P. (2014). Who comes back and when? Return migration decisions of academic scientists. Economic Letters, 124(3), 461–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Gokberg, L., Shmatko, N., Auriol, L. (Eds.) (2016). The Science and Technology Labor Force. The value of doctorate holders and development of professional career. Dordrecht: Springer.

  24. Guthrie, S., Lichten, C., Corbett, J., Wooding, S. (2017). International mobility of researchers. A review of literature, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif., and Cambridge, UK, https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/research_reports/RR1900/RR1991/RAND_RR1991z1.pdf Accessed 16 September 2018.

  25. Jonkers, K., & Cruz-Castro, L. (2013). Research upon return: the effect of international mobility on scientific ties, production and impact. Research Policy, 42(8), 1366–1377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Jöns, H. (2009). ‘Brain circulation’ and transnational knowledge networks: studying long-term effects of academic mobility to Germany, 1954–2000. Global Networks, 9(3), 315–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kehm, B., Teichler, U. (Eds.) (2013). The academic profession in Europe: new tasks and new challenges. Dordrecht: Springer.

  28. Kogan, M., Teichler, U. (2007). Key challenges to the academic profession. UNESCO Forum on Higher Education Research and Knowledge, INCHER Kassel, Paris and Kassel, https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Ulrich_Teichler/publication/44837369_Key_Challenges_to_the_Academic_Profession/links/0deec52a8e96552893000000/Key-Challenges-to-the-Academic-Profession.pdf, last Accessed 11 December 2017.

  29. Lee, J., & Kim, D. (2010). Brain gain or brain circulation? U.S. doctoral recipients returning to South Korea. Higher Education, 59(5), 627–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. MORE3 Study (2018). Support data collection and analysis concerning mobility patterns and career paths of researchers. Luxembourg: European Commission.

  31. Morettini, L., Primeri, E., Reale, E., Zinilli, A. (2016). Career trajectories of Phd graduates in the social sciences and humanities. In C. Sarrico, P. Teixeira, A. Magalhães, A. Veiga, M. J. Rosa, T. Carvalho (Eds.), Global challenges, national initiatives, and institutional responses. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

  32. Mugabushaka, A. M., Rieder, V., Toma, E. S. (2013). Mobile researchers in European research systems. Insights data of applicants to the European Research Council. Reflets et Perspectives de la vie économique, LII (4), 81–98.

  33. Musselin, C. (2004). Towards a European academic labour market? Some lessons drawn from empirical studies on academic mobility. Higher Education, 48(1), 55–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Nussbaum, M. (2010). Not for profit. Why democracy needs the humanities. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Oosterbeek, H., & Webbink, D. (2011). Does studying abroad induce a brain drain? Economica, 78(310), 347–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Parey, M., & Waldinger, F. (2011). Studying abroad and the effect on international labour market mobility: evidence from the introduction of ERASMUS. The Economic Journal, 121(551), 194–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Reale, E. et al. (2017). A review of literature on evaluating the scientific, social, and political impact of social sciences and humanities research. Research Evaluation, doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvx025.

  38. Rostan, M., Holbe, E.A. (2014). The international mobility of faculty. In F. Huang, M. Finkelstein, M. Rostan, The Internationalization of Academy. Changes, reality and prospects, (pp. 78–104). Dordrecht: Springer.

  39. Scellato, G., Franzoni, C., & Stephan, P. (2015). Migrant scientists and international networks. Research Policy, 44(1), 108–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Schott, T. (1993). World science. Globalization of institutions and participation. Science Technology and Human Values, 18(2), 196–208.

  41. Steijn, B., Need, A., & Gesthuizen, M. (2006). Well begun, half done? Long-term effects of labour market entry in the Netherlands, 1950–2000. Work, Employment and Society, 20(3), 453–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Veugelers, R., & van Bouwel, L. (2015). The effects of international mobility of European researchers: comparing intra-EU and US mobility. Research in Higher Education, 56(4), 360–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Waibel, S., Rüger, H., Ette, A., & Sauer, L. (2017). Career consequences of transnational educational mobility: a systematic literature review. Educational Research Review, 20(February), 81–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Van Der Wende, M. (2015). International academic mobility: towards a concentration of the minds in Europe. European Review, 23(1), 70–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emanuela Reale.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Reale, E., Morettini, L. & Zinilli, A. Moving, remaining, and returning: international mobility of doctorate holders in the social sciences and humanities. High Educ 78, 17–32 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0328-0

Download citation

Keywords

  • Doctorate holders
  • Knowledge circulation
  • International mobility
  • SSH