Advertisement

Higher Education

, Volume 75, Issue 4, pp 625–642 | Cite as

Instructors’ teaching styles: relation with competences, self-efficacy, and commitment in pre-service teachers

  • Antonio González
  • Ángeles Conde
  • Pino Díaz
  • Mar García
  • Carmen Ricoy
Article

Abstract

Instructors’ teaching styles in higher education are an issue of major importance because these interactions affect students’ self-perceptions, involvement, and achievement. This study aimed to test a theoretical model of relations between perceived teaching styles (autonomy support, structure, and control) and competences, self-efficacy, and commitment in pre-service teachers; to assess the invariance of the model in two samples; and to analyze the mediated relations between these variables. Measures were collected from 842 Spanish pre-service teachers. As main research implications, teaching styles predicted acquired competences, competences predicted teaching self-efficacy, and self-efficacy predicted commitment to the profession. This model was equivalent in two samples of childhood and primary education pre-service teachers. Competences and self-efficacy mediated the relationships between variables. As practical implications, this study clearly shows the need for different interventions to enhance adequate instructors’ teaching styles and to foster among novice pre-service teachers the acquisition of professional competences, initial self-efficacy, and a good level of commitment to their profession.

Keywords

Autonomy support Structure Control Competences Self-efficacy 

Supplementary material

10734_2017_160_MOESM1_ESM.docx (28 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 27 kb)

References

  1. Aelterman, N., Vansteenkiste, M., van Keer, H., De Meyer, J., Van den Berghe, L., & Haerens, L. (2013). Development and evaluation of a training on need-supportive teaching in physical education: qualitative and quantitative findings. Teaching and Teacher Education, 29, 64–75. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2012.09.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arbuckle, J. (2013). AMOS 22. User’s guide. Chicago: SmallWaters Corporation.Google Scholar
  3. Assor, A. (2012). Allowing choice and nurturing an inner compass: educational practices supporting students’ need for autonomy. In S. Christenson, A. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 421–439). New York: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baeten, M., Dochy, F., & Struyven, K. (2013). The effects of different learning environments on students’ motivation for learning and their achievement. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 484–501. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.2012.02076.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy. The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
  6. Belmont, M., Skinner, E., Wellborn, J., & Connell, J. (1992). Teacher as Social Context (TASC). Two measures of teacher provision of involvement, structure, and autonomy support (student report), Technical Report. NY: University of Rochester.Google Scholar
  7. Benita, M., Roth, G., & Deci, E. (2014). When are mastery goals more adaptive? It depends on experiences of autonomy support and autonomy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(1), 258–267. doi: 10.1037/a0034007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bresó, E., Schaufeli, W. B., & Salanova, M. (2011). Can a self-efficacy-based intervention decrease burnout, increase engagement, and enhance performance? A quasi-experimental study. Higher Education, 61, 339–355. doi: 10.1007/s10734-010-9334-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bruinsma, M., & Jansen, E. (2010). Is the motivation to become a teacher related to pre-service teachers’ intentions to remain in the profession? European Journal of Teacher Education, 33(2), 185–200. doi: 10.1080/02619760903512927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Byrne, B. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS. Basic concepts, applications, and programming. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Caena, F. (2014a). Comparative glocal perspectives on European teacher education. European Journal of Teacher Education, 37(1), 106–122. doi: 10.1080/02619768.2013.845165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Caena, F. (2014b). Teacher competence framework in Europe: policy-as-discourse and policy-as-practice. European Journal of Education, 49(3), 312–330. doi: 10.1111/ejed.12088.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Caena, F., & Margiotta, U. (2010). European teacher education: a fractal perspective tackling complexity. European Educational Research Journal, 9(3), 317–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chang, T., McKeachie, W., & Lin, Y. (2010). Faculty perceptions of teaching support and teaching efficacy in Taiwan. Higher Education, 59, 207–220. doi: 10.1007/s10734-009-9243-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chesnut, S. R., & Burley, H. (2015). Self-efficacy as a predictor of commitment to the teaching profession: a meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 15, 1–16. doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ciani, K., Sheldon, K., Hilpert, J., & Easter, M. (2011). Antecedents and trajectories of achievement goals: a self-determination perspective. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 223–242. doi: 10.1348/000709910X517399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Coladarci, T. (1992). Teachers’ sense of efficacy and commitment to teaching. Journal of Experimental Education, 60(4), 323–337 http://www.jstor.org/stable/20152340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. De Meyer, J., Tallir, I. B., Soenens, B., Vansteenkiste, M., Aelterman, N., den Berghe, V., et al. (2014). Does observed controlling teaching behavior relate to students’ motivation in physical education? Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(2), 541–554. doi: 10.1037/a0034399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. De Neve, D., Devos, G., & Tuytens, M. (2015). The importance of job resources and self-efficacy for beginning teachers’ professional learning in differentiated instruction. Teaching and Teacher Education, 47, 30–41. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2014.12.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. DeAngelis, K., Wall, A., & Che, J. (2013). The impact of preservice preparation and early career support on novice teachers’ career intentions and decisions. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(4), 338–355. doi: 10.1177/0022487113488945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Eren, A. (2012). Prospective teachers’ future time perspective and professional plans about teaching: the mediating role of academic optimism. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28, 111–123. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2011.09.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. European Commission. (2011a). Literature review teachers’ core competences: requirements and development. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
  23. European Commission. (2011b). Policy approaches to defining and describing teacher competences. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
  24. European Commission. (2013). Supporting teacher competence development for better learning outcomes. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
  25. Feiman-Nemser, S. (2008). Teacher learning. How do teachers learn to teach? In M. Cochran-Smith, S. Feiman-Neimser, D. McIntyre, & K. Demers (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education. Enduring questions in changing contexts (pp. 697–705). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Guay, F., Valois, P., Falardeau, E., & Lessard, V. (2016). Examining the effects of a professional development program on teachers’ pedagogical practices and students’ motivational resources and achievement in written French. Learning and Individual Differences, 45, 291–298. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2015.11.01.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Haerens, L., Aelterman, N., Vansteenkinste, M., Soenens, B., & Van Petergem, S. (2015). Do perceived autonomy support and controlling teaching relate to physical education students’ motivational experiences through unique pathways? Distinguishing between the bright and the dark side of motivation. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 16, 26–38. doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2014.08.013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hambleton, R., & Patsula, L. (1998). Adapting tests for use in multiple languages and cultures. Social Indicators Research, 45, 153–171. doi: 10.1023/A:1006941729637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Holzberger, D., Philipp, A., & Kunter, M. (2013). How teachers’ self-efficacy is related to instructional quality: a longitudinal analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 774–786. doi: 10.1037/a0032198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jang, H., Reeve, J., & Deci, E. (2010). Engaging students in learning activities: it is not autonomy support or structure but autonomy support and structure. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 588–600. doi: 10.1037/a0019682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jang, H., Kim, E. J., & Reeve, J. (2016). Why students become more engaged or more disengaged during the semester: a self-determination theory dual-process model. Learning and Instruction, 43, 27–38. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.01.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Klassen, R., & Tze, V. (2014). Teachers’ self-efficacy, personality, and teaching effectiveness: a meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 12, 56–76. doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2014.06.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kunter, M., Klusmann, U., Baumert, J., Richter, D., Voss, T., & Hachfeld, A. (2013). Professional competence of teachers: effects on instructional quality and student development. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 805–820. doi: 10.1037/a0032583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lamote, C., & Engels, N. (2010). The development of student teachers’ professional identity. European Journal of Teacher Education, 33(1), 3–18. doi: 10.1080/02619760903457735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lechuga, W. M. (2014). A motivation perspective on faculty mentoring: the notion of “non-intrusive” mentoring practices in science and engineering. Higher Education, 68, 909–926. doi: 10.1007/s10734-014-9751-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Liu, H., Liu, J., & Chi, X. (2014). Regulatory mechanisms of self-determination involvement in higher education: assessing Chinese students’ experiences. Higher Education, 67, 51–70. doi: 10.1007/s10734-013-9640-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. McDiarmid, G., & Clevenger-Bright, M. (2008). Rethinking teacher capacity. In M. Cochran-Smith, S. Feiman-Neimser, D. McIntyre, & K. Demers (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education. Enduring questions in changing contexts (pp. 134–156). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  38. McLachlan, S., & Hagger, M. (2010). Effects of an autonomy-supportive intervention on tutor behaviors in a higher education context. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 1204–1121. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2010.01.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Meng, Q., Zhu, C., & Cao, C. (2017). Chinese international students’ social connectedness, social and academic adaptation: the mediating role of global competence. doi: 10.1007/s10734-017-0129-x.Google Scholar
  40. Ministerio de Educación. (2007a). ORDEN ECI/3854/2007, de 27 de diciembre. [Order ECI/3854/2007, of 27 December]. Madrid: BOE.Google Scholar
  41. Ministerio de Educación. (2007b). ORDEN ECI/3857/2007, de 27 de diciembre [Order ECI/3857/2007, of 27 December]. Madrid: BOE.Google Scholar
  42. Moulding, L., Stewart, P., & Dunmeyer, M. (2014). Pre-service teachers’ sense of efficacy: relationship to academic ability, student teaching placement characteristics, and mentor support. Teaching and Teacher Education, 41, 60–66. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2014.03.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mouratidis, A., Vansteenkiste, M., Michou, A., & Lens, W. (2013). Perceived structure and achievement goals as predictors of students’ self-regulated learning and affect and the mediating role of competence need satisfaction. Learning and Individual Differences, 23, 179–186. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2012.09.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Patall, E., Vasquez, A., Steingut, R., Trimble, S., & Pituch, K. (2016). Daily interest, engagement, and autonomy support in the high school science classroom. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 46, 180–194. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2016.06.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Reeve, J. (2009). Why teachers adopt a controlling motivating style toward students and how they can become more autonomy supportive. Educational Psychologist, 44(3), 159–175. doi: 10.1080/00461520903028990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ronfeldt, M., Reininger, M., & Kwok, A. (2013). Recruitment or preparation? Investigating the effects of teacher characteristics and student teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(4), 319–337. doi: 10.1177/0022487113488143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rots, I., & Aelterman, A. (2008). Two profiles of teacher education graduates: a discriminant analysis of teacher commitment. European Educational Research Journal, 7(4), 523–534. doi: 10.2304/eerj.2008.7.4.523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rots, I., Aelterman, A., Vlerick, P., & Vermeulen, K. (2007). Teacher education, graduates’ teaching commitment and entrance into the teaching profession. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 543–556. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2007.01.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rots, I., Aelterman, A., Devos, G., & Vlerick, P. (2010). Teacher education and the choice to enter the teaching profession: a prospective study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 1619–1629. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2010.06.013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rots, I., Aelterman, A., & Devos, G. (2014). Teacher education graduates’ choice (not) to enter the teaching profession: does teacher education matter? European Journal of Teacher Education, 37(3), 279–294. doi: 10.1080/02619768.2013.845164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sierens, E., Vansteenkiste, M., Goossens, L., Soenens, B., & Dochy, F. (2009). The synergistic relationship of perceived autonomy support and structure in the prediction of self-regulated learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 57–68. doi: 10.1348/000709908X304398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Soenens, B., Sierens, E., Vansteenkiste, M., Dochy, F., & Goosens, L. (2012). Psychologically controlling teaching: examining outcomes, antecedents, and mediators. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(1), 108–120. doi: 10.1037/a0025742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Solstad, B. E., van Hoye, A., & Ommundsen, Y. (2015). Social-contextual and intrapersonal antecedents of coaches’ basic need satisfaction: the intervening effect of providing autonomy-support. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 20, 84–93. doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2015.05.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Southerland, L., & Markauskaite, L. (2012). Examining the role of authenticity in supporting the development of professional identity: an example from teacher education. Higher Education, 64, 747–766. doi: 10.1007/s10734-012-9522-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Struyven, K., & De Meyst, M. (2010). Competence-based teacher education: illusion or reality? An assessment of the implementation status in Flanders from teachers’ and students’ points of view. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 1495–1510. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2010.05.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Thadani, W., Breland, W., & Dewar, J. (2015). Implicit theories about teaching skills predict university faculty members’ interest in professional learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 40, 163–169. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2015.03.026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Thomson, M., & Palermo, C. (2014). Preservice teachers’ understanding of their professional goals: case studies from three different typologies. Teaching and Teacher Education, 44, 56–68. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2014.08.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Tschannen-Moran, M., & Woolfolk Hoy, A. (2001). Teaching efficacy: capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 783–805. doi: 10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00036-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Tschannen-Moran, M., & Woolfolk Hoy, A. (2007). The differential antecedents of self-efficacy beliefs of novice and experienced teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 944–956. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2006.05.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Tschannen-Moran, M., Woolfolk Hoy, A., & Hoy, W. K. (1998). Teacher efficacy: its meaning and measure. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 202–248. doi: 10.3102/00346543068002202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Tuononen, T., Parpala, A., Mattsson, M., & Lindblom-Ylänne, S. (2016). Work experience in relation to study pace and thesis grade: investigating the mediating role of student learning. Higher Education, 72, 41–58. doi: 10.1007/s10734-015-9937-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. UNESCO. (2012). International Standard Classification of Education ISCED 2011. Montreal: UNESCO http://www.uis.unesco.org/Education/Documents/isced-2011-en.pdf.Google Scholar
  63. Vansteenkiste, M., Sierens, E., Gossens, L., Gossens, L., Dochy, F., Mouratidis, A., et al. (2012). Identifying configurations of perceived teacher autonomy support and structure: associations with self-regulated learning, motivation and problem behavior. Learning and Instruction, 22, 431–439. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.04.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Visser-Wijnveen, G. J., Stes, A., & Van Petegem, P. (2012). Development and validation of a questionnaire measuring teachers’ motivation for teaching in higher education. Higher Education, 64, 421–436. doi: 10.1007/s10734-011-9502-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Wal, J., Brok, P., Hooijer, J., Martens, R., & Beemt, A. (2014). Teachers’ engagement in professional learning: exploring motivational profiles. Learning and Individual Differences, 36, 27–36. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2014.08.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wallace, T., Sung, H., & Williams, J. (2014). The defining features of teacher talk within autonomy supportive classroom management. Teaching and Teacher Education, 42, 14–46. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2014.04.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Watt, H., & Richardson, P. (2008). Motivations, perceptions, and aspirations concerning teaching as a career for different types of beginning teachers. Learning and Instruction, 18, 408–428. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.06.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Watt, H., Richardson, P. W., & Wilkins, K. (2014). Profiles of professional engagement and career development aspirations among USA preservice teachers. International Journal of Educational Research, 65, 23–40. doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2013.09.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Wijnia, L., Loyens, S., Derous, E., & Schmith, H. (2014). Do students’ topic interest and tutors’ instructional style matter in problem-based learning? Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(4), 919–933. doi: 10.1037/a0037119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Woolfolk Hoy, A., Hoy, W., & Davis, H. (2009). Teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs. In K. R. Wentzel & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 627–653). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  71. Zhang, D., Wang, Q., Losinski, M., & Katsiyannis, A. (2014). An examination of preservice teachers’ intentions to pursue careers in special education. Journal of Teacher Education, 65(2), 156–171. doi: 10.1177/0022487113510743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Antonio González
    • 1
  • Ángeles Conde
    • 1
  • Pino Díaz
    • 1
  • Mar García
    • 1
  • Carmen Ricoy
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Educational SciencesUniversity of VigoAs LagoasSpain

Personalised recommendations